REMUNERATION REPORTIntroductionThis <strong>report</strong> and <strong>the</strong> recommendations of <strong>the</strong> remuneration committeehave been approved without amendment by <strong>the</strong> board forsubmission to shareholders.O<strong>the</strong>r than as is specifically indicated in this <strong>report</strong>, <strong>the</strong> committeeintends to apply <strong>the</strong> same policies to each component of executivedirector remuneration in <strong>the</strong> future as in <strong>the</strong> year under review.This <strong>report</strong> complies with <strong>the</strong> Directors’ Remuneration ReportRegulations 2002, and, except where noted below, <strong>the</strong> companyapplied throughout <strong>the</strong> <strong>report</strong>ing year <strong>the</strong> provisions of <strong>the</strong> 2003Combined Code relating to remuneration.Information not subject to auditComposition and terms of reference of <strong>the</strong> remunerationcommittee (<strong>the</strong> committee)During <strong>the</strong> financial year ended 31 March <strong>2007</strong>, <strong>the</strong> membersof <strong>the</strong> committee were Mr Morland (Chairman), Lord Fellowes,Mr Manser and Mr Manzoni. Lord Renwick of Clifton, Mr Bible,Mr Santo Domingo and Mr Kahn joined meetings as observers andalso present were <strong>the</strong> Chief Executive, Mr Mackay, <strong>the</strong> CompanySecretary, Mr Davidson, and <strong>the</strong> Deputy Company Secretary,Mr Shapiro, o<strong>the</strong>r than when <strong>the</strong>ir own remuneration was discussed.The committee deals with <strong>the</strong> remuneration of <strong>the</strong> executive directorsand o<strong>the</strong>r members of <strong>the</strong> executive committee, as well as approvingall grants and awards under <strong>the</strong> company’s share incentive plans,in accordance with terms of reference approved by <strong>the</strong> board.Consideration is also given to <strong>the</strong> company’s groupwidecompensation and incentive policies to ensure alignment.AdvisersIn <strong>the</strong> course of its deliberations, <strong>the</strong> committee has considered <strong>the</strong>views of <strong>the</strong> Chief Executive on <strong>the</strong> remuneration and performance of<strong>the</strong> members of <strong>the</strong> executive committee. The Company Secretary,<strong>the</strong> Human Resources Director and <strong>the</strong> Head of Compensationand Benefits have also provided information to <strong>the</strong> committee relatingto <strong>the</strong> co-ordination of global pay policies, expatriate and local payfor international deployments, and equity usage through shareincentive plans.Kepler Associates and Mercer Human Resource Consulting havebeen appointed by <strong>the</strong> committee to provide advice on marketinformation and o<strong>the</strong>r remuneration matters. Kepler Associates doesnot provide any o<strong>the</strong>r advice or services to <strong>the</strong> group. Mercer alsoprovides advice to <strong>the</strong> company on pensions and risk matters.Remuneration policiesThe overall policy of <strong>the</strong> committee has been to ensure that executivedirectors and senior managers are rewarded for <strong>the</strong>ir contribution to<strong>the</strong> group’s operating and financial performance at levels which takeaccount of industry, market and country benchmarks. The basicobjective of <strong>the</strong> policy is that members of <strong>the</strong> executive committeeshould receive remuneration which is appropriate to <strong>the</strong>ir scale ofresponsibility and performance, and which will attract, motivate andretain individuals of <strong>the</strong> necessary calibre. The committee takesaccount of <strong>the</strong> need to be competitive in <strong>the</strong> different parts of <strong>the</strong>world in which <strong>the</strong> company operates.The committee has implemented its policy of agreeing aremuneration package for each executive director comprising anannual base salary, an annual cash bonus plan, long-term incentivesthrough participation in share option and performance share plans,pension contributions, o<strong>the</strong>r security and health benefits, and benefitsin kind. The base salaries, pensions and o<strong>the</strong>r benefits provided areintended to establish a level of ‘fixed’ pay which is competitive withappropriate comparators. The variable pay elements provided byshort-term and long-term incentives form a significant proportion ofexecutive directors’ pay and are intended to provide <strong>the</strong> opportunityfor executives to earn superior total pay for superior company andindividual performance. The table and charts below show <strong>the</strong> ratiosof performance-related compensation to base salary and benefitsof <strong>the</strong> executive directors, and <strong>the</strong> relative value of <strong>the</strong> differentelements, including <strong>the</strong> target bonus and fair value of <strong>the</strong> long-termshare-based compensation awarded in <strong>the</strong> year under review. Theratios are in line with <strong>the</strong> committee’s policy on <strong>the</strong> balance betweenfixed and variable pay.In order to align <strong>the</strong> interests of <strong>the</strong> executive directors and executivecommittee members with <strong>the</strong> interests of shareholders, shareincentives are considered to be critical elements of executiveremuneration policy. The committee considers that all elementsof <strong>the</strong> package are of importance in supporting <strong>the</strong> group’sremuneration policy.Target remuneration levels for <strong>the</strong> executive directors are set withreference to a group of 30 FTSE companies being ranked in <strong>the</strong> 15places ei<strong>the</strong>r side of <strong>SABMiller</strong> <strong>plc</strong> in terms of market capitalisation.The committee continued to have regard to pay levels and practicesin <strong>the</strong> company’s principal international competitors and incompanies in <strong>the</strong> USA and South Africa comparable to its divisionsin those countries.Salary £ Retirement £ Benefits £ Bonus £ LTI £ Total £ % Fixed Variable %EAG Mackay 950,000 285,000 120,032 1,450,000 2,373,984 5,179,016 26.2 73.8MI Wyman 575,000 172,500 152,227 565,000 1,445,034 2,909,761 30.9 69.1Performance related compensation (%)EAG MackayMI WymanSalary 18.3%Pension 5.5%Bonus 28.0%LTI 45.9%Benefits 2.3%Salary 19.8%Pension 5.9%Bonus 19.4%LTI 49.7%Benefits 5.2%48<strong>SABMiller</strong> <strong>plc</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> Report <strong>2007</strong> Remuneration <strong>report</strong>
As previously <strong>report</strong>ed, <strong>the</strong> committee last year reviewed <strong>the</strong>structure of pay arrangements for <strong>the</strong> executive directors andmembers of <strong>the</strong> executive committee including grant levels,performance criteria and vesting schedules. The committeeconsidered <strong>the</strong> retesting of <strong>the</strong> performance condition for vesting ofoptions granted under <strong>the</strong> company’s Approved and No. 2 Schemes(as defined on page 50) and decided that <strong>the</strong> limited retestingprovision should be removed for all future awards under <strong>the</strong> plan.The committee also considered <strong>the</strong> use of matching shares under<strong>the</strong> Performance Share Scheme (whereby executives who retainownership of shares awarded to <strong>the</strong>m after <strong>the</strong> initial three-yearperformance period, and who remain in employment with <strong>the</strong> groupfor a fur<strong>the</strong>r two-year period, become eligible to receive an additional50% of <strong>the</strong> initial number of shares vesting) and decided that in future<strong>the</strong> additional 50% will be incorporated into <strong>the</strong> initial award and aperformance condition applied to this portion of <strong>the</strong> award over afive-year period. These changes were applied to <strong>the</strong> options grantedand awards made in May 2006 and will apply to future optionsand awards.The committee also considered last year <strong>the</strong> need to ensure anappropriate balance of performance measures in <strong>the</strong> group’s longtermincentives. The committee decided that vesting for 50% offuture awards of performance shares would be subject to <strong>SABMiller</strong>’sTotal Shareholder Return (TSR) performance condition, and 50%would be subject to three-year adjusted earnings per share (EPS)growth, with targets set according to <strong>the</strong> committee’s judgementafter considering, among o<strong>the</strong>r factors, historical and forecastadjusted EPS growth for <strong>SABMiller</strong>’s peers (listed on page 51). For<strong>the</strong> period 2006 to 2009 <strong>the</strong> committee set last year an EPS growthtarget of 11% p.a. for full vesting with threshold vesting of 25% at6% p.a., measured in US dollars. For regional managing directors<strong>the</strong> profit element is based on regional, segmental EBITA targets over<strong>the</strong> three-year fiscal cycle for <strong>the</strong>ir respective regions. For <strong>the</strong> period<strong>2007</strong> to 2010 <strong>the</strong> committee has set an EPS growth target of11% p.a. for full vesting with threshold vesting of 25% at 6% p.a.,measured in US dollars. For regional managing directors <strong>the</strong> profitelement is again based on regional, segmental EBITA targets over<strong>the</strong> three-year fiscal cycle for <strong>the</strong>ir respective regions.The committee has reviewed <strong>the</strong> way in which <strong>the</strong> TSR performancecondition should operate in <strong>the</strong> case of TSR performance above<strong>the</strong> median of <strong>the</strong> peer group. It has determined that for <strong>the</strong> period<strong>2007</strong> to 2010 and for future periods, <strong>the</strong> maximum number of sharesshould be earned if <strong>the</strong> company’s TSR for <strong>the</strong> period exceeds <strong>the</strong>median by 25% with respect to <strong>the</strong> three-year vesting test and by33% with respect to <strong>the</strong> five-year vesting test. Of <strong>the</strong> maximumnumber of shares 25% will continue to be earned for TSRperformance at <strong>the</strong> median of <strong>the</strong> peer group. Intermediate outcomeswill result in a pro rata number of shares earned.The committee also resolved last year that future awards under<strong>the</strong> company’s long-term incentive plans will be determined primarilyby reference to <strong>the</strong> number of shares and options ra<strong>the</strong>r than asa multiple of base salary. De-linking <strong>the</strong> size of share-based awardsfrom salary will, in <strong>the</strong> committee’s view, support a more appropriateallocation of awards among executives and will avoid potentiallyinappropriate changes in <strong>the</strong> size of awards simply as a result of a riseor fall in share price. This philosophy has been continued this year.Base payThe committee reviews <strong>the</strong> salaries of executive directors at <strong>the</strong>beginning of each financial year. Details of <strong>the</strong> salaries applying from1 April <strong>2007</strong> and <strong>the</strong> percentage changes from 31 March <strong>2007</strong> levelsfor <strong>the</strong> executive directors are shown in <strong>the</strong> table below:<strong>2007</strong> 2008 % changeExecutive directors Salary Salary fromat 31 March <strong>2007</strong> £ £ <strong>2007</strong>EAG Mackay 950,000 1,020,000 7.4MI Wyman 575,000 615,000 7.0The committee received advice from consultants and <strong>the</strong> ChiefExecutive on appropriate pay levels for <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r members of <strong>the</strong>company’s executive committee:■■■■for those executives based in <strong>the</strong> UK, salaries were determinedby reference to appropriate UK benchmarksfor those executives, o<strong>the</strong>r than those resident in <strong>the</strong> USA,whose primary responsibilities were for operations of businessunits outside <strong>the</strong> UK, part of base pay was related to appropriatebenchmarks in <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>the</strong>atres of operation and <strong>the</strong> balance toUK pay levelsin <strong>the</strong> case of <strong>the</strong> executives responsible for <strong>the</strong> South African,European and Africa/Asia operations respectively, salary wasdetermined on <strong>the</strong> assessment that 30% of <strong>the</strong>ir time was spenton <strong>SABMiller</strong> <strong>plc</strong> duties and <strong>the</strong>refore related to <strong>the</strong> UK andglobal markets, while 70% was on duties for <strong>the</strong>ir businessesin <strong>the</strong>ir regionsUS salary levels have been determined by reference to <strong>the</strong>relevant US market comparators<strong>Annual</strong> incentive plansEach of <strong>the</strong> executive directors and members of <strong>the</strong> executivecommittee is entitled to participate in an annual bonus plan thatrewards <strong>the</strong> achievement of group financial, divisional financial (whereapplicable), strategic and personal performance objectives agreed by<strong>the</strong> committee. The Chief Executive may earn a bonus of up to 175%of base salary. The Chief Financial Officer may earn a bonus of up to120% of base salary and o<strong>the</strong>r executive committee members mayearn bonuses of up to 120% on <strong>the</strong>ir pay in <strong>the</strong> UK and 150% in <strong>the</strong>USA and South Africa.The group financial performance targets for executive director annualincentive plans relate to adjusted EPS growth and EBITA. Thecommittee believes that linking short-term incentives to profit growthhelps to reinforce <strong>the</strong> company’s business objectives. The divisionalfinancial targets vary according to divisional value drivers derived fromgroup needs and include EBITA and sales volumes. Financialperformance targets comprise 60% of <strong>the</strong> incentive bonus potential.The strategic and personal targets which make up <strong>the</strong> remaining40% are specific and measurable.At its meeting on 15 May <strong>2007</strong>, <strong>the</strong> committee received assessmentsof <strong>the</strong> performance of <strong>the</strong> executives participating in <strong>the</strong> bonus plansagainst <strong>the</strong>ir agreed targets. In light of <strong>the</strong> achievement against <strong>the</strong>group financial targets and <strong>the</strong> levels of achievement against <strong>the</strong>irstrategic and personal objectives, <strong>the</strong> committee agreed <strong>the</strong>payments of bonuses as shown below to <strong>the</strong> executive directors:<strong>2007</strong>Bonus % of %£ salary achievementEAG Mackay 1,450,000 153 87MI Wyman 565,000 98 82Overview Operating and financial review Governance Financial statements Shareholder informationRemuneration <strong>report</strong> <strong>SABMiller</strong> <strong>plc</strong> <strong>Annual</strong> Report <strong>2007</strong>49