12.07.2015 Views

Understanding and Managing the Increase in Chronic Claims and ...

Understanding and Managing the Increase in Chronic Claims and ...

Understanding and Managing the Increase in Chronic Claims and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

−20−Accord<strong>in</strong>gly, when participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a mediation, an <strong>in</strong>surer should ensure that <strong>the</strong> necessary<strong>in</strong>vestigations have been conducted <strong>and</strong> that sufficient medical <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>and</strong> documentation hasbeen obta<strong>in</strong>ed with respect to <strong>the</strong> claimant’s medical condition <strong>and</strong> attendant disabilities.Our judges <strong>and</strong> judges have <strong>and</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>ue to award aggravated <strong>and</strong>/or punitive damages <strong>and</strong> specialawards where an <strong>in</strong>surer has acted <strong>in</strong> bad faith <strong>and</strong> failed to properly <strong>in</strong>vestigate <strong>and</strong> consider aclaim.In Clarfield v. Crown Life Insurance Co. 24 , <strong>the</strong> Pla<strong>in</strong>tiff claimed aga<strong>in</strong>st Crown Life Insurance forpayment of disability benefits pursuant to an <strong>in</strong>surance policy. The Pla<strong>in</strong>tiff also claimed aggravated<strong>and</strong> punitive damages. Justice Juriansz awarded <strong>the</strong> Pla<strong>in</strong>tiff benefits under <strong>the</strong> policy of <strong>in</strong>suranceon <strong>the</strong> basis that <strong>the</strong> Pla<strong>in</strong>tiff was totally disabled with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> mean<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> policy until hecommenced a tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g program. Justice Jurianz also awarded aggravated damages <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> amount of$75,000.00 <strong>and</strong> punitive damages <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> amount of $200,000.00, comment<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>surer hadfailed to assess <strong>the</strong> Pla<strong>in</strong>tiff’s claim <strong>in</strong> a balanced <strong>and</strong> reasonable manner <strong>and</strong> had failed to act fairly<strong>and</strong> promptly when it dealt with <strong>the</strong> Pla<strong>in</strong>tiff’s claim.The failure of an <strong>in</strong>surer to act <strong>in</strong> good faith was also addressed <strong>in</strong> Whiten v. Pilot Insurance Co. 25In that case, a fire completely destroyed <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>sured’s home <strong>and</strong> its contents. Although <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>surer<strong>in</strong>itially paid $5000.00 <strong>in</strong> liv<strong>in</strong>g expenses <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> family’s rent for a couple of months, <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>surercut off rent abruptly without notice <strong>and</strong> refused to make fur<strong>the</strong>r payments alleg<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> familyhad <strong>in</strong>tentionally set fire to <strong>the</strong>ir home. The Supreme Court of Canada held that <strong>the</strong> jury’s award ofpunitive damages <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> amount of $1 million was with<strong>in</strong> rational limits given that <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>surer’sconduct was exceptionally reprehensible <strong>and</strong> gave rise to an actionable wrong <strong>in</strong> addition to <strong>the</strong>breach sued upon.2425Clarfield v. Crown Life Insurance Co. [2000] O.J. No. 4074 (S.C.J.)Whiten v. Pilot Insurance Co. [2002] S.C.J. No. 19 (S.C.C.)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!