12.07.2015 Views

Criterion-related Validity “Is the test valid?” Criterion-related Validity ...

Criterion-related Validity “Is the test valid?” Criterion-related Validity ...

Criterion-related Validity “Is the test valid?” Criterion-related Validity ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Now let’s consider <strong>the</strong> relationship between reliability & <strong>valid</strong>ity…“reliability is a precursor for <strong>valid</strong>ity”• conceptually -- how can a measure be consistently accurate(<strong>valid</strong>), unless it is consistent ??• internal consistency -- all items reflect <strong>the</strong> same construct• <strong>test</strong>-re<strong>test</strong> consistency -- scale yields repeatable scores• statistically -- limited reliability means that some of <strong>the</strong> variabilityin <strong>the</strong> measure is systematic, but part isunsystematic (unreliable)• low reliability will “attenuate” <strong>the</strong> <strong>valid</strong>ity correlation• much like range restriction -- but this is a restriction of <strong>the</strong>“systematic variance”, not <strong>the</strong> overall varianceVarious “correction for attenuation” formulas…Note: y=criterion x=measure being assessed ‘ = estimate• estimates what would be <strong>the</strong> <strong>valid</strong>itycoefficient if both <strong>the</strong> criterion and <strong>the</strong>measure were perfectly reliable(α=1.00)• estimates what would be <strong>the</strong> <strong>valid</strong>ity if <strong>the</strong>criterion were perfectly reliable• a more useful formula estimates <strong>the</strong> <strong>valid</strong>itycoefficient if each measure’s reliability“improved” to a specific valuer YXr YX ’ = --------------√α Y * √α Xr YXr YX ’ = -----√α Y“improved” αsit is possible to statistically “correct” for this attenuation-- like all “statistical correction”, this must be carefully applied!Measured <strong>valid</strong>ity√α Y ’ * √α X ’r YX ’= r YX --------------√α Y * √α Xmeasured αsExample …You have constructed an interview which is designed to predictemployee performance• scores on this interview (X) correlate .40 with supervisor’s ratings (Y)• <strong>the</strong> interview has an α Y = .50• <strong>the</strong> supervisor rating scale (<strong>the</strong> criterion) has α X= .70Correcting both <strong>the</strong> interviewand criterion to perfectreliability...Correcting just <strong>the</strong> to perfectreliability ...r YX.40r YX ’ = ----------- = ------------ = .68√α Y * √α X √.70 * √50r YX.40r YX ’ = ------------ = ------------ = .48√α Y √.70Correcting <strong>the</strong> interview toα=.7 to and criterion to α=.9...√α Y’ *√α X’ √.90 *√.70r YX’= r YX------------- = .40 ------------- = .53√α Y * √α X √.70 * √.50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!