Perceptions of CO2 Report - Global CCS Institute

More documents

Recommendations

Info

5 Internet surveyFindings from the initial qualitative work gave important insights which were explored in more detailthrough a 25-minute internet survey, completed by 2,470 respondents. For additional details onrecruitment, see section 5.2 below. All participants answered the same questions, but in the courseof the survey they were presented with different types of information as described in the followingsections. Figure 2 provides an overview of the survey sequence from beginning to end when it isread from top to bottom. “Outputs” at the right represent information collected by the survey.Figure 2: Overview of survey processTo test the effects of information provision, several measures were repeated before and afterinformation was provided. The survey was designed in such a way as to incorporate nineconditions or versions that differed according to the combination of information about CO 2presented to respondents. This design allowed the influence of different types of information to betested, as described in section 5.4 below. A complete list of survey questions and pieces ofprovided information can be found in Appendix C.The following sections describe the survey sequence.10 | Understanding how individuals perceive carbon dioxide
5.1 Responses collected: Values and knowledge of CO 2The first part of the survey was identical for all participants. It requested participants’ values andbeliefs about climate change and renewable energy, and it recorded their knowledge of CO 2 ’scharacteristics, effects, sources, and uses. These questions were based on the concepts that wereoften raised by respondents in the interviews and focus groups. Additionally, respondents ratedhow sure they were of their answers on a 1 to 5 scale, where answer option 1 indicated they weresure the given statement was not true; answer option 5 indicated they were sure that the givenstatement was true; and answer option 3 indicated that they were uncertain of their response.5.2 Information provided: CCS introductionNext, the survey presented respondents with brief introductory information on CCS, including anexplanatory diagram of the technology. The information was based on an introductory textdeveloped for and used in previous research into CCS perceptions of the lay public by theEuropean-funded NearCO2 project (Upham & Roberts, 2011).5.3 First assessment: CO2 impression, CCS impression and CCSacceptance measuresImpressions of CO 2 and CCS were measured before and after respondents received additionalinformation about CO 2 and CCS. They were measured using four scales with opposing adjectiveson each end: ‘negative-positive;’ ‘dirty-clean;’ ‘useless-useful;’ ‘dangerous-safe;’ and for CCS, anadditional scale: ‘developing technology-mature technology.’ Respondents could indicate whichadjective on the scale best represented their impressions of CO 2 and CCS. In addition,respondents indicated to what extent they would oppose or accept implementation of CCS storagein their country, neighbourhood, and offshore under the seabed of their nearest sea. In theanalysis, this first set of questions on CO 2 and CCS is referred to as the first assessment.5.4 Information provided: The nine conditionsAfter the introductory text on CCS and the first measures of CO 2 and CCS perceptions andacceptance, the overall sample of respondents was divided into nine separate conditions, each ofwhich received information from one or more of four different sets:• CO 2 properties (Information part A) listed information on CO 2 ’s chemistry, properties,toxicity, and uses; the greenhouse effect; and places where CO 2 exists.• CO 2 impact and natural phenomena (Information part B) described CO 2 ’s impacts andnatural phenomena involving it, e.g., hot springs with CO 2 in Japan and Germany and theLake Nyos incident.• CO 2 behaviour in CCS (Information part C) described how CO 2 would behave at theinjection stage, storage stage, and in the occurrence of CO 2 leakage during CCS. This textwas largely based on the information provided in the Information Choice Questionnaire (deBest-Waldhober, et al., 2009) and checked by experts for accuracy and balance.• Control (Information part D) repeated the introductory information and diagram of CCSpresented earlier in the survey.Understanding how individuals perceive carbon dioxide | 11
Page 2 and 3: Enquiries should be addressed to:Dr
Page 4 and 5: Part V Conclusion and Recommendatio
Page 6 and 7: TablesTable 1: Combination of infor
Page 8 and 9: Executive summaryCarbon dioxide cap
Page 10 and 11: Recommendations derived from this w
Page 12 and 13: 1 IntroductionClimate change has of
Page 14 and 15: 2.2 Perceptions of CO 2Very little
Page 16 and 17: • perceptions about the nature an
Page 18 and 19: 3 OverviewThis research project’s
Page 22 and 23: Respondents were provided with eith
Page 24 and 25: 6 Administration of the survey6.1 T
Page 26 and 27: Part III Results16 | Understanding
Page 28 and 29: 7.1.2 KNOWLEDGE AND PERCEPTIONS OF
Page 30 and 31: 7.2 Quantitative resultsThe followi
Page 32 and 33: PropertiesKnowledge about CO 2 ’s
Page 34 and 35: UsesRespondents were asked about th
Page 36 and 37: 7.2.3 PERCEPTIONS OF CO 2First asse
Page 38 and 39: 7.2.4 AWARENESS AND PERCEPTIONS OF
Page 40 and 41: First assessmentError! Reference so
Page 42 and 43: Second assessmentPerceptions were a
Page 44 and 45: formed their opinion using the CCS
Page 46 and 47: Table 18, Appendix F. Furthermore,
Page 48 and 49: DF DF DFInfoACO 2characteristicsInf
Page 50 and 51: Table 20 in Appendix F shows the re
Page 52 and 53: 8 DiscussionThis international rese
Page 54 and 55: eflect how close the potential CCS
Page 56 and 57: eceived information about natural p
Page 58 and 59: Part V Conclusion andRecommendation
Page 60 and 61: 9.2 Recommendations9.2.1 NEED FOR E
Page 62 and 63: Part VI Appendices andReferences52
Page 64 and 65: Q: How did your images and understa
Page 66 and 67: Q: What kind of information about C
Page 68 and 69: Q5Q6Q7Q8Q9AQuestion statementsHere
Page 70 and 71:
BCQuestion statementsPlease read th
Page 72 and 73:
Q13Q14Q15Question statementsNext yo
Page 74 and 75:
Appendix D Participant Demographics
Page 76 and 77:
Appendix E Selected Qualitative Res
Page 78 and 79:
• “Water is such a precious thi
Page 80 and 81:
Univ_dmy - - - - -Female_dmy - - -
Page 82 and 83:
The table above shows the compariso
Page 84 and 85:
Set B: CCS impressionTable 12: Regr
Page 86 and 87:
•Extra CO 2 is put in the air in
Page 88 and 89:
a50s_dmyO60s_dmyCsea_dmyAdjusted R-
Page 90 and 91:
ionCCSawarenessCO 2Clean1CO 2Useful
Page 92 and 93:
Table 14: ANOVA (three factors) for
Page 94 and 95:
Table 16: Regression analysis on in
Page 96 and 97:
CO 2relatedactivityInformationgathe
Page 98 and 99:
CO 2 relatedactivityInformationgath
Page 100 and 101:
Table 18: ANOVA (four factors) for
Page 102 and 103:
Table 20: Regression analysis on in
Page 104 and 105:
gathering topics Environment - - -0
Page 106 and 107:
Creswell, J. W. (2002). Research de
Page 108:
Shackley, S., Gough, C., & McLachla
show all

Perceptions of CO2 Report - Global CCS Institute

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?