The general equilibrium effects of fiscal policy

More documents

Recommendations

Info

[13] Coenen G., P. McAdam and R. Straub (2007), Tax Reform and Labour-MarketPerformance in the Euro Area: A Simulation-Based Analysis Using the New Area-Wide Model, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, forthcoming.[14] Colciago A. (2006), Sticky Wages and Rule-of-Thumb Consumers, mimeo.[15] Corsetti G., L. Dedola and S. Leduc (2005), Inflation and Exchange Rate Pass-Through: a Quantitative Assessment of Theoretical and Empirical Models, mimeo.[16] Erceg C.J., L. Guerrieri and C. Gust (2005), Expansionary Fiscal Shocks and theTrade Deficit, International Finance, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 363-397.[17] Eurostat (2006), Structures of the Taxation Systems in the European Union.[18] Fabiani S., M. Druant, I. Hernando, C. Kwapil, B. Landau, C. Loupias, F. Martins,T.Y. Matha, R. Sabbatini, H. Stahl and C.J. Stockman (2006), What Firms’Surveys Tell Us about Price-Setting Behavior in the Euro Area, InternationalJournal of Central Banking, Vol. 2, No. 3.[19] Fernandez-Villaverde J. and J. F. Rubio-Ramirez (2004), Comparing dynamicequilibrium models to data: a Bayesian approach, Journal of Econometrics, Vol.123.[20] Fernandez-Villaverde J. and J. F. Rubio-Ramirez (2006), Our research agenda:estimating DSGE models, newsletter of the Review of Economic Dynamics, fall2006.[21] Finn M.G. (1998), Cyclical Effects of Government Employment and Goods Purchases,International Economic Review, Vol. 39, No. 3.[22] Forni, L. and S. Momigliano (2004), Cyclical Sensitivity of Fiscal Policies basedon Real Time Data, Applied Economics Quarterly, Vol. 50, No. 3.[23] Furlanetto F. (2006), Fiscal Shocks and the Consumption Response when Wagesare Sticky, mimeo.[24] Galí J., M. Gertler and J.D. López-Salído (2001), European Inflation Dynamics,European Economic Review, Vol. 45, pp. 1237-1270.[25] Galí J., J.D. López-Salído and J. Vallés (2007), Understanding the Effects ofGovernment Spending on Consumption, Journal of the European Economic Association,Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 227-270.32
[26] Galí J., J.D. López-Salído and J. Vallés (2004), Rule-of-Thumb Consumers andthe Design of Interest Rate Rules, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 36,pp. 739-764.[27] Galí J. and R. Perotti (2003), Fiscal Policy and Monetary Integration in Europe,Economic Policy, Vol. 37.[28] Goodfriend M. and R.J. King (1997), The New Neoclassical Synthesis and theRole of Monetary Policy, NBER Macroeconomics Annual.[29] Henry J., P. Hernandez de Cos and S. Momigliano (2004), The Short Term Impactof Government Budgets on Prices: Evidence from Macroeconomic Models, ECBWorking Paper No. 396.[30] Kim J. (2000), Constructing and Estimating a Realistic Optimizing Model ofMonetary Policy, Journal of Monetary EconomicsVol. 45, pp. 329-359.[31] Linnemann L. and A. Schabert (2003), Fiscal Policy in the New NeoclassicalSynthesis, Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, Vol. 35, No. 6, pp. 911-929.[32] Mankiw N.G. (2000), The Savers-Spenders Theory of Fiscal Policy, AmericanEconomic Review, Vol. 90, No. 2.[33] Mendoza E.G., A. Razin and L.L. Tesar (1994), Effective Tax Rates in Macroeconomics:Cross-country Estimates of Tax Rates on Factor Incomes and Consumption,Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 34, No. 3.[34] Pappa E. (2005), New-keynesian or RCB Transmission? The Effects of FiscalShocks in Labor Markets, CEPR Discussion Paper n. 5313.[35] Perotti R. (2005), Estimating the Effects of Fiscal Policy in OECD Countries,CEPR Discussion Paper n. 4842.[36] Romanov A. (2003), International Effects of Fiscal Policies, mimeo IMF.[37] Rotemberg J.J. and M. Woodford (1992): Oligopolistic Pricing and the Effects ofAggregate Demand on Economic Activity, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 100,No. 6.[38] Sala L. (2004), The Fiscal Theory of the Price Level: Identifying Restrictions andEmpirical Evidence, IGIER Working Paper No. 257.33
Page 1 and 2: Temi di discussione(Working papers)
Page 3 and 4: THE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM EFFECTS OF
Page 5 and 6: 1 Introduction∗∗ This paper rec
Page 7 and 8: In this paper we contribute to the
Page 9 and 10: The paper is organized as follows.
Page 11 and 12: the consumption-leisure intratempor
Page 14 and 15: The representative Ricardian househ
Page 16 and 17: positive (suggesting pro-cyclical c
Page 18 and 19: Equilibrium in the goods market req
Page 20 and 21: trend, we fit a linear spline until
Page 22 and 23: Overall, most parameters seem to be
Page 24 and 25: ill). 19 Impulse responses are for
Page 26 and 27: falls, and inflation do as well. Ov
Page 28 and 29: consumption and investment to each
Page 30 and 31: 7 Concluding remarksIn this paper w
Page 34 and 35: [39] Schorfheide F. (2000), Loss Fu
Page 36 and 37: and of the capital accumulation equ
Page 38 and 39: and the aggregate resource constrai
Page 40 and 41: series using proxy indicators. In p
Page 42 and 43: T I 1 = general taxes on goods and
Page 44 and 45: Table 1: Selected prior and posteri
Page 46 and 47: Table 3: Variance decompositionafte
Page 48 and 49: Tax rate on labor income49443934291
Page 50 and 51: σ c1 2 3 4 5 6σ l0 0.5 12320γ1.5
Page 52 and 53: ρ z0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1ρ ε b0.2 0.4
Page 54 and 55: 0.8real interest rate0.4consumption
Page 56 and 57: 0.2real interest rate1consumption1i
Page 58 and 59: 1real interest rate−0.1consumptio
Page 60 and 61: 1.51output210.50−0.5consumptionin
Page 62 and 63: 210consumptionoutput10.50−1invest
Page 64 and 65: 1.510.5outputinvestment1.510.50cons
Page 66 and 67: RECENTLY PUBLISHED “TEMI” (*)N.
Page 68 and 69: 2005L. DEDOLA and F. LIPPI, The mon
Page 70 and 71: F. BUSETTI, S. FABIANI and A. HARVE

The general equilibrium effects of fiscal policy

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?