12.07.2015 Views

Growing the Sheltering Tree Growing the Sheltering Tree

Growing the Sheltering Tree Growing the Sheltering Tree

Growing the Sheltering Tree Growing the Sheltering Tree

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

C. Conscious Presence:The Strategic Implementation ofProgrammes to Promote Protection& Prevent ViolationsThe equation ‘presence equalsprotection’ does say <strong>the</strong> rightthing, but it doesn’t say enough.International presence alone willnot bring protection. Thepresence must be conscious,forceful, and courageous. It mustbe an engaged presence that isnot afraid to resist injustice andcruelty.– Bill Frelick,US Committee for RefugeesI am 100% sure that presence hasmade a difference.– Relief worker, AfghanistanI believe that 80% of <strong>the</strong> time Iam invited to go places withpeople just for <strong>the</strong> sake of mypresence with <strong>the</strong>m.– Civil Affairs Officer, AfghanistanAs noted in <strong>the</strong> quote to <strong>the</strong> left, presence alone willnot provide protection. Conscious presence isrequired: presence that has <strong>the</strong> specific aim of preventingor reducing violations and that seeks to exploitwhat may be very narrow windows of opportunity.It should not be forgotten that just as humanitarianorganizations engage in ‘strategic planning’, so dothose who are participants in armed conflict or campaignsof violence. It is important to determine what<strong>the</strong> goals of <strong>the</strong> parties are and how this will affectpresence and protection activities in general.Humanitarians are unarmed and are morally committedto respect for international law – thoseengaging in abuses, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, do not placerestraints on <strong>the</strong>ir behaviour. For this reason, presencewill not always prevent violations. Those perpetratingviolations are often conscious that humanitarians arewitnesses and may limit access for this reason. Theymay deliberately attack humanitarian aid workers inorder to force <strong>the</strong> withdrawal of aid operations or mayo<strong>the</strong>rwise manipulate <strong>the</strong> situation (by demandingpresence in one area while denying access to ano<strong>the</strong>r,for example).The presence of international witnesses who fail toact may be taken as a sign of acceptance of violationsand may fur<strong>the</strong>r embolden perpetrators, <strong>the</strong>reby fur<strong>the</strong>rincreasing risk. It is critically important thatwould-be perpetrators are aware that some action willbe taken when <strong>the</strong>y violate <strong>the</strong> law.Irrespective of <strong>the</strong> above caveats, people in dangerconfirm that presence is an essential protection tooland may have o<strong>the</strong>r benefits, such as preventing flightdue to panic and maintaining a sense of hope. Itseffectiveness as a protection strategy will vary accordingto time, place and circumstance, so it is importantto consider <strong>the</strong> specific situation at hand and planaccordingly.Peace Brigades International (PBI), which hasextensive experience in <strong>the</strong> use of presence through<strong>the</strong> protection strategy of accompaniment (physicalpresence with endangered persons) notes that given<strong>the</strong> limited resources available to many organizations,it is important to focus <strong>the</strong> work very carefully – howcan <strong>the</strong> most be gained from field presence? Accordingto one PBI expert, <strong>the</strong> only way is to select <strong>the</strong> majornodes of <strong>the</strong> social fabric of <strong>the</strong> community, and concentrateprotective efforts on <strong>the</strong>m. These nodes areusually individuals (natural leaders, elders, etc.), bodies(internal or tribal councils, for example), ororganizations (NGOS providing support to those indanger). If an attacker hits <strong>the</strong>se nodes, <strong>the</strong> protectionof <strong>the</strong> whole community is thrown into question. Butif <strong>the</strong>se social structures are able to go ahead with <strong>the</strong>irintegrative work, probably <strong>the</strong> whole community willmove ahead, even if <strong>the</strong>y suffer attacks or repression.This is a strategic and operative choice (of course, alllives, whe<strong>the</strong>r of leaders or ordinary citizens, areequally valuable). Obviously, it is not always easy toimplement this in daily work. For example, PBI providedround-<strong>the</strong>-clock presence in <strong>the</strong> PeaceCommunity of San José de Apartadó in Urabá,Colombia. It was impossible to protect <strong>the</strong> 2,000inhabitants – most of <strong>the</strong>m IDPS – in <strong>the</strong> communityor to protect <strong>the</strong> entire perimeter. In an agreementwith <strong>the</strong> Peace Community, it was established that PBIwould provide international presence with a focus on42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!