12.07.2015 Views

Are Bcr-Abl KD mutations already detectable at the time ... - siesonline

Are Bcr-Abl KD mutations already detectable at the time ... - siesonline

Are Bcr-Abl KD mutations already detectable at the time ... - siesonline

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LAL:signific<strong>at</strong>o clinico e biologicodelle mutazioni di <strong>Bcr</strong>-<strong>Abl</strong>Simona SoveriniDipar<strong>time</strong>nto di Em<strong>at</strong>ologia e Scienze Oncologiche “L. e A. Seràgnoli”Università di Bologna


The vast majority of Ph+ ALL p<strong>at</strong>ientstre<strong>at</strong>ed with im<strong>at</strong>inib relapse wi<strong>the</strong>vidence of a <strong>Bcr</strong>-<strong>Abl</strong> <strong>KD</strong> mut<strong>at</strong>ion


Im<strong>at</strong>inib-resistant pts with Ph+ ALL have <strong>the</strong>highest incidence of <strong>Bcr</strong>-<strong>Abl</strong> <strong>KD</strong> <strong>mut<strong>at</strong>ions</strong>D<strong>at</strong>a of <strong>the</strong> GIMEMA WP on CML on 655 IM-resistant ptsPhase <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>time</strong> of IM failure:CP (IM first-line) AP/BC CML Ph+ ALL30%64%76%resistant pts harbouring <strong>Abl</strong> <strong>KD</strong> <strong>mut<strong>at</strong>ions</strong>


T315I is <strong>the</strong> single most frequent <strong>Bcr</strong>-<strong>Abl</strong><strong>KD</strong> mut<strong>at</strong>ion in im<strong>at</strong>inib-resistant Ph+ ALL66 <strong>mut<strong>at</strong>ions</strong> in 62/82 ptsresistant to im<strong>at</strong>inibT315I <strong>mut<strong>at</strong>ions</strong>: 17/66 (26%)*P-loop <strong>mut<strong>at</strong>ions</strong>: 26/66 (39%)P-loopc<strong>at</strong>alyticdomainactiv<strong>at</strong>ionloopM244VL248VG250EQ252R/HY253F/HD276GT277AE255K/VE279KV289AE281A/KE292VM343TH396R/PL364IM351TL387M/FL384MF359V/IS417Y/FT315I E355G/DF382L E453G/KV379IF311L/I F317LE459K/QA380TF486S* Frequency of T315I <strong>mut<strong>at</strong>ions</strong> in im<strong>at</strong>inib-resistant CML: ~10-12%


Second-line TKIs in im<strong>at</strong>inib resistant Ph+ ALLp<strong>at</strong>ients have limited efficacyCHRmCgRF311IV299LNELG250ECHRCCgRF317LY253HCHRCCgRT315IWTCHR100T315IE255KCHRCCgRE255K,T315ID276GCHR PCgR100T315IWTCHR100F317LE255KCHRCCgRT315IY253HCHRCCgRT315A, F317LM351TCHRCCgR90M351T, F317LWTCHRF317IL387ML387M,F317Lmonths on das<strong>at</strong>inib0 1 2 3 6 9 12 15


Inhibiting <strong>Bcr</strong>-<strong>Abl</strong> in Ph+ ALL is likeshooting <strong>at</strong> a moving targetdas<strong>at</strong>inibim<strong>at</strong>inib 800nilotinib0141618monthsMale, 18 yrs, Ph+ ALLWTT315AY253HY253HT315AWTT315AWTT315AT315AT315AT315AY253HWTT315AG250ET315AG250ET315AG250ET315AY253HWT3 WTWT CCgR, MMRWTWTrelapserelapserelapseim<strong>at</strong>inibdas<strong>at</strong>inibnilotinib0121822monthsMale, 69 yrs, Ph+ ALLG250EG250EWTG250EWTWTWTWTG250EF317LG250E WTF317LG250EF317LY253HY253HWT G250EF317L WTG250EF317L Y253Hrelapserelapserelapse


In ALL genetic instability is high and allows<strong>the</strong> Ph+ clone to rapidly escape inhibitionNovel TKIs are active against <strong>the</strong> vast majority of IM-resistant <strong>mut<strong>at</strong>ions</strong>, but<strong>the</strong>y inexorably retain one or some insensitive <strong>mut<strong>at</strong>ions</strong>Disease burdenIMATINIB INHIBITOR 2 INHIBITOR 3 ??<strong>time</strong>RELAPSE 1 RELAPSE 2 RELAPSE 3BCR-ABL <strong>KD</strong> sequenceWT(?)IM-res mut<strong>at</strong>ionAccumul<strong>at</strong>ion of compounddrug-resistant <strong>mut<strong>at</strong>ions</strong>


<strong>Are</strong> <strong>Bcr</strong>-<strong>Abl</strong> <strong>KD</strong> <strong>mut<strong>at</strong>ions</strong> <strong>already</strong><strong>detectable</strong> <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>time</strong> of diagnosis?• In Ph+ ALL pts tre<strong>at</strong>ed with im<strong>at</strong>inib, resistance-associ<strong>at</strong>ed<strong>Bcr</strong>-<strong>Abl</strong> <strong>KD</strong> <strong>mut<strong>at</strong>ions</strong> arise more frequently and more rapidlythan in CML pts• Im<strong>at</strong>inib does not to induce <strong>mut<strong>at</strong>ions</strong>, but simply selectspre-existent mut<strong>at</strong>ed clonesIn how many newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL can we detect <strong>Bcr</strong>-<strong>Abl</strong><strong>KD</strong> <strong>mut<strong>at</strong>ions</strong> <strong>at</strong> low levels?


<strong>Are</strong> <strong>Bcr</strong>-<strong>Abl</strong> <strong>KD</strong> <strong>mut<strong>at</strong>ions</strong> <strong>already</strong><strong>detectable</strong> <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>time</strong> of diagnosis?• German experience: <strong>Bcr</strong>-<strong>Abl</strong> <strong>KD</strong> <strong>mut<strong>at</strong>ions</strong> detected by D-HPLC <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>time</strong> of diagnosis in:- 9/22 (41%) cases in elderly pts (Pfeifer et al, Blood 2007)– 6/34 (18%) cases in younger pts (Pfeifer et al, EHA 2008)• Lower detection limit of D-HPLC is routinely 5-10%• Wh<strong>at</strong> happens if we increase <strong>the</strong> sensitivity of ourscreening method?


P<strong>at</strong>ients (I)→ RNA samples collected <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>time</strong> of diagnosis from13 p<strong>at</strong>ients enrolled on a phase II study of <strong>the</strong> tre<strong>at</strong>mentof adult de novo Ph+ ALL with das<strong>at</strong>inib (GIMEMA LAL1205)DASATINIB 70 mg BIDPDNi.t. mtxi.t. mtx-6 0 +1 +22 +32 +43+84 days


P<strong>at</strong>ients (II)NSexAge<strong>Bcr</strong>-<strong>Abl</strong> typeSt<strong>at</strong>us (<strong>time</strong> from<strong>the</strong> start of das<strong>at</strong>inib,mo)Mut<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>at</strong>diagnosis(direct seq)Mut<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>at</strong>relapse(direct seq)1M49p190Relapsed (10)WTT315I2M56p210Relapsed (6)WTT315I3M56p210Relapsed (7)WTWT4F47p190Relapsed (4)WTWT5F74p210Relapsed (8)WTT315I6F58p210Relapsed (7)WTE255K7F59p210Relapsed (2)WTT315I8F30p210Relapsed (6)WTT315I9F57p190Remission (13)WTN.A.10F34p190Remission (5)WTN.A.11M52p190Remission (12)WTN.A.12F73p210Remission (23)WTN.A.13M72p190Remission (20)WTN.A.N.A., not applicable


Experimental designWT Y342Y E292GBCR<strong>KD</strong>ABL1.Amplific<strong>at</strong>ion of<strong>the</strong> BCR-ABL <strong>KD</strong>(a.a 206-524)by nestedRT-PCR andlig<strong>at</strong>ion into aplasmidlacZlacZpCR2.1TOPOvectorAMP R4.Directsequencing of150 to 200independentclones2.Transform<strong>at</strong>ionof E. colicompetent cells3.Pl<strong>at</strong>ing andovernightincub<strong>at</strong>ion<strong>at</strong> 37°C


Results (I)Aberrant <strong>Bcr</strong>-<strong>Abl</strong> <strong>KD</strong> sequences were detectedin ALL <strong>the</strong> p<strong>at</strong>ientsinsertionsdeletionspoint <strong>mut<strong>at</strong>ions</strong>missense (→ amino acid change)silent (→ no amino acid change)nonsense (→ prem<strong>at</strong>ure stop codon)N216139184


Results (II)Point <strong>mut<strong>at</strong>ions</strong> were randomly and uniformly distributedall over <strong>the</strong> <strong>KD</strong>Most of <strong>the</strong>m were not likely to be clinically relevantP-loop C-helix SH3 contact SH2 contact A-loopP216P K245R Y257H E275E E292G T315I E334E I360T T392I Q477stopK222E G249S Y264C E281K I293T F317L V335V A366A H396PD223N G250RA288T V304I/A T319A N336D R367stop I403TG227G Q252stop V289A R307Q Y326Y A337A K378E W405CV228A Y253YL327L Y342Y A380A A407AS229T/P G254EA344T L384PC346stop T389TE352G/KY353YMut<strong>at</strong>ions th<strong>at</strong> have been reported in im<strong>at</strong>inib-resistant pts are highlighted


N12345678910111213St<strong>at</strong>us (<strong>time</strong> from<strong>the</strong> start ofdas<strong>at</strong>inib, mo)Relapsed (10)Relapsed (6)Relapsed (7)Relapsed (4)Relapsed (8)Relapsed (7)Relapsed (2)Relapsed (6)Remission (13)Remission (5)Remission (12)Remission (23)Remission (20)Results (III)Each In In two contrast, p<strong>at</strong>ients, had an <strong>the</strong> F317L evidence T315I detected observed of two <strong>at</strong> to diagnosis <strong>at</strong> twelve relapse different failed could to <strong>already</strong> <strong>mut<strong>at</strong>ions</strong> expandbedetected <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>time</strong> of diagnosisSexMMMFFFFFFFMFMAge49565647745859305734527372<strong>Bcr</strong>-<strong>Abl</strong>typep190p210p210p190p210p210p210p210p190p190p190p210p190Mut<strong>at</strong>ions* <strong>at</strong> diagnosis (total no. of clones sequenced)L266P; A337A (150)K222E; V289A; V335V; K378E (180)V228A; R307Q; W405C (150)E275E; E281K; T319A; N336D (200)K245R; I293T; V304I; D363D; R367stop; K378E; 39 bp ins (180)G250R; L327L; I360T (150)G227G; I293T; V304I; T315I; C346stop; W405C (200)P216P; Y264C; T315I; A344T (150)D223N; S229T; Q252stop; L384P; T392I; A407A;del(cggga)1343 (200)S229P; K245R; A288T; 171 bp ins (200)G254E; Y326Y; E334E (150)E286E; E352K; A380A; T389T; Q477stop (150)G249S; Y253Y; Y257H; E292G; T304A; F317L; Y342Y; E352G;Y353Y; A366A; H396P; I403T (200)* Each mut<strong>at</strong>ion was detected by bidirectional sequencing in 2 to 5 independent clonesMut<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>at</strong>relapse(direct seq)T315IT315IWTWTT315IE255KT315IT315IN.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.N.A.


Results (IV)55/61(90%) nucleotide substitutions were transitionsTransitions:G>AA>GT>CC>TTotalTransversions:G>TA>TT>AT>GA>CTotal1514131355211116Such a high prevalenceof transitions (whichnormally occur 1.4 <strong>time</strong>smore frequently thantransversions) suggeststh<strong>at</strong> a specific mechanismgener<strong>at</strong>ing <strong>mut<strong>at</strong>ions</strong> ispredominant


Take-home messagesa) <strong>Bcr</strong>-<strong>Abl</strong> <strong>KD</strong> <strong>mut<strong>at</strong>ions</strong> can probably be found <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong><strong>time</strong> of diagnosis in all Ph+ ALL ptsb) TKI-resistant <strong>mut<strong>at</strong>ions</strong> present <strong>at</strong> low levels <strong>at</strong>diagnosis do not always outgrow and lead to relapse,probably because some of <strong>the</strong>m arise in cell cloneswith limited self-renewal capacityc) It is essential to understand <strong>the</strong> molecularmechanism(s) sustaining this “mut<strong>at</strong>or phenotype” aswell as how to <strong>the</strong>rapeutically interfere with <strong>the</strong>m


AcknowledgmentsDepartment of Hem<strong>at</strong>ology and Oncological Sciences “L. e A. Seràgnoli”,University of Bologna, ItalyMichele BaccaraniGiovanni MartinelliAlessandra GnaniSabrina ColarossiStefania PaoliniIlaria IacobucciCristina PapayannidisAnnalisa LonettiMarilina AmabileDepartment of Hem<strong>at</strong>ology and Cellular Biotechnologies, “La Sapienza” University,Rome, ItalyRobin FoàAntonella VitaleMarco VignettiLoredana EliaGiovanna MeloniAnna GuariniFranco MandelliGIMEMA ALL WORKING PARTY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!