01.12.2012 Views

Fleksibilni Internet servisi na bazi kontrole kašnjenja i

Fleksibilni Internet servisi na bazi kontrole kašnjenja i

Fleksibilni Internet servisi na bazi kontrole kašnjenja i

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fig. 1. Traffic control mechanisms employed in a QoS capable router.<br />

Admission control implements a decision algorithm that a router employs to<br />

determine whether an incoming request for service can be accepted without disrupting the<br />

service guarantees to established data flows. Unlike in a best-effort network, where a new<br />

connection request is accepted from any source anytime, a Call Admission Control<br />

(CAC) algorithm is executed in a QoS-e<strong>na</strong>bled network. It decides whether to accept or<br />

reject a new connection. The CAC algorithm estimates whether the available resources<br />

meet the set of QoS parameters requested by the connection [32].<br />

Traffic policing ensures that an accepted connection conforms to the QoS<br />

parameters negotiated during the admission control phase. For each packet entering the<br />

network, the policing mechanism detects whether it conforms to the “QoS contract”. If<br />

conforming, the packet is admitted to the router. Otherwise, the policing mechanism can<br />

either drop the packet or decide to accept it as a lower priority packet that will be dropped<br />

if congestion occurs. Policing is necessary only in access routers. There is no need to<br />

police the traffic in core routers [33].<br />

Traffic shaping is used to smooth out packets bursts in cases when incoming<br />

traffic does not conform to negotiated “QoS contract”. Unlike policing mechanisms,<br />

7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!