02.12.2012 Views

Expert Opinion - Nazi Looted Art

Expert Opinion - Nazi Looted Art

Expert Opinion - Nazi Looted Art

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

28<br />

November 1936 “she would negotiate with the foreign exchange office and all the<br />

other associated organizations” regarding this matter.<br />

Evidence: Correspondence Thekla Hess – Kunsthaus Zurich dated September<br />

23 and 30, 1936<br />

Until this point in time efforts to have the artworks in Switzerland regarded as loans<br />

had been successful. Nevertheless, German authorities could learn at any time that<br />

the artworks originally sent for exhibition (1933 in Basel, 1934 in Zurich) - at least<br />

since the end of the Zurich exhibition (due to an extension only in August 1934) -<br />

were no longer being kept by them as pieces for exhibition. Since then, Thekla Hess<br />

had continuously lived under the threat of being accused of having brought her<br />

possessions into a foreign country or at least of having them left there in order to<br />

protect them from access by German officials. Her September 23, 1936 letter<br />

demonstrated that she had already provided an affidavit to German authorities<br />

responsible for foreign exchange matters to the effect that no foreign exchange was<br />

paid for the artworks stored in Switzerland. Accordingly, the German officials were<br />

already aware prior to September 1936 of the Swiss whereabouts of the Hess<br />

collection artworks.<br />

In early November 1936 Thekla Hess was to have discussed the disposition of the<br />

artworks stored in Switzerland with the German foreign exchange office and to clarify<br />

legal foreign exchange payments. This is reflected in the Hess letter dated<br />

September 23, 1936. Based on the circumstances as related by Thekla Hess, it can<br />

be deduced that she was requested by the German authorities to repatriate the<br />

artworks no longer needed for exhibition in Switzerland back to Germany. If not, she<br />

faced the threat of repressive measures by the <strong>Nazi</strong> regime, a situation that<br />

portended the greatest dangers for her and her family members.<br />

Similar fates of other Jewish art collectors during the <strong>Nazi</strong> regime have already been<br />

documented.<br />

In the mid-thirties Walter Westfeld, the art collector and dealer in Duesseldorf, had<br />

brought some of his works of art to Paris, in anticipation of his emigration. This did<br />

not go unnoticed by the <strong>Nazi</strong> authorities. They arrested Westfeld, accusing him of<br />

having committed a foreign exchange deception. They sentenced him to prison and<br />

to pay a large fine which was settled by their auctioning off his entire art collection.<br />

Having completed his prison term, Westfeld was deported because his release<br />

would have posed “a threat to the existence and security of the people and the<br />

state.” Westfeld later perished in the Auschwitz concentration camp.<br />

Carl Sachs, the Jewish industrialist and art collector from Breslau, had succeeded in<br />

shipping 22 works of art from his high-caliber collection of French impressionists to<br />

Switzerland for exhibition purposes. In 1939 he emigrated to Switzerland with only<br />

RM 10 in his pocket and sustained himself by sales of pictures. One year later the<br />

Economics Ministry of the Reich demanded the repatriation of the artworks and<br />

seized as “settlement” all assets remaining in Germany.<br />

Evidence: Schnabel/Tatzkow, <strong>Nazi</strong> <strong>Looted</strong> <strong>Art</strong>, worldwide <strong>Art</strong> Restitution<br />

Handbook, 476-478 (Berlin, 2007), Tatzkow/Hinz, Citizens, Victims

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!