12.07.2015 Views

Sacks et al., 2009

Sacks et al., 2009

Sacks et al., 2009

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Weight-Loss Di<strong>et</strong>s with Different Compositions of MacronutrientsA High Fat0B Low Fat0Weight Loss (kg)−5−10Weight Loss (kg)−5−10Fat Intake (% kc<strong>al</strong>)Sessions Attended (%)24.354.531.253.135.254.939.647.345.548.7Fat Intake (% kc<strong>al</strong>)Sessions Attended (%)19.461.625.161.428.755.234.548.841.540.7C High Protein0D Average Protein0Weight Loss (kg)−5−10Weight Loss (kg)−5−10Protein Intake (% kc<strong>al</strong>)Sessions Attended (%)15.341.618.248.520.355.022.058.425.659.3Protein Intake (% kc<strong>al</strong>)Sessions Attended (%)14.554.016.847.818.456.020.357.124.148.7Figure 4. Weight Loss at 2 Years According to Adherence to Di<strong>et</strong>ary Fat and Protein Go<strong>al</strong>s.Intake was d<strong>et</strong>ermined from three 24-hour di<strong>et</strong> rec<strong>al</strong>ls. Quintiles of fat and protein intakes are shown for the combined high-fat groups(Panel A), low-fat groups (Panel B), high-protein groups AUTHOR: (Panel <strong>Sacks</strong> C), and average-protein RETAKEgroups 1st(Panel D); there were 45 to 51 participantsper quintile. Rates of attendance at group sessionsICMREG F FIGURE: (percent 4 of 4 of tot<strong>al</strong> sessions attended 2nd over the 2-year period) are shown for thequintiles of fat and protein intake. I bars indicate 95% confidence interv<strong>al</strong>s. P v<strong>al</strong>ues for a trend 3rd in weight loss across quintiles are as follows:P

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!