Hydropower Resource Assessment at Existing Reclamation Facilities

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Executive SummaryTable ES-3 Sites with Benefit Cost Ratios (with Green Incentives) Greater than 0.75Site ID Site Name State ProjectInstalledCapacity(kW)AnnualProduction(MWh)BenefitCost RatioWithGreenBenefitCost RatioWithoutGreenConstraint(seelegend)DataConfidenceLC-6 Bartlett Dam Arizona Salt River Project 7,529 36,880 3.5 2.25 F&W; REC MediumGP-146 Yellowtail Afterbay Dam Montana PSMBP - Yellowtail 9,203 68,261 3.05 2.86 - MediumCentral Utah Project -UC-141 Sixth Water Flow Control Utah Bonneville Unit 25,800 114,420 3.02 2.84 F&W; REC MediumLC-20 Horseshoe Dam Arizona Salt River Project 13,857 59,854 2.98 1.93 F&W; REC LowGP-125 Twin Buttes Dam Texas San Angelo 23,124 97,457 2.61 2.46 - LowUpper Diamond Fork FlowCentral Utah Project -UC-185 Control StructureUtah Bonneville Unit 12,214 52,161 2.36 2.22 F&W; REC MediumGP-99 Pueblo Dam Colorado Fryingpan-Arkansas 13,027 55,620 2.34 2.2 F&W HighMP-30 Prosser Creek Dam California Washoe 872 3,819 1.98 1.06 - HighPN-6 Arthur R. Bowman Dam Oregon Crooked River 3,293 18,282 1.9 1.79 REC HighUC-89 M&D Canal-Shavano Falls Colorado Uncompahgre 2,862 15,419 1.88 1.77 - LowGP-56 Huntley Diversion Dam Montana Huntley 2,426 17,430 1.86 1.74 - MediumMP-2 Boca Dam California Truckee Storage 1,184 4,370 1.68 0.89 REC; H&A HighPN-31 Easton Diversion Dam Washington Yakima 1,057 7,400 1.68 1.58 - HighUC-159Spanish Fork Flow ControlStructureUtahCentral Utah Project -Bonneville Unit 8,114 22,920 1.66 1.57 F&W MediumLC-21 Imperial DamArizona-California Boulder Canyon Project 1,079 5,325 1.61 1.05 F&W LowGP-46 Gray Reef Dam Wyoming PSMBP - Glendo 2,067 13,059 1.58 1.49 FP HighMP-8 Casitas Dam California Ventura River 1,042 3,280 1.57 0.84 - HighF&W; REC;UC-49 Grand Valley Diversion Dam Colorado Grand Valley 1,979 14,246 1.55 1.45 H&A MediumUC-52 Gunnison Tunnel Colorado Uncompahgre 3,830 19,057 1.55 1.45 - MediumGP-23 Clark Canyon Dam Montana PSMBP - East Bench 3,078 13,689 1.52 1.42 WQ HighNewUC-19 Caballo DamMexico Rio Grande 3,260 15,095 1.45 1.36 F&W LowES-8 – March 2011
Executive SummaryTable ES-3 Sites with Benefit Cost Ratios (with Green Incentives) Greater than 0.75Site ID Site Name State ProjectUC-147InstalledCapacity(kW)AnnualProduction(MWh)BenefitCost RatioWithGreenBenefitCost RatioWithoutGreenConstraint(seelegend)DataConfidenceSouth Canal, Sta. 181+10,"Site #4" Colorado Uncompahgre 3,046 15,536 1.44 1.35 - MediumPN-95 Sunnyside Dam Washington Yakima 1,362 10,182 1.43 1.35 H&A MediumUC-144 Soldier Creek Dam UtahCentral Utah Project -Bonneville Unit 444 2,909 1.39 1.31 F&W HighGP-52Helena Valley PumpingPlant Montana PSMBP - Helena Valley 2,626 9,608 1.38 1.29 - HighUC-131 Ridgway Dam Colorado Dallas Creek 3,366 14,040 1.35 1.27 F&W HighGP-41 Gibson Dam Montana Sun River 8,521 30,774 1.32 1.23 - HighSouth Canal, Sta 19+ 10UC-146 "Site #1" Colorado Uncompahgre 2,465 12,576 1.32 1.24 - MediumUC-51 Gunnison Diversion Dam Colorado Uncompahgre 1,435 9,220 1.28 1.2 F&W MediumPN-88 Scootney Wasteway Washington Columbia Basin 2,276 11,238 1.26 1.18 - LowSouth Canal, Sta.106+65,UC-150 "Site #3" Colorado Uncompahgre 2,224 11,343 1.26 1.18 - MediumGP-126 Twin Lakes Dam (USBR) Colorado Fryingpan-Arkansas 981 5,648 1.24 1.17 F&W HighGP-95 Pathfinder Dam Wyoming North Platte 743 5,508 1.23 1.16 REC; FP HighUC-162 Starvation Dam UtahCentral Utah Project -Bonneville Unit 3,043 13,168 1.23 1.15 F&W HighLC-15Gila Gravity Main CanalHeadworks Arizona Gila 223 1,548 1.17 0.75 - MediumGP-43 Granby Dam ColoradoColorado-BigThompson 484 2,854 1.16 1.09 F&W HighMP-32 Putah Diversion Dam California Solano 363 1,924 1.16 0.62 F&W MediumUC-179 Taylor Park Dam Colorado Uncompahgre 2,543 12,488 1.12 1.05 F&W HighGP-136 Willwood Diversion Dam Wyoming Shoshone 1,062 6,337 1.1 1.03 FP HighGP-93 Pactola DamSouthDakota PSMBP - Rapid Valley 596 2,725 1.07 1.01 REC HighUC-57 Heron DamNewMexico San Juan-Chama 2,701 8,874 1.06 1 F&W MediumUC-154Southside Canal, Sta 171+90 thru 200+ 67 (2 canal Colorado Collbran 2,026 6,557 1.05 0.99 - LowES-9 – March 2011
Page 1: RECLAMATIONManaging Water in the We
Page 4 and 5: Mission StatementsThe mission of th
Page 7 and 8: ContentsHydropower Resource Assessm
Page 15 and 16: Executive SummaryExecutive SummaryR
Page 17 and 18: Executive Summaryand consistency of
Page 19 and 20: Executive Summarywater quality, and
Page 21: Executive Summaryfacilities as a lo
Page 25 and 26: Executive SummaryTable ES-3 Sites w
Page 27 and 28: Chapter 1IntroductionChapter 1 Intr
Page 29 and 30: Chapter 1Introductionalso analyzed
Page 31 and 32: Chapter 1IntroductionActual or esti
Page 33 and 34: !CANADAÜ!Olympia SeaTac^!Longview!
Page 35 and 36: Chapter 2Hydropower Site Data Colle
Page 37 and 38: !CANADA GP114GP115GP117GP138GP116GP
Page 39 and 40: !!Boulder!!Ü§¨¦!190!Newcastle!R
Page 41 and 42: !§¨¦ 5Ü!BurnsO r e g o nPacific
Page 43 and 44: !CANADAÜPN86TonasketPN85PN16PN93PN
Page 45 and 46: !JacksonÜPacific NorthwestGreat Pl
Page 73 and 74:
Chapter 2Hydropower Site Data Colle
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Chapter 3Site Analysis Methods and
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83:
TURBINE SELECTION MATRIX0Flow (cfs)
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Hydropower Assessment ToolChapter 4
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Chapter 5Site Evaluation Results5.1
Page 112 and 113:
Chapter 5Site Evaluation ResultsTab
Page 114 and 115:
ÜO C F i s h e rL a k eS a n A n g
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
!Great Plains RegionWildlife Refuge
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
!ÜVerde Wild andScenic RiverRazorb
Page 130 and 131:
Chapter 5Site Evaluation Results5-8
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
! !RenoÜ!Grass Valley!TruckeeCarso
Page 138 and 139:
Chapter 5Site Evaluation Resultsann
Page 140 and 141:
ÜL i t t l e K a c h e s sL a k eN
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
!Pacific NorthwestWildlife RefugeWi
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Chapter 5Site Evaluation ResultsIn
Page 156 and 157:
!ÜVernalUC49UC89UC154UC132UC190!Kr
Page 158 and 159:
Chapter 5Site Evaluation ResultsFig
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Chapter 5Site Evaluation ResultsFig
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Chapter 5Site Evaluation ResultsThi
Page 170 and 171:
Chapter 6Conclusionsdifferent range
Page 172 and 173:
Chapter 6ConclusionsTable 6-3 Sites
Page 174 and 175:
Chapter 6Conclusionsnumber of sites
Page 176 and 177:
Chapter 6ConclusionsThis page inten
Page 178 and 179:
Chapter 7ReferencesThis page intent
Page 180 and 181:
Appendix ASite IdentificationTable
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Appendix BGreen Incentives Programs
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Table B-2 Arizona State IncentivesP
Page 202 and 203:
Table B-4 Colorado State Incentives
Page 204 and 205:
Table B-7 Montana State IncentivesP
Page 206 and 207:
Table B-10 New Mexico State Incenti
Page 208 and 209:
Table B-14 South Dakota State Incen
Page 210 and 211:
Table B- 18 Washington State Incent
Page 212 and 213:
Appendix CCost Estimating Methodtra
Page 214 and 215:
Appendix CCost Estimating MethodTab
Page 216 and 217:
Appendix CCost Estimating MethodTab
Page 218 and 219:
Appendix DUsing the Hydropower Asse
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Appendix ESite Evaluation ResultsTa
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Appendix ESite Evaluation ResultsTh
Page 254 and 255:
Table E-3Great Plains Region Model
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 263:
Table E-4Lower Colorado Region Mode
Page 266 and 267:
Table E-5Mid-Pacific Region Model R
Page 268 and 269:
Table E‐6Pacific Northwest Region
Page 270 and 271:
Table E‐6Pacific Northwest Region
Page 273 and 274:
Table E-7Upper Colorado Region Mode
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281:
Page 284 and 285:
Appendix FConstraint Evaluation Res
Page 286 and 287:
Appendix FConstraint Evaluation Res
Page 288 and 289:
Table F-1Great Plains ConstraintsSi
Page 290 and 291:
Table F-1Great Plains ConstraintsSi
Page 292 and 293:
Table F-2Lower Colorado Constraints
Page 294 and 295:
Table F-3Mid-Pacific ConstraintsSit
Page 296 and 297:
Table F-4Pacific Northwest Constrai
Page 298 and 299:
Table F-5Upper Colorado Constraints
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
!Great Plains RegionWildlife Refuge
Page 306 and 307:
!ÜN e v a d aLas Vegas!CalienteU t
Page 308 and 309:
MP28!Ü!Willows!Truckee!Grass Valle
Page 310 and 311:
!ÜCANADAPacific NorthwestWildlife
Page 312 and 313:
!ÜVernalUC156UC49UC89UC157UC155!UC
Page 314 and 315:
Appendix GPublic Comment SummaryGen
Page 316 and 317:
Appendix GPublic Comment SummaryThi
Page 318 and 319:
Comment Received Via Email-----Orig
Page 320 and 321:
Comment Received Via EmailRegards,M
Page 322 and 323:
Comment Received Via EmailFrom: Car
Page 324 and 325:
Comment Received Via EmailWe apprec
Page 326:
Mr. Michael PulskampDecember 6, 201
Page 331 and 332:
OverviewIn general, NHA is pleased
Page 333 and 334:
Economic analysis may contain imper
show all

Hydropower Resource Assessment at Existing Reclamation Facilities

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?