12.07.2015 Views

Potential health risks of exposure to noise from personal music ...

Potential health risks of exposure to noise from personal music ...

Potential health risks of exposure to noise from personal music ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Health <strong>risks</strong> <strong>from</strong> <strong>exposure</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>noise</strong> <strong>from</strong> <strong>personal</strong> <strong>music</strong> players3.4.5. ConclusionsHearing impairment may be defined as a reduction in hearing acuity or sensitivity, ortinnitus. Hearing loss is the inability <strong>of</strong> the affected individual <strong>to</strong> hear sounds at certainlevels that can be measured with pure-<strong>to</strong>ne audiometry. According <strong>to</strong> the WHO Grades <strong>of</strong>hearing loss no or very slight hearing problems exist when hearing threshold in thebetter ear is at or below 25 dB.The reduction in hearing acuity results in the impairment <strong>of</strong> speech understanding.High-frequency hearing loss, which is typical for age and <strong>noise</strong>-related hearingimpairments may result in worsening speech-in-<strong>noise</strong> comprehension. It is on average by1.2 dB per 10 dB. The ability <strong>to</strong> understand speech may be also impaired despite anormal audiometric threshold due <strong>to</strong> loss <strong>of</strong> timing information.Tinnitus defined as “a phan<strong>to</strong>m perception <strong>of</strong> sound" is a common problem. It is usuallyoriginating within the audi<strong>to</strong>ry system and is caused by abnormal conditions in thecochlea, the cochlear nerve, the ascending audi<strong>to</strong>ry pathway, or the audi<strong>to</strong>ry cortex.Hearing ability deteriorates with increasing age in virtually all people and thisdeterioration accelerates for older people. In young adults, up <strong>to</strong> the age <strong>of</strong> 40, thisprocess is slow and leads <strong>to</strong> negligible levels <strong>of</strong> hearing impairment.3.5. Noise-induced hearing loss and associated impairmentsNoise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) accrues progressively and <strong>of</strong>ten unnoticed until it hasreached a certain degree. The main site <strong>of</strong> impairment is the outer hair cells <strong>of</strong> thecochlea, where the damage is irreversible (Bamiou and Lutman 2007). Very high levels <strong>of</strong><strong>noise</strong> <strong>exposure</strong> can lead <strong>to</strong> acute mechanical damage <strong>to</strong> inner and outer hair cells, butthis form <strong>of</strong> damage is very rare. More commonly, there is chronic damage that builds upslowly over time. Since <strong>noise</strong>-induced hearing loss is irreversible, the main form <strong>of</strong>treatment is prevention.3.5.1. Epidemiology <strong>of</strong> <strong>noise</strong>-induced hearing lossExposure <strong>to</strong> excessive <strong>noise</strong> is one major cause <strong>of</strong> hearing disorders worldwide. TheWord Health Organization programme for Prevention <strong>of</strong> Deafness and HearingImpairment (WHO 1997, Smith 1998) stated: "Exposure <strong>to</strong> excessive <strong>noise</strong> is the majoravoidable cause <strong>of</strong> permanent hearing impairment worldwide. Noise-induced hearing lossis the most prevalent irreversible industrial disease, and the biggest compensatableoccupational hazard. More research is needed on basic mechanisms and means <strong>of</strong>prevention". In a more recent report WHO states (WHO 2002, Nelson 2005) “Worldwide,16% <strong>of</strong> the disabling hearing loss in adults is attributed <strong>to</strong> occupational <strong>noise</strong>, ranging<strong>from</strong> 7% <strong>to</strong> 21% in the various subregions”. Surveys estimate that <strong>noise</strong>-induced hearingloss (NIHL) affects 10 <strong>to</strong> 15 million people in the USA (see Lynch and Kil 2005). In theUK (Palmer et al 2002b) showed that some about 180,000 people aged 35-64 years wereestimated <strong>to</strong> have severe hearing difficulties attributable <strong>to</strong> <strong>noise</strong> at work and for tinnitusthis increased <strong>to</strong> 350,000 people who were seriously affected. In France a survey by theministry <strong>of</strong> employment (Sumer: surveillance médicale des risques pr<strong>of</strong>essionnels 2003,Magaud-Camus 2005) indicates that approximately 7% <strong>of</strong> employed workers are exposed<strong>to</strong> excessive <strong>noise</strong> levels (more than 85 dB(A) for at least 20 hours per week) and about25 % are exposed <strong>to</strong> hazardous <strong>noise</strong> <strong>exposure</strong>s (more than 85 dB(A) but less than 20hours per week); most exposed workers belong <strong>to</strong> industry (18%) and, <strong>to</strong> agricultureand house building (12%). Legally acceptable levels <strong>of</strong> <strong>noise</strong> <strong>exposure</strong> were definedmany years ago taking in<strong>to</strong> account the two main physical parameters <strong>of</strong> acousticintensity and duration <strong>of</strong> <strong>exposure</strong> as used for reference above.In order <strong>to</strong> better counteract NIHL a European directive that <strong>to</strong>ok effect in February2006, lowered the first action level (provide protection) <strong>to</strong> 80 dB(A) (Directive2003/10/EC, 2003). Acute acoustic trauma <strong>from</strong> firearms is the most frequent pathology26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!