12.07.2015 Views

Edexcel – Unit 1 - Access to History 2

Edexcel – Unit 1 - Access to History 2

Edexcel – Unit 1 - Access to History 2

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Access</strong> <strong>to</strong> His<strong>to</strong>ry Online <strong>Edexcel</strong> <strong>Unit</strong> 3 – A1 Protest, Crisis and Rebellion in England,1536–88the rebellion was a ‘conspiracy’ and that ithappened ‘<strong>to</strong>o soon’. This suggests that if it hadhappened later it might have been successful.However, this is not true as I know that somehis<strong>to</strong>rians say Wyatt <strong>to</strong>ok <strong>to</strong>o long <strong>to</strong> launch hisrebellion. Finally, the Source tells us that a mancalled Pembroke deserted the Queen and fled <strong>to</strong>Northumberland. This shows that the rebellion wasa threat because the Queen’s friends did not stickby her. This is backed up by my own knowledge asI know that the government were scared after therebellion. In fact they were so scared that theyexecuted some of the rebels (3).(3) There is also amisunderstanding: thecandidate misunderstands thereference <strong>to</strong> Northumberlandin Source 2.In Source 3 Colin Pendrill tell us what he thinksabout the Wyatt rebellion. However, this Sourcecomes from a textbook, not a proper his<strong>to</strong>ricalbook, and so was written <strong>to</strong> make money and istherefore biased. At the beginning of the SourceColin Pendrill does not talk about the WyattRebellion. Instead, he talks about Spain. But later inthe Source he says ‘Wyatt’s march on London waslittle better’. This shows that Wyatt’s Rebellion wasnot as successful as it could have been. In fact, itposed no threat whatsoever <strong>to</strong> Mary Tudor. This isbecause Mary had soldiers in London ready <strong>to</strong> meetWyatt and they attacked his rebellion and s<strong>to</strong>ppedhim capturing Mary. Colin Pendrill says that Wyattwas not the only person who failed. He also saysthat ‘Croft’, ‘the Duke of Suffolk’, and ‘Carew’ gaveup. Carew went <strong>to</strong> France because he had no hopeof taking Exeter. From my own knowledge I knowthat Wyatt failed because he was <strong>to</strong>o cautious.Overall, the Wyatt rebellion of 1554 did not pose aserious threat <strong>to</strong> the authority of Mary Tudor. Thisis because Wyatt was <strong>to</strong>o cautious and Mary hadsoldiers who could capture the rebels and checkthat they were executed. At one point, however, itlooked like the Wyatt Rebellion might overthrow themonarchy and at this point the government werescared (Source 2).Examiner’s AssessmentThere is some own knowledge here, and thebeginnings of an analytical response. Therefore, inAO1, this essay gets the bot<strong>to</strong>m mark in Level 3. Interms of source skills, the answer tends <strong>to</strong> presentparaphrases of the sources. What is more, thecomments on reliability are appropriate <strong>to</strong> AO2a,while <strong>Unit</strong> 3 tests AO2b – the ability <strong>to</strong> testinterpretations and synthesise an overall answer© Hodder Education 2011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!