Table of ContentsI. Master Agreements <strong>in</strong> General..............................................................................................................1A. Remedies found <strong>in</strong> master agreements.............................................................................................1B. Liquidated damages compared to early term<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong> liquidation rights........................................1II. Summary of <strong>Early</strong> <strong>Term<strong>in</strong>ation</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Liquidation</strong> Clauses .....................................................................2A. History of clauses <strong>in</strong> relation to master agreements .........................................................................2B. Events of default .............................................................................................................................2C. <strong>Term<strong>in</strong>ation</strong> events..........................................................................................................................2D. Summary of the early term<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong> liquidation remedy...............................................................2E. Summary of liquidation...................................................................................................................3F. Summary of setoff...........................................................................................................................3III. Mechanics of Procedure.....................................................................................................................3A. Events of default.............................................................................................................................31. New events of default..............................................................................................................3B. Notice of an event of default <strong>and</strong> early term<strong>in</strong>ation date ..................................................................5C. Election of remedy..........................................................................................................................51. Cherry-pick<strong>in</strong>g transactions to term<strong>in</strong>ate .................................................................................52. Non-exclusive nature ..............................................................................................................5D. <strong>Liquidation</strong> .....................................................................................................................................61. Market quotation versus loss ...................................................................................................62. Net present value ....................................................................................................................73. Disputed valuations.................................................................................................................74. One-way versus two-way payment ..........................................................................................7E. Setoff ..............................................................................................................................................81. In general................................................................................................................................82. Cross-product setoff................................................................................................................83. Cross-party setoff....................................................................................................................94. Setoff of collateral ..................................................................................................................9IV. Bankruptcy ........................................................................................................................................9A. In general........................................................................................................................................9B. Automatic stay..............................................................................................................................101. Exemptions from the automatic stay......................................................................................10a. Forward contracts <strong>and</strong> swap agreements def<strong>in</strong>ed ...............................................................10b. Importance of exemptions from the automatic stay............................................................11C. Avoidance action claims ...............................................................................................................111. Preferences <strong>and</strong> fraudulent transfers ......................................................................................12a. Types of fraudulent transfers.............................................................................................12b. In re Olympic Natural Gas Company ................................................................................12c. Avoidance actions <strong>and</strong> swap agreements ...........................................................................12D. Ipso facto provisions.....................................................................................................................13V. Conclusion........................................................................................................................................13i
I. Master Agreements <strong>in</strong> GeneralThe term “master agreement” generally means an agreement, often st<strong>and</strong>ardized for a commodity, with terms<strong>and</strong> conditions that will apply to multiple transactions, each evidenced by a brief transaction confirmation.Master agreements can be used for physically-delivered commodities or over-the-counter derivativetransactions. 1 St<strong>and</strong>ardized master agreements are commonly used to manage the risks associated withenergy trad<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> market<strong>in</strong>g transactions. Recent history demonstrates that such risks are numerous <strong>and</strong>substantial <strong>and</strong> can be costly if left unmitigated. Several events, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Enron’s bankruptcy, 2 the recent<strong>and</strong> ongo<strong>in</strong>g credit rat<strong>in</strong>g downgrades of some of the <strong>in</strong>dustry’s largest energy trad<strong>in</strong>g companies, <strong>and</strong> thesubsequent exit from the <strong>in</strong>dustry of some of those companies, 3 have dramatically changed the way manyenergy trad<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> market<strong>in</strong>g companies view, measure <strong>and</strong> mitigate credit risk. This change <strong>in</strong> perspectiveis caus<strong>in</strong>g companies to re-exam<strong>in</strong>e master agreements to take advantage of some of the hard lessons learned<strong>in</strong> the months follow<strong>in</strong>g Enron’s bankruptcy fil<strong>in</strong>g. In addition, non-traditional participants are enter<strong>in</strong>g themarket <strong>and</strong> br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g with them new ideas concern<strong>in</strong>g credit <strong>and</strong> risk management. Although parties apply it<strong>in</strong> different ways, the most common type of contractual provision used to manage credit risk <strong>in</strong> masteragreements is the early term<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong> liquidation provision. This paper analyzes the contents, mechanics<strong>and</strong> implications of early term<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong> liquidation provisions commonly used <strong>in</strong> master agreements.A. Remedies found <strong>in</strong> master agreementsMaster agreements typically conta<strong>in</strong> two types of remedies for the breach<strong>in</strong>g party’s nonperformance:liquidated damages <strong>and</strong> early term<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong> liquidation. Upon a party’s breach of its obligation to deliver orreceive a commodity under a master agreement, the non-breach<strong>in</strong>g party is usually entitled to recoverliquidated damages. 4 Liquidated damages can be calculated us<strong>in</strong>g the cover st<strong>and</strong>ard, which provides for therecovery of the difference between the contract price <strong>and</strong> the market price to purchase substitute quantities ofthe commodity, 5 or the spot st<strong>and</strong>ard, which is calculated by subtract<strong>in</strong>g the contract price from either themarket price quoted by <strong>in</strong>dependent market participants or a published, <strong>in</strong>dex price. 6 While these liquidateddamages typically <strong>in</strong>clude <strong>in</strong>cremental costs <strong>in</strong>curred as a result of the breach <strong>and</strong> the subsequent cover<strong>in</strong>gprocess, such as imbalance penalties or additional transmission costs, 7 they exclude other costs, such asadm<strong>in</strong>istrative costs <strong>in</strong>curred <strong>in</strong> replac<strong>in</strong>g the transaction. 8 Upon an event of default, term<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong>liquidation provisions def<strong>in</strong>e the non-default<strong>in</strong>g party’s rights under the master agreement. Events of defaultare carefully def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> master agreements but usually <strong>in</strong>clude any significant breach other than those relatedto the failure to deliver or receive a physical commodity.B. Liquidated damages compared to early term<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong> liquidation rightsLiquidated damages <strong>and</strong> early term<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong> liquidation differ <strong>in</strong> several material respects. Liquidateddamages are usually the non-default<strong>in</strong>g party’s sole <strong>and</strong> exclusive remedy for the other party’s failure toperform its obligations to deliver or receive the energy commodity under a master agreement between theparties. As a result, the payment by the default<strong>in</strong>g party of the liquidated damages prevents an event ofdefault under the agreement <strong>and</strong> the affected transactions <strong>and</strong> the master agreement cont<strong>in</strong>ues <strong>in</strong> full force <strong>and</strong>effect. Industry participants typically treat liquidated damages as a rout<strong>in</strong>e occurrence <strong>and</strong> envision thecont<strong>in</strong>uation of the master agreement <strong>and</strong> the transaction despite the failure that caused the liquidateddamages.In contrast, early term<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong> liquidation rights arise when there has been an occurrence, other than afailure to deliver or receive a commodity, that has global implications upon performance under the masteragreement <strong>and</strong>/or the f<strong>in</strong>ancial obligations of the parties. These occurrences typically relate to the credit,payment history, <strong>and</strong>/or solvency of the default<strong>in</strong>g party. The broad scope of events of default can cause theiroccurrence under one agreement to create early term<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong> liquidation rights under another agreement.Likewise, a failure on the part of or action of a guarantor or affiliate of a party to a master agreement can alsoconstitute an event of default. Upon an event of default, early term<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>and</strong> liquidation provisions usuallyprovide a number of rights to the non-default<strong>in</strong>g party, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g: (i) the right to term<strong>in</strong>ate all outst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>gtransactions under a master agreement; (ii) the right to liquidate the term<strong>in</strong>ated transactions; (iii) the right to1