Impact of NTFP ban on the lives and livelihood of the ... - Vasundhara

More documents

Recommendations

Info

SanitationPoor sanitation and unhygienic drinking water leads to various diseases (particularly water relatedvector borne diseases) like diarrohea and jaundice. Very few villages have tube wells for drinkingwater purpose. Rest <strong>of</strong> the villages has to depend on streamsand water channels for household chores aswell as drinkingpurpose.Water used for household as well asdrinking purposewater’.Sarat Chandra Sabhoo the retd. Pharmacist pointed thatdrinking polluted water is also one <strong>of</strong> the prime causes <strong>of</strong>infant deaths. He further added ‘bore/tube wells are notdugin the villages as the strict sanctuary lawdoes not allowthe operation <strong>of</strong> big machines and movement <strong>of</strong> heavyvehicles inside as thearea comesunder Tiger Reserve . Thepeople have no other options but to drink the pollutedCommunicationCommunication is a major problem and thevillage becomes completely inaccessible during therains. Under such circumstances the people are virtually left at the mercy <strong>of</strong> God as no facilities orhelp could possibly reach them and the peopleare imprisoned in the Green jail. There arenoroads connecting to some <strong>of</strong> the villages henceeven themedical van cannot reach them forregular check up. Last year when the incidence <strong>of</strong>mass infant death took place in Kuanribill village,due to heavy rains every connectivity to thevillage was cut <strong>of</strong>f andit was verydifficult forthemedical team to reach the village for help. Atemporary wooden bridge has been constructed connecting the village but the condition <strong>of</strong> thebridge (inthe photograph) showss that it cannot sustain the rains this year. Similar is the conditionfor most <strong>of</strong> the villages and such condition makes the life <strong>of</strong> the peoplee miserable.50
Annexure-1BAN ON <strong>NTFP</strong> COLLECTION AND ITS IMPACT ON PEOPLE AND WILDLIFE INPAs IN ORISSASection 1: Pr<strong>of</strong>ile <strong>of</strong> PA1. Name and Status:2. Area:3. Date <strong>of</strong> declaration4. Type <strong>of</strong> ecosystem:5. Important features:6. Major threats to the PAINFORMATION SHEET7. People’s perception on importance <strong>of</strong> forest:8. When was <strong>NTFP</strong> collection <strong>of</strong>ficially <strong>ban</strong>ned?:Section 2: Impressions <strong>of</strong> the local <strong>of</strong>ficials (forest/revenue/education/health)1. When was the <strong>ban</strong> implemented?2. What all has been <strong>ban</strong>ned?3. What do people do now that the <strong>ban</strong> has been imposed?4. What has been the impact on people?5. Has there been any positive impact on the wildlife because <strong>of</strong> the <strong>ban</strong>?6. Has there been any negative impact on wildlife because <strong>of</strong> the <strong>ban</strong>?7. What has been planned to resolve the situation?8. Has there been an alternatives suggested by the government to counter the impacts <strong>of</strong> the<strong>ban</strong>? What are they? How have they been implemented?Section 3: Village pr<strong>of</strong>ile1. District Name:2. Block Name:3. Village Selected:51
Page 1 and 2: IMPACT OF CONSERVATION POLICIES (SP
Page 3 and 4: ABSTRACTThe word Conservation is on
Page 5 and 6: MethodologyMethodology for the stud
Page 7 and 8: Issues in Protected Areasacross the
Page 9 and 10: non-timber forest produce, fish and
Page 11 and 12: those people who have been cultivat
Page 13 and 14: face lot of diffic
Page 15 and 16: The Order of Supre
Page 17 and 18: Forest DivisionsBoudh Forest Divisi
Page 19 and 20: item especially after monsoons. Lea
Page 21 and 22: CASE STUDY - 2SUNABEDA WILDLIFE SAN
Page 23 and 24: Manikgarh hill range extends in a s
Page 25 and 26: History of Protect
Page 27 and 28: The opinion of the
Page 29 and 30: sanctuary area. Dhaniram majhi, who
Page 31 and 32: surveyed villages but due to the pr
Page 33 and 34: In the year 2003, 134 households fr
Page 35 and 36: Village: KatingpaniKatingpani came
Page 37 and 38: Loss of KL Income
Page 39 and 40: 9%Growing Food Insecurity10%14%32%
Page 41 and 42: Village: GadgadaTotal Household- 18
Page 43 and 44: CASE STUDY-3SIMILIPAL WILDLIFE SANC
Page 45 and 46: diet of the people
Page 47 and 48: THE ONLY OPTION OF LIVELIHOOD SNATC
Page 49: is no bus service or any other mean
Page 53: 1. Sal/SialiLeaves2. Tenduleaves3.

Impact of NTFP ban on the lives and livelihood of the ... - Vasundhara

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?