exploring uses of digital archives in research and ... - skeptron.uu.se

More documents

Recommendations

Info

links to the world instead of funnelling all educational programs through the teacher.” 11 Heenvisaged all sorts of means in the learning web, primarily technological ones, to accessinformation autonomously, to communicate with others, exchange skills and to make thelearners own ideas available to others who might make use of them and so on and then hecoined the term: learning web, as a term for the liberation technology he foresaw.Hence, through my title which is inspired by Illich I want to emphasize what this study isabout: open kinds of experimental practices and principles of content design and theaccompanying tools and methods. Meaning for instance freedom of use or freedom tomanipulate the software or the content but also sharing content and working together forimprovement or problem solving. Within the software domain, the concept incorporates thenotion, open source, which basically means that the source code is available or open forusers and other programmers to read, to use and possibly reuse in different projects.Another prominent example of an open and experimental practice is the Oxford TextArchive, OTA, where they archive texts for future generations of scholars. 12 The OTAoriginally founded by Lou Burnard in 1976 to stop people from duplicating the work ofother researchers and instead collect copies of this kind of material to share it with anyonein the world who needed it. 13 At the OTA they encourage producers and contributors tomake texts as freely available as possible for (private/individual) research and teaching, butnot for any commercial business although this is up to the original depositor to decide.OTA started long before the web and they currently have more than 2500 encoded full texthigh quality titles in their archive. Many of the texts collected at OTA are encodedaccording to the TEI guidelines mentioned above, which is my third and last example ofopenness.The TEI community’s original overall aim was to develop interchange guidelines allowingprojects to share data and theories about data and to promote the development of commontools. More than 100 persons, from many different specialities and disciplines have beenworking hard since 1987, when the TEI project was launched, to produce and rewrite theguidelines. 14 This effort have been very successful and the TEI guidelines are now widelyaccepted as the standard interchange format for textual data and there are quite a few fulltext archives and projects currently using the TEI guidelines. 15Aims of the studyThe overall aim with my study is to explore how we can make information applicable fordifferent purposes and uses in research and educational practices. And the subject will be tostrive for a systematic exploration of digital content design 16 in research communities withthe auxiliary practical goal that such understanding might be valuable for educationalpractices in higher education in terms of how teachers and students could be givenopportunities to separate what is learnt from how it is taught in higher education. Myprimary focus is on uses of tools and methods for preparation and uses of electronic textbasedresources, since text is the dominant form of communicating knowledge in researchand education. I will also, to a far lesser extent, study the preparation and usage of other11 ibid. chapter 7.12 See the OTA website at http://ota.ahds.ac.uk/13 A researcher can spend five years typing in and encoding a text in ancient Greek, and if this is not known,another person might start doing the same thing.14 TEI's Guidelines for Electronic Text Encoding and Interchange (TEI P3), first published in April 1994(more than 1000 A4 pages) and have been revised a number of times since 1994.15 See http://www.tei-c.org/Applications/index.html16 When using the notion of content design I refer to: digitized preparations by encoding of electronic texts,and applications of different kinds of guidelines, tools and methods.pm-030505.doc utkast avh.pm. Monica Langerth Zetterman 4(34)
kinds of data, such as numerical sequences and database links since I am planning to do acomparative case study of two different research communities, the Text Encoding Initiativein the humanities and the bioinformatics in the natural sciences.Research questionsThe interrelated but yet standalone studies will be guided by the following questions andsub-questions:• How might teachers and students benefit from emerging mark-up and metadatarecommendations and standards?How might digital archives be designed allowing teachers and students flexiblemodes of access to and use of the content therein?• How does the terrain look like of in the uses of digital archives for humanities andsocial science research and education?How is the complexity of designing and preparing different kinds of contenthandled? What strategies, principles and interests inform their orientations?• How do research communities make use of digital archives and web repositories?How do researchers actually work with their tools and methods in the humanitiescommunities on the one hand and the natural sciences on the other hand?The problems, context and delimitationsAbove I have tried to argue for why it might be important to study how digital archives anddigital content are designed, managed and utilized in research but not yet discussed in whatway it might relate to teaching in higher education. Below, I will discuss some pedagogicalaspects on the relation between personal portfolios and shared repositories and how digitalarchives might be designed to allow teachers and students to access, retrieve and use thatcontent in different ways. I also want to give a brief overview of emerging mark-up andstandardization efforts and initiatives with relevance for educational settings. And last butnot least the issue of use of digital archives and the practices of content design in someresearch communities. This could of course be studied in a number of ways and I will try tounfold the issues inherent in the questions above by using three interlinking strands. Myintention is that these strands will serve as means to discern what kind of assumptions,levels and relationships I could be dealing with in my forthcoming studies.Content: the nature of information utilised and studied by scholars and teachers can bealmost anything and the information can be studied for many different reasons andpurposes. Thus, digitization of content, information and source material involves somefundamental decisions: what is considering being the data. 17 In this case, content willprimarily be equivalent with texts but to some extent other kinds of data as mentionedabove. 1817 When Willard McCarty (2002) discuss what happens when source materials (in the humanities) arecomputerized he stresses the interaction taking place during the process of selection and choosing what isconsider to be the data. The difficult part in construction of computerized source material is the inevitabledifference between human knowledge of and declarative statements about specific objects (i.e. the data).18 I will not – at this stage anyway – discuss or attempt to elucidate what a text is or might be. I leave thisdiscussion for the moment and instead treat the notion of text from a pragmatic and rather unproblematicview since my interest is within uses, manipulation and applications of electronic texts. Namely, when talkingabout texts I refer to signs organised as information and representation of any content. A linguistic definitioncould be: “a text is a sequence of paragraphs that represents an extended unit of speech” (Glossary oflinguistic terms, http://www.sil.org/linguistics/GlossaryOfLinguisticTerms/Index.htm [2003-04-07]).pm-030505.doc utkast avh.pm. Monica Langerth Zetterman 5(34)
Page 1 and 2: Deschooling information:exploring u
Page 3: communities. However, the rapidly g
Page 9 and 10: their learning or how they might be
Page 11 and 12: Furthermore, the move away from pro
Page 13 and 14: Another example is humanities in co
Page 15 and 16: e-negotiation (e.g. Collins) and ot
Page 17 and 18: test-bench environment” when talk
Page 19 and 20: group of learners engaged in learni
Page 21 and 22: comprehensive guide to all sorts of
Page 23 and 24: nodes of the network and the relati
Page 25 and 26: observations during an initial thre
Page 27 and 28: philosophy 126 , and biographies cr
Page 29 and 30: encode existing texts, is also suit
Page 31 and 32: References[to be completed]Andersso
Page 33 and 34: Knorr Cetina, K.& Mulkay, M (1983).

exploring uses of digital archives in research and ... - skeptron.uu.se

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?