espect to the percentage of patients achieving stable <strong>pain</strong> control, the time to achieve stable <strong>pain</strong>control, and the degree of <strong>pain</strong> control achieved. Another trial found titrated doses of sustainedreleasemorphine plus immediate-release oxycodone slightly superior to fixed-dose, immediatereleaseoxycodone for <strong>pain</strong> intensity, but no differences on measures of function, sleep, andpsychological distress. 88 Results of this trial are difficult to interpret because maximum doses of<strong>opioid</strong>s varied in the two arms (up to 200 mg MED/day in titrated dose arm, versus up to 20mg/day in the fixed-dose oxycodone arm), and average doses of <strong>opioid</strong>s were not <strong>report</strong>ed. Noneof the three trials was designed to assess outcomes related to risk of overdose, addiction, abuse,or misuse. Due to study limitations, inconsistent results, and differences between study armsother than use of sustained-release versus immediate-release <strong>opioid</strong>s, the SOE was ratedInsufficient.We identified no study published since the APS review on the comparative effectiveness ofdifferent methods for initiating and titrating <strong>opioid</strong>s.Key Question 3bIn patients with <strong>chronic</strong> <strong>pain</strong>, what is the comparative effectiveness ofshort- versus long-acting <strong>opioid</strong>s on outcomes related to <strong>pain</strong>, function, andquality of life; risk of overdose, addiction, abuse, or misuse; and doses of<strong>opioid</strong>s used?Key Points• No study compared effectiveness of short- versus long-acting <strong>opioid</strong>s on long-termoutcomes in patients with <strong>chronic</strong> <strong>pain</strong> (SOE: Insufficient).Detailed SynthesisThe APS review included a systematic review 89 of seven trials 87, 88, 90-94 of short- versus longacting<strong>opioid</strong> formulations, but none of the trials met inclusion criteria for the current review. Sixtrials 87, 90-94 were 30 days or shorter in duration and the other 88 was 16 weeks in duration. Five ofthe trials found no difference between sustained-release and immediate-release <strong>opioid</strong>formulations in <strong>pain</strong> control. 87, 90, 91, 93, 94 Although two trials found regimens including sustainedreleasepreparations more effective for <strong>pain</strong> control than regimens restricted to immediate-releasepreparations, results are difficult to interpret because the regimens were not given attherapeutically equivalent doses. 88, 92 No trial was designed to evaluate risk of overdose,addiction, abuse, or misuse.We identified no trials of short- versus long-acting <strong>opioid</strong>s published since the APS reviewthat met inclusion criteria.29
Key Question 3cIn patients with <strong>chronic</strong> <strong>pain</strong>, what is the comparative effectiveness ofdifferent long-acting <strong>opioid</strong>s on outcomes related to <strong>pain</strong>, function, andquality of life; and risk of overdose, addiction, abuse, or misuse?Key Points• Three randomized, head-to-head trials of various long-acting <strong>opioid</strong>s found nodifferences in long-term outcomes related to <strong>pain</strong> or function (SOE: Low).• No trial was designed to assess risk of overdose, addiction, abuse, or misuse (SOE:Insufficient).• One cohort study found sustained-release methadone to be associated with lowermortality risk (presumably related to accidental overdose) as compared to morphine in apropensity-adjusted analysis (SOE: Low).• Another cohort study found some differences between long-acting <strong>opioid</strong>s in rates ofadverse outcomes related to abuse, but outcomes were nonspecific for <strong>opioid</strong>-related adverseevents, precluding reliable conclusions (SOE: Insufficient).Detailed SynthesisThe APS review included one fair-quality, open-label randomized trial (n=680) of transdermalfentanyl versus sustained-release morphine in patients with <strong>chronic</strong> low back <strong>pain</strong> that evaluatedoutcomes through 13 months 43 (Table 2 below; Appendix E8a, E8b, and F4). The study found nodifferences between these long-acting <strong>opioid</strong>s in <strong>pain</strong> relief, <strong>pain</strong> intensity, use of supplementalanalgesic medications, work loss, and quality of life. The study was not designed to assessoverdose and addiction or related outcomes, and no cases of these outcomes were <strong>report</strong>ed. TheAPS review also included a fair-quality retrospective cohort study based on Oregon Medicaidadministrative data (n=5,684) that evaluated abuse and other related outcomes in patients withcancer or noncancer <strong>pain</strong> and at least one new 28-day prescription of methadone, sustainedreleaseoxycodone, sustained-release morphine, or transdermal fentanyl over a 4-yeartimeframe. 95 Adverse events were based on clinical encounters and ICD-9 codes and defined asemergency department (ED) visits or hospitalization for <strong>opioid</strong>-related events, all-cause ED visitsor hospitalizations, <strong>opioid</strong> poisoning, overdose symptoms, and death. After adjusting for <strong>opioid</strong>dose, co-morbidities, concomitant medications, and other potential confounders, sustained-releaseoxycodone was associated with lower risk than sustained-release morphine of an ED encounter orhospitalization involving an <strong>opioid</strong>-related adverse event (HR 0.45, 95 percent CI 0.26 to 0.77) ordeath (HR 0.71, 95 percent CI 0.54 to 0.94). Among patients with noncancer <strong>pain</strong>, compared withsustained-release morphine, fentanyl was associated with higher risk of ED encounters (HR 1.27,95 percent CI 1.02 to 1.59) and methadone was associated with greater risk of overdosesymptoms (HR 1.57, 95 percent CI 1.03 to 2.40). There were no significant differences betweenmethadone and long-acting morphine in risk of death (adjusted HR 0.71, 95 percent CI 0.46 to1.08) or overdose symptoms. Some limitations of this study include large, statistically significantdifferences in baseline characteristics between patients prescribed different long-acting <strong>opioid</strong>sand analysis of outcomes not specific for <strong>opioid</strong>-related adverse events. For example, overdosesymptoms were defined as alteration of consciousness, malaise, fatigue, lethargy, or respiratoryfailure.30
- Page 1 and 2:
Evidence Report/Technology Assessme
- Page 4 and 5:
PrefaceThe Agency for Healthcare Re
- Page 6 and 7:
Charles Inturrisi, Ph.D.Professor o
- Page 8 and 9:
Robert Jamison, Ph.D.Professor of A
- Page 10 and 11:
Conclusions. Evidence on long-term
- Page 12 and 13:
no opioid on: (1) opioid abuse, add
- Page 14 and 15:
References ........................
- Page 16 and 17:
The purpose of this report is to sy
- Page 18 and 19:
patient education, (3) urine drug s
- Page 20 and 21:
Each abstract was independently rev
- Page 22 and 23:
We rated the quality of each cohort
- Page 24 and 25: ResultsOverviewThe search and selec
- Page 26 and 27: Key Question 4. Risk Assessment and
- Page 28 and 29: Table A. Summary of evidence (conti
- Page 30 and 31: Table A. Summary of evidence (conti
- Page 32 and 33: Table A. Summary of evidence (conti
- Page 34 and 35: Evidence on the effectiveness of di
- Page 36 and 37: ApplicabilityA number of issues cou
- Page 38 and 39: the exception of buccal or intranas
- Page 40: References1. International Associat
- Page 43 and 44: outcome study of long-term opioid d
- Page 45 and 46: patients? Pain Physician. 2006;9(1)
- Page 47 and 48: American Academy of Pain Medicine,
- Page 49 and 50: d. What is the comparative effectiv
- Page 51 and 52: inclusion to English-language artic
- Page 53 and 54: adequately reported and acceptable;
- Page 55 and 56: eview comments will be made availab
- Page 57 and 58: Key Question 1aIn patients with chr
- Page 59 and 60: Key Question 2aIn patients with chr
- Page 61 and 62: and F2). 49-58 All were rated fair-
- Page 63 and 64: Table 1. Uncontrolled studies of lo
- Page 65 and 66: Table 1. Uncontrolled studies of lo
- Page 67 and 68: The annual overdose rate was 256 pe
- Page 69 and 70: The SOE for the association between
- Page 71 and 72: One fair-quality cross-sectional st
- Page 73: 5300 controls who did not visit the
- Page 77 and 78: Table 2. Head-to-head trials and ob
- Page 79 and 80: Table 2. Head-to-head trials and ob
- Page 81 and 82: withdrawal due to opioid misuse, bu
- Page 83 and 84: Table 3. Trials of different strate
- Page 85 and 86: Table 3. Trials of different strate
- Page 87 and 88: • Two studies evaluated the Scree
- Page 89 and 90: Table 4. Studies of risk assessment
- Page 91 and 92: Detailed SynthesisThe APS review id
- Page 93 and 94: Evidence on the effectiveness of di
- Page 95 and 96: Table 6. Summary of evidence (conti
- Page 97 and 98: Table 6. Summary of evidence (conti
- Page 99 and 100: Table 6. Summary of evidence (conti
- Page 101 and 102: The setting in which studies were c
- Page 103 and 104: switching to other prescription opi
- Page 105 and 106: States: Fact Sheet. Atlanta, GA: Ce
- Page 107 and 108: overdose: a cohort study. Ann Inter
- Page 109 and 110: placebo-controlled study. Clin Ther
- Page 111 and 112: pain. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(1):3
- Page 113 and 114: Appendix A. Search StrategiesDataba
- Page 115 and 116: 19. 18 and (random$ or control$ or
- Page 117 and 118: 11. (urine adj7 (screen$ or test$ o
- Page 119 and 120: 3. (alfentanil or alphaprodine or b
- Page 121 and 122: 25. Risk Reduction Behavior/ or Ris
- Page 123 and 124: KQ 4a-4c: Risk Prediction and Mitig
- Page 125 and 126:
"meperidine" OR "meptazinol" OR (MH
- Page 127 and 128:
PICOT Include ExcludeOutcomes • F
- Page 129 and 130:
Moore TM, Jones T, Browder JH, et a
- Page 131 and 132:
Banning A, Sjogren P, Kaiser F. Rea
- Page 133 and 134:
study. Pain. 2004;108(1-2):17-27. P
- Page 135 and 136:
Edlund MJ, Sullivan M, Steffick D,
- Page 137 and 138:
Gianutsos L, Safrenek S. Is there a
- Page 139 and 140:
China. Addiction. 2011;106(10):1801
- Page 141 and 142:
study. Compr Psychiatry. 1979;20(1)
- Page 143 and 144:
2009;10(4):531-43. PMID: 19243306.
- Page 145 and 146:
Mercadante S, Casuccio A, Tirelli W
- Page 147 and 148:
2003;107(3):486-92. PMID: 14506751.
- Page 149 and 150:
Quigley C. Hydromorphone for acute
- Page 151 and 152:
osteoarthritis-related pain: placeb
- Page 153 and 154:
2013;7(2):96-101. PMID: 23385449. E
- Page 155 and 156:
effect of maternal, postnatal, adol
- Page 157 and 158:
Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekild
- Page 159 and 160:
Yulug B, Ozan E. Buprenorphine: a s
- Page 161 and 162:
Author, YearType of StudySettingDur
- Page 163 and 164:
Author, YearType of StudySettingDur
- Page 165 and 166:
Author, YearType of StudySettingDur
- Page 167 and 168:
Author,yearDunn,2010ScreenedEligibl
- Page 169 and 170:
Author,yearGomes,2011ScreenedEligib
- Page 171 and 172:
Author,yearLi, 2013Method For Asses
- Page 173 and 174:
Author,yearMethod For AssessingOutc
- Page 175 and 176:
Appendix Table E4. Observational St
- Page 177 and 178:
Author, YearKQLi, 2013 KQ2a Case-Co
- Page 179 and 180:
Appendix Table E5. Observational St
- Page 181 and 182:
0Appendix Table E6. Observational S
- Page 183 and 184:
Appendix Table E7. Trials of Differ
- Page 185 and 186:
Appendix Table E8a. Head-to-Head Tr
- Page 187 and 188:
AuthorYearStudydesignDurationWild 2
- Page 189 and 190:
Author,YearHartung,2007Type of Stud
- Page 191 and 192:
Author,YearKrebs,2011Type of Study,
- Page 193 and 194:
AuthorYearStudyDesignDurationRCT12
- Page 195 and 196:
Author yearAshburn, 2011Study Desig
- Page 197 and 198:
Author yearPortenoy, 2007Study Desi
- Page 199 and 200:
Author yearSimpson, 2007Study Desig
- Page 201 and 202:
Author yearStudy designDurationCowa
- Page 203 and 204:
Author YearRalphs, 1994StudyDesignD
- Page 205 and 206:
Author,Year Study DesignAkbik 2006
- Page 207 and 208:
Author,YearWebster2005Study DesignP
- Page 209 and 210:
Appendix F. Quality Assessment Tabl
- Page 211 and 212:
Author,YearGomes,2011Gomes,2013KQKQ
- Page 213 and 214:
Evaluatespopulationother than theon
- Page 215 and 216:
Key QuestionOutcomeStudy DesignNumb
- Page 217 and 218:
Key QuestionOutcomeStudy DesignNumb
- Page 219:
Key Question Outcome4. Risk assessm