all club, the player is an active amateur and plays in the A-, B-, C- orD-youth of the relevant professional football club.In addition the professional football club claiming pool compensationfor a player must have notified the relevant player in writing byno later than 1 May of the calendar year that he may again participatein the club’s youth training. 14 A copy of this written notification alsoneeds to be submitted to the KNVB no later than 7 May of the samecalendar year.Pool compensations are separate from training compensations thatare due on the basis of the Regulations on General TransferProvisions, Training Compensation and Solidarity Contribution. Thepool regulations in fact state that, if a club has obtained pool compensationfor a player, this club no longer has any right to training compensationfor that player. 15 Any possible entitlement to training compensationby amateur clubs on the basis of the Regulations onGeneral Transfer Provisions, Training Compensation and SolidarityContribution is not affected by this. 16 It will be discussed later thatcompensation based on the pool regulations is higher than compensationbased on the Regulations on General Transfer Provisions,Training Compensation and Solidarity Contribution.3.2 InternationalThe FIFA Regulations and decisions by the DRC cover training compensationin international cases. Training compensation in internationalsituations will also be considered below. First, the focus will beon instances where training compensation is due to clubs which havecontributed to a player’s training. Here the FIFA Regulations of 2001and 2005 are unequivocal. Training compensation is payable when aplayer signs his first contract as a professional before the end of theseason of his 23 rd birthday. Compensation must also be paid for eachinternational transfer the player makes before the end of the season ofhis 23 rd birthday. This applies both to a transfer while there is anongoing contract, and to a transfer on conclusion of the player’semployment contract. 17A player’s former club has no right to any training compensation ifthat club has terminated the contract with the player without justcause. 18 Nor is there any entitlement to compensation if the playermoves to a club from category 4 (amateur level). 19 The rules of 2001provide an exception to this if the player acquires non-amateur statusagain within three years. 20 The rules of 2005 stipulate the term as 30months. 21The 2005 rules also provide that the player’s new club must havepaid the training compensation to all clubs which have a right to it,within 30 days following registration with the new football association.22 This rule also stipulates that if a link between the player andany of the clubs that trained him cannot be established, or if thoseclubs do not make themselves known within 18 months of the player’sfirst registration as a professional, the training compensation shallbe paid to the association(s) of the country (or countries) where theprofessional was trained. 23 The 2001 rules set the term at two years. 24The compensation must be used by the football association for developingyouth football.3.3 The first contract as a professionalTraining compensation must therefore be paid if a player signs a contractas a professional before the end of the season of his 23 rd birthday.But when is there in fact such an employment contract? Whereis the line between an amateur and a professional?Article 2 of the FIFA rules of 2001 and 2005 stipulates that a professionalhas a written contract with a club. He will in fact be paidmore than the amount of the actual expenditure for his football activities.The rules of 2001 provide that travel and hotel expenses incurredthrough involvement in a match and the costs of a player’s equipment,insurance and training may be reimbursed without jeopardisinga player’s amateur status.The DRC had to reach a decision in a case where a ‘scholarshipagreement’ was involved. According to this agreement, the playerreceived around EUR 500 a month in the first season, EUR 560 in thesecond and EUR 710 in the third. Travel expenses were also reimbursed.The DRC considered that the player received remunerationwhich exceeded the expenses incurred under article 2. It was also consideredthat the criteria of this article were conclusive in a case whereit had to be determined whether the status was amateur or professional.The legal nature or naming of the agreement is not important here.This is confirmed by the Court of Arbitration for Sport. 25 In thisinstance, the player with the ‘scholarship agreement’ was regarded asa professional. Because he had signed his contract as a professional,training compensation had to be paid. 26In another case, a player with a ‘scholarship agreement’ was indeedregarded as an amateur. In terms of this agreement, housing expenseswere paid, as well as travel and living expenses incurred by the playerarising from his training. The DRC considered that the nature of acontract between a player and a club is established by the relevantfootball association. In this instance, the player was registered as anamateur. It was also considered that the autonomy of the footballassociation should be respected, so that the status of registration withthe association is decisive should it have to be determined whether theconditions for receiving training compensation have been met. In thisinstance the status was thus amateur. This meant that no first contractas a professional had been created, so that no training compensationwas due. 27The next case deals with an ‘amateur sport agreement’. Accordingto this agreement, transportation, apartment and nutrition expenseswere reimbursed. The player also received a monthly amount of HUF57,000. The minimum wage in Hungary is HUF 62,500. The DRCconsidered that a player should not be regarded as amateur if he has awritten contract on the basis of which he receives remuneration whichexceeds the actual expenses incurred as a result of his football activities.It was concluded that just such a situation existed here. There wasthus a contract as a professional, so that training compensation had tobe paid. 28Another case involved a contract without a monthly salary, butwith bonuses which would be paid per match played. However, therelevant player never played a match in the club’s A-team. The DRCconcluded that, in formal terms, the player was a professional, butthat de facto he was an amateur because he had never received remuneration.The player had therefore not received any remunerationwhich was greater than the actual expenses incurred because of hisfootball activities. In this case no training compensation was thusdue. 29The next case involves a player with a contract as a professional.The player was also registered as a professional with the Greek footballassociation. In fact, he never played a match for a non-amateurteam. The DRC decided here that the player should be regarded as aprofessional. Because an employment contract had been signed, theclaimant club had the right to training compensation. 30Another case dealt with the status of an ‘aspirant contract’. Accordingto this contract, living and educational costs would be reimbursed. A cash14 Art. 2 Training Pool Regulations andart. 48 Regulations on Paid Football[Reglement Betaald Voetbal]15 Art. 2 (2) Training Pool Regulations16 Art. 2 (4) Training Pool Regulations17 Art. 20 of the Regulations for the Statusand Transfer of Players, edition 2005and art. 5 (2) of the RegulationsGoverning the Application of theRegulations for the Status and Transferof Players, edition 200118 Art. 2 (i) Annex 4 of the Regulations forthe Status and Transfer of Players, edition2005 and art. 5 (3) (b) of theRegulations Governing the Applicationof the Regulations for the Status andTransfer of Players, edition 200119 Art. 2 (ii) Annex 4 of the Regulations forthe Status and Transfer of Players, edition2005 and art. 5 (3) (a) of theRegulations Governing the Applicationof the Regulations for the Status andTransfer of Players, edition 200120 Art. 5 (3) (a) Regulations Governing theApplication of the Regulations for theStatus and Transfer of Players, edition2001 and DRC 65362 of 1 June 200521 Art 3 (2) Regulations for the Status andTransfer of Players, edition 200522 Art. 3 (2) Annex 4 of the Regulations forthe Status and Transfer of Players, edition200523 Art. 3 (3) Annex 4 of the Regulations forthe Status and Transfer of Players, edition200524 Art. 19 of the Regulations for the Statusand Transfer of Players, edition 200125 TAS 2005/A/38326 DRC 86137 of 17 August 200627 DRC 75142 of 28 July 200528 DRC 26286A of 21 February 2006 andDRC 26286B of 21 February 200629 DRC 26135 of 21 February 200630 DRC 115324 of 2 November 200530 <strong>2008</strong>/1-2ARTICLES
sum of EUR 15,240 would also be paid as compensation for expenses theplayer’s parents incurred. Travel and living expenses would also be reimbursedshould he be visited by his parents. The DRC considered thatsome of the abovementioned financial obligations, such as reimbursementfor expenses the parents incurred, exceeded the expenses actuallyincurred in terms of article 2 of the FIFA Regulations. Here too the statuswas that of a professional, so that training compensation was due. 31In conclusion it can be stated that the most important considerationof the DRC is the following:‘The chamber emphasised that a player shall be regarded as non-amateurif he has a written employment contract based on which he receivesremuneration in excess of the expenses effectively incurred for his footballactivity’ 323.4 Subsequent transfersThe right to training compensation exists, alongside the case where afirst contract is signed as a professional, if a professional transfersbefore the end of the season of his 23 rd birthday between two clubsbelonging to different football associations. It is not importantwhether this transfer occurs during or after expiry of the contract. 33An entitlement to compensation thus also arises if a professionalleaves a club and signs a contract with another club some time later. 34In FIFA circular no. 826 (31 October 2002) it was decided that inthe case of a subsequent transfer, only the previous club of the playerwould have a right to training compensation, and that all other formerclubs would not. This was confirmed by the DRC. 35 This ruleremains in force following the introduction of the FIFA Regulationsfor the Status and Transfer of Players of 2005. 363.5 Agreements which exclude training compensationIn some instances, agreements are signed covering training compensationbetween the clubs, the player and the manager. The instancesin which the entitlement to training compensation can be negatedthrough an agreement will be discussed below.In the cases handled by the DRC, the issue is consistently that of aplayer’s former club demanding training compensation from the newclub. The DRC had to reach a decision in a case where an agreementhad been signed between a player and his new club. According to thisagreement, the player was responsible for claims involving trainingcompensation. The agreement also stated that the player and his formerclubs could not claim any training compensation, and legal procedureswere excluded. However the former club had not signed thisagreement. The DRC thus considered that the agreement was not relevantin the case between the new and the former clubs. In thisinstance the former club enjoyed the normal right to training compensation.37An agreement where a player, his manager and the new club agreedthat the player and manager should bear responsibility for any compensationcovering training, was also deemed not to be relevant in acase between the new and former clubs. Here too it was decided that,because the former club was not party to the agreement, this formerclub retained its normal right to training compensation. 38The following case covers an agreement between a player and hisformer club. It was agreed that the club did not have to pay the salaryarrears. The respondent maintained that as a consequence, it was alsostipulated that the club would not demand any transfer sum or trainingcompensation from the new club. The claimant believed that theplayer was free and out of contract, but that the right to training compensationcontinued to exist. The DRC determined that the agreementbetween the player and his former club could not exclude theright to training compensation. 39The right to training compensation can however be excluded in anagreement between the player’s former and new clubs. A document inwhich the former club waives claims against a new club involving aspecific player, must be regarded as a statement of renunciation oftraining compensation. In this instance the right to training compensationthus lapses. 40The following situation concerns a confirmation from the formerclub to the player’s representative which states that the contract isending and that no transfer sum is claimed. The DRC decided thatthis document only excluded a transfer sum, but that training compensationstill had to be paid. 41In this case the issue is an agreement between a player and his formerclub. In this agreement the player states that he will not claimcompensation from this club. The player also declares that his newclub has confirmed that it will also not make any claim. It was alsoconfirmed that the international transfer certificate was providedwithout any demand for compensation. The new club did not intendpaying training compensation and appealed on the following threemain points. First, the player was free to sign for the new club. Thenext point concerned the abovementioned declarations by the player.The final point involved delivery of the international transfer certificatewithout any objections. The DRC decided that these reasonswere entirely irrelevant given that the issue was the payment of trainingcompensation. The DRC stated that the obligation to pay thiscompensation existed purely between clubs. Footballers play no directrole in this. The fact that the international transfer certificate washanded over to the football association without any objections did notimply that the player’s former club waived training compensation.Training compensation thus had to be paid. 42Finally, there was a case in which the new club stated it had agreedwith the former club that training compensation would be waived.However, it was agreed that the former club would participate in thefinancial reward once the player was transferred to a third club.The DRC decided that the new club was unable to provide adequateproof of this, so that the normal training compensation had tobe paid. 43It can be determined from the above that the right to training compensationcan be excluded if the player’s former and new club agree.Agreements between the new club or the former club and the player(and manager) cannot exclude training compensation. The DRC thenalso determined the following:‘The Chamber stated that training compensation is a right or an obligation,depending on each particular case, only between clubs. Moreover,players do not have any direct role to play in this specific topic.’ 443.6 No (new) contract offer within the European UnionFor a transfer within the European Union, the general rule is that nocompensation is due if the club which provided the relevant player’straining does not offer this player a contract. 45 This also applies if no newcontract is offered which is at least of an equivalent value to the previouscontract. 46 The regulations of 2005 also stipulate that the new contractmust be offered in writing and by registered mail at least 60 days beforeexpiry of the old one. The rule that no training compensation is due toa club which does not offer a player a contract, does not affect the rightsof any possible former clubs. 47 What requirements the DRC lays downin terms of the abovementioned regulation, will be discussed below.31 DRC 25633a of 4 February 2005 andDRC 25633b of 4 February 200532 DRC 26286A of 21 February 2006 andDRC 26286B of 21 February 200633Art. 20 and art. 2 sub ii Annex 4 ofthe Regulations for the Status andTransfer of Players, edition 2005 and art.15 Regulations for the Status andTransfer of Players, edition 200134 DRC 36645 of 23 March 200635 DRC 46146B of 27 April 2006, DRC26135 of 21 February 2006, DRC 74353of 22 July 2004 (FC Twente/Schalke 04- Simon Cziommer)36 Art. 3 (1) Annex 4 of the Regulations forthe Status and Transfer of Players, edition200537 DRC 86130A of 17 August 2006(Berliner Athletik Klub/Club Aydinspor- Kemel Akar) and DRC 86130B of 17August 2006 (Turkiyemspor Berlin/ClubAydinspor - Kemel Akar)38 DRC 46146A of 27 April 200639 DRC 115377 of 2 November 200540DRC 25528A of 4 February 200541 DRC 114461 of 9 November 2004. Thisdecision was confirmed by the CAS inArbitration CAS 2005/A/811 GalatasaraySK v/ MSV Duisburg GmbH & Co.KgaA, award of 19 December 200542 DRC 114642 of 9 November 200443 DRC 114346 of 9 November 200444 DRC 114642 of 9 November 200445 Art. 6 (3) Annex 4 of the Regulations forthe Status and Transfer of Players, edition2005 and art. 5 (5) RegulationsGoverning the Application of theRegulations for the Status and Transferof Players, edition 200146 See 2 and circular no. 769 and FIFACommentary on the Regulations for theStatus and Transfer of Players47 Art. 6 (3) Annex 4 of the Regulations forthe Status and Transfer of Players, edition2005 and art. 5 (5) RegulationsGoverning the Application of theARTICLES<strong>2008</strong>/1-2 31
- Page 6 and 7: White Paper has been prepared meets
- Page 8: and the Commission in particular. T
- Page 11 and 12: The EU Commission’s White Paper o
- Page 13 and 14: of the sport structure 21 ) will co
- Page 15 and 16: choosing a political and non-bindin
- Page 17 and 18: law of the country concerned, the s
- Page 20 and 21: 16 of the FIFA Status Regulations,
- Page 22 and 23: Be that as it may, clearly, if club
- Page 24 and 25: decide whether or not any provision
- Page 26 and 27: The Prize for Freedom of Movement:
- Page 28 and 29: observed that the extract only stip
- Page 30 and 31: not an amount Hearts had in mind. T
- Page 34 and 35: The regulations above apply if a pl
- Page 36 and 37: clubs from different football assoc
- Page 38 and 39: 04 appealed on the grounds of endin
- Page 40 and 41: (i) There is to be a new sanction f
- Page 42 and 43: H. Provisional Suspension after A S
- Page 44 and 45: 63. On the other hand, alternative
- Page 46 and 47: potential in order to be included o
- Page 48 and 49: that capable, qualified and experie
- Page 50 and 51: X - New rights of appeal1. The auth
- Page 52 and 53: A The Debate1 The pro argumentsThe
- Page 54 and 55: fundamental rule, known as “in du
- Page 56 and 57: lete’s body, the use of a prohibi
- Page 58 and 59: J.Comp. & Int’l L. (Duke Journal
- Page 61 and 62: 2008/1-2 59
- Page 63 and 64: isk of loss or damage to goods in t
- Page 65 and 66: True Supporters, Strict Liability,
- Page 67 and 68: CAS points at article 6 of UEFA Dis
- Page 69: subsequent disorder that occurred w
- Page 73 and 74: private member’s bill it was fear
- Page 75 and 76: found guilty of a criminal offence?
- Page 77 and 78: From our observations, applications
- Page 79 and 80: all violence abroad is misleading,
- Page 81 and 82: presumed allowances were four times
- Page 83 and 84:
of the activity, both the amateur a
- Page 85 and 86:
Nations. The crown prince, Willem-A
- Page 87:
6. These consultations must be cond
- Page 91 and 92:
of sport versus the “American”
- Page 93 and 94:
The Position of the Players’ Agen
- Page 95 and 96:
- Is there a need for regulation if
- Page 97 and 98:
Some Thoughts about the European Cl
- Page 99:
need for a solid, enforceable legal
- Page 103 and 104:
ing the appointment of members of t
- Page 105 and 106:
cedure (para. 2). Thus, in such pro
- Page 107 and 108:
elevant section of the public estab
- Page 109 and 110:
Sepp Blatter’s call to see player
- Page 111 and 112:
And the ‘White Paper’ adds that
- Page 113 and 114:
The EASE President Marie Leroux is
- Page 115 and 116:
Report on the Conference “Sport a
- Page 117 and 118:
Sports Law Conference in South Afri
- Page 119 and 120:
The Jurisprudence of the FIFADisput
- Page 121 and 122:
EU Competition Law. The European Co
- Page 123 and 124:
The Sports Boycott of Nigeria: Spor
- Page 125 and 126:
case France). France too, however,
- Page 127 and 128:
10:40 Coffee break11:00 The Sportin
- Page 129 and 130:
2008/1-2 127
- Page 131 and 132:
from 19 July to 4 August 1996, and
- Page 133 and 134:
sion the item entitled “Building
- Page 135 and 136:
Publication of CAS Awards(per March
- Page 137 and 138:
on June 21, 2002 cannot be consider
- Page 139 and 140:
contract had not been terminated, w
- Page 141 and 142:
Employment Contract signed with Gua
- Page 143 and 144:
FIFA Disciplinary Committee and thu
- Page 145 and 146:
By letter dated 27 July 2005 the Re
- Page 147 and 148:
National Anti-Doping Agency at the
- Page 149 and 150:
In its written decision, the Panel
- Page 151 and 152:
the Club had breached the Contracts
- Page 153 and 154:
1. right to promptly request an ana
- Page 155:
“TRANSLATING IS THINKINGWITH ANOT