Consultancy Study on Sport for All - Participation Patterns of Hong ...
Consultancy Study on Sport for All - Participation Patterns of Hong ...
Consultancy Study on Sport for All - Participation Patterns of Hong ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>sultancy</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Study</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> -<br />
Participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>Patterns</strong> <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g People in Physical Activities<br />
Summary Report<br />
(August 2009)<br />
Commissi<strong>on</strong>ed by Co-ordinated by<br />
Community <strong>Sport</strong>s Committee<br />
<strong>of</strong> the <strong>Sport</strong>s Commissi<strong>on</strong><br />
Submitted by<br />
The Chinese University <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong>s Science & Physical Educati<strong>on</strong><br />
Leisure and Cultural<br />
Services Department
Background<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>C<strong>on</strong>sultancy</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Study</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> -<br />
Participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>Patterns</strong> <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g People in Physical Activities<br />
Summary Report<br />
Different government departments (such as the Home Affairs Bureau, the<br />
Leisure and Cultural Services Department (LCSD), the Department <strong>of</strong> Health and the<br />
Educati<strong>on</strong> Bureau) and related organisati<strong>on</strong>s (such as the <strong>Sport</strong>s Federati<strong>on</strong> and Olympic<br />
Committee <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g, China, various nati<strong>on</strong>al sports associati<strong>on</strong>s and sports<br />
organisati<strong>on</strong>s, local sports groups and schools) have all al<strong>on</strong>g committed to providing<br />
diversified community sports services <strong>for</strong> the public and encouraging active participati<strong>on</strong> in<br />
sports activities across different sectors <strong>of</strong> the community to promote the culture <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong><br />
<strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>. These services have been implemented <strong>for</strong> years. It is now the opportune time to<br />
put in place a systematic and objective mechanism to gauge the level <strong>of</strong> public participati<strong>on</strong><br />
in sports and the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the relevant work in the community. In August 2006, the<br />
Community <strong>Sport</strong>s Committee (CSC) endorsed the six strategies <strong>for</strong> promoting community<br />
sports. One <strong>of</strong> the strategies was to <strong>for</strong>mulate indicators to measure the effectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />
the promoti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> in the community. It was hoped that by c<strong>on</strong>ducting a<br />
large-scale study <strong>on</strong> the participati<strong>on</strong> patterns <strong>of</strong> public physical activities, such as the extent,<br />
frequency, etc., and by objectively measuring the level <strong>of</strong> penetrati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> in the<br />
society, the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> all ef<strong>for</strong>ts <strong>for</strong> promoting community sports will be effectively<br />
assessed, and the findings may be used as the reference <strong>for</strong> setting future objectives. In<br />
January 2007, “the Working Group <strong>on</strong> the Formulati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Indicators <strong>for</strong> Measuring the<br />
Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>” (the Working Group) was set up under the CSC to deal with<br />
the matter.<br />
2. In a meeting held <strong>on</strong> 8 June 2007, the CSC endorsed the proposal <strong>on</strong> the study<br />
<strong>on</strong> the Participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>Patterns</strong> <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g People in Physical Activities (the study)<br />
submitted by the Working Group. In September 2007, the LCSD appointed the<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong>s Science and Physical Educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> The Chinese University <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g<br />
K<strong>on</strong>g (the C<strong>on</strong>sultant) to undertake a literature review, <strong>for</strong>mulate survey proposals,<br />
supervise the implementati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the survey and prepare a comprehensive final report. On 20<br />
February 2008, the Working Group submitted the c<strong>on</strong>sultancy study report <strong>on</strong> the literature<br />
review and the survey proposals to the CSC and members agreed to c<strong>on</strong>duct a household<br />
survey. On April 2008, the LCSD then appointed the C<strong>on</strong>sumer Search to c<strong>on</strong>duct a<br />
household survey in May and September. The C<strong>on</strong>sultant submitted a report to the<br />
Working Group <strong>on</strong> 27 November. The report c<strong>on</strong>sists <strong>of</strong> three parts: the result <strong>of</strong> the<br />
literature review, survey results and research findings, providing the focus <strong>for</strong> further<br />
studies and the way <strong>for</strong>ward <strong>for</strong> the development <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>.<br />
Objectives<br />
3. The objectives <strong>of</strong> this study are:<br />
i) To identify the trend and development <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> in selected<br />
countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities in the past five years;<br />
1
Methodology<br />
ii) To benchmark overseas practices in measuring sports and physical activity<br />
(PA) participati<strong>on</strong>;<br />
iii) To identify the participati<strong>on</strong> patterns in those countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities;<br />
iv) To identify indicators to measure the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the promoti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> policy in H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g as compared with those<br />
countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities;<br />
v) To identify and analyse the patterns <strong>of</strong> PA participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g<br />
citizens; and<br />
vi) To propose the way <strong>for</strong>ward <strong>for</strong> the future implementati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong><br />
<strong>All</strong> policy in H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g.<br />
4. To achieve the above objectives, the c<strong>on</strong>sultancy study is divided into two<br />
phases: Phase I c<strong>on</strong>sists <strong>of</strong> the literature review <strong>of</strong> 10 Western and Asia-Pacific<br />
countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities to understand the trend and development <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> in those<br />
countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities; and Phase II is a face-to-face random household survey intended<br />
to collect the patterns <strong>of</strong> sports and PA participati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Literature Review<br />
5. To better understand the <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> policies worldwide, a literature review<br />
was c<strong>on</strong>ducted at the initial stage <strong>of</strong> the study. Apart from H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g, ten<br />
countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities, including Canada, the European Uni<strong>on</strong>, the UK, the USA,<br />
Australia, China, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan were selected <strong>for</strong> the review.<br />
The <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> policies and relevant survey results <strong>of</strong> these countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities<br />
were also reviewed.<br />
6. Although it is clear that different countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities adopt different<br />
philosophies <strong>for</strong> sports promoti<strong>on</strong> and different definiti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>, there is a<br />
general trend that most countries, such as the USA, the UK, Singapore and China,<br />
emphasise exercise participati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g the general populati<strong>on</strong> and recognise the<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> health improvement and maintenance through PA participati<strong>on</strong>. It is also<br />
suggested that educati<strong>on</strong>al systems and school envir<strong>on</strong>ments are effective channels to<br />
promote PA/sports participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>for</strong> children and adolescents. Guidelines are proposed <strong>for</strong><br />
various levels <strong>of</strong> the society, such as schools, communities, families and individuals, to<br />
promote <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>. A summary <strong>of</strong> these guidelines is given in Appendix A.<br />
7. It is also observed that many countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities under review have<br />
introduced measurable nati<strong>on</strong>al objectives. For example, the UK aims at increasing PA<br />
participati<strong>on</strong> from 30% to 70% by 2020. Such tangible objectives provide clear directi<strong>on</strong>s<br />
<strong>for</strong> various stakeholders <strong>of</strong> the community to take up the comm<strong>on</strong> missi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> achieving the<br />
nati<strong>on</strong>al objectives. Moreover, most countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities agree that PA/sports<br />
participati<strong>on</strong> must be habitual. Most <strong>of</strong> them adopt “engaging in moderately intense<br />
2
PA/sports <strong>for</strong> an average <strong>of</strong> three times a week and <strong>for</strong> at least 30 minutes per day” as the<br />
basic requirement (e.g. the UK, China and Taiwan).<br />
8. Other than adopting the basic indicators <strong>for</strong> PA participati<strong>on</strong> as menti<strong>on</strong>ed above,<br />
some countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities also emphasise other aspects <strong>for</strong> promoting <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>.<br />
For example, Canada points out that <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> should include encouraging citizens to get<br />
involved in volunteer work related to sports (sports volunteers) and to participate in sports<br />
events as spectators.<br />
Definiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>, <strong>Sport</strong>s and Physical Activities<br />
9. A number <strong>of</strong> internati<strong>on</strong>al organisati<strong>on</strong>s, such as the European <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong><br />
Charter, the Internati<strong>on</strong>al Charter <strong>of</strong> Physical Educati<strong>on</strong> and <strong>Sport</strong>, the Trim and Fitness<br />
Internati<strong>on</strong>al <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> Associati<strong>on</strong> (TAFISA) and the <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> Commissi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Internati<strong>on</strong>al Olympic Committee, have given various definiti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>.<br />
Although there are some slight differences in the focus and terminologies in the definiti<strong>on</strong>s,<br />
the organisati<strong>on</strong>s all recognise the nati<strong>on</strong>al resp<strong>on</strong>sibility to ensure that every citizen has<br />
equal right to participate in sports and PA, and the stakeholders c<strong>on</strong>cerned, including the<br />
government and n<strong>on</strong>-government agencies, play important roles in achieving the provisi<strong>on</strong><br />
<strong>of</strong> sports and PA participati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
10. To sum up, we adopt the definiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> in this study as followed:<br />
“‘<strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>’ refers to creating opportunities and favourable envir<strong>on</strong>ment through the<br />
collaborati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> stakeholders and government to enable every<strong>on</strong>e, regardless <strong>of</strong> gender,<br />
age, ability, socio-ec<strong>on</strong>omic status, or ethnicity, to participate freely in physical activities<br />
and sport.”<br />
11. In this study, “Physical Activity” refers to any physical movements that<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sume energy. These include sports and daily physical tasks such as walking,<br />
housework, morning exercises, gardening and job-related manual work. “<strong>Sport</strong>” is defined<br />
as part <strong>of</strong> physical activities. Apart from physical exerti<strong>on</strong>, it usually requires sports skills<br />
with established rules <strong>for</strong> the game. Basketball, volleyball, swimming, track and field,<br />
dancing, etc. are examples <strong>of</strong> sports.<br />
Indicators Recommended to Measure Physical Activity Participati<strong>on</strong><br />
12. Two sets <strong>of</strong> indicators were used in this study to measure PA participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g people. One <strong>of</strong> them is the recent set <strong>of</strong> recommendati<strong>on</strong>s proposed by the<br />
Nati<strong>on</strong>al Associati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> and Physical Educati<strong>on</strong> (NASPE) and US Center <strong>for</strong> Disease<br />
C<strong>on</strong>trol (USCDC)/US Department <strong>of</strong> Health and Human Services (USDHHS) (USA<br />
indicator):<br />
i) For children, to engage in five days a week <strong>of</strong> at least 60 minutes<br />
(accumulated) <strong>of</strong> age-appropriate and developmental appropriate PA<br />
(recommended to be <strong>of</strong> moderate to vigorous intensity).<br />
ii) For adolescents, to engage in at least three days a week <strong>of</strong> PA that last at<br />
least 20 minutes at a time that require moderate to vigorous intensity <strong>of</strong><br />
3
exerti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
iii) For adults aged 20 or above, to engage in moderately intense PA <strong>for</strong> at<br />
least five times a week and <strong>for</strong> at least 30 minutes (accumulated) per day.<br />
Another indicator (Baseline Indicator), similar to the <strong>on</strong>e comm<strong>on</strong>ly used by other<br />
countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities and is a simpler indicator, is used to evaluate the PA<br />
participati<strong>on</strong>. For example, the UK, China and Taiwan have adopted three times a week <strong>for</strong><br />
30 minutes per day. Recent research has shown that an accumulati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> 30 minutes can also<br />
achieve similar health benefits (Miyashita, Burns, & Stensel, 2006 1 ) (Murphy & Hardman,<br />
1998 2 ). There<strong>for</strong>e, we propose the “Baseline Indicator” to mean engaging in moderately or<br />
vigorously intense PA <strong>for</strong> three times a week and <strong>for</strong> at least 30 minutes (accumulated) per<br />
day. This indicator is applicable to all age groups.<br />
Note 1: Accumulating multiple short bouts <strong>of</strong> exercise throughout the day effectively reduce<br />
postprandial plasma triacylglycerol c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong>s to an extent similar to that <strong>of</strong> a single<br />
30-min sessi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> exercise in healthy young men.<br />
2: Short bouts <strong>of</strong> brisk walking resulted in similar improvements in fitness and were at<br />
least as effective in decreasing body fatness as l<strong>on</strong>g bouts <strong>of</strong> the same total durati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Features <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> Policies in Reviewed Countries/Ec<strong>on</strong>omies/Cities<br />
13. There are distinct features in different countries with regard to the promoti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>. Canada and Singapore value the important role <strong>of</strong> sports excellence through<br />
the provisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> elite sports training and competiti<strong>on</strong>s. The UK and the USA are heading<br />
towards leading a trend in increasing PA <strong>for</strong> health improvement and maintenance, as well<br />
as addressing the obesity problem. Japan and China highlight the objective <strong>of</strong> improving<br />
the overall quality <strong>of</strong> life through sports and PA participati<strong>on</strong>. For example, China<br />
suggests that its citizens should subscribe to sports-related magazines regularly, and to learn<br />
at least two different lifel<strong>on</strong>g sports or PA. Canada, the European Uni<strong>on</strong> and Taiwan<br />
advocate that indirect participati<strong>on</strong> in sports either by serving as volunteers in sports event<br />
or by being sports attendees is also an important element in <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>. <strong>All</strong> these<br />
features need to be c<strong>on</strong>sidered when suggesting a suitable model <strong>for</strong> the promoti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong><br />
<strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> in H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g.<br />
Model <strong>for</strong> the Promoti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong><br />
14. When reviewing the <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> policies <strong>of</strong> the selected<br />
countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities, it is revealed that different countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities promote<br />
slightly different policies reflecting their distinct features and advantages. With reference<br />
to the key features <strong>of</strong> most <strong>of</strong> these countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities, particularly <strong>for</strong> Canada, UK,<br />
Australia, Singapore and South Korea, we come up with the following suggesti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>for</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g<br />
K<strong>on</strong>g. Other than PA/sports participati<strong>on</strong>, these countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities stress the<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> and services.<br />
i) Through educati<strong>on</strong>, public knowledge and awareness <strong>of</strong> the values <strong>of</strong><br />
sports and PA to the overall quality <strong>of</strong> life would be enhanced. In additi<strong>on</strong>,<br />
positive attitude towards PA/sports participati<strong>on</strong>, as well as specific skills<br />
4
that enable an individual to engage in sports and PA, would be improved<br />
through various educati<strong>on</strong>al channels.<br />
ii) The service comp<strong>on</strong>ents should include the provisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> leisure facilities<br />
and organisati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> leisure activities by different organisati<strong>on</strong>s, which<br />
encourage people’s participati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
iii) Apart from direct participati<strong>on</strong> through sports and PA, the values <strong>of</strong><br />
indirect participati<strong>on</strong> through volunteerism and attendance in sports<br />
events are also recognised. However, because <strong>of</strong> the specific focus <strong>of</strong><br />
this study, <strong>on</strong>ly the element <strong>of</strong> direct participati<strong>on</strong> is included.<br />
15. To promote <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> via “Educati<strong>on</strong>”, “Services” and “Participati<strong>on</strong>”, not<br />
<strong>on</strong>ly the active role <strong>of</strong> the government, but also the involvement <strong>of</strong> other n<strong>on</strong>-government<br />
organisati<strong>on</strong>s such as nati<strong>on</strong>al sports associati<strong>on</strong>s and related organisati<strong>on</strong>s, local<br />
organisati<strong>on</strong>s, sp<strong>on</strong>sorships and the overall infrastructure <strong>of</strong> the society are indispensable.<br />
To summarise, a structural diagram is shown below:<br />
<strong>Sport</strong>s Participati<strong>on</strong><br />
PA Participati<strong>on</strong><br />
Survey<br />
Methodology<br />
Awareness/<br />
Knowledge<br />
Participati<strong>on</strong><br />
<strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong><br />
Educati<strong>on</strong> Services<br />
Skills/Attitude<br />
Direct Participati<strong>on</strong> Indirect Participati<strong>on</strong><br />
16. Random sampling was used to select households <strong>for</strong> the face-to-face household<br />
survey to collect in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the participati<strong>on</strong> patterns <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g people in PA. As<br />
the study was divided into three age groups (7 to 12, 13 to 19, and 20 or above), the<br />
questi<strong>on</strong>naire was specially designed to suit resp<strong>on</strong>dents <strong>of</strong> different age groups. In order<br />
to avoid variati<strong>on</strong>s in the participati<strong>on</strong> patterns <strong>of</strong> PA because <strong>of</strong> seas<strong>on</strong>al preferences, the<br />
survey was c<strong>on</strong>ducted in two phases. The first phase was carried out from 22 May to 10 July<br />
5<br />
Facilities<br />
Training<br />
Programs<br />
<strong>Sport</strong>s Volunteers<br />
<strong>Sport</strong>s Attendees
2008, to collect data <strong>on</strong> PA patterns in a relatively cold period (January to March). The<br />
sec<strong>on</strong>d phase was carried out from 2 September to 19 October 2008, to collect the data in a<br />
relatively warm period (June to August). For this survey, the Kish Grid method was used to<br />
randomly select a household member from the sampled households <strong>for</strong> interview. The<br />
resp<strong>on</strong>se rate <strong>of</strong> the main sample was 70.18%. In order to make the data more representative,<br />
the survey data were presented as weighted data.<br />
Sample Design<br />
17. There were 4 037 successful interviews <strong>for</strong> the main sample and booster sample<br />
<strong>for</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>dents aged 7 or above and 1 054 <strong>for</strong> resp<strong>on</strong>dents aged 7 to 19.<br />
Main Results<br />
18. A total <strong>of</strong> 5 091 successful random samples were interviewed. The age<br />
breakdown is shown in Table 1.<br />
Table 1. Age group distributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> successful resp<strong>on</strong>dents<br />
Age Group<br />
Successful Interviews (No.)<br />
Total Main Booster<br />
7–12 693 186 507<br />
13–19 831 284 547<br />
20 or above 3 567 3 567 -<br />
Total 5 091 4 037 1 054<br />
19. Of the total resp<strong>on</strong>dents, 48.7% were male (n=2 479) and 51.3% were female<br />
(n=2 612). The sampling distributi<strong>on</strong> by gender matches the populati<strong>on</strong> distributi<strong>on</strong> in H<strong>on</strong>g<br />
K<strong>on</strong>g.<br />
Prevalence and Frequency <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong>s Participati<strong>on</strong><br />
20. As to the frequency <strong>of</strong> participati<strong>on</strong>, 65.5% <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens aged 7 or<br />
above participated in sports at least <strong>on</strong>ce in the past three m<strong>on</strong>ths (Jan to Mar /Jun to Aug<br />
2008). Figure 1 shows a slightly higher participati<strong>on</strong> rate <strong>for</strong> male citizens (68.4%) than<br />
female citizens (62.9%). It is also shown that with the increase in age, the participati<strong>on</strong> rate<br />
dropped significantly from 95.6% (aged 7 to 12) to 53.3% (aged 60 or above).<br />
6
Figure 1. <strong>Sport</strong>s participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens by age (Jan to Mar/Jun to Aug 2008)<br />
<br />
%<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
68.4<br />
65.5<br />
62.9<br />
96.494.7<br />
95.6<br />
85.1<br />
83.9 84.5<br />
7<br />
72.1<br />
67.2<br />
63.3<br />
62.8<br />
55.1<br />
58.8<br />
Male<br />
Female<br />
Overall<br />
54.4<br />
52.1 53.3<br />
<strong>All</strong> Age Group 7-12 yrs-old 13-19 yrs-old 20-39 yrs old 40-59 yrs-old 60 yrs or<br />
above<br />
21. Am<strong>on</strong>g all the sports participants, 41.2% participated three times or more per<br />
week (27.0% <strong>of</strong> the populati<strong>on</strong>), and 80.3% at least <strong>on</strong>ce per week (52.6% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
populati<strong>on</strong>).<br />
Figure 2. Frequency <strong>of</strong> sports participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens (Jan to Mar/Jun to Aug<br />
2008) <br />
45<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
%<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
23.4<br />
22.4 22.9<br />
4.5<br />
4.1 4.3<br />
Everyday 5-6 times<br />
a week<br />
15.4 14.0<br />
12.6<br />
3-4 times<br />
a week<br />
41.6<br />
39.1<br />
36.7<br />
1-2 times<br />
a week<br />
9.3<br />
8.1 8.7<br />
Once every Once every<br />
2 weeks 3 weeks<br />
8.9<br />
7.2<br />
5.4<br />
1.9<br />
1.5<br />
1.0 1.5<br />
1.2<br />
1.4 1.5 0.5 0.9<br />
Once a<br />
m<strong>on</strong>th<br />
Male<br />
Female<br />
Overall<br />
Once every Once every<br />
2 m<strong>on</strong>ths 3 m<strong>on</strong>ths<br />
22. Am<strong>on</strong>g all the sports participants, the three most <strong>of</strong>ten participated sports were,<br />
by order, jogging (13.8%), swimming (13.2%) and badmint<strong>on</strong> (10.1%). Different gender
and age groups have different choices. See Tables 2a and 2b <strong>for</strong> details.<br />
Figure 3. <strong>Sport</strong>s which H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens participated in most <strong>of</strong>ten (Jan to Mar/Jun to<br />
Aug 2008) <br />
%<br />
16<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
Jogging<br />
13.8<br />
Swimming<br />
13.2<br />
Badmint<strong>on</strong><br />
10.1<br />
Basketball<br />
7.3 7.1 6.7 6.5<br />
Hiking/ Excursi<strong>on</strong><br />
Qualiwalk<br />
Fitness exercise/ Stretching<br />
8<br />
Football<br />
4.5 4.3<br />
Fitness (multi-gym)<br />
Table 2a. <strong>Sport</strong>s which H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens participated in most <strong>of</strong>ten by gender <br />
Overall<br />
(%)<br />
Men (%) Women<br />
(%)<br />
Jogging 13.8 13.8 13.8<br />
Swimming 13.2 12.5 13.9<br />
Badmint<strong>on</strong> 10.1 7.8 12.4<br />
Basketball 7.3 13.0 1.8<br />
Hiking/Excursi<strong>on</strong> 7.1 7.5 6.6<br />
Qualiwalk 6.7 5.7 7.8<br />
Fitness<br />
exercise/Stretching<br />
6.5 4.3 8.6<br />
Football 4.5 9.0 0.1<br />
Fitness (multi-gym) 4.3 5.5 3.3<br />
Tai Chi 3.0 1.6 4.4<br />
Tai Chi<br />
3.0
Table 2b. <strong>Sport</strong>s which H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens participated in most <strong>of</strong>ten by age groups <br />
Overall<br />
(%)<br />
60 yrs old<br />
7-12 yrs 13-19 yrs 20-39 yrs 40-59 yrs<br />
or above<br />
old (%) old (%) old (%) old (%)<br />
(%)<br />
Jogging 13.8 14.2 10.4 15.6 15.3 8.5<br />
Swimming 13.2 19.8 13.4 15.6 11.4 6.6<br />
Badmint<strong>on</strong> 10.1 13.0 14.8 13.5 7.9 0.5<br />
Basketball 7.3 10.7 23.2 8.6 1.7 0.9<br />
Hiking/Excursi<strong>on</strong> 7.1 0.1 0.6 5.3 12.6 9.1<br />
Qualiwalk 6.7 1.7 0.8 4.2 9.0 16.5<br />
Fitness exercise/<br />
Stretching<br />
6.5 1.4 1.9 2.0 6.7 24.6<br />
Football 4.5 5.0 8.8 7.1 1.9 0.2<br />
Fitness<br />
(multi-gym)<br />
4.3 0.3 0.6 7.1 4.8 2.8<br />
Tai Chi 3.0 - 0.1 0.1 4.1 12.2<br />
<strong>Sport</strong>s Compani<strong>on</strong>s<br />
23. Almost half <strong>of</strong> all the sports participants (46.9%) resp<strong>on</strong>ded that<br />
friends/neighbours were their most popular compani<strong>on</strong>s; 40.8% exercised al<strong>on</strong>e and 13.1%<br />
exercised with classmates. Please refer to Table 3 <strong>for</strong> details <strong>of</strong> compani<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> different age<br />
groups.<br />
Table 3. Compani<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> different age group <br />
Time <strong>of</strong> Playing <strong>Sport</strong>s<br />
Age Group The most popular sport compani<strong>on</strong><br />
7–12 Parents (47.8%)<br />
13–19 Friends/Neighbours (64.4%)<br />
20–39 Friends/Neighbours (58.3%)<br />
40–59 Al<strong>on</strong>e (51.8%)<br />
60 or above Al<strong>on</strong>e (62.9%)<br />
24. Am<strong>on</strong>g all the sports participants, 35.5% usually exercised in the morning,<br />
27.6% in the evening and 20.2% in the afterno<strong>on</strong>. Please refer to Table 4 <strong>for</strong> details <strong>of</strong> the<br />
time choices <strong>of</strong> different age groups.<br />
9
Table 4. Time <strong>of</strong> playing sports by different age groups <br />
<strong>Sport</strong>s Venues Mainly Used<br />
Age Group Time <strong>of</strong> playing<br />
sports<br />
7–12 Afterno<strong>on</strong> (50.6%)<br />
13–19 Afterno<strong>on</strong> (44.6%)<br />
20–39 Evening (50.2%)<br />
40–59 Morning (41.5%)<br />
60 or above Morning (75.6%)<br />
25. Most <strong>of</strong> the sports participants engaged in their sports activities in Leisure/Public<br />
Facilities <strong>of</strong> the LCSD/Other Government Departments (60.6%), followed by Home (8.8%)<br />
and Private Housing Facilities (8.8%).<br />
Figure 4. <strong>Sport</strong>s venues mainly used (Jan to Mar/ Jun to Aug 2008) <br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
%<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Organisers<br />
60.6<br />
Leisure/Public<br />
facilities <strong>of</strong> the<br />
LCSD/Other<br />
Government<br />
departments<br />
8.8 8.8<br />
Home Private<br />
housing<br />
facilities<br />
10<br />
6.2 5.7 4.8 4.0<br />
School/<br />
College/<br />
University<br />
Country park Commercial<br />
Facilities Such<br />
as Fitness Club<br />
/ Yoga Club<br />
Private club<br />
26. Most sports participants organised sports activities by themselves or with<br />
friends (85.6%), followed by schools (9.4%) and LCSD (5.0%).
Figure 5. Organisers <strong>of</strong> the sports events (Jan to Mar/Jun to Aug 2008)<br />
<br />
%<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
85.6<br />
Sel<strong>for</strong>ganised/<br />
Organised<br />
9.4<br />
School/<br />
School<br />
Sector<br />
5.0 4.3 3.4 3.4 1.9 1.5<br />
LCSD<br />
Voluntary<br />
Associati<strong>on</strong><br />
Preference and Reas<strong>on</strong>s <strong>for</strong> Learning a <strong>Sport</strong><br />
11<br />
Private Club<br />
Commercial<br />
Gym/<br />
Fitness Club<br />
Private<br />
Housing<br />
Facilities<br />
Nati<strong>on</strong>al<br />
<strong>Sport</strong>s<br />
Associati<strong>on</strong><br />
27. For H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens (aged 7 or above), their first three choices <strong>for</strong> preferred<br />
sports were Swimming (14.7%), Tai Chi (10.3%) and Badmint<strong>on</strong> (8.8%). Children aged 7 to<br />
12 (16.8%), adolescents aged 13 to 19 (13.3%), young adults aged 20 to 39 (16.7%) and<br />
middle-aged adults (aged 40 to 59) (15.9%) all indicated that they would select Swimming<br />
as their first choice when learning a sport, whereas older pers<strong>on</strong>s aged 60 or above selected<br />
Tai Chi (20.6%).<br />
Figure 6. <strong>Sport</strong>s preferred to be learned <br />
%<br />
16<br />
14<br />
12<br />
10<br />
8<br />
6<br />
4<br />
2<br />
0<br />
Swimming<br />
14.7<br />
Tai Chi<br />
10.3<br />
8.8<br />
Badmint<strong>on</strong><br />
Various Kinds <strong>of</strong> Dance<br />
4.8 4.8<br />
Yoga<br />
Tennis<br />
3.8 3.6 3.6<br />
Table Tennis<br />
Basketball<br />
Jogging<br />
3.0 2.8<br />
Football
28. The first three factors that H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens c<strong>on</strong>sidered in learning a sport<br />
were Interest (40.7%), Health/Keep Fit (21.3%) and Time Availability (11.6%). As age<br />
increased, interest became less important (decreased from 65.0% <strong>for</strong> children to 19.6% <strong>for</strong><br />
older pers<strong>on</strong>s) while health became more important (increased from 5.2% <strong>for</strong> children to<br />
43.1% <strong>for</strong> older pers<strong>on</strong>s). Facilities (4.8%) and Cost (2.9%) did not seem to be the major<br />
c<strong>on</strong>cerns.<br />
PA Participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g Citizens<br />
29. According to the Baseline Indicator (i.e. engagement in moderately or<br />
vigorously intense PA/sports three times a week with an accumulati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> at least 30 minutes<br />
per day), the PA level <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens can be classified as Inactive (completely<br />
sedentary or <strong>of</strong> low PA), somewhat active (Some Active) and Active groups. Overall<br />
speaking, when c<strong>on</strong>sidering the Baseline Indicator (including PE less<strong>on</strong>s), 28.7% <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g<br />
K<strong>on</strong>g citizens are regarded as Inactive, 22.8% Some Active and 48.6% Active. Table 5 has<br />
summarised the PA prevalence <strong>for</strong> the three age groups according to the recommended PA<br />
level: 76.6%, 68.1% and 44.2% <strong>of</strong> children, adolescents and adults respectively were<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sidered Active; whereas 5.9%, 11.6% and 32.3% <strong>of</strong> children, adolescents and adults<br />
respectively were c<strong>on</strong>sidered Inactive.<br />
Table 5. Prevalence <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens meeting the recommended PA level <strong>of</strong> Baseline<br />
Indicator (%) <br />
Failure to meet the recommended<br />
PA level <strong>of</strong> Baseline Indicator<br />
Inactive<br />
Age Group Completely<br />
1<br />
Sedentary<br />
Low<br />
12<br />
PA 2<br />
Some<br />
Active 3<br />
Meeting the<br />
recommended PA<br />
level <strong>of</strong> Baseline<br />
Indicator<br />
Active 4<br />
Including PE 0.7 5.2 17.6 76.6<br />
7–12<br />
less<strong>on</strong>s<br />
Excluding PE<br />
less<strong>on</strong>s<br />
1.7 10.2 27.0 61.2<br />
Including PE 0.9 10.7 20.2 68.1<br />
13–19<br />
less<strong>on</strong>s<br />
Excluding PE<br />
less<strong>on</strong>s<br />
3.2 14.8 24.5 57.4<br />
20 or above 3.5 28.8 23.5 44.2<br />
Including PE 3.1 25.6 22.8 48.6<br />
Overall<br />
less<strong>on</strong>s<br />
Excluding PE<br />
less<strong>on</strong>s<br />
3.4 26.3 23.8 46.6<br />
Note: 1. Completely sedentary: H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they did not engage in 30 min [accumulated]<br />
<strong>of</strong> low-intensity PA weekly in the past three m<strong>on</strong>ths.<br />
2. Low PA: H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they engaged in 30 min [accumulated] <strong>of</strong> low-intensity PA<br />
but did not engage in 30 min [accumulated] <strong>of</strong> moderate or vigorous PA weekly in the past three<br />
m<strong>on</strong>ths.
3. Some Active: H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they engaged in 1 to 2 days <strong>of</strong> 30 min [accumulated]<br />
<strong>of</strong> moderate to vigorous activity weekly in the past three m<strong>on</strong>ths.<br />
4. Active: H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they engaged in three days or more <strong>of</strong> 30 min [accumulated]<br />
<strong>of</strong> moderate to vigorous activity weekly in the past three m<strong>on</strong>ths.<br />
30. Overall speaking, when the indicators suggested by the USCDC/USDHHS were<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sidered (including PE less<strong>on</strong>s), 29.4% <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens were regarded as Inactive,<br />
37.2% as Some Active and 33.3% as Active. The prevalence <strong>of</strong> engagement in PA by Active<br />
citizens changed to 34.1%, 71.3% and 29.1% <strong>for</strong> children, adolescents and adults<br />
respectively; while those <strong>of</strong> Inactive citizens (including PE less<strong>on</strong>s) changed to 20.2%,<br />
10.3% and 32.3% <strong>for</strong> children, adolescents and adults respectively.<br />
Table 6. Prevalence <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens meeting the recommended PA level <strong>of</strong> the<br />
USCDC/USDHHS (%) <br />
7-12<br />
13-19<br />
Overall<br />
Failure to meet the recommended<br />
PA level <strong>of</strong> USCDC/USDHHS<br />
Inactive<br />
Age Group Completely<br />
1<br />
Sedentary<br />
Low PA2<br />
Including PE<br />
less<strong>on</strong>s<br />
Excluding PE<br />
less<strong>on</strong>s<br />
Including PE<br />
less<strong>on</strong>s<br />
Excluding PE<br />
less<strong>on</strong>s<br />
13<br />
Some<br />
Active 3<br />
Meeting the<br />
recommended PA<br />
level <strong>of</strong><br />
USCDC/USDHHS<br />
Active 4<br />
(Meeting<br />
age-specific PA<br />
recommendati<strong>on</strong>)<br />
13.1 7.1 45.7 34.1<br />
17.1 10.0 51.9 21.0<br />
1.0 9.3 18.4 71.3<br />
2.5 12.3 24.2 61.0<br />
20 or above 3.5 28.8 38.6 29.1<br />
Including PE<br />
less<strong>on</strong>s<br />
Excluding PE<br />
less<strong>on</strong>s<br />
3.9 25.5 37.2 33.3<br />
4.3 26.0 38.1 31.5<br />
Note: 1. Completely sedentary: For ages 7 to 12, H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they did not engage at least<br />
<strong>on</strong>ce in 60 min (accumulated) <strong>of</strong> low-intensity PA weekly in the past three m<strong>on</strong>ths. For ages 13 to 19,<br />
H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they did not engage at least <strong>on</strong>ce in 20 min (c<strong>on</strong>tinuous) <strong>of</strong><br />
low-intensity PA weekly in the past three m<strong>on</strong>ths. For ages 20 or above, H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated<br />
that they did not engage at least <strong>on</strong>ce in 30 min (accumulated) <strong>of</strong> low-intensity PA weekly in the past<br />
three m<strong>on</strong>ths.<br />
2. Low PA: For ages 7 to 12, H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they engaged in 60 min [accumulated] <strong>of</strong><br />
low-intensity PA but did not engage in 60 min [accumulated] <strong>of</strong> moderate or vigorous PA weekly in the<br />
past three m<strong>on</strong>ths. For ages 13 to 19, H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they engaged in at least 20<br />
min <strong>of</strong> moderate PA, but did not engage in at least 20 min <strong>of</strong> moderate or vigorous PA weekly in the<br />
past three m<strong>on</strong>ths. For ages 20 or above, H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they engaged in 30 min<br />
[accumulated] <strong>of</strong> low-intensity PA, but did not engage in 30 min [accumulated] <strong>of</strong> moderate nor<br />
vigorous PA weekly in the past three m<strong>on</strong>ths.
3. Some Active: For ages 7 to 12, H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they did not engage in 60 min<br />
[accumulated] <strong>of</strong> moderate or vigorous PA <strong>for</strong> five days a week in the past three m<strong>on</strong>ths. For ages 13 to<br />
19, H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they did not engage in at least 20 min <strong>of</strong> moderate or vigorous<br />
PA. For ages 20 or above, H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they did not engage in 30 min<br />
[accumulated] <strong>of</strong> moderate or vigorous PA <strong>for</strong> five days a week in the past three m<strong>on</strong>ths.<br />
4. Active: H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens indicated that they reached the age-specific weekly PA guidelines (i.e., 7<br />
to 12 years old: five days <strong>of</strong> 60 min [accumulated] moderate PA and above; 13 to 19 years old: three<br />
days <strong>of</strong> 20 min moderate PA and above; 20 years old or above: five days <strong>of</strong> 30 min [accumulated]<br />
moderate PA and above.<br />
31. More than half (57.4%) <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens thought that they had<br />
“Sufficient” or “Very Sufficient” level <strong>of</strong> PA. For all age groups, Figure 7 shows that<br />
when compared with male citizens (63.5%), less female citizens (51.9%) perceived<br />
themselves as having sufficient PA level. More citizens aged 7 to 12 (72.0%) and 60 or<br />
above (77.7%) thought that they had “Sufficient” or “Very Sufficient” level <strong>of</strong> PA.<br />
Figure 7a. PA level perceived as sufficient or very sufficient <br />
%<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
7-12 yrs old 13-19 yrs old 20-39 yrs old 40-59 yrs old 60 yrs old or<br />
14<br />
Overall<br />
Male<br />
Female<br />
above
Figure 7b. PA level perceived as sufficient or very sufficient <br />
%<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Male<br />
Female<br />
Overall<br />
63.5<br />
57.4<br />
51.9<br />
75.6<br />
72.0<br />
68.1<br />
65.3<br />
54.7<br />
43.7<br />
15<br />
57.2<br />
46.3<br />
37.6<br />
58.9<br />
55.7<br />
52.8<br />
78.0 77.7<br />
77.4<br />
Overall 7-12 yr-old 13-19 yr-old 20-39 yr-old 40-59 yr-old 60 yr-old or<br />
above<br />
Primary Reas<strong>on</strong>s and Barriers <strong>for</strong> PA Participati<strong>on</strong><br />
32. The primary reas<strong>on</strong>s <strong>for</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens to engage in PA were “health/keep<br />
fit” (35.9%), “interest” (12.9%) and “to make it a habit in daily life” (11.6%). The primary<br />
reas<strong>on</strong> <strong>for</strong> those aged 7 to 12 (30.0%) and 13 to 19 (26.9%) to engage in PA was “interest”.<br />
For those aged 20 to 39 (32.5%), 40 to 59 (42.8%) and 60 or above (47.5%), the primary<br />
reas<strong>on</strong> was “health/keep fit”.<br />
Figure 8a. Reas<strong>on</strong>s <strong>for</strong> participati<strong>on</strong> in PA <br />
%<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
35.9<br />
Health/Keep Fit<br />
12.9<br />
Interest<br />
11.6<br />
To make it a habit in daily life<br />
6.0<br />
More leisure time<br />
4.9 4.8 4.7 4.1 3.6<br />
Physical training<br />
With compani<strong>on</strong> such as family & friends to<br />
participate in physical activities/ sports together<br />
To lose weight<br />
Good physical c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong><br />
Pastime<br />
2.4 2.3 1.5<br />
To know more about the benefits <strong>of</strong> physical<br />
activities<br />
To have fun<br />
The feeling <strong>of</strong> relaxati<strong>on</strong> after doing sports/<br />
physical activities
Figure 8b. Reas<strong>on</strong>s <strong>for</strong> PA participati<strong>on</strong> (by categories) <br />
Health Reas<strong>on</strong>s<br />
49.2%<br />
Matching<br />
Facilities/<br />
Envir<strong>on</strong>ment<br />
Reas<strong>on</strong>s 0.5%<br />
16<br />
Pers<strong>on</strong>al Reas<strong>on</strong>s<br />
(e.g. interests)<br />
43.6%<br />
Influence <strong>of</strong><br />
Family Members/<br />
Friends/Society<br />
(e.g. Social needs)<br />
6.7%<br />
33. The primary reas<strong>on</strong>s <strong>for</strong> not taking an initiative in PA participati<strong>on</strong> were “no<br />
spare time due to work/study” (30.7%), “tired” (17.5%) and “lazy” (14.6%). According to<br />
the data, the reas<strong>on</strong>s were “no spare time due to work/study” <strong>for</strong> those aged 7 to 59, and<br />
“health reas<strong>on</strong>” <strong>for</strong> those 60 or above.<br />
Figure 9a. Primary reas<strong>on</strong>s <strong>for</strong> not taking an initiative in PA participati<strong>on</strong> <br />
%<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
30.7<br />
No spare time due to work/study<br />
17.5<br />
Tired<br />
14.6<br />
Lazy<br />
9.8<br />
Health<br />
5.1 4.4 3.7<br />
No spare time due to family<br />
commitment<br />
Not interested<br />
Not physically fit<br />
2.5 2.2 1.8 1.5 1.1<br />
Bad weather<br />
No spare time due to other leisure<br />
activities<br />
No partner<br />
Take care <strong>of</strong> children<br />
No venue and facility
Figure 9b. Primary reas<strong>on</strong>s <strong>for</strong> not taking an initiative in PA participati<strong>on</strong> (by categories)<br />
<br />
Matching<br />
Facilities /<br />
Envir<strong>on</strong>mental<br />
Reas<strong>on</strong>s 3.8%<br />
Influence <strong>of</strong><br />
Family Members/<br />
Friends 1.9%<br />
Working Reas<strong>on</strong><br />
39.4%<br />
Health Reas<strong>on</strong><br />
14.5%<br />
17<br />
Pers<strong>on</strong>al Reas<strong>on</strong><br />
39.4%<br />
Time Spent <strong>on</strong> Doing Homework and Revisi<strong>on</strong> (Weekdays, Weekends and Public Holidays)<br />
34. Am<strong>on</strong>g full-time students, during weekdays, 32.2% spent <strong>on</strong>e to two hours per<br />
day <strong>on</strong> homework and studying, and 41.8% spent two hours or more per day <strong>on</strong> homework<br />
and studying. During weekends and public holidays, the patterns were similar, that is 27.5%<br />
and 39.0% respectively.<br />
Figure 10. Time spent <strong>on</strong> doing homework and revisi<strong>on</strong> <br />
%<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
9.5<br />
18.2<br />
Less than 30<br />
mins<br />
16.5<br />
15.4<br />
30 mins - less<br />
than 1 hr<br />
32.2<br />
27.5<br />
1 hr - less than<br />
2 hrs<br />
23.2<br />
18.7<br />
2 hrs - less<br />
than 3 hrs<br />
weekdays<br />
weekends and public holiday<br />
10.6<br />
9.6<br />
3 hrs - less<br />
than 4 hrs<br />
10.7<br />
8.0<br />
4 hrs or more
Time Spent <strong>on</strong> Watching TV, Playing Video Games and Computer<br />
35. For other activities, 33.8% <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens spent an average <strong>of</strong> three<br />
hours or more per day watching TV or using the computer during weekdays. The prevalence<br />
<strong>of</strong> children aged 7 to 12 spending four hours or more watching TV or using the computer<br />
during weekends and public holidays was 27.9%, which was more than double <strong>of</strong> that<br />
reported <strong>for</strong> weekdays. For adolescents, the patterns were similar.<br />
Figure 11a. Time spent <strong>on</strong> watching TV, playing video games and computer<br />
<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
%<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
6.0<br />
4.7<br />
Less than 30<br />
mins<br />
9.4<br />
8.9<br />
30 mins - less<br />
than 1 hr<br />
26.0 26.1<br />
21.7<br />
1 hr - less<br />
than 2 hrs<br />
23.0<br />
2 hrs - less<br />
than 3 hrs<br />
17.3<br />
15.9<br />
3 hrs - less<br />
than 4 hrs<br />
18<br />
8.2<br />
10.1<br />
4 hrs - less<br />
than 5 hrs<br />
3.7<br />
5.3<br />
5 hrs - less<br />
than 6 hrs<br />
weekdays<br />
weekends and public holiday<br />
2.6<br />
1.7<br />
6 hrs - less<br />
than 7 hrs<br />
5.2<br />
4.4<br />
7 hrs or more
Figure 11b. Time spent <strong>on</strong> watching TV, playing video games and computer during<br />
weekdays by age groups <br />
%<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
9.5<br />
4.5<br />
2.3<br />
Less than<br />
30 mins<br />
16.6<br />
9.1<br />
7.4<br />
30 mins -<br />
less than<br />
1 hour<br />
27.6<br />
26.0<br />
24.2<br />
1 hour -<br />
less than<br />
2 hours<br />
19.4<br />
24.6<br />
26.8<br />
2 hours -<br />
less than<br />
3 hours<br />
15.5<br />
19<br />
17.7<br />
3 hours -<br />
less than<br />
4 hours<br />
15.7<br />
5.4<br />
9.8<br />
8.2<br />
4 hours -<br />
less than<br />
5 hours<br />
5.1<br />
3.4 3.5<br />
5 hours -<br />
less than<br />
6 hours<br />
7-12 yrs old<br />
13-19 yrs old<br />
20 yrs old or above<br />
2.3<br />
1.7 1.8<br />
0.7<br />
6 hours -<br />
less than<br />
7 hours<br />
6.7<br />
4.3<br />
7 hours<br />
or more<br />
Figure 11c. Time spent <strong>on</strong> watching TV, playing video games and computer during<br />
weekends and public holidays by age groups <br />
%<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
9.4<br />
8.3<br />
4.7<br />
6.5 6.3<br />
2.3<br />
Less than 30<br />
mins<br />
30 mins -<br />
less than 1<br />
hour<br />
Time Spent <strong>on</strong> Walking<br />
19.6<br />
13.1<br />
22.8<br />
1 hour - less<br />
than 2 hours<br />
19.7<br />
17.8<br />
23.9<br />
2 hours -<br />
less than 3<br />
hours<br />
18.6<br />
18.0 17.1<br />
3 hours -<br />
less than 4<br />
hours<br />
10.4<br />
14.4<br />
9.6<br />
4 hours -<br />
less than 5<br />
hours<br />
7.2<br />
9.8<br />
5 hours -<br />
less than 6<br />
hours<br />
7-12 yrs old<br />
13-19 yrs old<br />
20 yrs old or above<br />
6.2 6.4<br />
4.6<br />
4.0<br />
2.1<br />
6 hours -<br />
less than 7<br />
hours<br />
13.2<br />
4.3<br />
7 hours or<br />
more<br />
36. 79.9% <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens spent at least 30 minutes in average <strong>on</strong> walking<br />
per day and around half <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens (50.5%) said they walked at least <strong>on</strong>e hour<br />
per day.
Figure 12. Time Spent <strong>on</strong> Walking <br />
%<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
3.9 3.6<br />
2.7 2.7<br />
2.1<br />
Less than 10<br />
mins<br />
23.7<br />
19.4<br />
16.2<br />
17.2<br />
11.8<br />
10 mins - less<br />
than 30 mins<br />
Time Spent <strong>on</strong> Transportati<strong>on</strong><br />
31.2<br />
31.3<br />
30.0<br />
29.8<br />
25.9<br />
30 mins - less<br />
than 1 hour<br />
21.9<br />
25.1<br />
20<br />
23.5<br />
19.7<br />
29.8<br />
1 hours - less<br />
than 2 hours<br />
11.7<br />
10.9<br />
9.5 9.4<br />
14.9<br />
2 hours - less<br />
than 3 hours<br />
6.26.1<br />
5.15.5<br />
4.2<br />
3 hours - less<br />
than 4 hours<br />
7-12 yrs-old<br />
13-19 yrs-old<br />
20-39 yrs-old<br />
40-59 yrs-old<br />
60 yrs-old & above<br />
5.5<br />
12.4<br />
11.7<br />
6.9<br />
4 hours or<br />
more<br />
37. Regarding time spent <strong>on</strong> various means <strong>of</strong> transportati<strong>on</strong>, 24.4% <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g<br />
citizens reported that they spent <strong>on</strong>e to two hours per day, 61.7% spent less than <strong>on</strong>e hour,<br />
and 13.9% spent more than two hours per day. Please refer to Figure 13 <strong>for</strong> details <strong>of</strong><br />
different age groups.<br />
Figure 13. Time Spent <strong>on</strong> Transportati<strong>on</strong> <br />
%<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
38.8<br />
23.9<br />
20.3<br />
11.4<br />
55.0<br />
Less than 10<br />
mins<br />
21.8<br />
20.6<br />
26.4<br />
24.3<br />
23.2 20.4<br />
23.0<br />
15.3<br />
16.2<br />
13.3<br />
12.7<br />
12.8<br />
10 mins - less<br />
than 30 mins<br />
30 mins - less<br />
than 1 hour<br />
31.7<br />
26.8<br />
10.7<br />
1 hours - less<br />
than 2 hours<br />
4.6<br />
2.0<br />
15.4<br />
12.7<br />
2 hours - less<br />
than 3 hours<br />
8.5<br />
2.9<br />
3.4<br />
1.0<br />
0.9 2.2 0.5 2.3<br />
0.9<br />
1.1 0.9 0.3<br />
3 hours - less<br />
than 4 hours<br />
7-12 yrs-old<br />
13-19 yrs-old<br />
20-39 yrs-old<br />
40-59 yrs-old<br />
60 yrs-old & above<br />
4 hours or<br />
more
Overall Time Spent <strong>on</strong> Sitting<br />
38. Regarding sedentary activities, 29.9% <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens spent six to nine<br />
hours per day <strong>on</strong> sitting, 42.2% spent less than six hours per day and 27.9% spent more than<br />
nine hours per day. Figure 14 shows that those aged 60 or above spent less time <strong>on</strong> sitting<br />
than younger <strong>on</strong>es.<br />
Figure 14. Time spent <strong>on</strong> sitting <br />
%<br />
45<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
6.6<br />
4.2<br />
10.5<br />
16.8<br />
15.6<br />
Time Spent <strong>on</strong> Sleeping<br />
16.2<br />
15.9<br />
27.3<br />
33.8<br />
37.3<br />
Less than 3 hours 3 hours - less than 6<br />
hours<br />
39.4<br />
35.7<br />
21<br />
28.6<br />
26.9<br />
31.6<br />
6 hours - less than 9<br />
hours<br />
30.4<br />
28.8<br />
21.9<br />
14.9<br />
10.1<br />
9 hours - less than 12<br />
hours<br />
7-12 yr-old<br />
13-19 yr-old<br />
20-39 yr-old<br />
40-59 yr-old<br />
60 yr-old or above<br />
9.0<br />
13.8<br />
11.6<br />
7.6<br />
5.2<br />
12 hours or more<br />
39. Only 55.3% <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens slept <strong>for</strong> seven hours or more daily, whereas<br />
27.5% slept <strong>for</strong> six to seven hours and 17.2% slept <strong>for</strong> less than six hours daily.<br />
Figure 15. Time spent <strong>on</strong> sleeping <br />
%<br />
45<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
7-12 yr-old<br />
13-19 yr-old<br />
20-39 yr-old<br />
40-59 yr-old<br />
60 yr-old or above<br />
9.1<br />
4.9<br />
3.5<br />
2.9<br />
0.3<br />
Less than 5<br />
hours<br />
16.1<br />
13.9<br />
12.2<br />
10.6<br />
1.4<br />
5 hours - less<br />
than 6 hours<br />
22.4<br />
5.5<br />
32.2<br />
30.7<br />
23.4<br />
6 hours - less<br />
than 7 hours<br />
34.9<br />
34.1<br />
33.7<br />
29.0<br />
24.8<br />
7 hours - less<br />
than 8 hours<br />
39.0<br />
20.7<br />
14.7<br />
13.5 15.0<br />
8 hours - less<br />
than 9 hours<br />
24.7<br />
8.4<br />
3.5<br />
3.1<br />
11.5<br />
9 hours or<br />
more
Awareness <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong>s-related In<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong><br />
40. Figure 16 shows that male H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens paid more attenti<strong>on</strong> to<br />
sports-related in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong> than female citizens. It shows that 25.2% <strong>of</strong> male citizens paid<br />
attenti<strong>on</strong> to sports-related news very <strong>of</strong>ten, while <strong>on</strong>ly 8.8% female citizens did the same.<br />
Figure 16. Attenti<strong>on</strong> to sports-related in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong> or news <br />
50<br />
45<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
%<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
12.8<br />
19.6<br />
16.4<br />
Awareness <strong>of</strong> LCSD Services<br />
32.2<br />
42.9<br />
37.8<br />
Never Seldom Sometimes Very <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
22<br />
29.8<br />
28.7<br />
29.2<br />
25.2<br />
8.8<br />
Male<br />
Female<br />
Overall<br />
41. Am<strong>on</strong>g H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens, 88.9% were aware <strong>of</strong> LCSD be<strong>for</strong>e the survey.<br />
Most <strong>of</strong> them knew about LCSD services through, by order, TV (59.4%), LCSD <strong>Sport</strong>s<br />
Venues (31.1%), Newspaper/Magazine (28.1%) and the Internet (21.7%).<br />
Figure 17. Awareness <strong>of</strong> LCSD be<strong>for</strong>e the survey <br />
%<br />
100<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
97.9 98.798.3<br />
90.5<br />
93.0<br />
88.9<br />
94.0 93.5 93.0 90.6 91.8<br />
87.5 85.2<br />
84.3 84.7<br />
16.6<br />
77.3<br />
70.9<br />
65.1<br />
Overall 7-12 yrs old 13-19 yrs old 20-39 yrs old 40-59 yrs old 60 yrs old or<br />
above<br />
Male<br />
Female<br />
Overall
<strong>Sport</strong>s Facilities<br />
42. Less than half (48.8%) <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens aged 13 or above c<strong>on</strong>sidered the<br />
sports facilities to be sufficient and 39.1% thought that the sports facilities were not<br />
sufficient. For those sports facilities deemed to be insufficient, the first three were, by order,<br />
badmint<strong>on</strong> courts (24.5%), swimming pools (21.0%) and sports centres (19.5%).<br />
Figure 18. <strong>Sport</strong>s facilities c<strong>on</strong>sidered to be insufficient <br />
%<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
24.5<br />
Badmint<strong>on</strong> Court<br />
21.0<br />
Swimming Pool<br />
19.5<br />
<strong>Sport</strong>s Centre<br />
12.6<br />
Basketball court<br />
11.1<br />
Football pitch<br />
23<br />
9.0<br />
Park/ open area with appropriate<br />
sports facilities<br />
7.9<br />
Jogging track<br />
6.8 6.1<br />
43. For H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens who c<strong>on</strong>sidered the sports facilities as inadequate, the<br />
facilities they wanted to increase most were badmint<strong>on</strong> courts (23.1%), swimming pools<br />
(20.6%) and sports centres (14.1%). The age group <strong>of</strong> 13 to 59 years old wanted to increase<br />
the number <strong>of</strong> the badmint<strong>on</strong> courts and those aged 60 or above desired to increase the<br />
number <strong>of</strong> parks/open areas with appropriate sports facilities.<br />
Fitness room<br />
Cycling track<br />
5.1<br />
Table tennis tables
Figure 19. <strong>Sport</strong>s facilities most desired to increase <br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
%<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
23.1<br />
Badmint<strong>on</strong> court<br />
20.6<br />
Swimming Pool<br />
14.1<br />
<strong>Sport</strong>s centre<br />
9.2 8.6 8.4 7.5 7.0<br />
Basketball court<br />
Football pitch<br />
24<br />
Park/ open area with appropriate<br />
sports facilities<br />
Suggesti<strong>on</strong>s to Strengthen the Promoti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong><br />
44. Large proporti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens aged 13 or above agreed that the<br />
suggesti<strong>on</strong>s to “strengthen media publicity” (42.1%) and “increase community sports<br />
facilities” (25.7%) can help the promoti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>.<br />
Figure 20. Suggesti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>for</strong> the promoti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> <br />
%<br />
45<br />
40<br />
35<br />
30<br />
25<br />
20<br />
15<br />
10<br />
5<br />
0<br />
42.1<br />
Strengthen media publicity<br />
25.7<br />
Increase community sports<br />
facilities<br />
19.4<br />
Provide more sports training<br />
classes<br />
18.2<br />
Strengthen physical educati<strong>on</strong><br />
in school<br />
12.4<br />
Build large-scale sports centres<br />
6.7<br />
Promote the sports culture in<br />
the whole community<br />
Jogging track<br />
3.6 3.3<br />
Reduce rental fee <strong>for</strong> using<br />
facilities<br />
Fitness room<br />
Develop sports with H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g<br />
characteristics<br />
6.2<br />
Cycling track<br />
5.0<br />
Table tennis tables<br />
2.0 1.5<br />
Organize free services /<br />
facilities<br />
Other suggesti<strong>on</strong>s related to<br />
improve services / facilities<br />
21.8<br />
D<strong>on</strong>'t know/ No comment
PA Participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> the H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g Island, Kowlo<strong>on</strong> and the New Territories<br />
45. Female adults in the New Territories had higher PA participati<strong>on</strong> than those <strong>on</strong><br />
the HK Island and in Kowlo<strong>on</strong>, whereas both male and female adults <strong>on</strong> the HK Island had<br />
higher sports participati<strong>on</strong> than those in the NT and Kowlo<strong>on</strong>. This was probably because<br />
the sports facilities <strong>on</strong> the HK Island were more accessible.<br />
Figure 21. Distributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Active female citizens by regi<strong>on</strong>s (measured by Baseline<br />
Indicator)<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
%<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
38.0<br />
25<br />
34.5<br />
43.9<br />
HK Island Kowlo<strong>on</strong> New Territories<br />
Figure 22. Number <strong>of</strong> days <strong>of</strong> sports participati<strong>on</strong> in different regi<strong>on</strong>s<br />
Seas<strong>on</strong>al Factors<br />
No. <strong>of</strong> days<br />
participated in<br />
sports<br />
6<br />
5<br />
4<br />
3<br />
2<br />
1<br />
0<br />
4.81<br />
4.66<br />
3.89<br />
3.35<br />
4.17<br />
Male<br />
Female<br />
3.89<br />
HK Island Kowlo<strong>on</strong> New Territories<br />
46. The general predicti<strong>on</strong> be<strong>for</strong>e the study was that most people would participate<br />
in PA in summer. However, it was found in this study that seas<strong>on</strong>al difference in PA/sports<br />
participati<strong>on</strong> was not obvious <strong>for</strong> children, adolescents and adults alike.
Figure 23a. PA participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> adults in different seas<strong>on</strong>s (measured by Baseline Indicator)<br />
%<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
Jan-Mar<br />
Jun-Aug<br />
32.4 32.2<br />
24.6<br />
26<br />
22.4<br />
43.0<br />
Inactive Some Active Active<br />
Figure 23b. PA participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Active children and adolescents in different seas<strong>on</strong>s<br />
(measured by Baseline Indicator)<br />
90<br />
80<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
81.0<br />
72.2<br />
69.9<br />
66.8<br />
45.4<br />
62.559.9<br />
59.1<br />
55.2<br />
7-12 yrs old 13-19 yrs old 7-12 yrs old 13-19 yrs old<br />
Including PE less<strong>on</strong>s Excluding PE less<strong>on</strong>s<br />
Characteristics <strong>of</strong> Active Venue Inactive Resp<strong>on</strong>dents<br />
Jan-Mar<br />
Jun-Aug<br />
47. Active and Inactive H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens made different choices in respect <strong>of</strong> the<br />
exercise compani<strong>on</strong>s, percepti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> sufficiency in PA, reas<strong>on</strong>s and barriers <strong>for</strong> PA<br />
participati<strong>on</strong>, etc. The Inactive children and adolescents spent more time <strong>on</strong> TV/computer<br />
and less time <strong>on</strong> daily walking. The Active adults spent less time <strong>on</strong> TV/computer (men<br />
<strong>on</strong>ly), less time <strong>on</strong> sitting, more time <strong>on</strong> daily walking and more time <strong>on</strong> transportati<strong>on</strong><br />
(men <strong>on</strong>ly), and had a lower level <strong>of</strong> smoking. Moreover, Some Active adults had higher<br />
educati<strong>on</strong> and family income levels. Table 7 shows a simple comparis<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> their<br />
characteristics.
Table 7. Comparis<strong>on</strong> between Active and Inactive resp<strong>on</strong>dents (measured by Baseline<br />
Indicator)<br />
Active H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g Citizens Inactive H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g Citizens<br />
Age group Younger Older<br />
Gender Male Female<br />
Time spent <strong>on</strong> daily<br />
More Less<br />
walking<br />
Time spent <strong>on</strong><br />
TV/computer Less More<br />
Time spent <strong>on</strong> sitting Less More<br />
Place <strong>of</strong> residence NT (women) Kowlo<strong>on</strong> (women)<br />
Exercise compani<strong>on</strong>s Exercise with friends Exercise al<strong>on</strong>e<br />
<strong>Sport</strong>s preference Jogging/Swimming<br />
Fitness exercise/Stretching<br />
exercise<br />
Prevalence <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong>s and PA Participati<strong>on</strong> in H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g<br />
48. A series <strong>of</strong> survey was c<strong>on</strong>ducted by the <strong>for</strong>mer <strong>Sport</strong>s Development Board<br />
(SDB) from 1996 to 2001 <strong>on</strong> sports participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens aged 15 or above.<br />
From the figure below, it can be seen that sports participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens aged<br />
15 or above in this survey was 63%, which was 9% higher than ten years ago (54% in 1998)<br />
and 15% higher than 2001.<br />
Figure 24. A comparis<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> sports participati<strong>on</strong> in previous and present studies<br />
70<br />
60<br />
50<br />
40<br />
%<br />
30<br />
20<br />
10<br />
0<br />
40<br />
50<br />
54<br />
27<br />
45 44<br />
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 …. 2008<br />
(Present<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>Study</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
Note: The data from 1996 to 2001 were retrieved from the <strong>Sport</strong>s Participati<strong>on</strong> Survey (SDB). The data in the<br />
present study indicate prevalence <strong>of</strong> participati<strong>on</strong> in at least <strong>on</strong>e sport activity during the last three m<strong>on</strong>ths by<br />
resp<strong>on</strong>dents aged 15 and above.<br />
48<br />
63
49. Similar results <strong>of</strong> increasing PA participati<strong>on</strong> were also found in other studies.<br />
For example, according to the behavioural risk factor survey c<strong>on</strong>ducted by the Department<br />
<strong>of</strong> Health from 2005 to 2007, the PA level <strong>of</strong> 18 to 64 years-old H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens<br />
increased from 20.3% in 2005 to 22.0% in 2006, and 23.0% in 2007. These data also<br />
indicate that the PA levels <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens were <strong>on</strong> the rise. The obvious increase as<br />
compared with the last decade may be associated with the <strong>on</strong>going ef<strong>for</strong>ts <strong>of</strong> various<br />
government departments and n<strong>on</strong>-government agencies in sports promoti<strong>on</strong>. For example,<br />
the LCSD organised a total <strong>of</strong> 22 000 community recreati<strong>on</strong> and sports activities <strong>for</strong><br />
1 253 442 participants in 2000. It was increased to 33 900 in 2008 (an increase <strong>of</strong> 54.1%),<br />
totalling 1 945 000 participants (an increase <strong>of</strong> 55.2%). The number <strong>of</strong> LCSD-subsidised<br />
activities in 2001 was 5 901, which was increased to 10 040 in 2008 (an increase <strong>of</strong> 70.1%).<br />
In additi<strong>on</strong>, the LCSD and the Department <strong>of</strong> Health has been promoting the Healthy<br />
Exercise <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> Campaign since 2000, and has been actively promoting the School <strong>Sport</strong>s<br />
programme with the Educati<strong>on</strong> Bureau since 2001. With the effect <strong>of</strong> the 2008 Beijing<br />
Olympic Games, the ef<strong>for</strong>ts are likely to result in an overall increase in PA participati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Recommendati<strong>on</strong>s<br />
50. The definiti<strong>on</strong> and model <strong>for</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> as well as the indicators <strong>for</strong><br />
measuring its effectiveness are developed from the findings <strong>of</strong> the literature review.<br />
Results from such evaluati<strong>on</strong> will serve as the basis <strong>for</strong> revising the future <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong><br />
policy in H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g. The results <strong>of</strong> the survey study <strong>on</strong> the PA and sports participati<strong>on</strong><br />
patterns will serve as benchmark figures <strong>for</strong> future studies.<br />
51. It is recommended that the <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> model shown below be adopted <strong>for</strong><br />
policy planning and future evaluati<strong>on</strong>:<br />
<strong>Sport</strong>s Participati<strong>on</strong><br />
PA Participati<strong>on</strong><br />
Knowledge/<br />
Awareness<br />
Participati<strong>on</strong><br />
<strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong><br />
Educati<strong>on</strong><br />
Promoti<strong>on</strong><br />
Services<br />
Skills/Attitude<br />
Direct Participati<strong>on</strong><br />
52. The present study recommends the objective <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> to be “to creating<br />
opportunities and favourable envir<strong>on</strong>ment through the collaborati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> stakeholders and<br />
28<br />
Indirect Participati<strong>on</strong><br />
Facilities<br />
Training<br />
Programmes<br />
<strong>Sport</strong>s Volunteers<br />
<strong>Sport</strong>s Attendees
government support to enable every<strong>on</strong>e, regardless <strong>of</strong> gender, age, ability, socio-ec<strong>on</strong>omic<br />
status or ethnicity to participate freely in physical activities and sport”.<br />
53. <strong>Sport</strong>s participati<strong>on</strong> produces a number <strong>of</strong> pers<strong>on</strong>al and social benefits. Apart<br />
from enhancing the quality <strong>of</strong> life, it also promotes good health. The indicators <strong>for</strong><br />
evaluating the health attainment effectiveness are mainly the frequency and intensity in PA<br />
participati<strong>on</strong>. The following two suggesti<strong>on</strong>s can serve as reference:<br />
(i) Indicator recommended by the US:<br />
� <strong>for</strong> elementary school-aged children, to accumulate at least 60<br />
minutes (each bout should last <strong>for</strong> at least 10 minutes or more) <strong>of</strong><br />
daily PA at moderate intensity or above <strong>for</strong> at least five days a week<br />
(NASPE, 2004);<br />
� <strong>for</strong> adolescents, to engage in three or more sessi<strong>on</strong>s per week <strong>of</strong> PA<br />
that last at least 20 minutes at a time, which require moderate to<br />
vigorous intensity <strong>of</strong> exerti<strong>on</strong> (USDHHS, 2000);<br />
� <strong>for</strong> adults, to accumulate at least 30 minutes (each bout should last<br />
<strong>for</strong> at least 10 minutes or more) <strong>of</strong> moderate activities <strong>for</strong> at least five<br />
days a week (USDHHS, 1996).<br />
(ii) To encourage the public to make PA a habit, participati<strong>on</strong> can start at the<br />
basic level. For the frequency and intensity, the recommendati<strong>on</strong> widely<br />
used by other countries/ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities can be adopted as follows:<br />
� engagement in moderately or vigorously intense PA/sports three<br />
times a week <strong>for</strong> at least 30 minutes accumulated per day. This<br />
indicator is applicable to all age groups.<br />
As the PA levels <strong>of</strong> more than half (51.4%) <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens did not meet the<br />
Baseline Indicator, it is suggested that an encouraging indicator applicable to all age groups<br />
should be used (i.e. Baseline Indicator). The targets will be the Inactive and Some Active<br />
pers<strong>on</strong>s. They are recommended to engage in moderately or vigorously intense PA/sports<br />
three times a week <strong>for</strong> at least 30 minutes accumulated per day. It will help to encourage<br />
those who do not have sufficient PA to participate more in such activities.<br />
54. In order to tie in with the rapid changes in technology, culture and life styles <strong>of</strong><br />
H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g, and to keep abreast <strong>of</strong> the extent <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> in the society, there is a need<br />
to c<strong>on</strong>duct regular territory-wide questi<strong>on</strong>naire surveys to track the changes in life styles<br />
and quality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens. Such evaluati<strong>on</strong> serves as <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> the tools <strong>for</strong><br />
evaluating our existing policies and programmes. To achieve this, benchmark indicators,<br />
which are evidence-based and recommended by prestigious pr<strong>of</strong>essi<strong>on</strong>al bodies, must be<br />
established. It is suggested that the same survey should be c<strong>on</strong>ducted at a five-year<br />
interval <strong>for</strong> a timely review <strong>of</strong> the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the policy and changes that result from<br />
the policies and ef<strong>for</strong>ts <strong>on</strong> PA/sports promoti<strong>on</strong>. In 1995, the Chinese Government<br />
announced that the nati<strong>on</strong>al survey <strong>on</strong> physical fitness and activities would be c<strong>on</strong>ducted at<br />
29
a five-year interval. The prevalence in PA participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> US citizens showed subtle<br />
annual changes from 2001 to 2005 (a drop from 41% to 37% <strong>for</strong> young adults), thus a<br />
clearer picture <strong>of</strong> change can be viewed at a five-year interval. The nati<strong>on</strong>al survey <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Australian government is also suggested to be c<strong>on</strong>ducted at a five-year interval. However,<br />
in order to allow evaluati<strong>on</strong> over a five-year period, preparati<strong>on</strong> work <strong>for</strong> the evaluati<strong>on</strong>,<br />
such as questi<strong>on</strong>naire design, interviewer training, survey tendering and field work<br />
interviews, need to be implemented within the five-year period. Thus a duly designated<br />
<strong>of</strong>fice resp<strong>on</strong>sible <strong>for</strong> the PA and sports participati<strong>on</strong> surveillance should be set up <strong>for</strong> the<br />
systematic and effective accomplishment <strong>of</strong> the task.<br />
55. To promote <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>, it is suggested that all stakeholders, including both<br />
government and n<strong>on</strong>-government agencies, be mobilised to participate in all three major<br />
elements <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>, namely educati<strong>on</strong>, services, and direct and indirect participati<strong>on</strong> in<br />
PA/sports.<br />
56. As a result <strong>of</strong> the survey, it is suggested that more media publicity be developed<br />
to educate the public and to raise their awareness <strong>of</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong> PA/sports<br />
participati<strong>on</strong>. For example, stimulating video clips which focus <strong>on</strong> the key messages <strong>of</strong> the<br />
importance <strong>of</strong> PA participati<strong>on</strong> can be produced and broadcasted through TV, roadshows and<br />
radio during prime time. Eye-catching posters with simple and easy-to-remember slogans<br />
can be posted in strategic secti<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> the community, such as the MTR, buses, mini-buses<br />
and entrances/exits <strong>of</strong> residential estates.<br />
57. “Too busy due to work/study” is the most comm<strong>on</strong> barrier <strong>for</strong> PA/sports<br />
participati<strong>on</strong>. Inactivity is also associated with the increase <strong>of</strong> time spent <strong>on</strong> TV. It is<br />
suggested that incentives be given to encourage more active lifestyle engagements at home<br />
or at work. Walking and stair-climbing can be good choices. Other innovative activities<br />
are also needed, such as interactive video games requiring active physical movements, rope<br />
skipping and hulahoop at home, am<strong>on</strong>g other things.<br />
58. Swimming, badmint<strong>on</strong>, jogging and walking are the most popular sports<br />
activities reported by H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g citizens, while swimming and Tai Chi are the most<br />
popular sports which citizens like to learn. It is there<strong>for</strong>e suggested that more promoti<strong>on</strong>al<br />
programmes related to swimming, badmint<strong>on</strong>, jogging, walking and Tai Chi be organised<br />
frequently. When planning <strong>for</strong> the additi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> sports facilities, the interests and opini<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong><br />
the community should be taken into c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
59. Since Active and Inactive citizens possess different characteristics, different<br />
strategies <strong>for</strong> encouraging PA/sports participati<strong>on</strong> should be <strong>for</strong>mulated. The<br />
psychological framework <strong>of</strong> the following Transtheoretical Model (TTM) <strong>for</strong> exercise<br />
promoti<strong>on</strong> can be applied (Marshall & Biddle, 2001): i) to raise the awareness <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Inactive people, to enable them to recognise the fun and importance <strong>of</strong> sports and then start<br />
participating in them; ii) to encourage those who have already participated in some sports to<br />
establish a habit <strong>of</strong> more participati<strong>on</strong> and; iii) to encourage those who regularly participate<br />
in sports to c<strong>on</strong>tinue doing so, and to improve their physical fitness and enjoy the fun <strong>of</strong><br />
sports. It is recommended that different PA/sports strategies <strong>for</strong> the three groups listed above<br />
be designed. To encourage Inactive citizens to become more active, more opportunities<br />
and attracti<strong>on</strong>s can be <strong>of</strong>fered, such as the organisati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> “exercise with partner” scheme or<br />
30
“buddy scheme”, <strong>of</strong>fering priority enrolment <strong>for</strong> each citizen enrolling in exercise<br />
programmes with a partner, certificates/medals <strong>of</strong> achievement if a certain number <strong>of</strong><br />
friends/buddies can be introduced into the exercise programme, additi<strong>on</strong>al awards <strong>for</strong> those<br />
in greater need, such as older individuals and/or female participants, etc. For the Active<br />
citizens, attenti<strong>on</strong> should be given to retain their active life style by providing more<br />
innovative and interesting activities. At the same time, resources and/or opportunities <strong>for</strong><br />
periodic physical fitness evaluati<strong>on</strong> and health check will be effective ways to maximise<br />
participati<strong>on</strong> in exercises. Similar to the setting in the Mainland, the provisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> physical<br />
fitness examinati<strong>on</strong> and pers<strong>on</strong>alised exercise prescripti<strong>on</strong> should be provided by setting up<br />
fitness testing centres across the 18 districts in H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g.<br />
60. In additi<strong>on</strong>, it is also recommended that combinati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> different types <strong>of</strong><br />
activities be provided <strong>for</strong> different age groups, <strong>for</strong> example, parent-child activities can be<br />
organised <strong>for</strong> parents and kids, to participate together. Team activities can be organised<br />
<strong>for</strong> young people who like to play in group. For the middle-aged and elderly, a variety <strong>of</strong><br />
PA/sports which they can participant in or play al<strong>on</strong>e should be designed <strong>for</strong> them.<br />
61. The results revealed that citizens living <strong>on</strong> the H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g Island are more<br />
active in sports participati<strong>on</strong> whereas women living in the New Territories are more active<br />
in PA participati<strong>on</strong>. It reflects that sports facilities in the New Territories may not be<br />
c<strong>on</strong>venient <strong>for</strong> citizens’ access. Hence, lifestyle activities such as walking and Tai Chi may<br />
be excellent choices <strong>for</strong> citizens living in the New Territories. Walking programmes can also<br />
be strengthened <strong>for</strong> women residing in Kowlo<strong>on</strong>, with special emphasis <strong>on</strong> peer-enrolment,<br />
either with friends or spouses.<br />
62. L<strong>on</strong>g term speaking, more opportunities should be provided <strong>for</strong> different sectors<br />
<strong>of</strong> the community to have more time <strong>for</strong> participati<strong>on</strong> in PA/sports. For example, <strong>for</strong> the<br />
benefit <strong>of</strong> the working people, enterprises may be encouraged to implement a five-day week<br />
to give employees more leisure time. At the same time, it is necessary to make the best use<br />
<strong>of</strong> the working envir<strong>on</strong>ment and the workplace by c<strong>on</strong>sidering adding appropriate facilities<br />
to promote staff participati<strong>on</strong> in PA/sports. The Educati<strong>on</strong> Bureau should make good use<br />
<strong>of</strong> the school resources, through a variety <strong>of</strong> methods, to encourage more students to<br />
participate in PA/sports.<br />
63. As can be seen, PA/sports participati<strong>on</strong> in the model <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> includes<br />
direct and indirect participati<strong>on</strong>. However, the present study evaluated <strong>on</strong>ly direct<br />
participati<strong>on</strong>. It is proposed that questi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>on</strong> the experience and prevalence <strong>of</strong> sports<br />
volunteers and attendees be included in future studies.<br />
64. A task <strong>for</strong>ce group to follow up <strong>on</strong> the recommendati<strong>on</strong>s listed above is likewise<br />
proposed.<br />
31
Countries/<br />
ec<strong>on</strong>omies/cities<br />
Summary <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> Policies<br />
<strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> Policies<br />
32<br />
Appendix A<br />
Australia The area <strong>of</strong> “<strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>” presents a large area <strong>of</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mati<strong>on</strong><br />
including inclusive practices in sports, cultural awareness, educati<strong>on</strong><br />
and the creati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> equal opportunities <strong>for</strong> all Australians to participate<br />
in sports.<br />
Active Australia: Four areas --<br />
- Educati<strong>on</strong>: increase awareness <strong>on</strong> the benefits <strong>of</strong> regular PA<br />
participati<strong>on</strong><br />
- Envir<strong>on</strong>ment: create better school and workplace envir<strong>on</strong>ment<br />
- Infrastructure: increase the capacity <strong>of</strong> the community<br />
- Evidence: establish nati<strong>on</strong>al PA m<strong>on</strong>itoring, evaluati<strong>on</strong> and<br />
research systems.<br />
Canada By 2012: a dynamic and leading-edge sport envir<strong>on</strong>ment that<br />
enables all Canadians:<br />
1. to experience and enjoy involvement in sports to the extent <strong>of</strong> their<br />
abilities and interests, and<br />
2. to increase the number <strong>of</strong> those who per<strong>for</strong>m c<strong>on</strong>sistently and<br />
successfully at the highest competitive levels.<br />
Four Aspects: -- Enhanced Participati<strong>on</strong>; Enhanced Excellence;<br />
Enhanced Capacity;<br />
Enhanced Interacti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
United<br />
Kingdom<br />
Top priority is to reduce obesity <strong>of</strong> the nati<strong>on</strong> via promoting <strong>Sport</strong><br />
<strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>.<br />
-- to encourage as many people as possible to engage in different<br />
<strong>for</strong>ms <strong>of</strong> sports;<br />
-- to increase the awareness and knowledge <strong>of</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong><br />
sports.<br />
USA Healthy People 2010:<br />
-- to increase the quality and years <strong>of</strong> healthy life;<br />
-- to eliminate the health disparities am<strong>on</strong>g different segments <strong>of</strong><br />
populati<strong>on</strong>;<br />
28 focus areas and 10 leading health indicators, am<strong>on</strong>g which PA has<br />
European<br />
Uni<strong>on</strong><br />
been determined as the nati<strong>on</strong>’s top priority.<br />
EU White Paper <strong>on</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>:<br />
A. The societal role <strong>of</strong> sport – (1) Public health and PA; (2) Fight<br />
against doping; (3) Educati<strong>on</strong> and training; (4) Volunteering in sports,<br />
active citizenship and n<strong>on</strong>-pr<strong>of</strong>it sports organisati<strong>on</strong>s; (5) Social<br />
inclusi<strong>on</strong> in and through sports; (6) Preventi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> and fight against<br />
racism and violence in sports; (7) <strong>Sport</strong>s in the Uni<strong>on</strong>'s external<br />
relati<strong>on</strong>s; and (8) Sustainable development.<br />
B. The ec<strong>on</strong>omic dimensi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> sports – (1) Ec<strong>on</strong>omic impact <strong>of</strong><br />
sports and (2) Public support <strong>for</strong> sports.<br />
C. The organisati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> sports – (1) Free movement and nati<strong>on</strong>ality;
(2) Players' agents; (3) Protecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> minors; (4) Corrupti<strong>on</strong>, m<strong>on</strong>ey<br />
laundering and other financial crime; (5) Licensing systems; and (6)<br />
Media.<br />
D. Follow-up – (1) Structured dialogue with sports stakeholders; (2)<br />
Cooperati<strong>on</strong> with Member States; and (3) Social dialogue.<br />
China Nati<strong>on</strong>wide Physical Fitness Programme: 1-2-1 initiatives (全民健<br />
身 121 工程)<br />
For citizens: -- Participate in at least <strong>on</strong>e physical exercise every day;<br />
learn at least two kinds <strong>of</strong> sports per year; participate in physical<br />
fitness test <strong>on</strong>ce a year.<br />
For family: -- Equip with at least <strong>on</strong>e exercise device; engage in<br />
outdoor PA no less than twice a quarter; subscribe to at least <strong>on</strong>e<br />
exercise-related magazine.<br />
For community: -- Provide at least <strong>on</strong>e exercise venue in each<br />
community; organise community-wide physical exercises twice a<br />
year; establish a group <strong>of</strong> fitness instructors in each community.<br />
For school: -- Require each student to participate in <strong>on</strong>e-hour physical<br />
exercise every day; organise students to participate in outdoor<br />
hiking or camping twice a year; organise students to take health<br />
examinati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong>ce a year.<br />
Japan 1) realise a lifel<strong>on</strong>g sports society in which all people can enjoy sports<br />
any time and any where, and create a sports envir<strong>on</strong>ment in local<br />
communities;<br />
2) improve Japanese internati<strong>on</strong>al competitiveness in sports so that<br />
Japanese athletes can play an even greater role in the Olympics and<br />
other internati<strong>on</strong>al athletic competiti<strong>on</strong>s; and<br />
3) take steps to enhance physical educati<strong>on</strong> in schools to further<br />
promote physical educati<strong>on</strong> and sports activities <strong>for</strong> children in<br />
c<strong>on</strong>juncti<strong>on</strong> with the support <strong>of</strong> schools and local governments.<br />
The goal <strong>of</strong> the Basic Plan <strong>for</strong> the Promoti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong>s is to increase<br />
the percentage <strong>of</strong> people involving in sports at least <strong>on</strong>ce a week to<br />
at least 50% as quickly as possible.<br />
South Korea Aims at improving the quality <strong>of</strong> citizens through sports and<br />
establishment <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> infrastructures.<br />
The promoti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> industry involves the c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
sports facilities, the development and distributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> sports<br />
programmes, and the promoti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> both voluntary sports clubs and<br />
products <strong>of</strong> the relevant sports. From 2003 to 2007, focus is<br />
placed <strong>on</strong> the c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> infrastructures, the facilitati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />
sports club activities in schools and the enhancement <strong>of</strong> the health<br />
c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> its citizens, especially the youths. It is targeted to<br />
increase sports participati<strong>on</strong> rate from 10% in 2007 to 30% in<br />
2011.<br />
Singapore The three pillars: <strong>Sport</strong>s <strong>for</strong> every<strong>on</strong>e, sporting excellence and a<br />
serious sports industry:<br />
-- <strong>Sport</strong>s Participati<strong>on</strong>: to provide all levels <strong>of</strong> sports and exercise<br />
programmes, from entry level to elite training.<br />
33
-- <strong>Sport</strong>s Excellence: to promote internati<strong>on</strong>al sporting excellence.<br />
-- <strong>Sport</strong>s Industry: to build a sustainable sports industry to maintain the<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tributi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Singapore <strong>Sport</strong>s Council to the greater ec<strong>on</strong>omy<br />
and to help finance their programmes.<br />
Taiwan The Six-year (2002–2007) Exercise Participants Multiplicati<strong>on</strong><br />
Program focuses <strong>on</strong> enabling inactive people to acquire knowledge<br />
and skills in sports. It c<strong>on</strong>sists <strong>of</strong> health educati<strong>on</strong>, fitness<br />
instructors and volunteers training, improvement <strong>of</strong> fitness<br />
facilities and organisati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> sports activities. A major objective<br />
is to increase 500 000 exercise participants annually, which include<br />
100 000 people participating in swimming and 50 000 people<br />
engaging in bicycling regularly. By 2007, three milli<strong>on</strong> people<br />
are expected to become exercise participants.<br />
H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g The objective <strong>of</strong> the “School <strong>Sport</strong>s Programme” and “Healthy<br />
Exercise <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong> Campaign” is to encourage every H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g<br />
citizen to engage in daily participati<strong>on</strong> in PA <strong>of</strong> moderate intensity<br />
<strong>for</strong> at least 30 minutes.<br />
34
Membership <strong>of</strong> the Working Group <strong>on</strong> the Formulati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Indicators <strong>for</strong><br />
Measuring the Effectiveness <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong><br />
C<strong>on</strong>venor<br />
Dr LO Wing-lok, JP<br />
Members<br />
Mr YEUNG Hoi-cheung<br />
Mr Francis CHAU Yin-ming, MH<br />
Dr CHOW Wah<br />
Dr Jacqueline CHOI Hiu-yeung<br />
Dr Kellie SO Pui-sheung<br />
Dr Patrick LAU Wing-chung<br />
Mr Vitus KWONG Ping-keung<br />
Ms LOK Kit-ha<br />
Secretariat<br />
Community <strong>Sport</strong>s Secti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Leisure and Cultural Services Department<br />
C<strong>on</strong>sultant <strong>of</strong> “<str<strong>on</strong>g>Study</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>Sport</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>All</strong>” - Department <strong>of</strong> <strong>Sport</strong>s Science &<br />
Physical Educati<strong>on</strong>, The Chinese University <strong>of</strong> H<strong>on</strong>g K<strong>on</strong>g<br />
Team Compositi<strong>on</strong><br />
Pr<strong>of</strong> Stanley HUI Sai-chuen<br />
Mr Raym<strong>on</strong>d SUM Kim-wai<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong> Samuel WONG Po-shing<br />
Mr Wolfgang BAUMANN<br />
Miss Kiwi CHAN Wing-yee<br />
Enquiries<br />
If you have any enquiries or suggesti<strong>on</strong>s related to this report, please c<strong>on</strong>tact the<br />
LCSD Hotline at 2414 5555.<br />
35