Download this PDF file - University of Alberta - Journal Hosting

“IN CONVERSATION WITH ODED LIPSCHITS” 41I submitted the Hebrew version of the manuscript to Yad YizhakBen Zvi in 2001 because it was time to do so, and even if the book wasaccepted for publication, and actually was published in April 2003, I wasnot entirely satisfied. I still saw problems and “holes” in my picture ofJudah in the 6 th century BCE, and still thought some of them could andshould be filled. Thus I waited until 2004 to submit the Englishmanuscript of the book, trying meanwhile to solidify the biblicalanalyses in it, along with the historical discussions and demographicevaluations. I worked on these revisions especially during my Sabbaticalyear in Heidelberg as a visiting scholar in the Wissenschaftlich-Theologisches Seminar of the Ruprecht Karls Universität. 29 Some ofmy new thoughts and conclusions were also published in papersbetween 2001 and 2004. 30 The overall picture was then presented in theEnglish edition of the book, even though I choose to end the book witha series of questions and subjects that remain open. Some of themshould be the subject of further research and some of them shouldprobably wait for future developments and future finds.When I started to prepare my research for publication, with themain goal of presenting a synthetic overview of the history of Judahunder Babylonian rule, I knew that I would have two options: to focuson the half empty cup; or to focus on the half full cup. To focus on thehalf empty cup would necessitate demonstrating the gaps in ourknowledge, emphasizing caution in treating archaeological and historicalproblems and probably avoiding an overall synthesis. To focus on thehalf full cup would mean taking full cognizance of the gaps in ourknowledge while treating in an exhaustive way each of the differentfields of research: biblical, archaeological and historical. My goal was tostudy each of them independently, without interference from the otherfields, but with a clear purpose: to get to a point where a positivesummary could be offered, and then a synthesis. Of course it is possiblethat I misunderstood some details or that I misinterpreted others.Naturally future discoveries can change our knowledge and perspectivesconcerning some parts in this big puzzle, and thus how we reconstructJerusalem (1999), 115-123 (Hebrew); “Judah, Jerusalem and the Temple (586-539 B.C.),” Transeuphratène 22 (2001), 129-142; “The Policy of the PersianEmpire and the Meager Architectural Finds in the Province of Yehud,” Faust,A. and Baruch, E. (eds.). New Studies in Jerusalem (Proceedings of the SeventhConference) (Ramat-Gan, 2001), 45-76 (Hebrew); “Was There a Royal Estatein Ein-Gedi by the End of the Iron Age and During the Persian Period?,”Schwartz, J., Amar, Z. and Ziffer, I. (eds.) Jerusalem and Eretz Israel (Arie KindlerVolume; Tel-Aviv, 2000), 31-42 (Hebrew).29 During this year I was hosted by my good friend and colleague, Prof.Manfred Oeming, and I would like to thank him for it.30 See Lipschits, O. Demographic Changes in Judah between the 7 th and the5 th Centuries BCE., Lipschits, O. and Blenkinsopp, J. (eds.) Judah and the Judeansin the Neo-Babylonian Period. (Winona Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns, 2003), 323-376;“Ammon in Transition from Vassal kingdom to Babylonian Province,”BASOR 335 (2004), 37-52; From Geba to Beersheba – A Further Discussion.RB 111-3 (2004), 345-361; “Achaemenid Imperial Policy, Settlement Processesin Palestine, and the Status of Jerusalem in the Middle of the Fifth CenturyBCE,” Lipschits, O. and Oeming, M. (eds.). Judah and the Judeans in the PersianPeriod. Winona-Lake, Ind.: Eisenbrauns; 2006), 19-52.