Progress in Developing the National Asset Database
Progress in Developing the National Asset Database
Progress in Developing the National Asset Database
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
multi-year approach for critical <strong>in</strong>frastructure and key asset protection to“<strong>in</strong>still predictability and structure <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> plann<strong>in</strong>g process.” 11 Develop<strong>in</strong>g ageospatial mapp<strong>in</strong>g of critical <strong>in</strong>frastructure and key resources was a separatebut related part of <strong>the</strong> strategy. 12In December 2003, this over-arch<strong>in</strong>g strategy became policy <strong>in</strong> HomelandSecurity Presidential Directive No. 7 (HSPD-7), Critical InfrastructureIdentification, Prioritization, and Protection. HSPD-7 sets forth <strong>the</strong> Secretaryof Homeland Security’s role <strong>in</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g “uniform policies, approaches,guidel<strong>in</strong>es, and methodologies for <strong>in</strong>tegrat<strong>in</strong>g federal <strong>in</strong>frastructure protectionand risk management activities,” based on critical <strong>in</strong>frastructure for whichDHS, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g IP, will “identify, prioritize, and coord<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>the</strong> protection.” 13The HSPD-7 required DHS to detail a national plan for CI/KR protectionwith<strong>in</strong> one year; DHS did not meet this deadl<strong>in</strong>e. 14The development of <strong>the</strong> <strong>National</strong> Infrastructure Protection Plan (NIPP) hastaken longer than expected, with an <strong>in</strong>terim NIPP released <strong>in</strong> February 2005and a draft version of <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al NIPP made available for public comment <strong>in</strong>November 2005 (as of this report, DHS had not released a f<strong>in</strong>al NIPP). Thedraft NIPP draws on <strong>the</strong> key elements of HSPD-7 <strong>in</strong> its risk managementframework, which <strong>in</strong>volves <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g stages: 1) identification of critical<strong>in</strong>frastructure; 2) identification and assessment of vulnerabilities;3) normalization, analysis, and prioritization; 4) implementation of protectiveprograms; and, 5) measur<strong>in</strong>g effectiveness. Federal, state and local, andprivate sector entities all have a role <strong>in</strong> implement<strong>in</strong>g this framework (seeAppendix C). The NIPP envisions a comprehensive, national <strong>in</strong>ventory ofassets to support its framework. DHS calls this <strong>in</strong>ventory <strong>the</strong> NADB.The NADB is <strong>in</strong>tended to be a “comprehensive catalog that <strong>in</strong>cludes an<strong>in</strong>ventory and descriptive <strong>in</strong>formation regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> assets and systems thatcomprise <strong>the</strong> nation’s CI/KR.” 15 DHS is now focused on populat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> firstgenerationNADB, <strong>the</strong> national asset <strong>in</strong>ventory that will support <strong>the</strong>development of an <strong>in</strong>formed national risk profile. The current NADB isdiverse and <strong>in</strong>cludes entries under every category of CI/KR (see Chart 1).11 The <strong>National</strong> Strategy for <strong>the</strong> Physical Protection of Critical Infrastructures and Key <strong>Asset</strong>s, February 2003. p.ix andp.23.12 NSPP CI/KA. pp. 24.13 Homeland Security Presidential Directive/ HSPD-7: Critical Infrastructure Identification, Prioritization, andProtection, Dec. 17, 2003.14 DHS also missed additional deadl<strong>in</strong>es for reports on risk assessment and read<strong>in</strong>ess enacted <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Intelligence Reformand Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, P.L. 108-458.15 Draft NIPP, November 2005, Section 3.2.1, p. 29. This document is pre-decisional.<strong>Progress</strong> <strong>in</strong> Develop<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>National</strong> <strong>Asset</strong> <strong>Database</strong>4