12.07.2015 Views

Perceptions of CO2 Report - Global CCS Institute

Perceptions of CO2 Report - Global CCS Institute

Perceptions of CO2 Report - Global CCS Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

TablesTable 1: Combination <strong>of</strong> information presented within survey conditions ..................................................... 12Table 2: Administration <strong>of</strong> the survey ............................................................................................................. 14Table 3: Effect <strong>of</strong> misunderstandings <strong>of</strong> CO 2 on understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>CCS</strong> a .......................................................... 29Table 4: Factors influencing first impression <strong>of</strong> <strong>CCS</strong> ........................................................................................ 31Table 5: Effect <strong>of</strong> information provision on acceptance <strong>of</strong> <strong>CCS</strong> implementation ............................................ 36Table 6: Comparison between Australian survey panel and national average ................................................ 61Table 7: Comparison between Japanese survey panel and national average.................................................. 62Table 8: Comparison between Netherlands survey panel and national average ............................................ 62Table 9: Regression analysis on influence <strong>of</strong> CO 2 knowledge and respondents’ demographics on firstassessment <strong>of</strong> CO 2 impressions ........................................................................................................................ 66Table 10: T-tests for changes between the first assessment and the second assessment on <strong>CO2</strong>perception ........................................................................................................................................................ 68Table 11: ANOVA (three factors) for influences <strong>of</strong> information package in changes between the firstassessment and the second assessment on CO 2 perception ........................................................................... 70Table 12: Regression analysis on understanding score <strong>of</strong> <strong>CCS</strong> ......................................................................... 71Table 13: Regression analysis on influence <strong>of</strong> CO 2 knowledge, CO 2 impressions and respondents’demographics on first assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>CCS</strong> impressions .................................................................................... 76Table 14: ANOVA (three factors) for influences <strong>of</strong> information in changes between the first assessmentand the second assessment on <strong>CCS</strong> perception ............................................................................................... 79Table 15: Regression analysis on influence <strong>of</strong> provided information on magnitude <strong>of</strong> change <strong>of</strong> <strong>CCS</strong>impressions ....................................................................................................................................................... 80Table 16: Regression analysis on influence <strong>of</strong> knowledge items, provided information and misperception<strong>of</strong> <strong>CCS</strong> on <strong>CCS</strong> overall impressions ................................................................................................................... 81Table 17: Regression analysis on influence <strong>of</strong> CO 2 knowledge, CO 2 impressions and respondents’demographics on first assessment <strong>of</strong> <strong>CCS</strong> implementation ............................................................................. 84Table 18: ANOVA (four factors) for influences <strong>of</strong> information in changes between the first assessmentand the second assessment on opinions on <strong>CCS</strong> implementations ................................................................. 87Table 19: Regression analysis on influence <strong>of</strong> provided information on magnitude <strong>of</strong> change <strong>of</strong> <strong>CCS</strong>implementation ................................................................................................................................................ 88Table 20: Regression analysis on influence <strong>of</strong> knowledge items, provided information and misperception<strong>of</strong> <strong>CCS</strong> on <strong>CCS</strong> implementation ......................................................................................................................... 89iv | Understanding how individuals perceive carbon dioxide

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!