Hydropower Resource Assessment at Existing Reclamation Facilities

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Chapter 1IntroductionChapter 4 Hydropower Assessment Tool: Describes components andapplication of the Hydropower Assessment Tool developed for this study toevaluate power production potential, benefit cost ratio, and internal rate ofreturn (IRR) of potential hydropower sites.Chapter 5 Site Evaluation Results: Presents results of the ResourceAssessment, organized by Reclamation region, and sensitivity analyses.Chapter 6 Conclusions: Summarizes study results and conclusions, and usesfor future hydropower analyses.Chapter 7 References: Lists references used to develop the report.1-6 – March 2011
!CANADAÜ!Olympia SeaTac^!Longview!PortlandÔ r e g o n!Eugene!Medford!Redding!WillowsSacramento!VacavilleCashmere!Cle Elum!!Roslyn!Moses Lake!Redmond!Bonanza!! ConcordSan Francisco!Yakima!Plush!Kennewick!Sutcliffe!Pendleton!Burns!Lovelock!! Reno !!Silver SpringsTruckeeGrass Valley^!Pollock PinesTonasketW a s h i n g t o nMid-Pacific^Carson City!! Yosemite Lakes! Los BanosHollister!FresnoC a l i f o r n i aSan Luis Obispo !!BakersfieldSolvang!!Santa Barbara !Oxnard!Spokane!!Pomeroy Lewiston!Baker City!Winnemucca!Los Angeles!Weiser!Vale!Donnelly^!Owyhee!Lowman!Spring Creek!WhitefishPacific NorthwestN e v a d aI d a h oBoise!Ely!Las Vegas!Missoula!Darby!Caliente!Carey!Rupert!Lake Havasu City!Bouse!Blythe!Yuma!DillonU t a h!Great Falls!Dubois!Sugar City!Kanosh!Beaver! !Ivins Hurricane!Prescott^!Smithfield!Ogden^!LevanLower Colorado^Helena!! Fountain HillsLitchfield Park!Jackson!EvanstonSalt Lake City!! FlorenceCasa Grande!Marana !Tucson!East Carbon!Havre!Boulder!Green River!Sonoita!Eden!Billings!Lovell!Cody!Rock Springs!Vernal!MoabUpper ColoradoA r i z o n aPhoenixM o n t a n a!Blanding!Riverton!Grand Junction!Mancos!Grants!GlasgowW y o m i n gMEXICO!Glendive!Dickinson!Scranton!Buffalo! !BuffaloSundance!! Rapid CityNewcastle!Rawlins!Casper!Kremmling!Wheatland!Fort Collins!Oglala!Chadron!Bridgeport!Mott!Lemmon!Valentine!McCook!Jamestown!Redfield!Ord!Grand Island! !Burlington Goodland! Great Plains! !Colorado SpringsHaysSalina!! Pueblo!SaguacheLas Animas!Chama!Los Alamos!Albuquerque!Socorro^!Truth or Consequences!Las CrucesAnthony!^C ô l o r a d oSanta FeCheyenne!Santa Rosa!Fort SumnerN e wM e x i c o!Boise City!Amarillo!Lubbock!Elk City!Mangum! !CarlsbadAbilene! !PecosSan Angelo!BalmorheaN o r t hD a k o t a^Pierre^S o u t hD a k o t aN e b r a s k aK a n s a s!Wichita Falls!San Antonio!Sisseton!Fargo!Sioux Falls!Wichita!Wellington!Enid!BlackwellÔ k l a h o m a^T e x a s^!ArdmoreAustinM i n n e s o t aLincoln!Emporia^!TulsaI o w aTopeka!Vinita!Sallisaw!Longview!Galveston^Des Moines^SOURCES: ESRI, Bureau of Reclamation, Anderson Engineering , NationalAtlas.govBureau of Reclamation Assessment Site0 55 110 220MilesAE Comm #: 12813 10-12-10 JLAFigure 1-1 : Resource Assessment Site Locations
Page 1: RECLAMATIONManaging Water in the We
Page 4 and 5: Mission StatementsThe mission of th
Page 7 and 8: ContentsHydropower Resource Assessm
Page 15 and 16: Executive SummaryExecutive SummaryR
Page 17 and 18: Executive Summaryand consistency of
Page 19 and 20: Executive Summarywater quality, and
Page 21 and 22: Executive Summaryfacilities as a lo
Page 23 and 24: Executive SummaryTable ES-3 Sites w
Page 25 and 26: Executive SummaryTable ES-3 Sites w
Page 27 and 28: Chapter 1IntroductionChapter 1 Intr
Page 29 and 30: Chapter 1Introductionalso analyzed
Page 31: Chapter 1IntroductionActual or esti
Page 35 and 36: Chapter 2Hydropower Site Data Colle
Page 37 and 38: !CANADA GP114GP115GP117GP138GP116GP
Page 39 and 40: !!Boulder!!Ü§¨¦!190!Newcastle!R
Page 41 and 42: !§¨¦ 5Ü!BurnsO r e g o nPacific
Page 43 and 44: !CANADAÜPN86TonasketPN85PN16PN93PN
Page 45 and 46: !JacksonÜPacific NorthwestGreat Pl
Page 79 and 80: Chapter 3Site Analysis Methods and
Page 81 and 82: Chapter 3Site Analysis Methods and
Page 83:
TURBINE SELECTION MATRIX0Flow (cfs)
Page 86 and 87:
Chapter 3Site Analysis Methods and
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Hydropower Assessment ToolChapter 4
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Chapter 5Site Evaluation Results5.1
Page 112 and 113:
Chapter 5Site Evaluation ResultsTab
Page 114 and 115:
ÜO C F i s h e rL a k eS a n A n g
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
!Great Plains RegionWildlife Refuge
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
!ÜVerde Wild andScenic RiverRazorb
Page 130 and 131:
Chapter 5Site Evaluation Results5-8
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
! !RenoÜ!Grass Valley!TruckeeCarso
Page 138 and 139:
Chapter 5Site Evaluation Resultsann
Page 140 and 141:
ÜL i t t l e K a c h e s sL a k eN
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
!Pacific NorthwestWildlife RefugeWi
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Chapter 5Site Evaluation ResultsIn
Page 156 and 157:
!ÜVernalUC49UC89UC154UC132UC190!Kr
Page 158 and 159:
Chapter 5Site Evaluation ResultsFig
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Chapter 5Site Evaluation ResultsFig
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
Chapter 5Site Evaluation ResultsThi
Page 170 and 171:
Chapter 6Conclusionsdifferent range
Page 172 and 173:
Chapter 6ConclusionsTable 6-3 Sites
Page 174 and 175:
Chapter 6Conclusionsnumber of sites
Page 176 and 177:
Chapter 6ConclusionsThis page inten
Page 178 and 179:
Chapter 7ReferencesThis page intent
Page 180 and 181:
Appendix ASite IdentificationTable
Page 182 and 183:
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
Appendix BGreen Incentives Programs
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Table B-2 Arizona State IncentivesP
Page 202 and 203:
Table B-4 Colorado State Incentives
Page 204 and 205:
Table B-7 Montana State IncentivesP
Page 206 and 207:
Table B-10 New Mexico State Incenti
Page 208 and 209:
Table B-14 South Dakota State Incen
Page 210 and 211:
Table B- 18 Washington State Incent
Page 212 and 213:
Appendix CCost Estimating Methodtra
Page 214 and 215:
Appendix CCost Estimating MethodTab
Page 216 and 217:
Appendix CCost Estimating MethodTab
Page 218 and 219:
Appendix DUsing the Hydropower Asse
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
Page 240 and 241:
Appendix ESite Evaluation ResultsTa
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
Page 246 and 247:
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Appendix ESite Evaluation ResultsTh
Page 254 and 255:
Table E-3Great Plains Region Model
Page 256 and 257:
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 263:
Table E-4Lower Colorado Region Mode
Page 266 and 267:
Table E-5Mid-Pacific Region Model R
Page 268 and 269:
Table E‐6Pacific Northwest Region
Page 270 and 271:
Table E‐6Pacific Northwest Region
Page 273 and 274:
Table E-7Upper Colorado Region Mode
Page 275 and 276:
Page 277 and 278:
Page 279 and 280:
Page 281:
Page 284 and 285:
Appendix FConstraint Evaluation Res
Page 286 and 287:
Appendix FConstraint Evaluation Res
Page 288 and 289:
Table F-1Great Plains ConstraintsSi
Page 290 and 291:
Table F-1Great Plains ConstraintsSi
Page 292 and 293:
Table F-2Lower Colorado Constraints
Page 294 and 295:
Table F-3Mid-Pacific ConstraintsSit
Page 296 and 297:
Table F-4Pacific Northwest Constrai
Page 298 and 299:
Table F-5Upper Colorado Constraints
Page 300 and 301:
Page 302 and 303:
Page 304 and 305:
!Great Plains RegionWildlife Refuge
Page 306 and 307:
!ÜN e v a d aLas Vegas!CalienteU t
Page 308 and 309:
MP28!Ü!Willows!Truckee!Grass Valle
Page 310 and 311:
!ÜCANADAPacific NorthwestWildlife
Page 312 and 313:
!ÜVernalUC156UC49UC89UC157UC155!UC
Page 314 and 315:
Appendix GPublic Comment SummaryGen
Page 316 and 317:
Appendix GPublic Comment SummaryThi
Page 318 and 319:
Comment Received Via Email-----Orig
Page 320 and 321:
Comment Received Via EmailRegards,M
Page 322 and 323:
Comment Received Via EmailFrom: Car
Page 324 and 325:
Comment Received Via EmailWe apprec
Page 326:
Mr. Michael PulskampDecember 6, 201
Page 331 and 332:
OverviewIn general, NHA is pleased
Page 333 and 334:
Economic analysis may contain imper
show all

Hydropower Resource Assessment at Existing Reclamation Facilities

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?