12.07.2015 Views

Report on Bioethics: Advance Care Directives - Law Reform ...

Report on Bioethics: Advance Care Directives - Law Reform ...

Report on Bioethics: Advance Care Directives - Law Reform ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(5) The development of advance care directives in Ireland1.40 Developments in Ireland have followed a similar pattern as otherStates, with the first significant discussi<strong>on</strong> of the issue being a lecture byCostello J in 1986 that addressed the US Quinlan case of 10 years previously.In 1996, the High Court and Supreme Court dealt with a high-profile caseinvolving a woman who had been in a near PVS state for over 20 years. Thedevelopment of a str<strong>on</strong>g hospice movement in Ireland in recent years has alsoraised the profile of advance care planning at the end of life; and, in 2007 theIrish Council for <strong>Bioethics</strong> published an Opini<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Advance</strong> <strong>Care</strong> <strong>Directives</strong>. 47(a)Costello J’s 1986 lecture <strong>on</strong> the terminally ill1.41 In a lecture given in 1986 <strong>on</strong> the law c<strong>on</strong>cerning the terminally ill, 48Costello J noted that, in Re Quinlan, 49 the New Jersey Supreme Court hadc<strong>on</strong>cluded that the withdrawal of artificial respirati<strong>on</strong> from Karen Quinlan wouldnot amount to homicide <strong>on</strong> the basis that her death had not been as a result ofthe withdrawal of life-support but had resulted from natural causes. He alsosuggested that the right of the terminally ill patient to forego life-sustainingtreatment is compatible with the provisi<strong>on</strong>s of the C<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong> of Ireland: 50―…there are very powerful arguments to suggest that the dignity andaut<strong>on</strong>omy of the human pers<strong>on</strong> (as c<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>ally predicated)require the State to recognise that decisi<strong>on</strong>s relating to life and deathare, generally speaking, <strong>on</strong>es in which a competent adult should befree to make without outside restraint, and that this freedom shouldbe regarded as an aspect of the right to privacy which should beprotected as a ‗pers<strong>on</strong>al‘ right by Article 40.3 [of the C<strong>on</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong> ofIreland]… [I]n the case of the terminally ill, it is very difficult to seewhat circumstances would justify the interference with a decisi<strong>on</strong> by acompetent adult of the right to forego or disc<strong>on</strong>tinue life-savingtreatment.‖1.42 These views, expressed by a leading Irish judge, even if writtenoutside his judicial role, str<strong>on</strong>gly support the c<strong>on</strong>cept that an advance caredirective would be enforceable in Irish law. Indeed, they were also expresslyreferred to ten years later in a very similar Irish case.(b) The Ward of Court case (1996)47484950Irish Council for <strong>Bioethics</strong> Is It Time for <strong>Advance</strong>d Healthcare <strong>Directives</strong>? (2007).Costello ―The Terminally Ill-The <strong>Law</strong>‘s C<strong>on</strong>cern‖ (1986) 21 Irish Jurist 35.355 A 2d 647 (1976): see paragraph 1.15, above.Costello ―The Terminally Ill – The <strong>Law</strong>‘s C<strong>on</strong>cerns‖ (1986) 21 Irish Jurist 35, at42.21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!