01.12.2012 Views

Consultancy Study on Sport for All - Participation Patterns of Hong ...

Consultancy Study on Sport for All - Participation Patterns of Hong ...

Consultancy Study on Sport for All - Participation Patterns of Hong ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>sultancy</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Study</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> -<br />

Participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>Patterns</strong> <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g People in Physical Activities<br />

Summary Report<br />

(August 2009)<br />

Commissi<strong>on</strong>ed by Co-ordinated by<br />

Community <strong>Sport</strong>s Committee<br />

<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Sport</strong>s Commissi<strong>on</strong><br />

Submitted by<br />

The Chinese University <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong>s Science & Physical Educati<strong>on</strong><br />

Leisure and Cultural<br />

Services Department


Background<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>sultancy</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Study</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> -<br />

Participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>Patterns</strong> <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g People in Physical Activities<br />

Summary Report<br />

Different government departments (such as the Home Affairs Bureau, the<br />

Leisure and Cultural Services Department (LCSD), the Department <strong>of</strong> Health and the<br />

Educati<strong>on</strong> Bureau) and related organisati<strong>on</strong>s (such as the <strong>Sport</strong>s Federati<strong>on</strong> and Olympic<br />

Committee <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g, China, various nati<strong>on</strong>al sports associati<strong>on</strong>s and sports<br />

organisati<strong>on</strong>s, local sports groups and schools) have all al<strong>on</strong>g committed to providing<br />

diversified community sports services <strong>for</strong> the public and encouraging active participati<strong>on</strong> in<br />

sports activities across different sectors <strong>of</strong> the community to promote the culture <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>. These services have been implemented <strong>for</strong> years. It is now the opportune time to<br />

put in place a systematic and objective mechanism to gauge the level <strong>of</strong> public participati<strong>on</strong><br />

in sports and the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the relevant work in the community. In August 2006, the<br />

Community <strong>Sport</strong>s Committee (CSC) endorsed the six strategies <strong>for</strong> promoting community<br />

sports. One <strong>of</strong> the strategies was to <strong>for</strong>mulate indicators to measure the effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

the promoti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> in the community. It was hoped that by c<strong>on</strong>ducting a<br />

large-scale study <strong>on</strong> the participati<strong>on</strong> patterns <strong>of</strong> public physical activities, such as the extent,<br />

frequency, etc., and by objectively measuring the level <strong>of</strong> penetrati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> in the<br />

society, the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> all ef<strong>for</strong>ts <strong>for</strong> promoting community sports will be effectively<br />

assessed, and the findings may be used as the reference <strong>for</strong> setting future objectives. In<br />

January 2007, “the Working Group <strong>on</strong> the Formulati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Indicators <strong>for</strong> Measuring the<br />

Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>” (the Working Group) was set up under the CSC to deal with<br />

the matter.<br />

2. In a meeting held <strong>on</strong> 8 June 2007, the CSC endorsed the proposal <strong>on</strong> the study<br />

<strong>on</strong> the Participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>Patterns</strong> <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g People in Physical Activities (the study)<br />

submitted by the Working Group. In September 2007, the LCSD appointed the<br />

Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong>s Science and Physical Educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> The Chinese University <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g<br />

K<strong>on</strong>g (the C<strong>on</strong>sultant) to undertake a literature review, <strong>for</strong>mulate survey proposals,<br />

supervise the implementati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the survey and prepare a comprehensive final report. On 20<br />

February 2008, the Working Group submitted the c<strong>on</strong>sultancy study report <strong>on</strong> the literature<br />

review and the survey proposals to the CSC and members agreed to c<strong>on</strong>duct a household<br />

survey. On April 2008, the LCSD then appointed the C<strong>on</strong>sumer Search to c<strong>on</strong>duct a<br />

household survey in May and September. The C<strong>on</strong>sultant submitted a report to the<br />

Working Group <strong>on</strong> 27 November. The report c<strong>on</strong>sists <strong>of</strong> three parts: the result <strong>of</strong> the<br />

literature review, survey results and research findings, providing the focus <strong>for</strong> further<br />

studies and the way <strong>for</strong>ward <strong>for</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>.<br />

Objectives<br />

3. The objectives <strong>of</strong> this study are:<br />

i) To identify the trend and development <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> in selected<br />

countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities in the past five years;<br />

1


Methodology<br />

ii) To benchmark overseas practices in measuring sports and physical activity<br />

(PA) participati<strong>on</strong>;<br />

iii) To identify the participati<strong>on</strong> patterns in those countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities;<br />

iv) To identify indicators to measure the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the promoti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> policy in H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g as compared with those<br />

countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities;<br />

v) To identify and analyse the patterns <strong>of</strong> PA participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g<br />

citizens; and<br />

vi) To propose the way <strong>for</strong>ward <strong>for</strong> the future implementati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong><br />

<strong>All</strong> policy in H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g.<br />

4. To achieve the above objectives, the c<strong>on</strong>sultancy study is divided into two<br />

phases: Phase I c<strong>on</strong>sists <strong>of</strong> the literature review <strong>of</strong> 10 Western and Asia-Pacific<br />

countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities to understand the trend and development <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> in those<br />

countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities; and Phase II is a face-to-face random household survey intended<br />

to collect the patterns <strong>of</strong> sports and PA participati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Literature Review<br />

5. To better understand the <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> policies worldwide, a literature review<br />

was c<strong>on</strong>ducted at the initial stage <strong>of</strong> the study. Apart from H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g, ten<br />

countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities, including Canada, the European Uni<strong>on</strong>, the UK, the USA,<br />

Australia, China, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan were selected <strong>for</strong> the review.<br />

The <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> policies and relevant survey results <strong>of</strong> these countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities<br />

were also reviewed.<br />

6. Although it is clear that different countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities adopt different<br />

philosophies <strong>for</strong> sports promoti<strong>on</strong> and different definiti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>, there is a<br />

general trend that most countries, such as the USA, the UK, Singapore and China,<br />

emphasise exercise participati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g the general populati<strong>on</strong> and recognise the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> health improvement and maintenance through PA participati<strong>on</strong>. It is also<br />

suggested that educati<strong>on</strong>al systems and school envir<strong>on</strong>ments are effective channels to<br />

promote PA/sports participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>for</strong> children and adolescents. Guidelines are proposed <strong>for</strong><br />

various levels <strong>of</strong> the society, such as schools, communities, families and individuals, to<br />

promote <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>. A summary <strong>of</strong> these guidelines is given in Appendix A.<br />

7. It is also observed that many countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities under review have<br />

introduced measurable nati<strong>on</strong>al objectives. For example, the UK aims at increasing PA<br />

participati<strong>on</strong> from 30% to 70% by 2020. Such tangible objectives provide clear directi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

<strong>for</strong> various stakeholders <strong>of</strong> the community to take up the comm<strong>on</strong> missi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> achieving the<br />

nati<strong>on</strong>al objectives. Moreover, most countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities agree that PA/sports<br />

participati<strong>on</strong> must be habitual. Most <strong>of</strong> them adopt “engaging in moderately intense<br />

2


PA/sports <strong>for</strong> an average <strong>of</strong> three times a week and <strong>for</strong> at least 30 minutes per day” as the<br />

basic requirement (e.g. the UK, China and Taiwan).<br />

8. Other than adopting the basic indicators <strong>for</strong> PA participati<strong>on</strong> as menti<strong>on</strong>ed above,<br />

some countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities also emphasise other aspects <strong>for</strong> promoting <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>.<br />

For example, Canada points out that <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> should include encouraging citizens to get<br />

involved in volunteer work related to sports (sports volunteers) and to participate in sports<br />

events as spectators.<br />

Definiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>, <strong>Sport</strong>s and Physical Activities<br />

9. A number <strong>of</strong> internati<strong>on</strong>al organisati<strong>on</strong>s, such as the European <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong><br />

Charter, the Internati<strong>on</strong>al Charter <strong>of</strong> Physical Educati<strong>on</strong> and <strong>Sport</strong>, the Trim and Fitness<br />

Internati<strong>on</strong>al <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> Associati<strong>on</strong> (TAFISA) and the <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> Commissi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Internati<strong>on</strong>al Olympic Committee, have given various definiti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>.<br />

Although there are some slight differences in the focus and terminologies in the definiti<strong>on</strong>s,<br />

the organisati<strong>on</strong>s all recognise the nati<strong>on</strong>al resp<strong>on</strong>sibility to ensure that every citizen has<br />

equal right to participate in sports and PA, and the stakeholders c<strong>on</strong>cerned, including the<br />

government and n<strong>on</strong>-government agencies, play important roles in achieving the provisi<strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> sports and PA participati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

10. To sum up, we adopt the definiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> in this study as followed:<br />

“‘<strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>’ refers to creating opportunities and favourable envir<strong>on</strong>ment through the<br />

collaborati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> stakeholders and government to enable every<strong>on</strong>e, regardless <strong>of</strong> gender,<br />

age, ability, socio-ec<strong>on</strong>omic status, or ethnicity, to participate freely in physical activities<br />

and sport.”<br />

11. In this study, “Physical Activity” refers to any physical movements that<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sume energy. These include sports and daily physical tasks such as walking,<br />

housework, morning exercises, gardening and job-related manual work. “<strong>Sport</strong>” is defined<br />

as part <strong>of</strong> physical activities. Apart from physical exerti<strong>on</strong>, it usually requires sports skills<br />

with established rules <strong>for</strong> the game. Basketball, volleyball, swimming, track and field,<br />

dancing, etc. are examples <strong>of</strong> sports.<br />

Indicators Recommended to Measure Physical Activity Participati<strong>on</strong><br />

12. Two sets <strong>of</strong> indicators were used in this study to measure PA participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g people. One <strong>of</strong> them is the recent set <strong>of</strong> recommendati<strong>on</strong>s proposed by the<br />

Nati<strong>on</strong>al Associati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> and Physical Educati<strong>on</strong> (NASPE) and US Center <strong>for</strong> Disease<br />

C<strong>on</strong>trol (USCDC)/US Department <strong>of</strong> Health and Human Services (USDHHS) (USA<br />

indicator):<br />

i) For children, to engage in five days a week <strong>of</strong> at least 60 minutes<br />

(accumulated) <strong>of</strong> age-appropriate and developmental appropriate PA<br />

(recommended to be <strong>of</strong> moderate to vigorous intensity).<br />

ii) For adolescents, to engage in at least three days a week <strong>of</strong> PA that last at<br />

least 20 minutes at a time that require moderate to vigorous intensity <strong>of</strong><br />

3


exerti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

iii) For adults aged 20 or above, to engage in moderately intense PA <strong>for</strong> at<br />

least five times a week and <strong>for</strong> at least 30 minutes (accumulated) per day.<br />

Another indicator (Baseline Indicator), similar to the <strong>on</strong>e comm<strong>on</strong>ly used by other<br />

countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities and is a simpler indicator, is used to evaluate the PA<br />

participati<strong>on</strong>. For example, the UK, China and Taiwan have adopted three times a week <strong>for</strong><br />

30 minutes per day. Recent research has shown that an accumulati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> 30 minutes can also<br />

achieve similar health benefits (Miyashita, Burns, & Stensel, 2006 1 ) (Murphy & Hardman,<br />

1998 2 ). There<strong>for</strong>e, we propose the “Baseline Indicator” to mean engaging in moderately or<br />

vigorously intense PA <strong>for</strong> three times a week and <strong>for</strong> at least 30 minutes (accumulated) per<br />

day. This indicator is applicable to all age groups.<br />

Note 1: Accumulating multiple short bouts <strong>of</strong> exercise throughout the day effectively reduce<br />

postprandial plasma triacylglycerol c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s to an extent similar to that <strong>of</strong> a single<br />

30-min sessi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> exercise in healthy young men.<br />

2: Short bouts <strong>of</strong> brisk walking resulted in similar improvements in fitness and were at<br />

least as effective in decreasing body fatness as l<strong>on</strong>g bouts <strong>of</strong> the same total durati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Features <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> Policies in Reviewed Countries/Ec<strong>on</strong>omies/Cities<br />

13. There are distinct features in different countries with regard to the promoti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>. Canada and Singapore value the important role <strong>of</strong> sports excellence through<br />

the provisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> elite sports training and competiti<strong>on</strong>s. The UK and the USA are heading<br />

towards leading a trend in increasing PA <strong>for</strong> health improvement and maintenance, as well<br />

as addressing the obesity problem. Japan and China highlight the objective <strong>of</strong> improving<br />

the overall quality <strong>of</strong> life through sports and PA participati<strong>on</strong>. For example, China<br />

suggests that its citizens should subscribe to sports-related magazines regularly, and to learn<br />

at least two different lifel<strong>on</strong>g sports or PA. Canada, the European Uni<strong>on</strong> and Taiwan<br />

advocate that indirect participati<strong>on</strong> in sports either by serving as volunteers in sports event<br />

or by being sports attendees is also an important element in <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>. <strong>All</strong> these<br />

features need to be c<strong>on</strong>sidered when suggesting a suitable model <strong>for</strong> the promoti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> in H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g.<br />

Model <strong>for</strong> the Promoti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong><br />

14. When reviewing the <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> policies <strong>of</strong> the selected<br />

countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities, it is revealed that different countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities promote<br />

slightly different policies reflecting their distinct features and advantages. With reference<br />

to the key features <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> these countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities, particularly <strong>for</strong> Canada, UK,<br />

Australia, Singapore and South Korea, we come up with the following suggesti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>for</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g<br />

K<strong>on</strong>g. Other than PA/sports participati<strong>on</strong>, these countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities stress the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> and services.<br />

i) Through educati<strong>on</strong>, public knowledge and awareness <strong>of</strong> the values <strong>of</strong><br />

sports and PA to the overall quality <strong>of</strong> life would be enhanced. In additi<strong>on</strong>,<br />

positive attitude towards PA/sports participati<strong>on</strong>, as well as specific skills<br />

4


that enable an individual to engage in sports and PA, would be improved<br />

through various educati<strong>on</strong>al channels.<br />

ii) The service comp<strong>on</strong>ents should include the provisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> leisure facilities<br />

and organisati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> leisure activities by different organisati<strong>on</strong>s, which<br />

encourage people’s participati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

iii) Apart from direct participati<strong>on</strong> through sports and PA, the values <strong>of</strong><br />

indirect participati<strong>on</strong> through volunteerism and attendance in sports<br />

events are also recognised. However, because <strong>of</strong> the specific focus <strong>of</strong><br />

this study, <strong>on</strong>ly the element <strong>of</strong> direct participati<strong>on</strong> is included.<br />

15. To promote <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> via “Educati<strong>on</strong>”, “Services” and “Participati<strong>on</strong>”, not<br />

<strong>on</strong>ly the active role <strong>of</strong> the government, but also the involvement <strong>of</strong> other n<strong>on</strong>-government<br />

organisati<strong>on</strong>s such as nati<strong>on</strong>al sports associati<strong>on</strong>s and related organisati<strong>on</strong>s, local<br />

organisati<strong>on</strong>s, sp<strong>on</strong>sorships and the overall infrastructure <strong>of</strong> the society are indispensable.<br />

To summarise, a structural diagram is shown below:<br />

<strong>Sport</strong>s Participati<strong>on</strong><br />

PA Participati<strong>on</strong><br />

Survey<br />

Methodology<br />

Awareness/<br />

Knowledge<br />

Participati<strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong><br />

Educati<strong>on</strong> Services<br />

Skills/Attitude<br />

Direct Participati<strong>on</strong> Indirect Participati<strong>on</strong><br />

16. Random sampling was used to select households <strong>for</strong> the face-to-face household<br />

survey to collect in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the participati<strong>on</strong> patterns <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g people in PA. As<br />

the study was divided into three age groups (7 to 12, 13 to 19, and 20 or above), the<br />

questi<strong>on</strong>naire was specially designed to suit resp<strong>on</strong>dents <strong>of</strong> different age groups. In order<br />

to avoid variati<strong>on</strong>s in the participati<strong>on</strong> patterns <strong>of</strong> PA because <strong>of</strong> seas<strong>on</strong>al preferences, the<br />

survey was c<strong>on</strong>ducted in two phases. The first phase was carried out from 22 May to 10 July<br />

5<br />

Facilities<br />

Training<br />

Programs<br />

<strong>Sport</strong>s Volunteers<br />

<strong>Sport</strong>s Attendees


2008, to collect data <strong>on</strong> PA patterns in a relatively cold period (January to March). The<br />

sec<strong>on</strong>d phase was carried out from 2 September to 19 October 2008, to collect the data in a<br />

relatively warm period (June to August). For this survey, the Kish Grid method was used to<br />

randomly select a household member from the sampled households <strong>for</strong> interview. The<br />

resp<strong>on</strong>se rate <strong>of</strong> the main sample was 70.18%. In order to make the data more representative,<br />

the survey data were presented as weighted data.<br />

Sample Design<br />

17. There were 4 037 successful interviews <strong>for</strong> the main sample and booster sample<br />

<strong>for</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>dents aged 7 or above and 1 054 <strong>for</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>dents aged 7 to 19.<br />

Main Results<br />

18. A total <strong>of</strong> 5 091 successful random samples were interviewed. The age<br />

breakdown is shown in Table 1.<br />

Table 1. Age group distributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> successful resp<strong>on</strong>dents<br />

Age Group<br />

Successful Interviews (No.)<br />

Total Main Booster<br />

7–12 693 186 507<br />

13–19 831 284 547<br />

20 or above 3 567 3 567 -<br />

Total 5 091 4 037 1 054<br />

19. Of the total resp<strong>on</strong>dents, 48.7% were male (n=2 479) and 51.3% were female<br />

(n=2 612). The sampling distributi<strong>on</strong> by gender matches the populati<strong>on</strong> distributi<strong>on</strong> in H<strong>on</strong>g<br />

K<strong>on</strong>g.<br />

Prevalence and Frequency <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong>s Participati<strong>on</strong><br />

20. As to the frequency <strong>of</strong> participati<strong>on</strong>, 65.5% <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens aged 7 or<br />

above participated in sports at least <strong>on</strong>ce in the past three m<strong>on</strong>ths (Jan to Mar /Jun to Aug<br />

2008). Figure 1 shows a slightly higher participati<strong>on</strong> rate <strong>for</strong> male citizens (68.4%) than<br />

female citizens (62.9%). It is also shown that with the increase in age, the participati<strong>on</strong> rate<br />

dropped significantly from 95.6% (aged 7 to 12) to 53.3% (aged 60 or above).<br />

6


Figure 1. <strong>Sport</strong>s participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens by age (Jan to Mar/Jun to Aug 2008)<br />

<br />

%<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

68.4<br />

65.5<br />

62.9<br />

96.494.7<br />

95.6<br />

85.1<br />

83.9 84.5<br />

7<br />

72.1<br />

67.2<br />

63.3<br />

62.8<br />

55.1<br />

58.8<br />

Male<br />

Female<br />

Overall<br />

54.4<br />

52.1 53.3<br />

<strong>All</strong> Age Group 7-12 yrs-old 13-19 yrs-old 20-39 yrs old 40-59 yrs-old 60 yrs or<br />

above<br />

21. Am<strong>on</strong>g all the sports participants, 41.2% participated three times or more per<br />

week (27.0% <strong>of</strong> the populati<strong>on</strong>), and 80.3% at least <strong>on</strong>ce per week (52.6% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

populati<strong>on</strong>).<br />

Figure 2. Frequency <strong>of</strong> sports participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens (Jan to Mar/Jun to Aug<br />

2008) <br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

%<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

23.4<br />

22.4 22.9<br />

4.5<br />

4.1 4.3<br />

Everyday 5-6 times<br />

a week<br />

15.4 14.0<br />

12.6<br />

3-4 times<br />

a week<br />

41.6<br />

39.1<br />

36.7<br />

1-2 times<br />

a week<br />

9.3<br />

8.1 8.7<br />

Once every Once every<br />

2 weeks 3 weeks<br />

8.9<br />

7.2<br />

5.4<br />

1.9<br />

1.5<br />

1.0 1.5<br />

1.2<br />

1.4 1.5 0.5 0.9<br />

Once a<br />

m<strong>on</strong>th<br />

Male<br />

Female<br />

Overall<br />

Once every Once every<br />

2 m<strong>on</strong>ths 3 m<strong>on</strong>ths<br />

22. Am<strong>on</strong>g all the sports participants, the three most <strong>of</strong>ten participated sports were,<br />

by order, jogging (13.8%), swimming (13.2%) and badmint<strong>on</strong> (10.1%). Different gender


and age groups have different choices. See Tables 2a and 2b <strong>for</strong> details.<br />

Figure 3. <strong>Sport</strong>s which H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens participated in most <strong>of</strong>ten (Jan to Mar/Jun to<br />

Aug 2008) <br />

%<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Jogging<br />

13.8<br />

Swimming<br />

13.2<br />

Badmint<strong>on</strong><br />

10.1<br />

Basketball<br />

7.3 7.1 6.7 6.5<br />

Hiking/ Excursi<strong>on</strong><br />

Qualiwalk<br />

Fitness exercise/ Stretching<br />

8<br />

Football<br />

4.5 4.3<br />

Fitness (multi-gym)<br />

Table 2a. <strong>Sport</strong>s which H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens participated in most <strong>of</strong>ten by gender <br />

Overall<br />

(%)<br />

Men (%) Women<br />

(%)<br />

Jogging 13.8 13.8 13.8<br />

Swimming 13.2 12.5 13.9<br />

Badmint<strong>on</strong> 10.1 7.8 12.4<br />

Basketball 7.3 13.0 1.8<br />

Hiking/Excursi<strong>on</strong> 7.1 7.5 6.6<br />

Qualiwalk 6.7 5.7 7.8<br />

Fitness<br />

exercise/Stretching<br />

6.5 4.3 8.6<br />

Football 4.5 9.0 0.1<br />

Fitness (multi-gym) 4.3 5.5 3.3<br />

Tai Chi 3.0 1.6 4.4<br />

Tai Chi<br />

3.0


Table 2b. <strong>Sport</strong>s which H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens participated in most <strong>of</strong>ten by age groups <br />

Overall<br />

(%)<br />

60 yrs old<br />

7-12 yrs 13-19 yrs 20-39 yrs 40-59 yrs<br />

or above<br />

old (%) old (%) old (%) old (%)<br />

(%)<br />

Jogging 13.8 14.2 10.4 15.6 15.3 8.5<br />

Swimming 13.2 19.8 13.4 15.6 11.4 6.6<br />

Badmint<strong>on</strong> 10.1 13.0 14.8 13.5 7.9 0.5<br />

Basketball 7.3 10.7 23.2 8.6 1.7 0.9<br />

Hiking/Excursi<strong>on</strong> 7.1 0.1 0.6 5.3 12.6 9.1<br />

Qualiwalk 6.7 1.7 0.8 4.2 9.0 16.5<br />

Fitness exercise/<br />

Stretching<br />

6.5 1.4 1.9 2.0 6.7 24.6<br />

Football 4.5 5.0 8.8 7.1 1.9 0.2<br />

Fitness<br />

(multi-gym)<br />

4.3 0.3 0.6 7.1 4.8 2.8<br />

Tai Chi 3.0 - 0.1 0.1 4.1 12.2<br />

<strong>Sport</strong>s Compani<strong>on</strong>s<br />

23. Almost half <strong>of</strong> all the sports participants (46.9%) resp<strong>on</strong>ded that<br />

friends/neighbours were their most popular compani<strong>on</strong>s; 40.8% exercised al<strong>on</strong>e and 13.1%<br />

exercised with classmates. Please refer to Table 3 <strong>for</strong> details <strong>of</strong> compani<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> different age<br />

groups.<br />

Table 3. Compani<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> different age group <br />

Time <strong>of</strong> Playing <strong>Sport</strong>s<br />

Age Group The most popular sport compani<strong>on</strong><br />

7–12 Parents (47.8%)<br />

13–19 Friends/Neighbours (64.4%)<br />

20–39 Friends/Neighbours (58.3%)<br />

40–59 Al<strong>on</strong>e (51.8%)<br />

60 or above Al<strong>on</strong>e (62.9%)<br />

24. Am<strong>on</strong>g all the sports participants, 35.5% usually exercised in the morning,<br />

27.6% in the evening and 20.2% in the afterno<strong>on</strong>. Please refer to Table 4 <strong>for</strong> details <strong>of</strong> the<br />

time choices <strong>of</strong> different age groups.<br />

9


Table 4. Time <strong>of</strong> playing sports by different age groups <br />

<strong>Sport</strong>s Venues Mainly Used<br />

Age Group Time <strong>of</strong> playing<br />

sports<br />

7–12 Afterno<strong>on</strong> (50.6%)<br />

13–19 Afterno<strong>on</strong> (44.6%)<br />

20–39 Evening (50.2%)<br />

40–59 Morning (41.5%)<br />

60 or above Morning (75.6%)<br />

25. Most <strong>of</strong> the sports participants engaged in their sports activities in Leisure/Public<br />

Facilities <strong>of</strong> the LCSD/Other Government Departments (60.6%), followed by Home (8.8%)<br />

and Private Housing Facilities (8.8%).<br />

Figure 4. <strong>Sport</strong>s venues mainly used (Jan to Mar/ Jun to Aug 2008) <br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

%<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Organisers<br />

60.6<br />

Leisure/Public<br />

facilities <strong>of</strong> the<br />

LCSD/Other<br />

Government<br />

departments<br />

8.8 8.8<br />

Home Private<br />

housing<br />

facilities<br />

10<br />

6.2 5.7 4.8 4.0<br />

School/<br />

College/<br />

University<br />

Country park Commercial<br />

Facilities Such<br />

as Fitness Club<br />

/ Yoga Club<br />

Private club<br />

26. Most sports participants organised sports activities by themselves or with<br />

friends (85.6%), followed by schools (9.4%) and LCSD (5.0%).


Figure 5. Organisers <strong>of</strong> the sports events (Jan to Mar/Jun to Aug 2008)<br />

<br />

%<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

85.6<br />

Sel<strong>for</strong>ganised/<br />

Organised<br />

9.4<br />

School/<br />

School<br />

Sector<br />

5.0 4.3 3.4 3.4 1.9 1.5<br />

LCSD<br />

Voluntary<br />

Associati<strong>on</strong><br />

Preference and Reas<strong>on</strong>s <strong>for</strong> Learning a <strong>Sport</strong><br />

11<br />

Private Club<br />

Commercial<br />

Gym/<br />

Fitness Club<br />

Private<br />

Housing<br />

Facilities<br />

Nati<strong>on</strong>al<br />

<strong>Sport</strong>s<br />

Associati<strong>on</strong><br />

27. For H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens (aged 7 or above), their first three choices <strong>for</strong> preferred<br />

sports were Swimming (14.7%), Tai Chi (10.3%) and Badmint<strong>on</strong> (8.8%). Children aged 7 to<br />

12 (16.8%), adolescents aged 13 to 19 (13.3%), young adults aged 20 to 39 (16.7%) and<br />

middle-aged adults (aged 40 to 59) (15.9%) all indicated that they would select Swimming<br />

as their first choice when learning a sport, whereas older pers<strong>on</strong>s aged 60 or above selected<br />

Tai Chi (20.6%).<br />

Figure 6. <strong>Sport</strong>s preferred to be learned <br />

%<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

Swimming<br />

14.7<br />

Tai Chi<br />

10.3<br />

8.8<br />

Badmint<strong>on</strong><br />

Various Kinds <strong>of</strong> Dance<br />

4.8 4.8<br />

Yoga<br />

Tennis<br />

3.8 3.6 3.6<br />

Table Tennis<br />

Basketball<br />

Jogging<br />

3.0 2.8<br />

Football


28. The first three factors that H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens c<strong>on</strong>sidered in learning a sport<br />

were Interest (40.7%), Health/Keep Fit (21.3%) and Time Availability (11.6%). As age<br />

increased, interest became less important (decreased from 65.0% <strong>for</strong> children to 19.6% <strong>for</strong><br />

older pers<strong>on</strong>s) while health became more important (increased from 5.2% <strong>for</strong> children to<br />

43.1% <strong>for</strong> older pers<strong>on</strong>s). Facilities (4.8%) and Cost (2.9%) did not seem to be the major<br />

c<strong>on</strong>cerns.<br />

PA Participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g Citizens<br />

29. According to the Baseline Indicator (i.e. engagement in moderately or<br />

vigorously intense PA/sports three times a week with an accumulati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> at least 30 minutes<br />

per day), the PA level <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens can be classified as Inactive (completely<br />

sedentary or <strong>of</strong> low PA), somewhat active (Some Active) and Active groups. Overall<br />

speaking, when c<strong>on</strong>sidering the Baseline Indicator (including PE less<strong>on</strong>s), 28.7% <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g<br />

K<strong>on</strong>g citizens are regarded as Inactive, 22.8% Some Active and 48.6% Active. Table 5 has<br />

summarised the PA prevalence <strong>for</strong> the three age groups according to the recommended PA<br />

level: 76.6%, 68.1% and 44.2% <strong>of</strong> children, adolescents and adults respectively were<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sidered Active; whereas 5.9%, 11.6% and 32.3% <strong>of</strong> children, adolescents and adults<br />

respectively were c<strong>on</strong>sidered Inactive.<br />

Table 5. Prevalence <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens meeting the recommended PA level <strong>of</strong> Baseline<br />

Indicator (%) <br />

Failure to meet the recommended<br />

PA level <strong>of</strong> Baseline Indicator<br />

Inactive<br />

Age Group Completely<br />

1<br />

Sedentary<br />

Low<br />

12<br />

PA 2<br />

Some<br />

Active 3<br />

Meeting the<br />

recommended PA<br />

level <strong>of</strong> Baseline<br />

Indicator<br />

Active 4<br />

Including PE 0.7 5.2 17.6 76.6<br />

7–12<br />

less<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Excluding PE<br />

less<strong>on</strong>s<br />

1.7 10.2 27.0 61.2<br />

Including PE 0.9 10.7 20.2 68.1<br />

13–19<br />

less<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Excluding PE<br />

less<strong>on</strong>s<br />

3.2 14.8 24.5 57.4<br />

20 or above 3.5 28.8 23.5 44.2<br />

Including PE 3.1 25.6 22.8 48.6<br />

Overall<br />

less<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Excluding PE<br />

less<strong>on</strong>s<br />

3.4 26.3 23.8 46.6<br />

Note: 1. Completely sedentary: H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they did not engage in 30 min [accumulated]<br />

<strong>of</strong> low-intensity PA weekly in the past three m<strong>on</strong>ths.<br />

2. Low PA: H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they engaged in 30 min [accumulated] <strong>of</strong> low-intensity PA<br />

but did not engage in 30 min [accumulated] <strong>of</strong> moderate or vigorous PA weekly in the past three<br />

m<strong>on</strong>ths.


3. Some Active: H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they engaged in 1 to 2 days <strong>of</strong> 30 min [accumulated]<br />

<strong>of</strong> moderate to vigorous activity weekly in the past three m<strong>on</strong>ths.<br />

4. Active: H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they engaged in three days or more <strong>of</strong> 30 min [accumulated]<br />

<strong>of</strong> moderate to vigorous activity weekly in the past three m<strong>on</strong>ths.<br />

30. Overall speaking, when the indicators suggested by the USCDC/USDHHS were<br />

c<strong>on</strong>sidered (including PE less<strong>on</strong>s), 29.4% <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens were regarded as Inactive,<br />

37.2% as Some Active and 33.3% as Active. The prevalence <strong>of</strong> engagement in PA by Active<br />

citizens changed to 34.1%, 71.3% and 29.1% <strong>for</strong> children, adolescents and adults<br />

respectively; while those <strong>of</strong> Inactive citizens (including PE less<strong>on</strong>s) changed to 20.2%,<br />

10.3% and 32.3% <strong>for</strong> children, adolescents and adults respectively.<br />

Table 6. Prevalence <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens meeting the recommended PA level <strong>of</strong> the<br />

USCDC/USDHHS (%) <br />

7-12<br />

13-19<br />

Overall<br />

Failure to meet the recommended<br />

PA level <strong>of</strong> USCDC/USDHHS<br />

Inactive<br />

Age Group Completely<br />

1<br />

Sedentary<br />

Low PA2<br />

Including PE<br />

less<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Excluding PE<br />

less<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Including PE<br />

less<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Excluding PE<br />

less<strong>on</strong>s<br />

13<br />

Some<br />

Active 3<br />

Meeting the<br />

recommended PA<br />

level <strong>of</strong><br />

USCDC/USDHHS<br />

Active 4<br />

(Meeting<br />

age-specific PA<br />

recommendati<strong>on</strong>)<br />

13.1 7.1 45.7 34.1<br />

17.1 10.0 51.9 21.0<br />

1.0 9.3 18.4 71.3<br />

2.5 12.3 24.2 61.0<br />

20 or above 3.5 28.8 38.6 29.1<br />

Including PE<br />

less<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Excluding PE<br />

less<strong>on</strong>s<br />

3.9 25.5 37.2 33.3<br />

4.3 26.0 38.1 31.5<br />

Note: 1. Completely sedentary: For ages 7 to 12, H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they did not engage at least<br />

<strong>on</strong>ce in 60 min (accumulated) <strong>of</strong> low-intensity PA weekly in the past three m<strong>on</strong>ths. For ages 13 to 19,<br />

H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they did not engage at least <strong>on</strong>ce in 20 min (c<strong>on</strong>tinuous) <strong>of</strong><br />

low-intensity PA weekly in the past three m<strong>on</strong>ths. For ages 20 or above, H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated<br />

that they did not engage at least <strong>on</strong>ce in 30 min (accumulated) <strong>of</strong> low-intensity PA weekly in the past<br />

three m<strong>on</strong>ths.<br />

2. Low PA: For ages 7 to 12, H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they engaged in 60 min [accumulated] <strong>of</strong><br />

low-intensity PA but did not engage in 60 min [accumulated] <strong>of</strong> moderate or vigorous PA weekly in the<br />

past three m<strong>on</strong>ths. For ages 13 to 19, H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they engaged in at least 20<br />

min <strong>of</strong> moderate PA, but did not engage in at least 20 min <strong>of</strong> moderate or vigorous PA weekly in the<br />

past three m<strong>on</strong>ths. For ages 20 or above, H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they engaged in 30 min<br />

[accumulated] <strong>of</strong> low-intensity PA, but did not engage in 30 min [accumulated] <strong>of</strong> moderate nor<br />

vigorous PA weekly in the past three m<strong>on</strong>ths.


3. Some Active: For ages 7 to 12, H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they did not engage in 60 min<br />

[accumulated] <strong>of</strong> moderate or vigorous PA <strong>for</strong> five days a week in the past three m<strong>on</strong>ths. For ages 13 to<br />

19, H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they did not engage in at least 20 min <strong>of</strong> moderate or vigorous<br />

PA. For ages 20 or above, H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they did not engage in 30 min<br />

[accumulated] <strong>of</strong> moderate or vigorous PA <strong>for</strong> five days a week in the past three m<strong>on</strong>ths.<br />

4. Active: H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they reached the age-specific weekly PA guidelines (i.e., 7<br />

to 12 years old: five days <strong>of</strong> 60 min [accumulated] moderate PA and above; 13 to 19 years old: three<br />

days <strong>of</strong> 20 min moderate PA and above; 20 years old or above: five days <strong>of</strong> 30 min [accumulated]<br />

moderate PA and above.<br />

31. More than half (57.4%) <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens thought that they had<br />

“Sufficient” or “Very Sufficient” level <strong>of</strong> PA. For all age groups, Figure 7 shows that<br />

when compared with male citizens (63.5%), less female citizens (51.9%) perceived<br />

themselves as having sufficient PA level. More citizens aged 7 to 12 (72.0%) and 60 or<br />

above (77.7%) thought that they had “Sufficient” or “Very Sufficient” level <strong>of</strong> PA.<br />

Figure 7a. PA level perceived as sufficient or very sufficient <br />

%<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

7-12 yrs old 13-19 yrs old 20-39 yrs old 40-59 yrs old 60 yrs old or<br />

14<br />

Overall<br />

Male<br />

Female<br />

above


Figure 7b. PA level perceived as sufficient or very sufficient <br />

%<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Male<br />

Female<br />

Overall<br />

63.5<br />

57.4<br />

51.9<br />

75.6<br />

72.0<br />

68.1<br />

65.3<br />

54.7<br />

43.7<br />

15<br />

57.2<br />

46.3<br />

37.6<br />

58.9<br />

55.7<br />

52.8<br />

78.0 77.7<br />

77.4<br />

Overall 7-12 yr-old 13-19 yr-old 20-39 yr-old 40-59 yr-old 60 yr-old or<br />

above<br />

Primary Reas<strong>on</strong>s and Barriers <strong>for</strong> PA Participati<strong>on</strong><br />

32. The primary reas<strong>on</strong>s <strong>for</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens to engage in PA were “health/keep<br />

fit” (35.9%), “interest” (12.9%) and “to make it a habit in daily life” (11.6%). The primary<br />

reas<strong>on</strong> <strong>for</strong> those aged 7 to 12 (30.0%) and 13 to 19 (26.9%) to engage in PA was “interest”.<br />

For those aged 20 to 39 (32.5%), 40 to 59 (42.8%) and 60 or above (47.5%), the primary<br />

reas<strong>on</strong> was “health/keep fit”.<br />

Figure 8a. Reas<strong>on</strong>s <strong>for</strong> participati<strong>on</strong> in PA <br />

%<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

35.9<br />

Health/Keep Fit<br />

12.9<br />

Interest<br />

11.6<br />

To make it a habit in daily life<br />

6.0<br />

More leisure time<br />

4.9 4.8 4.7 4.1 3.6<br />

Physical training<br />

With compani<strong>on</strong> such as family & friends to<br />

participate in physical activities/ sports together<br />

To lose weight<br />

Good physical c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong><br />

Pastime<br />

2.4 2.3 1.5<br />

To know more about the benefits <strong>of</strong> physical<br />

activities<br />

To have fun<br />

The feeling <strong>of</strong> relaxati<strong>on</strong> after doing sports/<br />

physical activities


Figure 8b. Reas<strong>on</strong>s <strong>for</strong> PA participati<strong>on</strong> (by categories) <br />

Health Reas<strong>on</strong>s<br />

49.2%<br />

Matching<br />

Facilities/<br />

Envir<strong>on</strong>ment<br />

Reas<strong>on</strong>s 0.5%<br />

16<br />

Pers<strong>on</strong>al Reas<strong>on</strong>s<br />

(e.g. interests)<br />

43.6%<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong><br />

Family Members/<br />

Friends/Society<br />

(e.g. Social needs)<br />

6.7%<br />

33. The primary reas<strong>on</strong>s <strong>for</strong> not taking an initiative in PA participati<strong>on</strong> were “no<br />

spare time due to work/study” (30.7%), “tired” (17.5%) and “lazy” (14.6%). According to<br />

the data, the reas<strong>on</strong>s were “no spare time due to work/study” <strong>for</strong> those aged 7 to 59, and<br />

“health reas<strong>on</strong>” <strong>for</strong> those 60 or above.<br />

Figure 9a. Primary reas<strong>on</strong>s <strong>for</strong> not taking an initiative in PA participati<strong>on</strong> <br />

%<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

30.7<br />

No spare time due to work/study<br />

17.5<br />

Tired<br />

14.6<br />

Lazy<br />

9.8<br />

Health<br />

5.1 4.4 3.7<br />

No spare time due to family<br />

commitment<br />

Not interested<br />

Not physically fit<br />

2.5 2.2 1.8 1.5 1.1<br />

Bad weather<br />

No spare time due to other leisure<br />

activities<br />

No partner<br />

Take care <strong>of</strong> children<br />

No venue and facility


Figure 9b. Primary reas<strong>on</strong>s <strong>for</strong> not taking an initiative in PA participati<strong>on</strong> (by categories)<br />

<br />

Matching<br />

Facilities /<br />

Envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />

Reas<strong>on</strong>s 3.8%<br />

Influence <strong>of</strong><br />

Family Members/<br />

Friends 1.9%<br />

Working Reas<strong>on</strong><br />

39.4%<br />

Health Reas<strong>on</strong><br />

14.5%<br />

17<br />

Pers<strong>on</strong>al Reas<strong>on</strong><br />

39.4%<br />

Time Spent <strong>on</strong> Doing Homework and Revisi<strong>on</strong> (Weekdays, Weekends and Public Holidays)<br />

34. Am<strong>on</strong>g full-time students, during weekdays, 32.2% spent <strong>on</strong>e to two hours per<br />

day <strong>on</strong> homework and studying, and 41.8% spent two hours or more per day <strong>on</strong> homework<br />

and studying. During weekends and public holidays, the patterns were similar, that is 27.5%<br />

and 39.0% respectively.<br />

Figure 10. Time spent <strong>on</strong> doing homework and revisi<strong>on</strong> <br />

%<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

9.5<br />

18.2<br />

Less than 30<br />

mins<br />

16.5<br />

15.4<br />

30 mins - less<br />

than 1 hr<br />

32.2<br />

27.5<br />

1 hr - less than<br />

2 hrs<br />

23.2<br />

18.7<br />

2 hrs - less<br />

than 3 hrs<br />

weekdays<br />

weekends and public holiday<br />

10.6<br />

9.6<br />

3 hrs - less<br />

than 4 hrs<br />

10.7<br />

8.0<br />

4 hrs or more


Time Spent <strong>on</strong> Watching TV, Playing Video Games and Computer<br />

35. For other activities, 33.8% <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens spent an average <strong>of</strong> three<br />

hours or more per day watching TV or using the computer during weekdays. The prevalence<br />

<strong>of</strong> children aged 7 to 12 spending four hours or more watching TV or using the computer<br />

during weekends and public holidays was 27.9%, which was more than double <strong>of</strong> that<br />

reported <strong>for</strong> weekdays. For adolescents, the patterns were similar.<br />

Figure 11a. Time spent <strong>on</strong> watching TV, playing video games and computer<br />

<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

%<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

6.0<br />

4.7<br />

Less than 30<br />

mins<br />

9.4<br />

8.9<br />

30 mins - less<br />

than 1 hr<br />

26.0 26.1<br />

21.7<br />

1 hr - less<br />

than 2 hrs<br />

23.0<br />

2 hrs - less<br />

than 3 hrs<br />

17.3<br />

15.9<br />

3 hrs - less<br />

than 4 hrs<br />

18<br />

8.2<br />

10.1<br />

4 hrs - less<br />

than 5 hrs<br />

3.7<br />

5.3<br />

5 hrs - less<br />

than 6 hrs<br />

weekdays<br />

weekends and public holiday<br />

2.6<br />

1.7<br />

6 hrs - less<br />

than 7 hrs<br />

5.2<br />

4.4<br />

7 hrs or more


Figure 11b. Time spent <strong>on</strong> watching TV, playing video games and computer during<br />

weekdays by age groups <br />

%<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

9.5<br />

4.5<br />

2.3<br />

Less than<br />

30 mins<br />

16.6<br />

9.1<br />

7.4<br />

30 mins -<br />

less than<br />

1 hour<br />

27.6<br />

26.0<br />

24.2<br />

1 hour -<br />

less than<br />

2 hours<br />

19.4<br />

24.6<br />

26.8<br />

2 hours -<br />

less than<br />

3 hours<br />

15.5<br />

19<br />

17.7<br />

3 hours -<br />

less than<br />

4 hours<br />

15.7<br />

5.4<br />

9.8<br />

8.2<br />

4 hours -<br />

less than<br />

5 hours<br />

5.1<br />

3.4 3.5<br />

5 hours -<br />

less than<br />

6 hours<br />

7-12 yrs old<br />

13-19 yrs old<br />

20 yrs old or above<br />

2.3<br />

1.7 1.8<br />

0.7<br />

6 hours -<br />

less than<br />

7 hours<br />

6.7<br />

4.3<br />

7 hours<br />

or more<br />

Figure 11c. Time spent <strong>on</strong> watching TV, playing video games and computer during<br />

weekends and public holidays by age groups <br />

%<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

9.4<br />

8.3<br />

4.7<br />

6.5 6.3<br />

2.3<br />

Less than 30<br />

mins<br />

30 mins -<br />

less than 1<br />

hour<br />

Time Spent <strong>on</strong> Walking<br />

19.6<br />

13.1<br />

22.8<br />

1 hour - less<br />

than 2 hours<br />

19.7<br />

17.8<br />

23.9<br />

2 hours -<br />

less than 3<br />

hours<br />

18.6<br />

18.0 17.1<br />

3 hours -<br />

less than 4<br />

hours<br />

10.4<br />

14.4<br />

9.6<br />

4 hours -<br />

less than 5<br />

hours<br />

7.2<br />

9.8<br />

5 hours -<br />

less than 6<br />

hours<br />

7-12 yrs old<br />

13-19 yrs old<br />

20 yrs old or above<br />

6.2 6.4<br />

4.6<br />

4.0<br />

2.1<br />

6 hours -<br />

less than 7<br />

hours<br />

13.2<br />

4.3<br />

7 hours or<br />

more<br />

36. 79.9% <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens spent at least 30 minutes in average <strong>on</strong> walking<br />

per day and around half <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens (50.5%) said they walked at least <strong>on</strong>e hour<br />

per day.


Figure 12. Time Spent <strong>on</strong> Walking <br />

%<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

3.9 3.6<br />

2.7 2.7<br />

2.1<br />

Less than 10<br />

mins<br />

23.7<br />

19.4<br />

16.2<br />

17.2<br />

11.8<br />

10 mins - less<br />

than 30 mins<br />

Time Spent <strong>on</strong> Transportati<strong>on</strong><br />

31.2<br />

31.3<br />

30.0<br />

29.8<br />

25.9<br />

30 mins - less<br />

than 1 hour<br />

21.9<br />

25.1<br />

20<br />

23.5<br />

19.7<br />

29.8<br />

1 hours - less<br />

than 2 hours<br />

11.7<br />

10.9<br />

9.5 9.4<br />

14.9<br />

2 hours - less<br />

than 3 hours<br />

6.26.1<br />

5.15.5<br />

4.2<br />

3 hours - less<br />

than 4 hours<br />

7-12 yrs-old<br />

13-19 yrs-old<br />

20-39 yrs-old<br />

40-59 yrs-old<br />

60 yrs-old & above<br />

5.5<br />

12.4<br />

11.7<br />

6.9<br />

4 hours or<br />

more<br />

37. Regarding time spent <strong>on</strong> various means <strong>of</strong> transportati<strong>on</strong>, 24.4% <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g<br />

citizens reported that they spent <strong>on</strong>e to two hours per day, 61.7% spent less than <strong>on</strong>e hour,<br />

and 13.9% spent more than two hours per day. Please refer to Figure 13 <strong>for</strong> details <strong>of</strong><br />

different age groups.<br />

Figure 13. Time Spent <strong>on</strong> Transportati<strong>on</strong> <br />

%<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

38.8<br />

23.9<br />

20.3<br />

11.4<br />

55.0<br />

Less than 10<br />

mins<br />

21.8<br />

20.6<br />

26.4<br />

24.3<br />

23.2 20.4<br />

23.0<br />

15.3<br />

16.2<br />

13.3<br />

12.7<br />

12.8<br />

10 mins - less<br />

than 30 mins<br />

30 mins - less<br />

than 1 hour<br />

31.7<br />

26.8<br />

10.7<br />

1 hours - less<br />

than 2 hours<br />

4.6<br />

2.0<br />

15.4<br />

12.7<br />

2 hours - less<br />

than 3 hours<br />

8.5<br />

2.9<br />

3.4<br />

1.0<br />

0.9 2.2 0.5 2.3<br />

0.9<br />

1.1 0.9 0.3<br />

3 hours - less<br />

than 4 hours<br />

7-12 yrs-old<br />

13-19 yrs-old<br />

20-39 yrs-old<br />

40-59 yrs-old<br />

60 yrs-old & above<br />

4 hours or<br />

more


Overall Time Spent <strong>on</strong> Sitting<br />

38. Regarding sedentary activities, 29.9% <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens spent six to nine<br />

hours per day <strong>on</strong> sitting, 42.2% spent less than six hours per day and 27.9% spent more than<br />

nine hours per day. Figure 14 shows that those aged 60 or above spent less time <strong>on</strong> sitting<br />

than younger <strong>on</strong>es.<br />

Figure 14. Time spent <strong>on</strong> sitting <br />

%<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

6.6<br />

4.2<br />

10.5<br />

16.8<br />

15.6<br />

Time Spent <strong>on</strong> Sleeping<br />

16.2<br />

15.9<br />

27.3<br />

33.8<br />

37.3<br />

Less than 3 hours 3 hours - less than 6<br />

hours<br />

39.4<br />

35.7<br />

21<br />

28.6<br />

26.9<br />

31.6<br />

6 hours - less than 9<br />

hours<br />

30.4<br />

28.8<br />

21.9<br />

14.9<br />

10.1<br />

9 hours - less than 12<br />

hours<br />

7-12 yr-old<br />

13-19 yr-old<br />

20-39 yr-old<br />

40-59 yr-old<br />

60 yr-old or above<br />

9.0<br />

13.8<br />

11.6<br />

7.6<br />

5.2<br />

12 hours or more<br />

39. Only 55.3% <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens slept <strong>for</strong> seven hours or more daily, whereas<br />

27.5% slept <strong>for</strong> six to seven hours and 17.2% slept <strong>for</strong> less than six hours daily.<br />

Figure 15. Time spent <strong>on</strong> sleeping <br />

%<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

7-12 yr-old<br />

13-19 yr-old<br />

20-39 yr-old<br />

40-59 yr-old<br />

60 yr-old or above<br />

9.1<br />

4.9<br />

3.5<br />

2.9<br />

0.3<br />

Less than 5<br />

hours<br />

16.1<br />

13.9<br />

12.2<br />

10.6<br />

1.4<br />

5 hours - less<br />

than 6 hours<br />

22.4<br />

5.5<br />

32.2<br />

30.7<br />

23.4<br />

6 hours - less<br />

than 7 hours<br />

34.9<br />

34.1<br />

33.7<br />

29.0<br />

24.8<br />

7 hours - less<br />

than 8 hours<br />

39.0<br />

20.7<br />

14.7<br />

13.5 15.0<br />

8 hours - less<br />

than 9 hours<br />

24.7<br />

8.4<br />

3.5<br />

3.1<br />

11.5<br />

9 hours or<br />

more


Awareness <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong>s-related In<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong><br />

40. Figure 16 shows that male H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens paid more attenti<strong>on</strong> to<br />

sports-related in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong> than female citizens. It shows that 25.2% <strong>of</strong> male citizens paid<br />

attenti<strong>on</strong> to sports-related news very <strong>of</strong>ten, while <strong>on</strong>ly 8.8% female citizens did the same.<br />

Figure 16. Attenti<strong>on</strong> to sports-related in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong> or news <br />

50<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

%<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

12.8<br />

19.6<br />

16.4<br />

Awareness <strong>of</strong> LCSD Services<br />

32.2<br />

42.9<br />

37.8<br />

Never Seldom Sometimes Very <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

22<br />

29.8<br />

28.7<br />

29.2<br />

25.2<br />

8.8<br />

Male<br />

Female<br />

Overall<br />

41. Am<strong>on</strong>g H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens, 88.9% were aware <strong>of</strong> LCSD be<strong>for</strong>e the survey.<br />

Most <strong>of</strong> them knew about LCSD services through, by order, TV (59.4%), LCSD <strong>Sport</strong>s<br />

Venues (31.1%), Newspaper/Magazine (28.1%) and the Internet (21.7%).<br />

Figure 17. Awareness <strong>of</strong> LCSD be<strong>for</strong>e the survey <br />

%<br />

100<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

97.9 98.798.3<br />

90.5<br />

93.0<br />

88.9<br />

94.0 93.5 93.0 90.6 91.8<br />

87.5 85.2<br />

84.3 84.7<br />

16.6<br />

77.3<br />

70.9<br />

65.1<br />

Overall 7-12 yrs old 13-19 yrs old 20-39 yrs old 40-59 yrs old 60 yrs old or<br />

above<br />

Male<br />

Female<br />

Overall


<strong>Sport</strong>s Facilities<br />

42. Less than half (48.8%) <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens aged 13 or above c<strong>on</strong>sidered the<br />

sports facilities to be sufficient and 39.1% thought that the sports facilities were not<br />

sufficient. For those sports facilities deemed to be insufficient, the first three were, by order,<br />

badmint<strong>on</strong> courts (24.5%), swimming pools (21.0%) and sports centres (19.5%).<br />

Figure 18. <strong>Sport</strong>s facilities c<strong>on</strong>sidered to be insufficient <br />

%<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

24.5<br />

Badmint<strong>on</strong> Court<br />

21.0<br />

Swimming Pool<br />

19.5<br />

<strong>Sport</strong>s Centre<br />

12.6<br />

Basketball court<br />

11.1<br />

Football pitch<br />

23<br />

9.0<br />

Park/ open area with appropriate<br />

sports facilities<br />

7.9<br />

Jogging track<br />

6.8 6.1<br />

43. For H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens who c<strong>on</strong>sidered the sports facilities as inadequate, the<br />

facilities they wanted to increase most were badmint<strong>on</strong> courts (23.1%), swimming pools<br />

(20.6%) and sports centres (14.1%). The age group <strong>of</strong> 13 to 59 years old wanted to increase<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> the badmint<strong>on</strong> courts and those aged 60 or above desired to increase the<br />

number <strong>of</strong> parks/open areas with appropriate sports facilities.<br />

Fitness room<br />

Cycling track<br />

5.1<br />

Table tennis tables


Figure 19. <strong>Sport</strong>s facilities most desired to increase <br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

%<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

23.1<br />

Badmint<strong>on</strong> court<br />

20.6<br />

Swimming Pool<br />

14.1<br />

<strong>Sport</strong>s centre<br />

9.2 8.6 8.4 7.5 7.0<br />

Basketball court<br />

Football pitch<br />

24<br />

Park/ open area with appropriate<br />

sports facilities<br />

Suggesti<strong>on</strong>s to Strengthen the Promoti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong><br />

44. Large proporti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens aged 13 or above agreed that the<br />

suggesti<strong>on</strong>s to “strengthen media publicity” (42.1%) and “increase community sports<br />

facilities” (25.7%) can help the promoti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>.<br />

Figure 20. Suggesti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>for</strong> the promoti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> <br />

%<br />

45<br />

40<br />

35<br />

30<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

42.1<br />

Strengthen media publicity<br />

25.7<br />

Increase community sports<br />

facilities<br />

19.4<br />

Provide more sports training<br />

classes<br />

18.2<br />

Strengthen physical educati<strong>on</strong><br />

in school<br />

12.4<br />

Build large-scale sports centres<br />

6.7<br />

Promote the sports culture in<br />

the whole community<br />

Jogging track<br />

3.6 3.3<br />

Reduce rental fee <strong>for</strong> using<br />

facilities<br />

Fitness room<br />

Develop sports with H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g<br />

characteristics<br />

6.2<br />

Cycling track<br />

5.0<br />

Table tennis tables<br />

2.0 1.5<br />

Organize free services /<br />

facilities<br />

Other suggesti<strong>on</strong>s related to<br />

improve services / facilities<br />

21.8<br />

D<strong>on</strong>'t know/ No comment


PA Participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g Island, Kowlo<strong>on</strong> and the New Territories<br />

45. Female adults in the New Territories had higher PA participati<strong>on</strong> than those <strong>on</strong><br />

the HK Island and in Kowlo<strong>on</strong>, whereas both male and female adults <strong>on</strong> the HK Island had<br />

higher sports participati<strong>on</strong> than those in the NT and Kowlo<strong>on</strong>. This was probably because<br />

the sports facilities <strong>on</strong> the HK Island were more accessible.<br />

Figure 21. Distributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Active female citizens by regi<strong>on</strong>s (measured by Baseline<br />

Indicator)<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

%<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

38.0<br />

25<br />

34.5<br />

43.9<br />

HK Island Kowlo<strong>on</strong> New Territories<br />

Figure 22. Number <strong>of</strong> days <strong>of</strong> sports participati<strong>on</strong> in different regi<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Seas<strong>on</strong>al Factors<br />

No. <strong>of</strong> days<br />

participated in<br />

sports<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

4.81<br />

4.66<br />

3.89<br />

3.35<br />

4.17<br />

Male<br />

Female<br />

3.89<br />

HK Island Kowlo<strong>on</strong> New Territories<br />

46. The general predicti<strong>on</strong> be<strong>for</strong>e the study was that most people would participate<br />

in PA in summer. However, it was found in this study that seas<strong>on</strong>al difference in PA/sports<br />

participati<strong>on</strong> was not obvious <strong>for</strong> children, adolescents and adults alike.


Figure 23a. PA participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> adults in different seas<strong>on</strong>s (measured by Baseline Indicator)<br />

%<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Jan-Mar<br />

Jun-Aug<br />

32.4 32.2<br />

24.6<br />

26<br />

22.4<br />

43.0<br />

Inactive Some Active Active<br />

Figure 23b. PA participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Active children and adolescents in different seas<strong>on</strong>s<br />

(measured by Baseline Indicator)<br />

90<br />

80<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

81.0<br />

72.2<br />

69.9<br />

66.8<br />

45.4<br />

62.559.9<br />

59.1<br />

55.2<br />

7-12 yrs old 13-19 yrs old 7-12 yrs old 13-19 yrs old<br />

Including PE less<strong>on</strong>s Excluding PE less<strong>on</strong>s<br />

Characteristics <strong>of</strong> Active Venue Inactive Resp<strong>on</strong>dents<br />

Jan-Mar<br />

Jun-Aug<br />

47. Active and Inactive H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens made different choices in respect <strong>of</strong> the<br />

exercise compani<strong>on</strong>s, percepti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> sufficiency in PA, reas<strong>on</strong>s and barriers <strong>for</strong> PA<br />

participati<strong>on</strong>, etc. The Inactive children and adolescents spent more time <strong>on</strong> TV/computer<br />

and less time <strong>on</strong> daily walking. The Active adults spent less time <strong>on</strong> TV/computer (men<br />

<strong>on</strong>ly), less time <strong>on</strong> sitting, more time <strong>on</strong> daily walking and more time <strong>on</strong> transportati<strong>on</strong><br />

(men <strong>on</strong>ly), and had a lower level <strong>of</strong> smoking. Moreover, Some Active adults had higher<br />

educati<strong>on</strong> and family income levels. Table 7 shows a simple comparis<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> their<br />

characteristics.


Table 7. Comparis<strong>on</strong> between Active and Inactive resp<strong>on</strong>dents (measured by Baseline<br />

Indicator)<br />

Active H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g Citizens Inactive H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g Citizens<br />

Age group Younger Older<br />

Gender Male Female<br />

Time spent <strong>on</strong> daily<br />

More Less<br />

walking<br />

Time spent <strong>on</strong><br />

TV/computer Less More<br />

Time spent <strong>on</strong> sitting Less More<br />

Place <strong>of</strong> residence NT (women) Kowlo<strong>on</strong> (women)<br />

Exercise compani<strong>on</strong>s Exercise with friends Exercise al<strong>on</strong>e<br />

<strong>Sport</strong>s preference Jogging/Swimming<br />

Fitness exercise/Stretching<br />

exercise<br />

Prevalence <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong>s and PA Participati<strong>on</strong> in H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g<br />

48. A series <strong>of</strong> survey was c<strong>on</strong>ducted by the <strong>for</strong>mer <strong>Sport</strong>s Development Board<br />

(SDB) from 1996 to 2001 <strong>on</strong> sports participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens aged 15 or above.<br />

From the figure below, it can be seen that sports participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens aged<br />

15 or above in this survey was 63%, which was 9% higher than ten years ago (54% in 1998)<br />

and 15% higher than 2001.<br />

Figure 24. A comparis<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> sports participati<strong>on</strong> in previous and present studies<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

%<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

40<br />

50<br />

54<br />

27<br />

45 44<br />

1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 …. 2008<br />

(Present<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>Study</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

Note: The data from 1996 to 2001 were retrieved from the <strong>Sport</strong>s Participati<strong>on</strong> Survey (SDB). The data in the<br />

present study indicate prevalence <strong>of</strong> participati<strong>on</strong> in at least <strong>on</strong>e sport activity during the last three m<strong>on</strong>ths by<br />

resp<strong>on</strong>dents aged 15 and above.<br />

48<br />

63


49. Similar results <strong>of</strong> increasing PA participati<strong>on</strong> were also found in other studies.<br />

For example, according to the behavioural risk factor survey c<strong>on</strong>ducted by the Department<br />

<strong>of</strong> Health from 2005 to 2007, the PA level <strong>of</strong> 18 to 64 years-old H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens<br />

increased from 20.3% in 2005 to 22.0% in 2006, and 23.0% in 2007. These data also<br />

indicate that the PA levels <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens were <strong>on</strong> the rise. The obvious increase as<br />

compared with the last decade may be associated with the <strong>on</strong>going ef<strong>for</strong>ts <strong>of</strong> various<br />

government departments and n<strong>on</strong>-government agencies in sports promoti<strong>on</strong>. For example,<br />

the LCSD organised a total <strong>of</strong> 22 000 community recreati<strong>on</strong> and sports activities <strong>for</strong><br />

1 253 442 participants in 2000. It was increased to 33 900 in 2008 (an increase <strong>of</strong> 54.1%),<br />

totalling 1 945 000 participants (an increase <strong>of</strong> 55.2%). The number <strong>of</strong> LCSD-subsidised<br />

activities in 2001 was 5 901, which was increased to 10 040 in 2008 (an increase <strong>of</strong> 70.1%).<br />

In additi<strong>on</strong>, the LCSD and the Department <strong>of</strong> Health has been promoting the Healthy<br />

Exercise <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> Campaign since 2000, and has been actively promoting the School <strong>Sport</strong>s<br />

programme with the Educati<strong>on</strong> Bureau since 2001. With the effect <strong>of</strong> the 2008 Beijing<br />

Olympic Games, the ef<strong>for</strong>ts are likely to result in an overall increase in PA participati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

Recommendati<strong>on</strong>s<br />

50. The definiti<strong>on</strong> and model <strong>for</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> as well as the indicators <strong>for</strong><br />

measuring its effectiveness are developed from the findings <strong>of</strong> the literature review.<br />

Results from such evaluati<strong>on</strong> will serve as the basis <strong>for</strong> revising the future <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong><br />

policy in H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g. The results <strong>of</strong> the survey study <strong>on</strong> the PA and sports participati<strong>on</strong><br />

patterns will serve as benchmark figures <strong>for</strong> future studies.<br />

51. It is recommended that the <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> model shown below be adopted <strong>for</strong><br />

policy planning and future evaluati<strong>on</strong>:<br />

<strong>Sport</strong>s Participati<strong>on</strong><br />

PA Participati<strong>on</strong><br />

Knowledge/<br />

Awareness<br />

Participati<strong>on</strong><br />

<strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong><br />

Educati<strong>on</strong><br />

Promoti<strong>on</strong><br />

Services<br />

Skills/Attitude<br />

Direct Participati<strong>on</strong><br />

52. The present study recommends the objective <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> to be “to creating<br />

opportunities and favourable envir<strong>on</strong>ment through the collaborati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> stakeholders and<br />

28<br />

Indirect Participati<strong>on</strong><br />

Facilities<br />

Training<br />

Programmes<br />

<strong>Sport</strong>s Volunteers<br />

<strong>Sport</strong>s Attendees


government support to enable every<strong>on</strong>e, regardless <strong>of</strong> gender, age, ability, socio-ec<strong>on</strong>omic<br />

status or ethnicity to participate freely in physical activities and sport”.<br />

53. <strong>Sport</strong>s participati<strong>on</strong> produces a number <strong>of</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>al and social benefits. Apart<br />

from enhancing the quality <strong>of</strong> life, it also promotes good health. The indicators <strong>for</strong><br />

evaluating the health attainment effectiveness are mainly the frequency and intensity in PA<br />

participati<strong>on</strong>. The following two suggesti<strong>on</strong>s can serve as reference:<br />

(i) Indicator recommended by the US:<br />

� <strong>for</strong> elementary school-aged children, to accumulate at least 60<br />

minutes (each bout should last <strong>for</strong> at least 10 minutes or more) <strong>of</strong><br />

daily PA at moderate intensity or above <strong>for</strong> at least five days a week<br />

(NASPE, 2004);<br />

� <strong>for</strong> adolescents, to engage in three or more sessi<strong>on</strong>s per week <strong>of</strong> PA<br />

that last at least 20 minutes at a time, which require moderate to<br />

vigorous intensity <strong>of</strong> exerti<strong>on</strong> (USDHHS, 2000);<br />

� <strong>for</strong> adults, to accumulate at least 30 minutes (each bout should last<br />

<strong>for</strong> at least 10 minutes or more) <strong>of</strong> moderate activities <strong>for</strong> at least five<br />

days a week (USDHHS, 1996).<br />

(ii) To encourage the public to make PA a habit, participati<strong>on</strong> can start at the<br />

basic level. For the frequency and intensity, the recommendati<strong>on</strong> widely<br />

used by other countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities can be adopted as follows:<br />

� engagement in moderately or vigorously intense PA/sports three<br />

times a week <strong>for</strong> at least 30 minutes accumulated per day. This<br />

indicator is applicable to all age groups.<br />

As the PA levels <strong>of</strong> more than half (51.4%) <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens did not meet the<br />

Baseline Indicator, it is suggested that an encouraging indicator applicable to all age groups<br />

should be used (i.e. Baseline Indicator). The targets will be the Inactive and Some Active<br />

pers<strong>on</strong>s. They are recommended to engage in moderately or vigorously intense PA/sports<br />

three times a week <strong>for</strong> at least 30 minutes accumulated per day. It will help to encourage<br />

those who do not have sufficient PA to participate more in such activities.<br />

54. In order to tie in with the rapid changes in technology, culture and life styles <strong>of</strong><br />

H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g, and to keep abreast <strong>of</strong> the extent <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> in the society, there is a need<br />

to c<strong>on</strong>duct regular territory-wide questi<strong>on</strong>naire surveys to track the changes in life styles<br />

and quality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens. Such evaluati<strong>on</strong> serves as <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the tools <strong>for</strong><br />

evaluating our existing policies and programmes. To achieve this, benchmark indicators,<br />

which are evidence-based and recommended by prestigious pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al bodies, must be<br />

established. It is suggested that the same survey should be c<strong>on</strong>ducted at a five-year<br />

interval <strong>for</strong> a timely review <strong>of</strong> the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the policy and changes that result from<br />

the policies and ef<strong>for</strong>ts <strong>on</strong> PA/sports promoti<strong>on</strong>. In 1995, the Chinese Government<br />

announced that the nati<strong>on</strong>al survey <strong>on</strong> physical fitness and activities would be c<strong>on</strong>ducted at<br />

29


a five-year interval. The prevalence in PA participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> US citizens showed subtle<br />

annual changes from 2001 to 2005 (a drop from 41% to 37% <strong>for</strong> young adults), thus a<br />

clearer picture <strong>of</strong> change can be viewed at a five-year interval. The nati<strong>on</strong>al survey <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Australian government is also suggested to be c<strong>on</strong>ducted at a five-year interval. However,<br />

in order to allow evaluati<strong>on</strong> over a five-year period, preparati<strong>on</strong> work <strong>for</strong> the evaluati<strong>on</strong>,<br />

such as questi<strong>on</strong>naire design, interviewer training, survey tendering and field work<br />

interviews, need to be implemented within the five-year period. Thus a duly designated<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice resp<strong>on</strong>sible <strong>for</strong> the PA and sports participati<strong>on</strong> surveillance should be set up <strong>for</strong> the<br />

systematic and effective accomplishment <strong>of</strong> the task.<br />

55. To promote <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>, it is suggested that all stakeholders, including both<br />

government and n<strong>on</strong>-government agencies, be mobilised to participate in all three major<br />

elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>, namely educati<strong>on</strong>, services, and direct and indirect participati<strong>on</strong> in<br />

PA/sports.<br />

56. As a result <strong>of</strong> the survey, it is suggested that more media publicity be developed<br />

to educate the public and to raise their awareness <strong>of</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong> PA/sports<br />

participati<strong>on</strong>. For example, stimulating video clips which focus <strong>on</strong> the key messages <strong>of</strong> the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> PA participati<strong>on</strong> can be produced and broadcasted through TV, roadshows and<br />

radio during prime time. Eye-catching posters with simple and easy-to-remember slogans<br />

can be posted in strategic secti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the community, such as the MTR, buses, mini-buses<br />

and entrances/exits <strong>of</strong> residential estates.<br />

57. “Too busy due to work/study” is the most comm<strong>on</strong> barrier <strong>for</strong> PA/sports<br />

participati<strong>on</strong>. Inactivity is also associated with the increase <strong>of</strong> time spent <strong>on</strong> TV. It is<br />

suggested that incentives be given to encourage more active lifestyle engagements at home<br />

or at work. Walking and stair-climbing can be good choices. Other innovative activities<br />

are also needed, such as interactive video games requiring active physical movements, rope<br />

skipping and hulahoop at home, am<strong>on</strong>g other things.<br />

58. Swimming, badmint<strong>on</strong>, jogging and walking are the most popular sports<br />

activities reported by H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens, while swimming and Tai Chi are the most<br />

popular sports which citizens like to learn. It is there<strong>for</strong>e suggested that more promoti<strong>on</strong>al<br />

programmes related to swimming, badmint<strong>on</strong>, jogging, walking and Tai Chi be organised<br />

frequently. When planning <strong>for</strong> the additi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> sports facilities, the interests and opini<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong><br />

the community should be taken into c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>.<br />

59. Since Active and Inactive citizens possess different characteristics, different<br />

strategies <strong>for</strong> encouraging PA/sports participati<strong>on</strong> should be <strong>for</strong>mulated. The<br />

psychological framework <strong>of</strong> the following Transtheoretical Model (TTM) <strong>for</strong> exercise<br />

promoti<strong>on</strong> can be applied (Marshall & Biddle, 2001): i) to raise the awareness <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Inactive people, to enable them to recognise the fun and importance <strong>of</strong> sports and then start<br />

participating in them; ii) to encourage those who have already participated in some sports to<br />

establish a habit <strong>of</strong> more participati<strong>on</strong> and; iii) to encourage those who regularly participate<br />

in sports to c<strong>on</strong>tinue doing so, and to improve their physical fitness and enjoy the fun <strong>of</strong><br />

sports. It is recommended that different PA/sports strategies <strong>for</strong> the three groups listed above<br />

be designed. To encourage Inactive citizens to become more active, more opportunities<br />

and attracti<strong>on</strong>s can be <strong>of</strong>fered, such as the organisati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> “exercise with partner” scheme or<br />

30


“buddy scheme”, <strong>of</strong>fering priority enrolment <strong>for</strong> each citizen enrolling in exercise<br />

programmes with a partner, certificates/medals <strong>of</strong> achievement if a certain number <strong>of</strong><br />

friends/buddies can be introduced into the exercise programme, additi<strong>on</strong>al awards <strong>for</strong> those<br />

in greater need, such as older individuals and/or female participants, etc. For the Active<br />

citizens, attenti<strong>on</strong> should be given to retain their active life style by providing more<br />

innovative and interesting activities. At the same time, resources and/or opportunities <strong>for</strong><br />

periodic physical fitness evaluati<strong>on</strong> and health check will be effective ways to maximise<br />

participati<strong>on</strong> in exercises. Similar to the setting in the Mainland, the provisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> physical<br />

fitness examinati<strong>on</strong> and pers<strong>on</strong>alised exercise prescripti<strong>on</strong> should be provided by setting up<br />

fitness testing centres across the 18 districts in H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g.<br />

60. In additi<strong>on</strong>, it is also recommended that combinati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong><br />

activities be provided <strong>for</strong> different age groups, <strong>for</strong> example, parent-child activities can be<br />

organised <strong>for</strong> parents and kids, to participate together. Team activities can be organised<br />

<strong>for</strong> young people who like to play in group. For the middle-aged and elderly, a variety <strong>of</strong><br />

PA/sports which they can participant in or play al<strong>on</strong>e should be designed <strong>for</strong> them.<br />

61. The results revealed that citizens living <strong>on</strong> the H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g Island are more<br />

active in sports participati<strong>on</strong> whereas women living in the New Territories are more active<br />

in PA participati<strong>on</strong>. It reflects that sports facilities in the New Territories may not be<br />

c<strong>on</strong>venient <strong>for</strong> citizens’ access. Hence, lifestyle activities such as walking and Tai Chi may<br />

be excellent choices <strong>for</strong> citizens living in the New Territories. Walking programmes can also<br />

be strengthened <strong>for</strong> women residing in Kowlo<strong>on</strong>, with special emphasis <strong>on</strong> peer-enrolment,<br />

either with friends or spouses.<br />

62. L<strong>on</strong>g term speaking, more opportunities should be provided <strong>for</strong> different sectors<br />

<strong>of</strong> the community to have more time <strong>for</strong> participati<strong>on</strong> in PA/sports. For example, <strong>for</strong> the<br />

benefit <strong>of</strong> the working people, enterprises may be encouraged to implement a five-day week<br />

to give employees more leisure time. At the same time, it is necessary to make the best use<br />

<strong>of</strong> the working envir<strong>on</strong>ment and the workplace by c<strong>on</strong>sidering adding appropriate facilities<br />

to promote staff participati<strong>on</strong> in PA/sports. The Educati<strong>on</strong> Bureau should make good use<br />

<strong>of</strong> the school resources, through a variety <strong>of</strong> methods, to encourage more students to<br />

participate in PA/sports.<br />

63. As can be seen, PA/sports participati<strong>on</strong> in the model <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> includes<br />

direct and indirect participati<strong>on</strong>. However, the present study evaluated <strong>on</strong>ly direct<br />

participati<strong>on</strong>. It is proposed that questi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> the experience and prevalence <strong>of</strong> sports<br />

volunteers and attendees be included in future studies.<br />

64. A task <strong>for</strong>ce group to follow up <strong>on</strong> the recommendati<strong>on</strong>s listed above is likewise<br />

proposed.<br />

31


Countries/<br />

ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities<br />

Summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> Policies<br />

<strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> Policies<br />

32<br />

Appendix A<br />

Australia The area <strong>of</strong> “<strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>” presents a large area <strong>of</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong><br />

including inclusive practices in sports, cultural awareness, educati<strong>on</strong><br />

and the creati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> equal opportunities <strong>for</strong> all Australians to participate<br />

in sports.<br />

Active Australia: Four areas --<br />

- Educati<strong>on</strong>: increase awareness <strong>on</strong> the benefits <strong>of</strong> regular PA<br />

participati<strong>on</strong><br />

- Envir<strong>on</strong>ment: create better school and workplace envir<strong>on</strong>ment<br />

- Infrastructure: increase the capacity <strong>of</strong> the community<br />

- Evidence: establish nati<strong>on</strong>al PA m<strong>on</strong>itoring, evaluati<strong>on</strong> and<br />

research systems.<br />

Canada By 2012: a dynamic and leading-edge sport envir<strong>on</strong>ment that<br />

enables all Canadians:<br />

1. to experience and enjoy involvement in sports to the extent <strong>of</strong> their<br />

abilities and interests, and<br />

2. to increase the number <strong>of</strong> those who per<strong>for</strong>m c<strong>on</strong>sistently and<br />

successfully at the highest competitive levels.<br />

Four Aspects: -- Enhanced Participati<strong>on</strong>; Enhanced Excellence;<br />

Enhanced Capacity;<br />

Enhanced Interacti<strong>on</strong>.<br />

United<br />

Kingdom<br />

Top priority is to reduce obesity <strong>of</strong> the nati<strong>on</strong> via promoting <strong>Sport</strong><br />

<strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>.<br />

-- to encourage as many people as possible to engage in different<br />

<strong>for</strong>ms <strong>of</strong> sports;<br />

-- to increase the awareness and knowledge <strong>of</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong><br />

sports.<br />

USA Healthy People 2010:<br />

-- to increase the quality and years <strong>of</strong> healthy life;<br />

-- to eliminate the health disparities am<strong>on</strong>g different segments <strong>of</strong><br />

populati<strong>on</strong>;<br />

28 focus areas and 10 leading health indicators, am<strong>on</strong>g which PA has<br />

European<br />

Uni<strong>on</strong><br />

been determined as the nati<strong>on</strong>’s top priority.<br />

EU White Paper <strong>on</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>:<br />

A. The societal role <strong>of</strong> sport – (1) Public health and PA; (2) Fight<br />

against doping; (3) Educati<strong>on</strong> and training; (4) Volunteering in sports,<br />

active citizenship and n<strong>on</strong>-pr<strong>of</strong>it sports organisati<strong>on</strong>s; (5) Social<br />

inclusi<strong>on</strong> in and through sports; (6) Preventi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> and fight against<br />

racism and violence in sports; (7) <strong>Sport</strong>s in the Uni<strong>on</strong>'s external<br />

relati<strong>on</strong>s; and (8) Sustainable development.<br />

B. The ec<strong>on</strong>omic dimensi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> sports – (1) Ec<strong>on</strong>omic impact <strong>of</strong><br />

sports and (2) Public support <strong>for</strong> sports.<br />

C. The organisati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> sports – (1) Free movement and nati<strong>on</strong>ality;


(2) Players' agents; (3) Protecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> minors; (4) Corrupti<strong>on</strong>, m<strong>on</strong>ey<br />

laundering and other financial crime; (5) Licensing systems; and (6)<br />

Media.<br />

D. Follow-up – (1) Structured dialogue with sports stakeholders; (2)<br />

Cooperati<strong>on</strong> with Member States; and (3) Social dialogue.<br />

China Nati<strong>on</strong>wide Physical Fitness Programme: 1-2-1 initiatives (全民健<br />

身 121 工程)<br />

For citizens: -- Participate in at least <strong>on</strong>e physical exercise every day;<br />

learn at least two kinds <strong>of</strong> sports per year; participate in physical<br />

fitness test <strong>on</strong>ce a year.<br />

For family: -- Equip with at least <strong>on</strong>e exercise device; engage in<br />

outdoor PA no less than twice a quarter; subscribe to at least <strong>on</strong>e<br />

exercise-related magazine.<br />

For community: -- Provide at least <strong>on</strong>e exercise venue in each<br />

community; organise community-wide physical exercises twice a<br />

year; establish a group <strong>of</strong> fitness instructors in each community.<br />

For school: -- Require each student to participate in <strong>on</strong>e-hour physical<br />

exercise every day; organise students to participate in outdoor<br />

hiking or camping twice a year; organise students to take health<br />

examinati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong>ce a year.<br />

Japan 1) realise a lifel<strong>on</strong>g sports society in which all people can enjoy sports<br />

any time and any where, and create a sports envir<strong>on</strong>ment in local<br />

communities;<br />

2) improve Japanese internati<strong>on</strong>al competitiveness in sports so that<br />

Japanese athletes can play an even greater role in the Olympics and<br />

other internati<strong>on</strong>al athletic competiti<strong>on</strong>s; and<br />

3) take steps to enhance physical educati<strong>on</strong> in schools to further<br />

promote physical educati<strong>on</strong> and sports activities <strong>for</strong> children in<br />

c<strong>on</strong>juncti<strong>on</strong> with the support <strong>of</strong> schools and local governments.<br />

The goal <strong>of</strong> the Basic Plan <strong>for</strong> the Promoti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong>s is to increase<br />

the percentage <strong>of</strong> people involving in sports at least <strong>on</strong>ce a week to<br />

at least 50% as quickly as possible.<br />

South Korea Aims at improving the quality <strong>of</strong> citizens through sports and<br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> infrastructures.<br />

The promoti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> industry involves the c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

sports facilities, the development and distributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> sports<br />

programmes, and the promoti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> both voluntary sports clubs and<br />

products <strong>of</strong> the relevant sports. From 2003 to 2007, focus is<br />

placed <strong>on</strong> the c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> infrastructures, the facilitati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

sports club activities in schools and the enhancement <strong>of</strong> the health<br />

c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> its citizens, especially the youths. It is targeted to<br />

increase sports participati<strong>on</strong> rate from 10% in 2007 to 30% in<br />

2011.<br />

Singapore The three pillars: <strong>Sport</strong>s <strong>for</strong> every<strong>on</strong>e, sporting excellence and a<br />

serious sports industry:<br />

-- <strong>Sport</strong>s Participati<strong>on</strong>: to provide all levels <strong>of</strong> sports and exercise<br />

programmes, from entry level to elite training.<br />

33


-- <strong>Sport</strong>s Excellence: to promote internati<strong>on</strong>al sporting excellence.<br />

-- <strong>Sport</strong>s Industry: to build a sustainable sports industry to maintain the<br />

c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Singapore <strong>Sport</strong>s Council to the greater ec<strong>on</strong>omy<br />

and to help finance their programmes.<br />

Taiwan The Six-year (2002–2007) Exercise Participants Multiplicati<strong>on</strong><br />

Program focuses <strong>on</strong> enabling inactive people to acquire knowledge<br />

and skills in sports. It c<strong>on</strong>sists <strong>of</strong> health educati<strong>on</strong>, fitness<br />

instructors and volunteers training, improvement <strong>of</strong> fitness<br />

facilities and organisati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> sports activities. A major objective<br />

is to increase 500 000 exercise participants annually, which include<br />

100 000 people participating in swimming and 50 000 people<br />

engaging in bicycling regularly. By 2007, three milli<strong>on</strong> people<br />

are expected to become exercise participants.<br />

H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g The objective <strong>of</strong> the “School <strong>Sport</strong>s Programme” and “Healthy<br />

Exercise <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> Campaign” is to encourage every H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g<br />

citizen to engage in daily participati<strong>on</strong> in PA <strong>of</strong> moderate intensity<br />

<strong>for</strong> at least 30 minutes.<br />

34


Membership <strong>of</strong> the Working Group <strong>on</strong> the Formulati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Indicators <strong>for</strong><br />

Measuring the Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong><br />

C<strong>on</strong>venor<br />

Dr LO Wing-lok, JP<br />

Members<br />

Mr YEUNG Hoi-cheung<br />

Mr Francis CHAU Yin-ming, MH<br />

Dr CHOW Wah<br />

Dr Jacqueline CHOI Hiu-yeung<br />

Dr Kellie SO Pui-sheung<br />

Dr Patrick LAU Wing-chung<br />

Mr Vitus KWONG Ping-keung<br />

Ms LOK Kit-ha<br />

Secretariat<br />

Community <strong>Sport</strong>s Secti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Leisure and Cultural Services Department<br />

C<strong>on</strong>sultant <strong>of</strong> “<str<strong>on</strong>g>Study</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>” - Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong>s Science &<br />

Physical Educati<strong>on</strong>, The Chinese University <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g<br />

Team Compositi<strong>on</strong><br />

Pr<strong>of</strong> Stanley HUI Sai-chuen<br />

Mr Raym<strong>on</strong>d SUM Kim-wai<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong> Samuel WONG Po-shing<br />

Mr Wolfgang BAUMANN<br />

Miss Kiwi CHAN Wing-yee<br />

Enquiries<br />

If you have any enquiries or suggesti<strong>on</strong>s related to this report, please c<strong>on</strong>tact the<br />

LCSD Hotline at 2414 5555.<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!