eu constitutionalisation - EUROPEUM Institute for European Policy

Chapter 2: The Convention and IGC Texts of the Constitutiong FISCHER, J. (2000), From Confederacy to freedom – Thoughts on the Finality ofEuropean Integration, speech at the Humboldt University, 12 May 2000, Berlin.g FOLLESDAL, A. (2002), Drafting a European Constitution – Challenges andopportunities, Constitutionalism Web Papers,(Manchester: Manchester University).g GREVI, G. (2004) Light and shade of a quasi constitution. An assessment,EPC Policy Paper, (Bruxelles: European Policy Centre), p. 1–12.g HOFFMANN, L. (2002), The Convention on the Future of Europe – Thoughts on theConvention-model, Jean Monnet Working Paper- NYU School of Law, New York.g Intervention of Andrew Duff at the Conference Towards a European Constitution,Goodenough College, London, 1–2 July 2004.g Introductory speech of the president Valéry Giscard d’Estaing to the EuropeanConvention, 26 February 2002 (SN 1565/02).g Laeken Declaration on the Future of the European Union (Laeken EuropeanCouncil, 14–15 Dec 2001).g MAGNETTE, P.(2004), La Convention Européenne: argumenter et négocier dansune assemblée constituante multinationale, Revue Française de SciencePolitique, volume 54 № 1.g MAGNETTE, P. and NICOLAIDIS, K. (2004) Coping with the Lilliput syndrome.Large vs. Small member states in the European Convention, PolitiqueEuropéenne Vol. 13, p. 69-95g MAGNETTE, P ET NICOLAIDIS K. (2004), The European Convention: bargainingin the shadow of rhetoric, West European Politics, Vol. 27(3), p. 381-404.g MAURER, A. (2003), The European Parliament, the National Parliaments and theEU Conventions, in Politique Européenne, Vol. 9 (Hiver), p. 76-98.g MORAVCSIK, A. and Nicolaidis, K (1999), Explaining the Treaty of Amsterdam:interests, influence institutions. Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 37(1),p. 59-85.g POLLAK, J. (2004) “The Convention Hype: Visions of Representation”, Paperpresented at CIDEL Workshop London, Constitution Making and DemocraticLegitimacy in the European Union, 12 – 13 November 2004, London.g Preliminary draft of the Constitutional Treaty (CONV 369/02), 28 October 2002.g Presidency Conclusions, Seville European Council, 21 and 22 June 2002.g Propositions conjointes franco-allemandes dans le doamine de la justice et desaffaires intérieures (CONV 435/02).g Propositions conjointes franco-allemandes pour la Convention européenne dansle domaine de la politique européenne de securité et de défense (CONV 422/02).g «Réformer les procédures de révision des traités – Deuxième rapport sur laréorganisation des Traités de l’Union Européenne», 31 juillet 2000 (EUI : Florence).Chapter 2: The Convention and IGC Texts of the Constitutiong REH, C. and WESSELS, W (2002), Towards an innovative mode of treaty reform?Three sets of expectations for the Convention, Collegium, Vol. 24, p. 17-41.g REICH, C. (2004) Le Conseil législatif: “chimère ou réalité?, Revue du Marchécommun et de l’Union européenne, Vol. 479, p. 361-366.g RISSE, T. (2003), Let’s argue: communicative action in world politics,International organization, Vol. 54(1), p. 1-39.g SCHONLAU, J. (2003), Conventional wisdom? Comparing deliberative interactionin the European Conventions Mark I and II, Paper presented at the CIDELConference “Deliberative constitutional politics in the EU”, Albarracin, Zaragoza.g Traité établissant une Constitution pour l’Europe (CONV 850/03).g Traité établissant une Constitution pour l’Europe (CIG 87/2/04).g VERHOFSTADT, G. (2000), «A Vision of Europe», Speech by the Belgian primeminister at the European Policy Centre (21 September, 2000), Brussels.g WEIZSACKER R., DEHAENE. J. L. and SIMON, D. (1999), Report on the futureenlargement of the European Union (18 October, 1999).g ZARTMAN, W. and RUBIN, J. Z (2000), Symmetry and asymmetry in negotiation,in Power and Negotiation, W. Zartman and J.Z. Rubin (eds.),(Michigan: The University of Michigan Press), p. 271-291.72 73