12.07.2015 Views

READING THE RUNES New Perspectives on The Spanish Civil War ...

READING THE RUNES New Perspectives on The Spanish Civil War ...

READING THE RUNES New Perspectives on The Spanish Civil War ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<str<strong>on</strong>g>New</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Perspectives</str<strong>on</strong>g> On <strong>The</strong> <strong>Spanish</strong> <strong>Civil</strong> <strong>War</strong>POUM’s governmental suppressi<strong>on</strong> in 1937. Tragically, thePOUM’s co-founder, Andreu Nin i Pérez (1892-1937), aprominent Catalan writer and labour figure, and c<strong>on</strong>seller(minister) of justice in the revoluti<strong>on</strong>ary Catalan Generalitat(regi<strong>on</strong>al government) of 1936, was murdered by Stalinists.<strong>The</strong> appointment of an alleged and unrepentant “Trotskyite” tothe justice portfolio in Catal<strong>on</strong>ia at the <strong>on</strong>set of the worstMoscow purge trials was a powerful repudiati<strong>on</strong> of the claimsof the Russian authorities and must have been perceived bythe Stalin leadership with excepti<strong>on</strong>al horror. While the POUMwas not Trotskyist in official terms, its anti-Stalinism kept itvery close to the Trotskyist movement, some Trotskyists foughtin its ranks, and it did not denounce Trotsky or his acolytes inthe Stalinist manner. But the full roster of POUM, Trotskyist,and anarchist victims in Spain, killed within the country, orkidnapped and liquidated elsewhere by Communists, wasprobably no more than 30 people. Trotskyist claims aboutwholesale murder of the POUM and anarchists seem to havereflected spite, in that the POUM had rejected the politicaladvice of Trotsky and his few <strong>Spanish</strong>, as well as hisinternati<strong>on</strong>al, followers. More important, however, both thePOUM and, unquesti<strong>on</strong>ably, the anarchist movement, weredeeply rooted in Catal<strong>on</strong>ia and could not be d<strong>on</strong>e away witheasily.<strong>The</strong> third historical error, which c<strong>on</strong>tinues to be repeated, isthe belief that Nin himself, a Soviet functi<strong>on</strong>ary from 1921 to1930, was a “secretary” for, or otherwise attached to the staffof, Le<strong>on</strong> Trotsky during the latter’s period of stateresp<strong>on</strong>sibilities. 3 Nin occupied a high post in the RedInternati<strong>on</strong>al of Labor Uni<strong>on</strong>s (Profintern) as well as serving inthe leading structures of the CI and the <strong>Spanish</strong> CommunistParty. During the internal struggle in the Russian CommunistParty (Bolsheviks) he became a member of an Internati<strong>on</strong>alCommissi<strong>on</strong> of the Oppositi<strong>on</strong>al Center, but did not workdirectly with or under Trotsky. Victor Serge recalled, “InMoscow I took part in the Internati<strong>on</strong>al Commissi<strong>on</strong> set up bythe Oppositi<strong>on</strong>al Centre, together with [Grigori] Zinoviev’sspokesman [Moisei Markovich] Kharit<strong>on</strong>ov, Fritz Wolf (whoso<strong>on</strong> capitulated, which did not stop him being shot in 1937),Andrés Nin, the Bulgarian Lebedev (or Stepanov, a clandestineOppositi<strong>on</strong>ist who betrayed us and later worked as aComintern agent during the revoluti<strong>on</strong> in Spain) and two orthree other militants whose names I have forgotten.” 4115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!