12.07.2015 Views

Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences ...

Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences ...

Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economic Sciences ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

SULTANA NAYEEM, University <strong>of</strong> Dhakaunless he increases his stock <strong>of</strong> informationthrough forming weak ties.The hypothesis <strong>of</strong> the following statisticalanalysis is migrants with weak ties have higherincome mobility than others with strong ties.Some proxies are made to define weak <strong>and</strong> strongties, e.g. respondents were asked how they passedtheir leisure time? Their answers are coded as:Weak tie: visiting ‘Bangla Bazaar’ <strong>of</strong> Kotaraya,going to pubs <strong>and</strong> shopping centres, attendingreligious <strong>and</strong> political discussion <strong>and</strong> communityget togethers.Strong tie: watching movies using satellite(with the housemates), visiting local friends(neighbours) <strong>and</strong> gossiping in a restaurant (local).We have regressed their monthly wage withboth quantitative regressors: job alteration, length<strong>of</strong> stay in years in Malaysia <strong>and</strong> qualitative ordummy regressor: weak or strong tie. ANCOVA(Analysis <strong>of</strong> Covariance) model is as follows:Yi= β1 + β2D2i+ β3X2i+ β4X3i+ ui,where, Y = monthly wage <strong>of</strong> the ith migrant iniRM, X 2= job alteration <strong>of</strong> the ith migrant,iX 3=ilength <strong>of</strong> staying in years <strong>of</strong> the ith migrant, D 2=i1, if the migrant has weak tie; 0, otherwise (ifstrong tie). With ui= error term, β = constant,1β2, β3,β = coefficients <strong>of</strong> dummy, job alteration4<strong>and</strong> length <strong>of</strong> staying respectively. The followingregression results are obtained:∧Y i = −7 .295 + 363.779D2i+ 93.556X2i+ 83. 228X3ise = (250.001) (173.518) (74.742) (19.806)t = (-.029) (2.096) (1.252) (4.202)p-value= (.977) (0.038)* (.213) (0.000)*R 2 = .171, n= 150Where, se means st<strong>and</strong>ard error <strong>of</strong> the estimatedcoefficient, t is t-statistic, p-value is theprobability value, * - indicating p-value is significantat 5% level <strong>of</strong> significance, R 2 is multiplecoefficient <strong>of</strong> determination, i.e. the 17% variationin wages are explained by the regressors <strong>and</strong>n is the sample size.From the above results, it can be concludedthat the dummy variable <strong>and</strong> length <strong>of</strong> stay havestatistically significant relationship with thewage. Duration <strong>of</strong> migrant life in the host countryhas the strong positive effect on wage. Keepingall other variables constant, the average monthlywages <strong>of</strong> migrants with weak ties are higher byabout RM 363.78 than those with strong ties. Ourdata in this study is cross-sectional one whereheteroscedasticity may involve frequently. So, weassume that u is normally distributed with meani22zero <strong>and</strong> variance σ , i.e. u ~ii N(0,σi) . We testby graphical method <strong>and</strong> White’s general heteroscedasticitytest (White, 1980) with the nullhypothesis: H 0 : there is no heteroscedasticity inthe error variance <strong>and</strong> found H 0 may be rejected.4000300020001000-1000-2000020 40 60 80 100 120 140Residual Actual FittedFigure 1 – Plotting residual to check heteroscedasticyFrom the above figure, it is depicted that theresidual term <strong>of</strong> the fitted regression showingheteroscedasticity for different values <strong>of</strong> the regressors.The variances <strong>of</strong> the error (according tothe black line <strong>of</strong> zero value) are fluctuating fordifferent values at different b<strong>and</strong> width.Table 2 – White Heteroskedasticity Test ResultsF-statistic 9.932964 Probability 0.000000Obs*R-squared 38.46709 Probability 0.0000008000600040002000So, this study performed the White heteroscedasticity-consistentvariances <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ard errortest for the remedy <strong>of</strong> heteroscedasticity <strong>and</strong>to get robust st<strong>and</strong>ard errors.Table 3 – White Heteroskedasticity-Consistent St<strong>and</strong>ardErrors & CovarianceVariable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.CONST -7.295058 279.9356 -0.026060 0.9792Dummy 363.7786 130.4603 2.788424 0.0060Alteration <strong>of</strong> job 93.55614 82.85140 1.129204 0.2607Length <strong>of</strong> staying 83.22766 33.05351 2.517968 0.0129011

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!