22 <strong>EVCA</strong> <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>Professional</strong> <strong>St<strong>and</strong>ards</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Private</strong> <strong>Equity</strong> <strong>and</strong> Venture Capital IndustryQuestionWhat are <strong>the</strong> responsibilities of <strong>the</strong> GP in relation to per<strong>for</strong>mancein<strong>for</strong>mation of Portfolio Companies?ExplanationMost jurisdictions have legislative obligations regarding in<strong>for</strong>mationto be provided to shareholders of Portfolio Companies. However, it iscommon practice <strong>for</strong> Funds that invest in Portfolio Companies torequire more frequent <strong>and</strong> detailed in<strong>for</strong>mation than required bylegislation. In particular, <strong>the</strong> GP may require more frequent <strong>and</strong>detailed in<strong>for</strong>mation regarding <strong>the</strong> Portfolio Company in orderto fulfil its contractual obligations to <strong>the</strong> LPs in <strong>the</strong> Fund.RecommendationThe GP should agree non-legislative in<strong>for</strong>mation requirements with<strong>the</strong> Portfolio Company’s management that take into account its ownreporting obligations, its ability to per<strong>for</strong>m its responsibilities on behalfof <strong>the</strong> Fund, as shareholder <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> efficient <strong>and</strong> effective use ofresources within <strong>the</strong> Portfolio Company. Typically, key per<strong>for</strong>manceindicators (KPIs) are developed that allow Portfolio Companymanagement <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> GP to carefully monitor company per<strong>for</strong>mance.The GP should treat corporate in<strong>for</strong>mation which it obtainsconfidentially <strong>and</strong> with due consideration to commercial sensitivity<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> needs of <strong>the</strong> Portfolio Company’s o<strong>the</strong>r stakeholders <strong>and</strong>should ensure that its own LPs are bound by similar confidentialityobligations with respect to such in<strong>for</strong>mation in <strong>the</strong> Fund documents.3.4.2. Environmental factorsQuestionWhat environmental factors should <strong>the</strong> GP consider in relation to <strong>the</strong>management of <strong>the</strong> Fund’s Portfolio Companies?ExplanationGenerally, GPs should support a prudent approach to environmentalchallenges within <strong>the</strong>ir Portfolio Companies. These challenges couldconcern a range of factors including resource use, waste production<strong>and</strong> disposal; emissions to air, l<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> water; energy use, cost ofcarbon <strong>and</strong> climate change; biodiversity <strong>and</strong> habitat conservation.RecommendationDue diligence into prospective investments should include anevaluation of <strong>the</strong> likely environmental impact of <strong>the</strong> conduct of suchbusiness. GPs should recommend to <strong>the</strong> boards of PortfolioCompanies, pursuant to shareholder documents, to identify <strong>and</strong> takematerial environmental factors into account in <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>mulation of <strong>the</strong>Portfolio Company’s business plan. GPs are generally expected toactively manage environmental risk factors in Portfolio Companies.3.4.3. Social factorsQuestionWhat social factors would be applicable to <strong>the</strong> conduct of <strong>the</strong> Fund’sPortfolio Companies?ExplanationGenerally, factors which affect <strong>the</strong> work<strong>for</strong>ce, customers, suppliers <strong>and</strong>communities of a Portfolio Company should be evaluated at boardlevel. Social factors can include stakeholder dialogue <strong>and</strong> observanceof core labour st<strong>and</strong>ards in areas such as child labour, <strong>for</strong>ced labour,trade union rights <strong>and</strong> discrimination in <strong>the</strong> labour market.RecommendationHuman rights are likely to be an integral part of <strong>the</strong> social factors <strong>and</strong>board level discussions may include development of strategies toprevent direct <strong>and</strong> indirect involvement in human rights violations.Depending on <strong>the</strong> size <strong>and</strong> nature of <strong>the</strong> business, a PortfolioCompany may also consider introducing a corporate socialresponsibility programme <strong>and</strong> publishing corporate socialresponsibility reports. A GP should ensure that such items are put on<strong>the</strong> agenda <strong>for</strong> board discussion where appropriate.3.4.4. Governance factorsOne of <strong>the</strong> key areas of due diligence that should be completed by aGP prior to investment is corporate governance at <strong>the</strong> prospectivePortfolio Company. The corporate governance systems, processes <strong>and</strong>controls applied by <strong>the</strong> senior management team at <strong>the</strong> company willreveal much about <strong>the</strong> effective running of <strong>the</strong> business to be investedin. A business with effective corporate governance in place will providea strong plat<strong>for</strong>m <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> rapid implementation of value buildinginitiatives. A business with weak, ineffective corporate governance willmake a higher risk investment but is likely to reap considerable benefitfrom <strong>the</strong> implementation of robust governance systems <strong>and</strong>processes that are suitable <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> business.Effective corporate governance, once installed, should support <strong>the</strong>decision-making process <strong>and</strong> follow-through within <strong>the</strong> organisation<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> alignment of interests across <strong>the</strong> stakeholders in <strong>the</strong> businessincluding management, employees <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> GP itself.QuestionWhat governance processes are applicable at <strong>the</strong> Portfolio Company<strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> conduct of a Fund’s business?ExplanationA Portfolio Company is likely to be provided with guidance ongovernance requirements by <strong>the</strong> GP at initial investment. In somecases, <strong>the</strong> implementation of specific requirements will be a conditionof closing <strong>the</strong> transaction. The management of a Portfolio Companycan be strongly influenced by <strong>the</strong> attitude of <strong>the</strong> GP to boardeffectiveness, controls, checks <strong>and</strong> balances. If not already in place, <strong>the</strong>GP should typically ensure that each Portfolio Company hasappropriate governance structures to safeguard against fraud, bribery<strong>and</strong> corruption <strong>and</strong> to ensure internal financial control, qualityassurance, risk <strong>and</strong> conflict management <strong>and</strong> transparent reporting<strong>and</strong> communication. Ensuring <strong>the</strong>se objectives are achieved whilstpreserving <strong>the</strong> autonomy of <strong>the</strong> Portfolio Company board to drivebusiness growth <strong>and</strong> not hamper it with bureaucratic processes <strong>and</strong>controls, is an important balance to achieve <strong>and</strong> to be able todemonstrate at <strong>the</strong> point at which <strong>the</strong> business is sold.RecommendationTo ensure that Portfolio Companies are applying appropriate goodgovernance practices <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards, <strong>the</strong> GP should ensure it remainsup to date <strong>and</strong> familiar with good practice <strong>and</strong> guidance in <strong>the</strong>respective countries <strong>and</strong> industries in which its Portfolio Companiesare based. This can be done in a number of ways, <strong>for</strong> example througha suitable law firm or advisor which can ensure that relevant Codes<strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards are understood, particularly by those individuals whowill be representing <strong>the</strong> GP on <strong>the</strong> board of <strong>the</strong> Portfolio Company.Also, by recruiting <strong>and</strong> installing experienced executives to <strong>the</strong> boardor respective supervisory committees of <strong>the</strong> Portfolio Company, whocan demonstrate a good underst<strong>and</strong>ing of <strong>and</strong> track record in applying<strong>the</strong> required governance st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong> practices. Finally, it isimportant that <strong>the</strong> GP also demonstrates to its wider stakeholdercommunity sound environmental, social <strong>and</strong> governance (ESG)practices <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards that are both appropriate <strong>and</strong> proportionateto its own business.
23 <strong>EVCA</strong> <strong>H<strong>and</strong>book</strong> <strong>Professional</strong> <strong>St<strong>and</strong>ards</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Private</strong> <strong>Equity</strong> <strong>and</strong> Venture Capital IndustryWhere <strong>the</strong> GP has identified risks <strong>and</strong> opportunities (including ESGrisks) that are deemed material to <strong>the</strong> success of <strong>the</strong> investment, <strong>the</strong>GP should ensure that practices are developed to mitigate associatedrisks <strong>and</strong> pursue opportunities. The implementation <strong>and</strong> effectivenessof <strong>the</strong>se practices should be monitored as appropriate. Noting that <strong>the</strong>marketplace context could change, <strong>the</strong> GP should occasionallyundertake to update <strong>the</strong> responsible investment risk/opportunityanalysis <strong>and</strong> revise, remove or add policies as appropriate. Where <strong>the</strong>Fund’s LPs have expressed an interest in responsible investmentfactors, <strong>the</strong> GP should seek to report to <strong>the</strong>se LPs on a suitably regularbasis. The GP may also choose to send unsolicited reports onresponsible investment factors to all LPs.3.4.5. Board participationQuestionHow should <strong>the</strong> GP act in relation to <strong>the</strong> board of <strong>the</strong> PortfolioCompany?ExplanationThe GP will frequently appoint one or more experienced members ofits own staff or representatives to <strong>the</strong> board of <strong>the</strong> Portfolio Company.Typically, designees of <strong>the</strong> GP will have in-depth experience of <strong>the</strong>sector <strong>and</strong> will have been involved in <strong>the</strong> original due diligence <strong>and</strong>review of <strong>the</strong> investment.There are many variations on <strong>the</strong> overall composition of boards,but in relation to non-executive members of <strong>the</strong> board, <strong>the</strong>se mayinclude some/all of <strong>the</strong> following: one or more single directors whoare members/employees/representatives of <strong>the</strong> GP of <strong>the</strong> Fund;an independent non-executive chairman; <strong>and</strong>/or, an independentnon-executive board member. These non-executive members of <strong>the</strong>board may be selected as <strong>the</strong>y have specific <strong>and</strong> appropriate industryknowledge <strong>and</strong> insight.RecommendationThe GP should ensure that <strong>the</strong> board is structured <strong>and</strong> appointmentsare made in <strong>the</strong> best interests of <strong>the</strong> Portfolio Company.The relationship between <strong>the</strong> board <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> management of <strong>the</strong>Portfolio Company should be clear <strong>and</strong> supported by appropriatedocumentation of roles <strong>and</strong> responsibilities.QuestionWhose interests do <strong>the</strong> GP-appointed director look after on a board?ExplanationWhatever <strong>the</strong> means of appointment, directors do not serve <strong>the</strong>interests of one particular shareholder but act in <strong>the</strong> interests of<strong>the</strong> Portfolio Company. The position of director is a fiduciary one.A director does not act as <strong>the</strong> representative or advocate of <strong>the</strong> bodywhich appointed him. Fiduciary duties generally are summarised as aduty of loyalty to <strong>the</strong> company, a duty to avoid <strong>and</strong> disclose conflicts,duties of confidentiality, to act in good faith, to exercise care, skill <strong>and</strong>diligence <strong>and</strong> to act with integrity.RecommendationA GP-appointed director should always be aware that he/she mustact in <strong>the</strong> interests of <strong>the</strong> Portfolio Company <strong>and</strong> all its shareholders.Where conflicts arise, <strong>the</strong> GP may need to excuse <strong>the</strong> director frommeetings <strong>and</strong> may need to reach investment related decisions in fulldisclosure of <strong>the</strong> director’s conflict of interests. The GP should ensurethat its board appointee(s) clearly disclose any conflicts of interestwith respect to <strong>the</strong>ir role as members of <strong>the</strong> board promptly when<strong>the</strong>y arise.QuestionWhat does being a board member entail?ExplanationThe overriding principle of fiduciary duty to <strong>the</strong> company <strong>and</strong> all itsshareholders apply to <strong>the</strong> whole board. A director is expected todevote such time <strong>and</strong> diligence as is reasonably necessary to fur<strong>the</strong>r<strong>the</strong> business of <strong>the</strong> company. Attendance at <strong>and</strong> being well prepared<strong>for</strong> board meetings should be assumed. Directors with particular skillsmay be asked to serve on additional board committees such asdirectors with accountancy training serving on audit committees.RecommendationA director should be prepared to invest time in his role as a directorto underst<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> needs of <strong>the</strong> company <strong>and</strong> to participate in review<strong>and</strong> decision-making affecting <strong>the</strong> business.The GP should ensure that its appointee(s) to <strong>the</strong> board fullyunderst<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir responsibilities to <strong>the</strong> GP <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir legal dutiesto <strong>the</strong> Portfolio Company as a member of <strong>the</strong> board.QuestionWhat skills does <strong>the</strong> GP-appointed director need to be a boardmember?ExplanationMany skills are applicable to membership of a board of directors.The company may particularly need directors with industryexperience, with legal, corporate finance or accounting experience orwith general management experience. All <strong>the</strong>se skills, plus <strong>the</strong> abilityto evaluate risk <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r skills, are likely to be needed by everycompany over time <strong>and</strong> are unlikely to be offered by one sole director.There<strong>for</strong>e, <strong>the</strong> ability to work collaboratively <strong>and</strong> openly with seniormanagement <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r directors is also of great importance.RecommendationThe GP should encourage its board appointee(s) to seek appropriatesupport <strong>and</strong> training to enable <strong>the</strong>m to carry out <strong>the</strong>ir duties as boardmembers to <strong>the</strong> best of <strong>the</strong>ir abilities <strong>and</strong> in accordance with <strong>the</strong>irlegal duties <strong>and</strong> contractual commitments. The GP should seek toensure that all appointees to <strong>the</strong> board are individuals of appropriateauthority, skill <strong>and</strong> experience who can provide value <strong>and</strong> insight to<strong>the</strong> Portfolio Company.QuestionWhat is <strong>the</strong> best size <strong>for</strong> a board?ExplanationThinking has evolved on optimum board size. Factors to bear in mindin considering board composition include <strong>the</strong> skills required to run <strong>the</strong>business, <strong>the</strong> interests of <strong>the</strong> shareholders <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir desire <strong>for</strong> activeparticipation in decision-making, <strong>the</strong> governance <strong>and</strong> logistics <strong>and</strong>costs implications of convening a large group of people frequently <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong> need <strong>for</strong> balanced decision-making through diversity of opinion.RecommendationNo number can be stipulated <strong>for</strong> optimum board size but <strong>the</strong> boardshould periodically review its composition <strong>and</strong> its success <strong>and</strong> adjustits size accordingly.