12.07.2015 Views

Metal Stocks in Society – Scientific Synthesis - UNEP

Metal Stocks in Society – Scientific Synthesis - UNEP

Metal Stocks in Society – Scientific Synthesis - UNEP

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Metal</strong> <strong>Stocks</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Society</strong> – <strong>Scientific</strong> <strong>Synthesis</strong>mate of <strong>in</strong>-use stocks for some 20 elements<strong>in</strong> Japan; he found that the Japanese <strong>in</strong>-usestocks of gold, <strong>in</strong>dium, silver, t<strong>in</strong>, and tantalumwere 10 – 20 % of estimated virg<strong>in</strong> reservesof those metals, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g the importanceof enhanced reserach efforts for theseless-abundant metals.For the more-developed countries, there issufficient <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> Table 1 to computean average person’s allocation of <strong>in</strong>-usemetal stock. Do<strong>in</strong>g so demonstrates thedependence of modern lifestyles on a substantialstock of metal, a perspective especiallyuseful because few <strong>in</strong>dividuals areaware of their share of metals <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>frastructuressuch as communications, rail networks,and power generation and distributionsystems, as well as <strong>in</strong> their personal homesand vehicles. The average more-developedcountry citizen’s <strong>in</strong>-use metal stock is betweenten and fifteen metric tons. Of thisamount, five metals – iron, alum<strong>in</strong>ium,copper, z<strong>in</strong>c, and manganese, make up morethan 98 %.One feature of the limited data is that thereappear to be significant differences atpresent <strong>in</strong> the per capita <strong>in</strong>-use stock of themore-developed and less-developed countries.Additionally, when measured at differentspatial levels suburban residents appearto have larger per capita <strong>in</strong>-use stock thando urban or especially rural residents, althoughthis is an observation that needs <strong>in</strong>putfrom future research on <strong>in</strong>-use stock variations.Given the obvious wealth discrepancies,these results seem qualitatively reasonable,but much work rema<strong>in</strong>s to be done tobetter understand stocks from a spatial (orspatial analytical level) perspective. An additionalfactor is that tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account an entirenation may <strong>in</strong>crease the per capita <strong>in</strong>-usestock due to <strong>in</strong>frastructure and other <strong>in</strong>-usef<strong>in</strong>al goods that occur only <strong>in</strong> sparsely populatedareas. Such f<strong>in</strong>al goods may <strong>in</strong>cludeships, large trucks, heavy <strong>in</strong>dustrial equipment,offshore drill<strong>in</strong>g equipment, railways,military hardware, and aircraft.Table 3.. Extant In-Use<strong>Metal</strong> StockEstimationsfor Specialty<strong>Metal</strong>s. a<strong>Metal</strong>Number ofestimatesPercent ofall estimatesGlobal percapita stockMDC percapita stock bAntimony 1 0.8 1Cadmium 3 2.5 40 80Chromium 3 2.5 7 – 50Cobalt 1 0.8 1Magnesium 1 0.8 5Manganese 1 0.8 100Mercury 1 0.8 10LDC percapita stock cMolybdenum1 0.8 3Nickel 3 2.5 2 – 4T<strong>in</strong> 2 1.6 3Titanium 1 0.8 13Tungsten 1 0.8 119a/b/c see table 2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!