å„èª¿æŸ¥ç§‘åŠ©ç†è™•é•·åŠèª¿æŸ¥çµ„çµ„é•·çš„å ±å‘Š - å»‰æ”¿å ¬ç½²

The following cases have been resolved since the lastreview, and are worthy of mention.This case, reported in last year's Review, involvedtwo Government Architects accepting bribes in return forexercising lax supervision over government contracts. Botha rchitects were found guilty on all charges and were sentencedto two years' and two and a half years' imprison-ment, respectively.a sentence is the deterrent effect that it will have - not sole -ly on the person being sentenced but upon other public ser -vants who may tend to yield to temptation ...... whilstthose who would depart this standard should know that the consequence will be imprisonment."The Housing Architects caseIn passing sentence on the accused, H.H. JudgeWright said, inter alia,"...... the underlying purpose of the offences was to keepthe Accused 'sweet', to ensure what were called 'harmo -nious relations' on the sites".A Housing Department architect ruined by the corruptprovision of lavish meals, fine wines and the attention ofa dance hostess at a deluxe hotel"...... the hidden cancer of the implicit understanding, theunspoken arrangement, is precisely the danger againstwhich there need be vigilance......""It must be that a very real consideration in imposing suchThe Drainage Services Department shortpiling caseRigged measuring tape used formeasuring shortened pilesDifference between core logs recoveredfrom a shortened pile and an up-tostandardpile