CITY OF PERTH INDEX

COUNCILMINUTES 13 JUNE 2000Ord Con Mins 13 June 2000CITY OF PERTHINDEXItem Description Page313/00 PRAYER 730314/00 DECLARATION OF OPENING 730315/00 APOLOGIES 730316/00 QUESTION TIME FOR THE PUBLIC 730317/00 MEMBERS ON LEAVE OF ABSENCE AND APPLICATIONSFOR LEAVE OF ABSENCE 735318/00 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES 735319/00 ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE DEPUTY LORD MAYORWITHOUT DISCUSSION 736320/00 DISCLOSURE OF MEMBERS’ INTERESTS 736321/00 QUESTIONS OF WHICH DUE NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVENWITHOUT DISCUSSION 736322/00 CORRESPONDENCE 736323/00 PETITIONS 736324/00 84 ABERDEEN STREET NORTHBRIDGE, EXTENDEDTRADING PERMIT, ABERDEEN HOTEL 736325/00 HAY STREET, WEST PERTH - PROPOSED NO STOPPING 740326/00 MILLIGAN STREET AND MOUNT STREET, PERTH -PROPOSED PICK UP AND SET DOWN STAND FORPEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES 741327/00 125-137 (PT LOT 13) ST GEORGES TERRACE, PERTH -GROUND FLOOR ALTERATIONS TO EXISTING BUILDING 743328/00 VICTORIA AVENUE/RIVERSIDE DRIVE - FLOAT PLANEOPERATION 749M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES 13 JUNE 2000Item Description Page329/00 146 (PART LOT 5) WELLINGTON STREET, EAST PERTH -EIGHT STOREY BUILDING ACCOMMODATING 42MULTIPLE DWELLINGS AND BASEMENT CAR PARKING 754330/00 REVIEW OF CHILD CARE FEES - CITIPLACE CHILD CARECENTRE 760331/00 AMENDMENT NO. 12 TO THE EAST PERTHREDEVELOPMENT SCHEME - CHANGES TO SECTION5.15.4 OF THE SCHEME TEXT 764332/00 TENDER 077-1999/2000 REMOVAL OF OIL ANDCHEMICALS FROM ROAD SURFACES 767333/00 LICENSING OF THE ADVERTISING PILLARS - HAYSTREET MALL 769334/00 ADDITIONAL ADVERTISING PROPOSAL - PADBURYWALK 772335/00 ASSIGNMENT AND EXTENSION OF LEASE - CITYSTATION PHARMACY 774336/00 ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE - QV1 BASEMENT CAR PARK 776337/00 PIER STREET CARPARK - ONE.TEL BATTERY BACKUPCUBE AND ANTENNAE 778338/00 HOUSE/SPONSORSHIP AND DONATIONS COMMITTEE -MEETING HELD ON 16 MAY 2000 781339/00 NORTHBRIDGE/WEST END PRECINCT COMMITTEE -VACANCY 782340/00 BUDGET POLICIES 784341/00 MOTIONS OF WHICH PREVIOUS NOTICE HAS BEENGIVEN 7851. GAY AND LESBIAN PRIDE PARADE 7852. GAY AND LESBIAN PRIDE PARADE - COUNCILSPOKESPERSON 7853. ARDEN STREET, EAST PERTH - SURVEY 786M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES 13 JUNE 2000Item Description Page4. PERTH CONVENTION AND EXHIBITION CENTRETASKFORCE - COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVE 7865. PERTH CONVENTION AND EXHIBITION CENTRETASKFORCE - COUNCIL NOMINATED REPRESENTATIVE 7876. PERTH CONVENTION AND EXHIBITION CENTRETASKFORCE - COUNCIL NOMINATED REPRESENTATIVE 788342/00 REPRESENTATION ON STATUTORY AUTHORITIES ANDPUBLIC BODIES 788343/00 URGENT BUSINESS 7881. QUORUM OF FORESHORE ENHANCEMENTCOMMITTEE 7882. GAY AND LESBIAN PRIDE PARADE SURVEY 789M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 730 - 13 JUNE 2000Minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of the Council of the City of Perth held in the Council Chamber,Ninth Floor, Council House, 27 St George’s Terrace, Perth, on Tuesday, 13 June 2000 at6.03pm.Presiding:Councillors Present:The Deputy Lord Mayor, Cr M SutherlandDavidson, Goodman, McEvoy, MacGill, Stroudand TudoriIn Attendance:Garry Hunt - Chief Executive OfficerNoelene Jennings - Director Corporate ServicesDoug Forster - Director Business UnitsGarry Dunne - Director Service UnitsCharlotte Stockwell - Director StrategyMax Hipkins - Director PlanningPeter Monks - Manager Approvals ServicesJamie Parry - Manager Corporate SupportSue Potter - Administrative Team LeaderSharene Chatfield - Co-ordinator Public Relations313/00 PRAYERThe Deputy Lord Mayor took the Chair and the prayer was read by the Chief Executive Officer.314/00 DECLARATION OF OPENINGThe Deputy Lord Mayor declared the meeting open.315/00 APOLOGIESThe Lord Mayor.316/00 QUESTION TIME FOR THE PUBLICThe Chief Executive Officer advised that the following questions had been received.Mr W. Brough134 Bennett StreetEAST PERTH 6004With reference to the Council ordinary meeting on 25 January 2000 it was resolved to institute legalaction under the Environmental Protection Act against the owner/occupier of John’s Food andLiquor Store at 144 Bennett Street, East Perth, if noise emissions from the refrigeration motors wasnot reduced within 21 days.M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 731 - 13 JUNE 2000Question 1Answer:Question 2Answer:Question 3Answer:Did the Council proceed with legal action or not?The Chief Executive Officer responded that the Council didproceed with the legal action.If yes to question 1, when was the action taken and did theowner/occupier plead guilty or not guilty and what was the court’s ruling?The Chief Executive Officer responded that in the court of PettySessions on 31 May 2000, the defendant, Timpar nominees("Johns Food and Liquor Store" in East Perth) pleaded guiltyunder Section 79(1) of the Environmental Protection Act. Themagistrate imposed a fine of $250, and costs of $565. TheMagistrate imposed the fine based on mitigating circumstances,such as the fact that the noise had now been reduced and that thework required was a considerable expense for the small businessinvolved.Did the Council recover all costs incurred in this action?The Chief Executive Officer responded that the costs imposed bythe Magistrate are governed by sentencing rules, and are notintended to cover all costs incurred by the City. The legal costs tothe City for this case are in the order of $1700.Cr Stroud entered the Council Chamber at 6.05 pmCr MacGill departed the Council Chamber at 6.05pmMr Paul Ritter66 Orange Valley RoadKALAMUNDA 6076Question 1Contrary to assurance I have received no answer to my questions onlevels of staffing and budgeting for the Director of Planning’s department.I ask again, particularly in the light of the soccer stadium announcement,will the Director of Planning be given adequate staff, funds and support toensure the City’s vital input so this development is achieved?Answer:The Chief Executive Officer responded that as previously advised,the City’s budget has not yet been finalised and was currentlyM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 732 - 13 JUNE 2000being considered by the Budget Committee. Once complete thisinformation will be supplied to Mr Ritter.Question 2:Answer:Question 3:Does the City Council appreciate how important it is that this “hole in theheart” of Perth operation is carried out using the City’s creative potentialcontribution?The Chief Executive Officer responded that he believed that thisquestion is in relation to the Convention Centre and SoccerStadium and the answer is yes.Does the City Council appreciate it will take specific and creative input toensure the potential benefits, by connecting the development with thepedestrian networks to City Centre, Northbridge and the ParliamentaryPrecinct?Will the City Council ask its Director of Planning to prepare plansaccordingly in conjunction with developers and government?Answer:Question 4:Answer:Question 5:Answer:The Chief Executive Officer responded that this issue is a matterfor the Council to examine. The City has had input from twobidders that are currently still on track and will have additionalinput into the process when the successful bidder is known.Would it fit into the City of Perth’s program - to inform the public of itsefforts for the City - to support the enclosed series of 13 half hours of TVCh 31 Community Television Perth? The programs deal with the Visionof Perth 2029 publication by the Minister and show specifically theimaginative input of the Local Authority during the last hundred years,together with current potential.The Chief Executive Officer responded that unfortunately theattachment was not provided, however, the question will be takenon notice.Can the Chief Executive Officer give an assurance that I will receive aresponse from no less than four separate Council Officers - to whom Ihave been directed to seek information and who have not answered myletters in recent weeks?The Chief Executive Officer responded that it would appreciated ifMr Ritter could contact Mr Parry at the end of the meeting so thatthe letters can be identified, as any that had not been answered todate, could not be ascertained.M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 733 - 13 JUNE 2000Cr MacGill departed the Council Chamber at 6.07pmMr B Bradbury210/112 Goderich StreetEAST PERTH WA 6004Question 1Will Council rates be raised in the new financial year?(a)(b)(c)By what percentage?Will any special considerations be given to ‘Senior Citizens’?Will car parking fees be raised also?Answer:Question 2Answer:Question 3Answer:Question 4The Chief Executive Officer responded that the BudgetCommittee is still meeting to make recommendations to theCouncil. He would expect that there would be some increases infees, charges and rates. Senior citizens, particularly those of apension age, already receive benefits which are subsidised by theState Government.What was the total amount spent on alcoholic beverages for the period1998-1999; by the Perth City Council?The Chief Executive Officer responded that he would like to takethat question on notice as he did not know the amount.When is the work on the refurbishment of the Town Hall due to start?The Chief Executive Officer responded that the City is currentlyout to bids for architects for the project. The determination of thework will be largely dependent on the work on the associated siteknown as the Treasury Building.Could you tell me how the “Youth Sculpture” competition is progressing?(a)When will the display of the works take place and where?Answer:The Chief Executive Officer responded that he is not aware of thestatus of the competition. He knows that the work of the lastwinner is erected at City West in West Perth.Mr Steven SingerM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 734 - 13 JUNE 200020 Beacon TerraceEAST PERTH WA 6005With regard to the proposed Gay Pride survey of ratepayersQuestion 1Answer:Question 2Answer:Can the Lord Mayor confirm that the WA Electoral Commissionerrequires the electoral roll for the election to be re-opened to permit thesurvey question to be included in the bi-election ballot?The Chief Executive Officer responded that this can be confirmedon the advice that was received late today.Does the PCC support the use of special override provisions (sections9.64 and 9.62) of the Local Government Act 1995 to circumvent theusual requirements for giving notice to close the electoral roll no later than56 days prior to the election date?The Chief Executive Officer responded that this is not a matterwhich has been before the Council, so the question will need to betaken on notice.Mr Damian MeyerConvenor - Gay and Lesbian Equality (WA) IncPO Box 420NORTHBRIDGE WA 6865Question 1Answer:Question 2Answer:Question 3Answer:Can the Lord Mayor state the wording of the question to be asked in thesurvey on PCC support of the Pride Parade to be held in conjunctionwith the bi-election?The Chief Executive Officer responded that the wording of thequestion has not been determined, the City has only just receivedadvice today on how that matter will proceed.Can the Lord Mayor state what supplementary material explaining thesurvey will be included in the election package?The Chief Executive Officer responded that this has not yet beendetermined.Will the City allow the affected organisation, Lesbian & Gay Pride WAInc access to, and the ability to participate in, the compilation of thatinformation?The Chief Executive Officer responded that the information will beM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 735 - 13 JUNE 2000submitted by the City to the Electoral Commissioner.Mr Stephen Hutchison12 Ostend ParadeMINDARIE WA 6030QuestionDoes the Council intend to conduct a referendum on the staging of RallyAustralia similar to the proposed referendum on Pride?If not, why is the Pride Parade treated differently?Answer:The Chief Executive Officer responded that he would like todisclose that he is a member of the Rally Australia Board. Thatevent is not the subject of a special action.Mr Collin Mullane3/15 Talbot AvenueCOMO WA 6152Question 1Have the traders in Northbridge been consulted to gauge their opinion onthe Pride Parade?If they have, what percentage were in favour?If not, why were they not consulted?Answer:The Chief Executive Officer responded that there has been noconsultation to date and the proposed survey will perform thatrole.317/00 MEMBERS ON LEAVE OF ABSENCE AND APPLICATIONSFOR LEAVE OF ABSENCENil318/00 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTESThe minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of the Council held on 23 May 2000 were submitted forconsideration.Moved by Cr McEvoy, seconded by Cr StroudThat the minutes of the Ordinary Meeting of the Council held on 23 May 2000, betaken as read and confirmed.M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 736 - 13 JUNE 2000The motion was put and carried.319/00 ANNOUNCEMENTS BY THE DEPUTY LORD MAYORWITHOUT DISCUSSIONThe official guests who attended the Council meeting of 13 June 2000 were Anglicare WA BoardMembers as follows:-• Anthony W Kiernan (Tony) - Chairman• Ian Carter - Chief Executive Officer• George Horton• Geoff Potter• Margaret Stockton-Metcalf• John Summers.320/00 DISCLOSURE OF MEMBERS’ INTERESTSThe Chief Executive Officer advised that the following Members had disclosed an interest in thefollowing matters.Member/Officer Minute No. Page No. Nature of InterestCr McEvoy 324/00 736 Has a hotel licence.321/00 QUESTIONS OF WHICH DUE NOTICE HAS BEEN GIVENWITHOUT DISCUSSIONNil322/00 CORRESPONDENCEThe Chief Executive Officer advised that correspondence had been received from the Department ofLocal Government and Electoral Commission regarding the survey on the Gay and Lesbian PrideParade.323/00 PETITIONSNil324/00 84 ABERDEEN STREET NORTHBRIDGE, EXTENDEDTRADING PERMIT, ABERDEEN HOTELBACKGROUND:SUBURB/LOCATION:Aberdeen Hotel, 84 Aberdeen Street, Northbridge.M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 737 - 13 JUNE 2000DA/BA REFERENCE: 00/9521FILE REFERENCE: P1003567/2RESPONSIBLE DIRECTOR:Garry Dunne, Director Services UnitsDATE: 29 May 2000LANDOWNER:APPLICANT:ZONING:SITE HISTORY:Main Roads WANorthbridge Enterprises Pty Ltd(MRS Zone) Reserved for Controlled Access Highway(City Planning Scheme Zone) Metropolitan Regional SchemeReserved for Controlled Access Highway.The Aberdeen Hotel has operated on the above site for many years.Extensive renovations were completed in 1998 and included theestablishment of the areas for which the extended trading permit hasbeen requested.COMPLIANCE:This application to the Director of Liquor Licensing is to satisfy the requirements of The LiquorLicensing Act 1988.POLICY/LEGISLATION/STRATEGIC PLAN:Liquor Licensing Act 1988.DETAILS:Notification has been received from the Director of Liquor Licensing that an application has beenreceived from the licensee of the Aberdeen Hotel, requesting an extension of trading hours forvarious areas of the hotel. The application requests an extension of the licensed hours from 12.00midnight on Wednesdays to 3.00 am on Thursdays, 12.00midnight on Fridays and Saturdays to3.00am on Saturdays and Sundays, and from 10.00pm to 12 midnight on Sundays.Five previous extended trading permits, for different hours, have been granted to the licensee of theHotel after the Council supported the applications at its meetings of 23 September 1997, 27January 1998, 10 November 1998, 13 April 1999 and 14 March 2000.COMMENTS:The Aberdeen Hotel is situated in the Northbridge entertainment area. Its location is such that it hasresidences at both the front and rear of the premises. The residences at the rear are located in theTown of Vincent which received several complaints relating to noise from amplified music emanatingfrom the hotel during 1997. Two noise abatement directions were issued to the previousmanagement of the hotel. The management of the premises changed on 12 February 1998, however,complaints concerning noise emissions from the hotel have recently been received from occupants ofadjoining premises. A Noise Abatement Direction was served on the manager of the hotel on 23October 1999 and a further warning notice issued on 20 May 2000. Any further proof of nuisanceM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 738 - 13 JUNE 2000will result in infringement notices being issued under the provisions of the Environmental Protection(Noise) Regulations 1997A hearing to consider this application was held by the Director of Liquor Licensing on 6 and 7 June2000. Due to the lack of response from the WA Police Service to a request for their comments onthe application, no decision of the Council was available to forward to the Director of LiquorLicensing prior to the hearing.A letter containing preliminary comments not supporting the application was therefore forwarded tothe Director of Liquor Licensing on 29 May 2000.The letter indicated that the comments were only preliminary, had not been endorsed at a Councilmeeting and further correspondence, elaborating on the Council’s decision, would be forwardedfollowing the Council meeting of 13 June 2000.The comments from the Alcohol and Drug Unit of the WA Police Services as to that Units opinionon the granting of the Extended Trading Permit were received on 29 May 2000. The officers of theUnit have submitted a lengthy intervention submission to the Director of Liquor Licensing objecting tothe granting of the extended hours.As part of that submission the Alcohol and Drug Unit has included the following items as reasons thatthe application should be refused.(1) “The application is not in the interests of the community” or “the retaining of the peaceand the maintenance of law in Northbridge.”(2) “The application does not consider the availability of public transport for patronsdeparting Northbridge.”(3) “Is contrary to the scheme of the Liquor Act and its purpose in minimizing harm.”(4) “The application is not in the interests of the community.”(5) “Concern that the granting of this permit would have a detrimental impact on thepolicing of this precinct and that in itself is not in the community interest.(6) “That by extending hours of trading there will be a shift in the incidence of police callscorresponding to the new finishing time for trading.”As part of their conclusion the Alcohol and Drug Unit have stated:-“In this instance we submit that in considering the merits of this application the Director mustgive due consideration to the wider interests of the community not only in minimising harmthat may result from the use of liquor, but also the interests of the community in maintainingpeace and amenity of the greater Northbridge area.”M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 739 - 13 JUNE 2000The comments from the Alcohol and Drug Unit are endorsed. Furthermore, the potential for theapplication to act as a precedent for other hotels to apply for extended trading permits is also aconcernIn view of the noise complaints and the objections from the WA Police Service it is recommendedthat the Council advise the Director of Liquor Licensing that the application to extend the tradinghours of the Aberdeen Hotel is not supported.It was therefore recommended that the Director of Liquor Licensing be advised that the Councildoes not support the granting of an extended trading permit, to the licensee of the Aberdeen Hotel,for the various areas of the premises for the hours:- 12.00 midnight on Wednesdays to 3.00 am on Thursdays, for the area known as Zone 5;- 12.00 midnight on Fridays and Saturdays to 3.00am on Saturdays and Sundays, for the areasknown as Zones 1, 2, 4 and 5;- 10.00pm to 12 midnight on Sundays for Zones 1, 2, 4 and 5.(Cr McEvoy disclosed an interest and did not vote on this item)MemberCr McEvoyNature of InterestHas a hotel licence.Cr McEvoy departed the Chamber at 6.13pmMoved by Cr Tudori, seconded by Cr GoodmanThat the Director of Liquor Licensing be advised that the Council supports thegranting of an extended trading permit, to the licensee of the Aberdeen Hotel, for thevarious areas of the premises for the hours;12.00 midnight on Wednesdays to 3.00 am on Thursdays, for the area known as Zone5;12.00 midnight on Fridays and Saturdays to 3.00am on Saturdays and Sundays, forthe areas known as Zones 1, 2, 4 and 5;10.00pm to 12 midnight on Sundays for Zones 1, 2, 4 and 5.Discussion ensuedThe motion was put and lostM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

14 BOLETÍN OFICIAL DE PONTEVEDRA Nº 134 — Miércoles 11 julio 2007REG. T./IDENTIF. RAZON SOCIAL/NOMBRE DIRECCIÓN C.P. POBLACIÓN TD NUM.PROV.APREMIO PERIODO IMPORTE1211 10 36108448040 DIAZ ALBO ANA AV ATLANTIDA-URB.PER 36208 VIGO 03 36 2007 010042843 1006 1006 166,631211 10 36108926774 GARCIA FERNANDEZ JAVIER LG FAVAL 26 36979 SANXENXO 03 36 2007 010027584 1006 1006 166,631211 10 36109682566 MOLDES FRANCO MANUEL CL PINTOR LAXEIRO 14 36500 LALIN 03 36 2007 010032739 1006 1006 166,631211 10 36109727935 SEOANE FERNANDEZ JOSE MA CL NUMANCIA 57 36205 VIGO 03 36 2007 010037890 1006 1006 166,631211 10 36110050661 LAGO OZORES MIGUEL ANGEL CL LEON 12 36206 VIGO 03 36 2007 010038092 1006 1006 166,631211 10 36110145136 ALVAREZ GESTEIRO CESAR CL TABOADA LEAL 29 36203 VIGO 03 36 2007 010052846 1006 1006 166,631211 10 36110282653 LAMAS ALVAR JOSE ANTONIO CL SANJURJO BADIA 10 36207 VIGO 03 36 2007 010044964 1006 1006 166,631211 10 36110334284 GONZALEZ TENORIO CARMEN CL TOMAS ALONSO 187 36208 VIGO 03 36 2007 010045267 1006 1006 166,631211 10 36110489585 CERRILLO CALIXTO ANA PIL AV BRASIL 49 36750 GOIAN SAN C 03 36 2007 010048200 1006 1006 166,631211 10 36110662973 FERNANDEZ RODRIGUEZ RAMO CL PARAGUAY 18 36204 VIGO 03 36 2007 010038702 1006 1006 166,631211 10 36110702379 ROMERO BUCETA MARIA CARM CL SAN ANTONIÑO 55 36191 BARRO 03 36 2007 010033244 1006 1006 7,931211 10 36110714911 CARRERA RODRIGUEZ RAUL CL XENE 2 36214 BEMBRIVE 03 36 2007 010038904 1006 1006 166,631211 10 36110762502 ABREU PEREZ ANTONIO AV ATLANTIDA 54 36209 VIGO 03 36 2007 010045974 1006 1006 166,631221 07 091007435885 VELASCO FIGUEREDO KIOWAN CL ANTELO Y MARIÑO 1 36995 POIO 03 36 2007 012844931 0806 0806 166,631221 07 151038941284 RIASCOS CETRE MARITZA CL SAN ROQUE 15 36600 VILAGARCIA D 03 36 2007 010030012 1006 1006 166,631221 07 281192829548 FERUZO —- OLEKSANDR CL SAN JOSE 3 36940 CANGAS 03 36 2007 010039005 1006 1006 166,631221 07 331031218774 LUNA BRIOSO MARIA SANTA CL DR. FERMIN GARCIA 36650 CALDAS DE RE 03 36 2007 010030113 1006 1006 166,631221 07 361030209926 ARROYO GUEVARA JOBA AMER AV JUAN CARLOS I 22 36600 VILAGARCIA D 03 36 2007 012851601 0906 0906 166,631221 07 361030209926 ARROYO GUEVARA JOBA AMER AV JUAN CARLOS I 22 36600 VILAGARCIA D 03 36 2007 012851702 1006 1006 166,631221 07 361032223280 CONSTANTIN —- ALEXANDRA CL HISPANIDAD 43 36203 VIGO 03 36 2007 010049614 1006 1006 166,631221 07 361034883710 BOMTEMPO —- PATRICIA BO DOCTOR CADAVAL 10 36202 VIGO 03 36 2007 010049917 1006 1006 166,631221 07 361035182891 MARTINEZ REALPE GLORIA L CL ZAMORA 40 36203 VIGO 03 36 2007 010050018 1006 1006 166,631221 07 361035966672 SALAZAR TENECHE SANDRA M CL CAMELIAS 94 36211 VIGO 03 36 2007 010041631 1006 1006 166,63R E L A C I O N D E P R O V I D E N C I A S D E A P R E M I O C O R R E S P O N D I E N T E S A O T R A S P R O V I N C I A SNUM. PROVID. NUM. IDENTIF. REGIMEN NOMBRE DOMICILIO PERIODO IMPORTE012007010272381 241000246220 R.E. AGRARIO BARNOCH —- ABDERRAHMANE CL. ARRAYAL, 2 - 36700 TUI 10/2006 43,55252007010510578 251013766182 R.E. AGRARIO KOMSON —- KOFI CL. OUTON DA BOUZA, 14 - 36620 VILANOVA 10/2006 87,11312007010497757 330119778010 R.E. AGRARIO PAEZ ROBLEDO CARLOS CL. SABIA, 12 - 36700 TUI 10/2006 31,94032007012382205 331032458657 R.E. AGRARIO AJAL - MOHAMMED LG. PAREDES, 10 - 36140 VILABOA 10/2006 87,11072007010859142 071020683390 R.E. AUTONOMOS DOALLO LOPEZ JUAN CL. RIVERO DE AGUILAR - 36600 VILAGARCIA 11/2006 7,49352007010953700 150072303267 R.E. AUTONOMOS RIBERA POSE MODESTO CL. POSTEMIRON, 1 - 36140 VILABOA 11/2006 280,97152007010554985 150084956111 R.E. AUTONOMOS GOMEZ VIEITES GERARDO CL. RUA CABANAS, 34 - 36163 POIO 11/2006 365,35432007010540318 171021709406 R.E. AUTONOMOS ALVES DA SILVA JOAQUIM CL. ALFONSO XIII, 29 - 36201 VIGO 11/2006 7,28282007013211833 270036502125 R.E. AUTONOMOS FOLGUEIRA LOPEZ, JOSE MAR CL. PINTOR COLMEIRO, 6 - 36211 VIGO 11/2006 315,18282007031385791 270036502125 R.E. AUTONOMOS FOLGEIRA LO0PEZ JOSE MAR CL. PINTOR COLMEIRO, 6 - 36211 VIGO 06/2006 12,62332006021095910 331004159010 R.E. AUTONOMOS DIAZ CORDERO JHONATAN CL. VILABOA, 2 - 36611 VILAGARCIA 10/2006 280,97332007010526626 331004159010 R.E. AUTONOMOS DIAZ CORDERO JHONATAN CL. VILABOA, 2 - 36611 VILAGARCIA 11/2006 280,97352007011110011 350050422863 R.E. AUTONOMOS GONZALEZ MACHIN MARCELO CL. MONTERO RIOS, 8 - 36201 VIGO 11/2006 429,84352007011010078 351014621941 R.E. AUTONOMOS CONDE MIGUENS EFREN CL. CASAL DE MOGOS, 2 - 36612 CATOIRA 11/2006 349,32352006029792737 351014621941 R.E. AUTONOMOS CONDE MIGUENS EFREN CL. CASAL DE MOGOS, 2 - 36612 CATOIRA 10/2006 349,32152007013709105 360039466892 R.E. AUTONOMOS LAGO GARCIA ANTONIO CL. CAMILO JOSE CELA 36614 VILAGARCIA 06/2006 12,62282007014295304 360045005996 R.E. AUTONOMOS SUAREZ RODRIGUEZ FILOMEN CL. BOLIVIA, 30 - 36203 VIGO 11/2006 289,44282007014750291 360069032290 R.E. AUTONOMOS ARGIBAY PAZ ENRIQUE CL. EDUARDO PONDAL, 53 - 36002 PONTEV 11/2006 280,97322007010162133 360070858217 R.E. AUTONOMOS FERNANDEZ PATRICIO EUGEN LG. FILGUEIRA - 36420 CRECENTE 11/2006 280,97282007014793842 360071356048 R.E. AUTONOMOS CACABELOS MONTES JORGE CL. CONSTITUCION, 15 - 36960 SANXENXO 09/2006 280,97282007014793943 360071356048 R.E. AUTONOMOS CACABELOS MONTES JORGE CL. CONSTITUCION, 15 - 36960 SANXENXO 10/2006 280,97282007014794044 360071356048 R.E. AUTONOMOS CACABELOS MONTES JORGE CL. CONSTITUCION, 15 - 36960 SANXENXO 11/2006 280,97482006014362317 361001218545 R.E. AUTONOMOS CIDRAS SOLLA IGNACIO CL. DOCTOR OTERO ULLO - 36913 MARIN 03/2006 280,97482006015094261 361001218545 R.E. AUTONOMOS CIDRAS SOLLA IGNACIO CL. DOCTOR OTERO ULLO - 36913 MARIN 04/2006 280,97322007010227407 361014867657 R.E. AUTONOMOS ALCOBRE SOUTO ROCIO CL BARO CRUZ CIRA, 2 - 36540 SILLEDA 11/2006 280,97082007014348550 361021291784 R.E. AUTONOMOS DACOSTA VILLAVERDE ROSA LG. MEILIDE, 45 - 36139 CERDEDO 11/2006 280,97402007010088554 401004921049 R.E. AUTONOMOS RAMOS BARRETO LUIS MIGUEL CL. ESTACION, 2 - 40450 NAVA DE LA A 11/2006 280,97282007011390051 281203905938 R.E. HOGAR FAJARDO SOSA FERNANDO CL. RUA DE OURO, 14 - 36002 PONTEVEDRA 10/2006 166,63Vigo, a 29 de junio de 2007.—La jefa de sección de Notificaciones, Asunción Aller González.2007006623

COUNCILMINUTES - 741 - 13 JUNE 2000DETAILS:A request has been received from the managers and a tenant of the QV1 building to remove thekerbside bays in Hay Street, immediately east of the QV1 public car park and the tenant car park asthe parked cars obstruct the line of vision for vehicles exiting the car parks in the street. The QV1public car park is located on the north side of Hay Street and a tenant car park is located on thesouth of Hay Street midway between Milligan and Elder Streets.FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:ACCOUNT NO: 07 061 210BUDGET ITEM:Kerbside Parking MaintenanceBUDGET PAGE NUMBER: 31BUDGETED AMOUNT: $172,488AMOUNT SPENT TO DATE: $139,900ACTUAL COST: $240BALANCE: $32,308COMMENTS:A site inspection has revealed that the level of safety for egress from the public car park, on the northside of Hay Street, is considered appropriate and does not necessitate the removal of kerbsideparking to the east of the driveway. The parking bay is located 12.8 metres away and thereforeprovides reasonable sight lines. Egress is also facilitated during the pedestrian phase of the trafficlights at the intersection of Hay and Milligan Streets.The situation for exiting vehicles from the tenant car park, on the south side of Hay Street, isdifferent, as the kerbside parking bay is located only 1.8 metres east of the driveway. This is thestandard clearance between kerbside parking bays and most crossovers within the City where thenumber of vehicles exiting a driveway is small. However, considering the tenant car park has acapacity of 160 bays, the number of vehicles exiting the driveway would justify the removal of thekerbside parking bay to increase sight lines and improve safety. It is therefore recommended that thekerbside parking bay to the east of the car park crossover, be replaced by a no stopping restriction.Moved by Cr Stroud, seconded by Cr McEvoyThat the Council approves the imposition of a no stopping restriction on the southernside of Hay Street, 87.6 metres west of Milligan Street, and extending 6.0 metreswestwards in lieu of the one hour metered parking as shown on Drawing No.P6839.06B.The motion was put and carriedM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 742 - 13 JUNE 2000326/00 MILLIGAN STREET AND MOUNT STREET, PERTH -PROPOSED PICK UP AND SET DOWN STAND FORPEOPLE WITH DISABILITIESBACKGROUND:SUBURB/LOCATION:DA/BA REFERENCE: -Perth/Milligan Street and Mount StreetFILE REFERENCE: P1012708, P1002100/2RESPONSIBLE DIRECTOR: Garry Dunne - Director Service UnitsDATE: 24 May 2000POLICY/LEGISLATION/STRATEGIC PLAN:Perth Parking Management Act 1999.DETAILS:Requests have been received from businesses in the area for the establishment of pick up and setdown stands for the disabled in Mount Street and outside the Centrelink office in Milligan Street.The parking in Mount Street is one hour ticket; a pick up and set down stand is located on thewestern end of the street near the Mitchell Freeway. In Milligan Street the parking is two hourmetered.FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:ACCOUNT NO:BUDGET ITEM:BUDGET PAGE NUMBER: 5BUDGETED AMOUNT: $25,000AMOUNT SPENT TO DATE: $5,000ACTUAL COST: $15,000BALANCE: $5,000CW-3080-7918Kerbside Parking Improvements DisabledCOMMENTS:There is great demand for kerbside parking within the central business district, consequently it is notalways possible to locate a parking bay to permit people with disabilities to access the offices andestablishments in a particular area. In order to ensure kerbside parking is available for people withdisabilities, it is proposed to establish pick up and set down stands adjacent to the Centrelink officein Milligan Street and in the cul de sac of Mount Street. Parking bays for people with disabilities arewider than usual and are designed with ramps to facilitate access.M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 743 - 13 JUNE 2000The City of Perth’s Disability Service Plan recommends that existing facilities and services beadapted to meet the needs of people with disabilities. There is an opportunity for the bays to beestablished in these streets. The estimated cost of the works is $15,000.Pick up and set down stands for people with disabilities have been established in a number oflocations within the city. There are no kerbside bays for people with disabilities in the vicinity ofMount Street; and the nearest one to Milligan Street is on the northern side of Wellington Street, 190metres to the east. Accordingly the proposed locations of these parking facilities is consistent withthe Disability Service Plan.Moved by Cr Stroud, seconded by Cr GoodmanThat:-(i) the Council approves the establishment of a pick up and set down stand (15minute maximum) for people with disabilities:-(a)(b)on the eastern side of Milligan Street 15.8 metres south of WellingtonStreet and extending 9.0 metres southwards operative at all times in lieuof the existing two hour metered parking operative 8.00am to 5.30pmMonday to Friday and 8.00am to 12.00 noon Saturday as shown ondrawing No. 7227.03A;on the southern side of Mount Street 65.0 metres west of Spring Street andextending 9.0 metres westwards operative at all times in lieu of theexisting pick up and set down stand as shown on drawing No. 7268-01A;(ii)the cost for the above works estimated at $15,000 be charged to ‘KerbsideParking Improvements Disabled’.Discussion ensuedMotion to deferMoved by Cr Tudori, seconded by Cr McEvoyThat the item relating to Milligan Street and Mount Street, Perth - Proposed Pick Upand Set Down Stand For People With Disabilities, be deferred.The motion to defer was put and carriedM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 744 - 13 JUNE 2000327/00 125-137 (PT LOT 13) ST GEORGES TERRACE, PERTH -GROUND FLOOR ALTERATIONS TO EXISTINGBUILDINGBACKGROUND:SUBURB/LOCATION:DA/BA REFERENCE: 00/0110FILE REFERENCE:RESPONSIBLE DIRECTOR:Former WA Trustee Building, Westralia Square site, PerthP1006130Garry Dunne, Director Service UnitsDATE: 24 March 2000LANDOWNER:APPLICANT:ZONING:APPROXIMATE COST: $1,000,000Skeat Pty Ltd and Sharland Pty Ltd c/- Consolidated Press HoldingsNoel Beil Ridley Smith & Partners Architects(MRS Zone) Central City Area(City Planning Scheme Zone) Office COSITE HISTORY:The subject property forms part of the Westralia Square developmentsite and is listed on the State Register of Heritage Places and in the FifthSchedule of the City Planning Scheme as a Building of Historic Interest.The Council at its meeting held on 17 October 1988 approved anapplication for the development of an office complex over the WestraliaSquare site comprising three office buildings (one 55 storey tower andtwo 20 storey towers) and associated car parking. The proposeddevelopment was approved subject to various conditions relating tomatters including:-• restriction of the plot ratio over the site to a maximum of 6.0:1;• retention and refurbishment of heritage buildings along St George'sTerrace;• the construction of an upper level pedestrian walkway systembetween the subject site and the Busport.The Council at its meeting held on 17 April 1989 approved an increasein plot ratio to 6.25:1 for the proposed development.The Council at its meeting held on 22 October 1996 granted approvalfor a 19 level hotel building containing 360 hotel rooms, six residentialsuites, function rooms, conference facilities, restaurants, bars, recreationfacilities and basement car parking on the south eastern corner of theWestralia Square site.M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 745 - 13 JUNE 2000DETAILS:Approval is being sought to carry out ground floor alterations to the former WA Trustees Building at131-133 St Georges Terrace to develop a major site entrance to the Westralia Square site. Theproposal has been prepared in consultation with the Heritage Council of WA (HCWA) and aims toprovide access to the main portion of the site from St Georges Terrace without detracting from theaesthetic quality of the Newspaper House group of buildings.It is proposed to remove the existing narrow front door and to relocate it to the western sideelevation. A 9.3 metre wide front access will be constructed in the front facade, protected by acurved, cantilevered metal awning. The entry foyer will be enlarged by reconfiguring the existingfront offices and repairs and reinstatement of original features will be made to the original businesshall to create a transitional space between the entry and the main podium of the Westralia Squaredevelopment.POLICY/LEGISLATION/STRATEGIC PLAN:Newspaper House/Perth Technical College Street Block Guidelines:Specific Planning and Development Guidelines have been formulated for the street block bounded bySt George's Terrace, Mill Street, Mounts Bay Road and William Street, which contains theNewspaper House/Perth Technical College group of heritage buildings. The objectives for this streetblock include to:-• promote developments which portray an image of prestige and quality commensurate with theirlocation within a primary office area;• give high priority to the conservation of buildings of recognised heritage value, in particular thegroup of buildings from Newspaper House to the Old Boys School, and to the integration of newdevelopment with the heritage buildings and the surrounding streetscape in general;• promote a streetscape that retains the traditional qualities of the street as an attractive,comfortable and interesting environment for people;• complete the grade separated pedestrian links throughout the site including the completion of theupper level walkway system.In regard to the WA Trustees Building, the Guidelines state that the facade of this building should beretained as well as a portion of the buildings behind the facades of adequate depth to provide internalspaces with proportions, scale and detailing compatible with the retained facades.The proposed alterations are considered to be compatible with the requirements of these Guidelines.M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 746 - 13 JUNE 2000COMPLIANCE WITH PLANNING SCHEME:The WA Trustees Building is listed under the Fifth Schedule of the City Planning Scheme as aBuilding of Historic Interest pursuant to Clause 46(1) of the Scheme. No alteration or modificationto the building can be carried out without first obtaining planning approval.The alterations include the reconfiguration (reduction in area) of two existing offices to create asecurity office and an office/shop fronting St Georges Terrace. A shop is a discretionary use withinthe Office CO zone. It is considered that this would be an appropriate use within this portion of thebuilding.The alterations do not affect the existing setbacks, building height or plot ratio.Draft City Planning Scheme:The draft City Planning Scheme contains similar provisions to those in the current Scheme relating toplaces of cultural heritage significance. The proposed alteration would not conflict with the provisionof the St Georges (P6) Precinct which will apply to this area.Minor Town Planning Scheme:The proposed development is subject to the provisions of Minor Town Planning Scheme No. 18 -Westralia Square. The main objective of this Scheme is to facilitate the comprehensiveredevelopment of the total Westralia Square site. In particular the Scheme includes provisions to:-• control vehicle access to and from the site;• ensure retention of existing heritage buildings;• enable plot ratio and parking allowances for land within the Scheme Area to be calculated as ifthey were one site.The proposed development complies with the requirements of Minor Town Planning Scheme No.18.COMMENTS:A previous approval for the site included a major access at street level through the central section ofthe former Perth Technical College. The approval for the site entry was withdrawn following theheritage listing of the buildings by the HCWA.Indirect access to the site will be achieved through the currently approved ground floor arcade areasproposed for Newspaper House and the Royal Insurance buildings. The applicant, however,considers that these do not provide a satisfactory main entry statement. Unlike the other buildings inthis group, the former WA Trustees Building has a restricted presentation to the street through aM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 747 - 13 JUNE 2000single door way, however, in accordance with the proposal, the building has the potential to act as anentry statement to the Westralia Square development with minimal loss of significant heritage fabric,or impact upon the streetscape.The original development approval for the Westralia Square project was granted a bonus plot ratioon the basis of the provision of various public facilities and retention and refurbishment of heritagebuildings on St George's Terrace. The alterations include repairs and reinstatement of originalinternal features and will preserve external features through relocation of materials and existingopenings, which would comply with the intent of granting a bonus plot ratio to the site.Heritage Council of WA:In correspondence dated 24 May 1999, the HCWA advised that it approves the site entry design asbeing the maximum intervention and removal of extant fabric subject to conditions, including the needfor a comprehensive conservation plan, a Heritage Agreement being entered into that ensures thecontinued maintenance and repair of significant fabric and a program for completion of therestoration of the building. The HCWA has also requested consideration being given to retention ofthe basement stairs within the building. The HCWA has advised that their advice from May 1999remains valid and is applicable to the current application. An approval for the alterations shouldcontain conditions that address the HCWA requirements.The applicant has advised that some work towards a Heritage Agreement for the Newspaper Housegroup of buildings has already been undertaken and that the Conservation Plan is nearing completion.Awning Design:The proposed development includes an awning to be located over the building entrance. The curvedawning is proposed to extend a maximum of 2 metres into the road reserve and will be four metresabove the footpath. The Local Law relating to Awnings Over Streets states that the Council shallnot issue a licence for the erection of an awning in St George's Terrace unless the awning will affordprotection from the weather over an entrance to a building; and the materials of which the awning isto be constructed, its design and colour are, in the opinion of the Council, compatible with theaesthetics and character of the street in which the awning is to be erected. It is considered that theproposed awning satisfies these criteria.Disabled Access:The new entry to the building will include extensions to the existing trachyte and marble steps. Theapplicant will be required to address the standards for disabled access for commercial buildings.Conclusion:M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 748 - 13 JUNE 2000The former WA Trustees Building has the potential to act as an entry statement in a way which isconsidered architecturally appropriate and with a minimal loss of significant heritage fabric or impacton the St Georges Terrace streetscape. Subject to the applicant meeting the requirements of theHCWA, the application can be supported.Moved by Cr Tudori, seconded by Cr DavidsonThat:-(i)in accordance with the provisions of the City Planning Scheme and theMetropolitan Region Scheme the Council approves the application submitted byNoel Beil Ridley Smith and Partners Architects for alterations to the frontfacade, the site entry and Grand Hall at Pt Lot 13 (No. 125-137) St GeorgesTerrace, Perth as shown on plans dated 10 March 2000 and as indicated onMetropolitan Region Scheme Form One dated 9 March 2000, subject to:-(a)(b)(c)(d)details of the materials and finishes for the proposed alterations,including particular attention to the street elevation of the building, beingsubmitted for approval prior to the issue of the relevant building licence;a Conservation Plan being prepared for the property, and a HeritageAgreement being entered into with the Heritage Council of WesternAustralia, prior to the issue of the relevant building licence, with theHeritage Agreement incorporating the Conservation Plan and includingprovisions for the continued maintenance and repair of significant fabric,a program for completion of the restoration program for the building andis to include any other works to the fabric that are required to ensure thesecurity and weather protection of the building;details of any projection into the road reserve, particularly the proposedcantilevered awning, being submitted for approval prior to the issue of therelevant building licence;the entry to the building complying with design for access and mobilitystandards, Part 1 and Part 4 of AS1428;M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 749 - 13 JUNE 2000(ii)the applicant being advised that the consent of the Minister for LocalGovernment under Section 400 of the Local Government (MiscellaneousProvisions) Act 1960 will be required for any encroachment over the roadreserve.The motion was put and carried328/00 VICTORIA AVENUE/RIVERSIDE DRIVE - FLOAT PLANEOPERATIONBACKGROUND:Swan RiverSUBURB/LOCATION:DA/BA REFERENCE: 00/0211FILE REFERENCE: P.1000807RESPONSIBLE DIRECTOR:Garry Dunne, Director Service UnitsDATE: 15 May 2000LANDOWNER:APPLICANT:ZONING:SITE HISTORY:Crown owned foreshore reserve, vested in the City of PerthHarbour Air(MRS Zone) Waterways(City Planning Scheme Zone) Reserved under the MRS for WaterwaysThe Council on 14 June 1994 referred an application for a seaplaneoperation on the Swan River, adjacent to Riverside Drive betweenGovernors Avenue and Plain Street, to the Swan River Trust with arecommendation for refusal and that further discussions be held with theapplicant in relation to possible alternative options.On 12 September 1995 the Council referred an application for aseaplane operation on the Swan River adjacent to the southern end ofHeirisson Island to the Swan River Trust with a recommendation thatthis be considered for a trial period, subject to the Swan River Trustbeing satisfied that there are no environmental or health risks.At the Council meeting of 22 December 1998 it was resolved to referan application for a seaplane operation adjacent to the Swan Riverforeshore and the western end of Heirisson Island to the Swan RiverTrust with a recommendation for approval and advice that the Councilwas prepared to consider the operation of seaplanes on Perth Water,subject to the formulation of an overall planning and developmentstrategy for seaplane operations to allow for appropriate andM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 750 - 13 JUNE 2000coordinated development.”At the Council meeting of 9 February 1999 it was resolved to refer anapplication for a seaplane operation adjacent to the Swan Riverforeshore, east of Barrack Square, to the Swan River Trust with advicethat the Council had concerns over the proposed mooring location ofthe seaplane within Barrack Square and that signage needed to beaddressed. Council reiterated the need for an overall planning anddevelopment strategy for seaplane operations on Perth Water.On 22 February 1999 the Minister for Water Resources refused theapplication for the following reasons:1. The proposal is an undesirable and unnecessary use which willhave a detrimental impact on the amenity of the river environs.2. The proposal is likely to conflict with the existing pattern ofusage and access to the river for public recreation andenjoyment.3. The proposal will create an undesirable precedent for theproliferation of similar commercial activities which maycompromise long term planning objectives and futurerecreational usage of the river.DETAILS:Approval is sought for a 12 month trial for a seaplane operation with a take-off and landing area onthe Swan River parallel to Riverside Drive, adjacent to the area between Hill and Bennett Streets.The float plane service would operate commercially, seven days a week between 8:30am and6:30pm in summer and between 9am and 5pm in winter. The operation would offer tours of Perthand surrounding areas (minimum 15 minute flight) as well as commuting between Perth andMandurah, for a maximum of four passengers at one time. The applicant hopes to find 2 hours ofwork per day in the first year of operation. All flights below 610 metres shall be over water andflights over residential areas are prohibited below 460 metres.The unmarked landing area will be approximately 60 metres wide by 400 metres long (the seaplanewill require a landing distance of 245 metres and a take off distance of 305 metres). The mooringdock has been moved upstream from the previous application. It is proposed to construct a smalljetty/pontoon in the vicinity of the intersection of Victoria Avenue and Riverside Drive. Refuelling ofthe seaplane will occur from the pontoon by hand from drums or a small portable tank.The applicant, in support of the application, has advised the following:“Harbour Air met with the Minister for Water Resources on 19 October 1999. Afterpresenting the Minister with new information previously unavailable to the Swan River TrustM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 751 - 13 JUNE 2000(SRT) he directed the SRT to reassess the application. The Minister acknowledges that thereis no technical reason that would prohibit the operation of the seaplane.”The applicant has stated that the noise levels of the seaplane landing and take off will be less than thatof powerboats in the area and helicopters using the Riverside Drive landing area, and less than thenoise levels from traffic on Riverside Drive. The applicant has also advised that by law, all riverusers have right of way over a seaplane landing or taking off and hence, the seaplane operationwould not impact on any river users at any time. The applicant asserts that the seaplane willcomplement and enhance the area and that a 12 month trial will be sufficient to accurately assess theimpact upon the river, the reserve and their users.POLICY/LEGISLATION/STRATEGIC PLAN:The City’s Foreshore Action Plan (November 1999) identifies the foreshore area adjacent toVictoria Avenue as being an additional activities node, supporting small jetties and boardwalks. Theproposal could be compatible with this plan.COMPLIANCE WITH PLANNING SCHEME:There are no provisions of the City Planning Scheme relevant to the subject site as it falls within aMetropolitan Region Scheme Reserves for Waterways and Parks and Recreation.Draft City Planning Scheme:The subject site falls within the Civic Precinct (P12). There are no provisions in the Draft CityPlanning Scheme applying to the subject site as it falls within a Metropolitan Region Scheme Reservefor Waterways.COMMENTS:Landing Area:The 60m wide landing area will be located 30 metres from the shore and will have a 30 metre bufferzone to the boat channel. The applicant has undertaken a comprehensive study of the landing area interms of the frequency and nature of its usage. It is concluded that in any one hour period theprobability that any vessel will be in the landing area is typically less than one. The seaplane wouldconduct a maximum of two flights per hour.There are no objections to the proposed location of the landing and take off strip for the seaplaneoperation. It is considered that appropriate controls are currently in place to prevent the seaplaneinterfering with other river users and that the noise impact of the seaplane is minimal and compatiblewith the surrounding river, road and recreational reserves, although there is potential for the activityto create a distraction for motorists on Riverside Drive. The seaplane operation will provide anadditional recreational and tourist attraction within the city and can be supported.MooringM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 752 - 13 JUNE 2000The applicant has identified the Victoria Avenue jetty location as an alternative to Barrack Square.The application seeks to establish the suitability of this location. The final design of the jetty wouldbe subject to negotiation and a subsequent development application. The applicant would seek toattach the required “U” shaped mooring pontoon to the jetty. The pontoon is designed to house theseaplane overnight. Details have not been supplied by the applicant to address the security issuesassociated with mooring the plane in this location. The Council can request that this matter beclarified by the SRT prior to the determination of the application.The City’s Foreshore Action Plan indicates boardwalks and small jetties in the subject location.These jetties would be completed at a later stage of the foreshore redevelopment, after restoration tothe seawall is completed. A contribution to the construction and/or lease agreements can benegotiated between the City and the applicant should the seaplane proposal proceed. A temporaryjetty could be supported in this location in the interim, subject to its construction and maintenancebeing at the applicant’s cost.Safety and restricted access signage and limited promotional advertising would be displayed on thejetty, subject to separate approval.Pollution:Wake: The landing area is not wake sensitive, with the shoreline being a concrete/stone sea wall.The sea plane at full take-off speed produces less wake than a Rottnest Ferry moving at only 8knots. The faster the plane travels the less wake it produces.Exhaust Gas: Emission standards are as per those required for new aircraft engines and are similarto car engine emissions.Noise: Noise tests have been conducted by ERM Mitchell McCotter for the applicant on PerthWater, with full load at full power. Measurements were taken in front of residential buildings inTerrace Road (being the closest dwellings to the landing area). The tests confirmed that the seaplaneis incapable of generating enough noise to contravene Environmental Protection (Noise)Regulations 1997 between 7am and 7pm (the seaplane is only licensed to operate during daylighthours). The sea plane will also comply with the noise levels set by the Swan River Trust forrecreational craft on the Swan River. The following maximum noise emissions are listed as acomparison:Seaplane: 70dBRiverside Drive peak traffic: 75dBJet Skis and Recreational Power Boats: 75dBHelicopters (Riverside Drive heli-pad): 85dBThe applicant’s report also lists a number of ways in which noise levels can be minimised from thoseof maximum power take off levels.M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 753 - 13 JUNE 2000Refuelling: The seaplane is refuelled by hand pump which transfers 1 litre per stroke, limiting theextent of any possible spills. No fuel will be stored at the jetty. Fuel will be brought in and takenaway daily in a small portable tank or drum as required. Legal requirements for refuelling are as perthe Civil Aviation Orders. The applicant has not provided details regarding the transportation ordaily storage of the fuel drums which should be further addressed to ensure that the risk of pollution(both visual pollution and fuel spills) is minimised.Strategy:A number of similar applications for seaplane operations on the Swan River have been referred tothe City for comment in recent years and, therefore, it is recommended that the Swan River Trust berequested to formulate an overall planning and development strategy for seaplane operations onPerth Water, in conjunction with the City of Perth and other relevant authorities, to allow forappropriate and coordinated development.Conclusion:The activity has the potential to complement and enhance the foreshore area. Further details will berequired, in liaison with the City, for the location and structure of the proposed jetty/mooring,however, the principle of the jetty location in the vicinity of Victoria Avenue conforms with theForeshore Action Plan and can be supported. A trial period of 12 months for this mooring locationis supported in order to assess the impact of the seaplane on the amenity of the area, including noiseof, and refueling procedures for, the seaplane.Moved by Cr Tudori, seconded by Cr StroudThat the Council:-(i)refers the application by Harbour Air for a seaplane operation on the SwanRiver adjacent to Riverside Drive, Perth, and floating pontoon attached to a jettyin the vicinity of Victoria Avenue as detailed in the report received by the Cityon 10 May 2000, to the Swan River Trust with the following advice:-(a)(b)(c)there are no objections to the proposed seaplane landing and take-offarea;further details will be required, in liaison with the City, for the locationand structure of the proposed jetty/mooring, however, the Council supportsin principle the establishment of the jetty in the vicinity of VictoriaAvenue;further details will be required regarding the transportation and dailystorage of the portable fuel drums to ensure that the risk of pollution (bothvisual pollution and fuel spills) is minimised;M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 754 - 13 JUNE 2000(d)(e)(f)further details will be required regarding security issues associated withmooring the plane at the proposed jetty;a trial period of 12 months for this mooring location is supported in orderto assess the impact of the seaplane on the amenity of the area, includingnoise of, and refueling procedures for, the seaplane;details of signage would be required with any application for a jetty ormooring structure;(Cont’d)(ii)requests the Swan River Trust to:-(a)formulate an overall planning and development strategy for seaplaneoperations on Perth Water, in conjunction with the City of Perth and otherrelevant authorities, to allow for appropriate and coordinateddevelopment.Discussion ensuedThe motion was put and carried329/00 146 (PART LOT 5) WELLINGTON STREET, EAST PERTH -EIGHT STOREY BUILDING ACCOMMODATING 42MULTIPLE DWELLINGS AND BASEMENT CAR PARKINGBACKGROUND:SUBURB/LOCATION:DA/BA REFERENCE: 00/0163FILE REFERENCE: P.1011684RESPONSIBLE DIRECTOR:Corner of Wellington Street and Hill Street, opposite WellingtonSquare, East PerthGarry Dunne, Director Service UnitsDATE: 4 May 2000LANDOWNER:APPLICANT:ZONING:B Corp Pty LtdPeter Hunt Architects(MRS Zone) Central City Area(City Planning Scheme Zone) General Commercial CCM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 755 - 13 JUNE 2000APPROXIMATE COST: $4,600,000SITE HISTORY:The 1360m 2 site is currently vacant, with a 2.5m fall across the sitefrom south to north. Wellington Square is located to the east of the siteand the Moore Street Council Car Park (No. 23), accommodating 71car bays is to the west. To the north is a three storey warehouse and asingle storey building fronting Hill Street. A multi-storey office buildingoccupied by the Royal Perth Hospital is located on the opposite(southern) side of Wellington Street.On 13 December 1994 the Council granted approval for a sevenstorey serviced apartment building with a shop, restaurant, healthcentre and lobby on the subject site, subject to the plot ratio notexceeding 3.0:1. On 11 November 1997 the Council approved aneight storey building accommodating 90 serviced apartments,conference room, restaurant, gymnasium, lobby and lounge with anundercroft car park. On 17 January 2000, approval was grantedunder delegated authority for a four storey building containing 20multiple dwellings.DETAILS:Approval is sought for the construction of an eight storey building containing 42 residentialapartments ranging in size from 75m 2 to 93.5m 2 . Forty of the apartments will contain two bedrooms,with kitchen and dining/living areas and a 1.5m 2 store. Two apartments on the ground floor will besingle bedroom units. Basement parking will be provided for 40 cars, with three additional car baysprovided at ground level. Taking advantage of the natural slope of the site, access to the basementwill be directly accessible from Hill Street.The first five residential floors will each contain six apartments with the floor plans and balconiesdesigned to maximise views to Wellington Square. Floors 6 and 7 will each contain three apartmentsto articulate the top of the building and to provide a visual transition from the higher corner element tothe rest of the building mass and to potential developments on adjoining sites. The 6 th Floor will alsoaccommodate communal facilities including a lounge, gym, spa and barbecue area on the roofterrace.The development will have a plot ratio of 2.75:1 and will be of a similar height and scale to theserviced apartment development approved for the site in 1997.POLICY/LEGISLATION:Goderich Design Policy (draft):In recognition that the development standards of the Scheme do not reflect the specific character ofthe subject locality, the Council has prepared the draft Goderich Design Policy to provide guidancein assessing development applications in this Precinct, including built form, building design andM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 756 - 13 JUNE 2000amenity provisions. The Policy requires nil setbacks to Hill Street, Wellington Street and the sideboundaries and restricts the height of development on this site to 19.5 metres. Buildings are toaddress the street and unsympathetic contrasts of scale and materials relative to adjoining buildingsshould be avoided, although corner sites may be emphasised by “greater scale or geometry, includingadditional height, balconies, curves or different roof forms”.The proposal would satisfy the objectives of the Policy insofar as it would add to the range of innercity residential opportunities in the area and in terms of overlooking and the location of car parking.The applicants seek approval for additional building height on the basis of the site being on a corner,and the proposal does not comply with the street setback guidelines.Perth Parking Policy:Residential parking is exempt from the requirements of the Perth Parking Policy.COMPLIANCE WITH PLANNING SCHEME:Multiple dwellings are an ‘AA’ use within the General Commercial CC zone, requiring the Council toexercise discretion in determining the application. The proposed development has been assessed inaccordance with the City Planning Scheme and the draft Goderich Design Policy. The proposaldoes not comply with the following requirements:-Development Standard Required ProposedSetbacks (Policy)- Front (Wellington St)- Secondary Street (Hill St)nilnil1m - 3.2m0.5m - 4.8mMaximum Plot Ratio (Residential) 1.5:1 2.74:1Maximum Density (R160) 21 dwellings 42 dwellingsMinimum Open Space (Policy) 60% 32%Maximum Car Parking 41 bays 43 baysBuilding Height (Policy) 19.5m 25mDraft City Planning Scheme:The subject property is situated within the City Centre area of the Victoria Precinct (P4). ThisPrecinct provides for various forms of residential accommodation in addition to medical facilities,education, government services and some commercial uses. The ‘Building Heights and Setbacks’Policy (4.5) of the Draft Scheme is consistent with the draft Goderich Design Policy in that it statesthat prominent sites such as corner sites and those which define and identify squares and publicplaces should accentuate the built character of the area through the introduction of a building which istaller than its surrounds.COMMENTS:Building Height:M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 757 - 13 JUNE 2000A height limit of 19.5 metres applies to the site under the provisions of the draft Goderich DesignPolicy. The revised plans contain the first five floors within this limit, with the 6 th and 7 th floorsexceeding the height limit by 5 metres. The two upper levels each contain three units, being only50% of the floor area of the lower levels, and have been designed to emphasise the corner elementof the building. The intent of this revised design is considered to be appropriate in that the Policy(and the draft City Planning Scheme) encourages buildings on corner sites, particularly those whichdefine Wellington Square, to create landmark features that may be emphasised by additional height.The third unit (B4) on the upper two floors has the effect of extending the additional height awayfrom the corner element. The applicant has explained that these units were included to meet theowner’s specifications that the development contain a minimum of 42 dwellings, and that the unitshad been setback from Wellington Street so that they would not be apparent when the developmentwas viewed from street level. In order to provide a transition from the height of the corner elementto future development on the adjoining sites, it is recommended that the third unit (B4) on the 7 thlevel be deleted, resulting in 41 units. This would ensure that the corner element remained the featureelement in terms of height, defining the corner as encouraged under the Policy.It is noted that the development will be a minimum of 2 metres lower than the serviced apartmentdevelopment approved for the site in 1997, however, this development was approved prior to thepreparation of the draft Goderich Design Policy.Plot Ratio:Clause 126 of the Scheme states that dwellings may be incorporated in a development in the GeneralCommercial zone if the plot ratio of the residential component does not exceed a maximum plot ratioof 1.5:1. The residential development will have a plot ratio of 2.74:1 which is less than the maximumplot ratio of 3.0:1 permitted for commercial development in this location. It has previously beenaccepted by Council that a plot ratio of 1.5:1 for residential buildings is a disincentive for thedevelopment of inner city accommodation and that variations to the residential plot ratio may beconsidered on the basis that the plot ratio applicable to commercial development is not exceeded.On this basis, the variation is supported under Clause 48 of the Scheme.Housing Density:A maximum density of R160 applies to residential development in the General Commercial zone,which would permit a maximum of 21 units on the 1360m 2 site. The applicant is seeking a variationto this requirement to allow 42 dwellings on the site (equivalent to R309). While this variationappears significant, the number of units does not necessarily affect the built form and it is consideredthat the intensity of the use would not have an adverse impact upon the adjoining commercialproperties. Council has approved similar variations on commercial zoned land within the GoderichPrecinct and, therefore, the variation can be supported in accordance with the provisions of Clause48 of the Scheme.Setbacks:M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 758 - 13 JUNE 2000The City Planning Scheme does not specify setback requirements for development in the GeneralCommercial zone. The draft Goderich Design Policy promotes nil setbacks to all the boundaries ofthe subject site. While nil setbacks are proposed for the basement/undercroft level, and nil sidesetbacks are included for the first five floors of apartments, the development will be setback anaverage of 2.8 metres from Wellington Street, with only the entry stairs built to the boundary, andwill be setback 0.5 metres to 4.8 metres from Hill Street. The justification for this variation stemsfrom the design that includes residential apartments on the ground level. In order to provide privacyfor the occupants and screening to the car parking level from Hill Street, landscaped and terracedsetback areas are proposed. These variations to the street setbacks are supported, as the overallscale of the development will achieve the objective of defining and enclosing Wellington Square,while enhancing the residential amenity of the development.Car Parking:Under the City Planning Scheme there is no obligation to provide car parking spaces onsite. If carparking spaces are provided for this development, however, the number of spaces is not to exceed300 bays per hectare, which equates to a maximum of 41 bays. The proposal provides a total of 43car parking bays, being one bay per proposed unit and one additional bay for visitors. Inconsidering variations to the Scheme parking requirements, the Council has previously accepted theprovision of one bay per unit, as proposed. On this basis, the additional 2 bays can be supported.As the site slopes downward from Wellington Street (RL13.00 to RL10.33), the basement car parkrises up to 2.5 metres above the level of Hill Street. The elevations do not show any detail ofventilation grills to the car park level, but should vents be required, particular attention to the detailwill be required at working drawing stage to minimise the visual impact at pedestrian level. This canbe addressed as a condition of approval.Access to the car parking will require the removal of two street trees. These trees should bereplaced at the developers cost.Open Space:The development does not provide 60% open space, as required under the R Codes, however, eachapartment will have balconies with a minimum depth of 2m and communal facilities including a roofterrace, will be provided for the occupants. These facilities adequately compensate the shortfall inopen space and are considered appropriate for inner city living.Conclusion:The redevelopment of the vacant site for the purposes of a residential apartment complex complieswith the objectives of the City Planning Scheme and the draft Goderich Design Policy. The proposalM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 759 - 13 JUNE 2000will add activity and interest to the immediate locality and enhance the existing range of inner cityaccommodation in the area. The building has been designed to maximise the outlook overWellington Square. It is considered that the proposed height of the building will not adversely affectthe amenity of the streetscape or impinge on the amenity of adjoining buildings or Wellington Square.The variation can be supported on the basis that the increased height will define the prominent siteand its relationship to the park. The application is recommended for conditional approval.Moved by Cr McEvoy, seconded by Cr MacGillThat:-(i)in accordance with the provisions of the City Planning Scheme and theMetropolitan Region Scheme the Council APPROVES BY AN ABSOLUTEMAJORITY the application for an eight storey building accommodating 42multiple dwellings and a basement car park at Part Lot 5 (No. 146) WellingtonStreet corner Hill Street, East Perth as detailed on Metropolitan Region SchemeForm One dated 7 April 2000 and as shown on the revised plans dated 18 May2000, subject to:-(a)(b)(c)(d)a maximum of 41 multiple dwellings being constructed on the site withunit B4 on the 7 th level floor plan being deleted in order to more closelycomply with the height requirements of the draft Goderich Design Policy;details of the design, colours and finishes for the proposed building, withparticular attention to the street elevations and the undercroft facade toHill Street, being submitted for approval prior to the issue of the relevantbuilding licence;a detailed landscaping plan being submitted for approval prior to theissue of the relevant building licence;any fencing along the street frontages of the property being designed in anopen style (50% open), with any solid component of the wall beingrestricted to a height of 0.75 metres above the road verge level, withdetails of street frontage fencing being submitted for approval prior to theissue of the relevant building licence;M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 760 - 13 JUNE 2000(e)the two street trees shown on the approved plan as “to be removed” beingreplaced in a location within the Wellington Street and Hill Street roadverges adjacent to the site as agreed by the City, within 3 months of thecompletion of the development. All costs incurred in the removal andreplacement of the trees being the responsibility of the developer;(Cont’d)(f)The proposed development being designed and constructed in such amanner so that existing and possible future noise levels associated withthe surrounding commercial uses, that could potentially affect futureoccupiers, can be successfully attenuated. The details of such attenuationbeing submitted for approval prior to the issue of the relevant buildinglicence;(ii)the applicant being advised that the Council will need to be furnished withwritten confirmation that potential occupants of the development will benotified, prior to the purchase of the apartments, of the potential for noise anddisturbances resulting from the proximity of existing or potential uses and therequirements of the City and other organisations to provide inner city serviceson a 24 hours basis, which may impact on the amenity of the residentialenvironment.Discussion ensuedMotion to deferMoved by Cr Sutherland, seconded by Cr DavidsonThat the motion relating to 146 (Part Lot 5) Wellington Street, East Perth - EightStorey Building Accommodating 42 Multiple Dwellings and Basement Car Parking,be deferred.The motion to defer was put and carriedM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 761 - 13 JUNE 2000330/00 REVIEW OF CHILD CARE FEES - CITIPLACE CHILDCARE CENTREBACKGROUND:PerthSUBURB/LOCATION:DA/BA REFERENCE:FILE REFERENCE: P1009591/3RESPONSIBLE DIRECTOR:Garry Dunne, Director Service UnitsDATE: 22 May 2000The City of Perth has a long and highly regarded involvement in the provision of quality child careservices aimed at accommodating visitors to the city and people working in the city.The City of Perth sponsors the Citiplace Long Day Care Centre and the Citiplace Occasional CareCentre located in the City Station Complex on the Corner of Wellington and Barrack Streets.Citiplace Child Care facility was opened in June 1989.The Centres are licensed under the State Government Community Service (Child Care) Regulations1998 to provide a total of 71 child care places. The Citiplace Long Day Centre provides 38 placesfor children of parents or carers who are working or studying. The Citiplace Occasional CareCentre provides 33 occasional care places for those people visiting the city for shopping or otherpurposes.The Council at its meeting held on 12 May 1998 adopted a report with recommendations ofapplications of competitive neutrality principles in relation to National Competition Policy and theimplication of those principles on the City’s child care facilities. Relevant recommendations were:(vii) applies full cost pricing reflecting the Citiplace Child Care Centre’s net competitiveadvantage of $57,029 to its long day care and occasional care fees phased in over threeyears effective as of 1 July 1998;(viii) reviews the Citiplace child care service’s net competitive advantage annually andadjust pricing accordingly.POLICY/LEGISLATION/STRATEGIC PLAN:Community Services (Child Care) Regulations 1988Commonwealth of Australia Child Care Act 1972National Competition Policy Reform (WA) Act 1996City of Perth Strategic Plan 1998-2002Social and Cultural DevelopmentM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 762 - 13 JUNE 2000• Directly support those services and facilities which are readily accessible by all communitymembers.DETAILS:In 1999/2000 the fees for child care at the Citiplace Child Care Centres were approved as:-1999/2000 2000/2001 (proposed)Full Weekly Fee $178.00 (from $168.00) ^5.95% $183.00 ^2.8%Daily Fee $37.00 (from $35.00) ^5.7% $39.00 ^5.4%Sessional Fee $24.00 (from $22.00) ^9% $26.00 ^8.3%Hourly Fee $5.50 (from $5.00) ^10% $5.75 ^4.55%Competitive AdvantageIn May 1998 the Council approved the application of competitive neutrality principles determined bythe National Competition Policy (WA) Act, to its significant business activities. The Citiplace ChildCare Centre was one of the activities identified as enjoying a net competitive advantage of $57,029.The impact of the application of full cost pricing was an increase of $16.54 per week for long daycare and an increase of .48 cents per hour for occasional care. The Council approved the netcompetitive advantage being phased in over a period of 3 years. A $5 annual increase to the longday care fee and 16 cents per hour fee for occasional care, in addition to annual operating increases,was implemented in the budgets for 1998/99 and 1999/2000.The net competitive advantage has been assessed and it has been found that implementation of thethird adjustment would cause undue and excessive hardship to those parents on a low to moderateincome. This group is a high user of the service. Accordingly, it is suggested on public benefitgrounds, that the fees not be increased in the 2000/2001 budget.Fees Structure of Other CentresHarmony Child Care Centre (West Perth) $145- $185Juniors Child Care Centre (Hay Street) $180Museum Street Child Care Centre $155Leederville Child Care Centre $175FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:It can be seen from the fee structure of other child care centres operating in closest proximity to theCitiplace Child Care Centre, that the proposed fee for Citiplace Child Care Centre is higher than thatproposed for most other centres.Following the entry into the market of many private operators a number of community based centreshave been forced to close due to falling utilisation rates and increasing debt that cannot be borne bysponsors. Many private centres have also been forced to close. In the inner city in recent yearsseveral private child care centres have closed.M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 763 - 13 JUNE 2000For the Citiplace Child Care Centre long day care service to meet the estimated operating costs in2000/2001 it would be necessary for the Centre to achieve a 100% utilisation rate and charge a feeof $191.It is proposed that the ongoing and potentially increasing cost to the City of Perth of sponsoring achild care service be the subject of a separate report that addresses the continued involvement of theCity as a policy issue.GST Implications:Not applicable to child care fees.COMMENTS:It is recommended that the fee structure as proposed for the long day care and occasional day careservices at the Citiplace Child Care Centre, be approved.The advantages and importance of the Citiplace Child Care Centre to the community can besummarised as:• A well designed purpose-built child care facility that is unique in structure in that it is able toaccommodate up to 71 children from 0 to 6 years of age in either an occasional care or long daycare capacity in the one facility.• The location of the Centre is central and it is readily accessible to people travelling to the city bytrain, bus or private vehicle.• It offers parents the opportunity to visit their child during the day. This is particularly important tomothers who are breast feeding.• It has a High Quality accreditation status for a maximum 3 year period with the NationalChildcare Accreditation Council. This is the highest standard that can be achieved in the QualityImprovement and Accreditation System.• Parents are happy in the knowledge that the Centre is a non-profit community based facilitysupported by the City of Perth.• The Centre contributes to commercial and economic activity in the city in meeting the child careneeds of shoppers and workers.• Businesses, Hotels, retail outlets, Courts and others can refer people to the service.• It is also a resource for City of Perth employees in need of child care.M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 764 - 13 JUNE 2000• People feel secure in the knowledge that the service under the auspices of the City will continue tooperate unlike other services that have closed down with minimal notice being given to parents.• The fees are competitive and provide value-for-money.• There is continuity of care as staff turnover is minimal.Moved by Cr Stroud, seconded by Cr McEvoyThat:-(i)the following fee structure for child care at the Citiplace Child Care Centres for2000/2001 be APPROVED BY AN ABSOLUTE MAJORITY effective from 1July 2000;(Cont’d)LONG DAY CARE(a) Full Weekly Fee $183.00(b) Daily Fee $39.00(c) Sessional Fee $26.00OCCASIONAL DAY CARE(a) Hourly Fee $5.75(ii)the net competitive advantage cost pricing adjustment relative to NationalCompetition Policy, and application of competitive neutrality principles, not beapplied to the Centre’s fees for 2000/2001.The motion was put and carried by an absolute majority.331/00 AMENDMENT NO. 12 TO THE EAST PERTHREDEVELOPMENT SCHEME - CHANGES TO SECTION5.15.4 OF THE SCHEME TEXTBACKGROUND:SUBURB/LOCATION:PerthM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 765 - 13 JUNE 2000DA/BA REFERENCE: -FILE REFERENCE: P1010386/15RESPONSIBLE DIRECTOR:Charlotte Stockwell, Director StrategyDATE: 26 May 2000The East Perth Redevelopment Authority proposes to amend the East Perth Redevelopment Schemeto allow erection of a building up to 70 metres high on the Main Roads Western Australia (MRWA)site at the corner of Wellington Street and Plain Street, East Perth.This report identifies issues relating to the proposed amendment and recommends that the East PerthRedevelopment Authority be notified of the City’s considerations.The proposed height would result in a built form which is not inconsistent with the general City form.Further, effort should be given to ensuring that a building which would ultimately be constructed onthe site will not prejudice the character of the immediate locality.By letter dated 8 May 2000, at Schedule No.1, the East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA)advised of its intention to amend the East Perth Redevelopment Scheme to facilitate erection of abuilding up to 70 metres high on the Main Roads Western Australia (MRWA) site at the corner ofWellington Street and Plain Street, East Perth.On 13 December 1999, Consultants for the EPRA met with the Manager of Strategy Unit and theManager Approvals Services to discuss the development potential of the site. A workshop was laterheld on the 22 December 1999 to further discuss the issue. In attendance at this workshop wereChris Melsom (EPRA), Helen Griffiths (EPRA) , George Gillan (town planner), Tony Ednie Brown(architect), Sharni Howe (architect), Patric De Villiers (architect/planner) and Chris Antill (townplanner).The EPRA advised that the purpose of the exercise was to establish the long term developmentpotential of the site and that there was no indication that MRWA had an intention to either vacate thesite or redevelop the site at this time.POLICY/LEGISLATION/STRATEGIC PLAN:Pursuant to section 29(3) of the East Perth Redevelopment Act 1991, the EPRA is required to referdetails of the proposed amendment to the City of Perth for comment prior to seeking the Minister'sconsent to advertise the proposed amendment. The City will have the further opportunity tocomment on the proposed amendment during the 42 day public consultation period.DETAILS:The land is located in the Waterloo Precinct of the East Perth Redevelopment Scheme. At presentall new development in the precinct is limited to 12 metres above ground. The EPRA does notpropose to allow remaining land within the precinct to exceed the 12 metre height limit.The existing building is 10 storeys high (approximately 40 metres in height).M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 766 - 13 JUNE 2000Waterloo Precinct is intended principally for residential development. In the event that the MRWAsite is redeveloped, the East Perth Redevelopment Scheme intends that the MRWA site would bedeveloped principally for residential uses.The development around the MRWA site includes:-• residential development (generally 3-4 storeys), Gloucester Park Raceway, and the WACA tothe east;• 4A Car Park (being an at grade car park) and Queens Gardens to the south;• the East Perth Cemetery to the north;• Police Traffic Branch (a 3 storey building) and the Goderich residential precinct to the west.Draft City of Perth City Planning SchemeThe draft City of Perth City Planning Scheme (the Scheme) proposes that the city form is comprisedof taller buildings grouped at the centre of the City - no maximum height limit is specified (300 metresAHD is imposed by the Civil Aviation Authority). This facilitates buildings such as Central Park tobe constructed in that part of the City. Moving east along St George’s Terrace, buildings may beerected to generally no higher than 90 to 100 metres in height. Moving further east along AdelaideTerrace into the more residential areas of Goderich residential precinct, the maximum height is 48metres.If a building was constructed on the MRWA site to the height of 70 metres, and land along AdelaideTerrace was redeveloped to a possible height of around 100 metres, it is unlikely that the building onthe MRWA site would be visually prominent when viewed from the major vantage points of the Cityor at any of the main entry points into the City, other than the entry to the City along East Parade.Built Form Design GuidelinesThe EPRA advised that design guidelines would be prepared to guide the form of development onthe site. It is noted that in the EPRA’s resolution dated 14 February 2000, a building envelope wasreferred to which has not been subsequently forwarded to the City. Opportunity exists for the Cityto provide substantial input into design guidelines.FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:Nil.GST Implications:Nil.M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 767 - 13 JUNE 2000COMMENTS:The EPRA and its consultants have concluded that the site is a unique location within the East Pertharea which can therefore be treated differently from the remainder of the Redevelopment Area.Principally, the sites location on the crest of a hill offers the opportunity for a landmark building to beconstructed on the site.Being on the crest of a hill, the land is at a visually prominent location. The existing building, atapproximately 40 metres above ground level, is clearly visible when viewed from the South Perthforeshore. However in the event that land fronting Adelaide Terrace is developed to its maximumheight allowance, it is unlikely new development on the MRWA site would be more prominent thanthe buildings along Adelaide Terrace .Whilst the proposed height is considered acceptable, it is necessary to give detailed consideration tothe design guidelines which are to be prepared for the site. In that regard matters such as ensuringthe form and site layout of the building compliments the pattern of development established to date inthe redevelopment area is important. The guidelines should also consider whether a single building ora number of buildings on the property would be more appropriate on the site.Moved by Cr McEvoy, seconded by Cr MacGillThat the East Perth Redevelopment Authority (EPRA) be advised that the City doesnot object in principle to the proposed amendment to the East Perth RedevelopmentScheme by deletion of the maximum height limit for the Main Roads WesternAustralia (MRWA) site subject to:-(i)(ii)provision of background information to the Council relating to the justificationfor the proposed building height;extensive contribution from the City of Perth to the Design Guidelines for theMRWA site particularly with regard to ensuring that the building form isconsistent with the general city form and complements the local streetscape.Discussion ensuedThe motion was put and carried332/00 TENDER 077-1999/2000 REMOVAL OF OIL ANDCHEMICALS FROM ROAD SURFACESM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 768 - 13 JUNE 2000BACKGROUND:SUBURB/LOCATION:DA/BA REFERENCE:FILE REFERENCE:RESPONSIBLE DIRECTOR:PerthP1015602Douglas Forster, Director Business UnitsDATE: 25 May 2000Tenders have been invited from suitably qualified and experienced contractors for removal of oilfrom road surfaces within the City of Perth. The invitation closed on 1 May 2000 for a schedule ofrates tender.POLICY/LEGISLATION/STRATEGIC PLAN:Local Government Act 1995Local Government (Functions and General) Regulations 1996Council Policy CS2 - Expenditure - Authorisations - Annual ItemsDETAILS:Seven tenders were received when the tender closed on 1 May 2000.The specification and accompanying documents stated the criteria upon which the evaluation oftenders would be based, as follows:1. Price2. Experience with similar works3. Support resources4. Methods of disposal of waste5. Cleaning of a Test Panel6. Compliance with tender7. Financial viabilityTenderers were asked to submit written details of how they would achieve the requirements of theselection criteria.The contract is for an initial period of 12 months when a review will be carried out. An option isavailable to extend the contract by up to two one year periods.M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 769 - 13 JUNE 2000Tender EvaluationTender documents were collected by eighteen interested parties. Tenders were submitted by:Aqua~Therme;Grime Fighters;Industrial Scrubbing Services;Merlin Environmental Steam Cleaning;Perth General Contracting;WA Jet Spray;Western Educting Services.The tenders were evaluated against the selection criteria and three tenderers, Perth GeneralContracting, WA Jet Spray and Grime Fighters, were requested to demonstrate cleaning of a trialarea. Attached is a full breakdown of the schedules submitted by tenderers.The results of the trials showed that Grime Fighters were able to remove more of the oil residualbuild-up evenly over the trial area. WA Jet Spray and Perth General Contracting left oil stainingwhich was only visible once the area had dried out.Grime Fighters’ schedule of rates is competitively priced and their submission addressed all therequirements of the selection criteria. Grime Fighters has undertaken work within the City of Perth inthe past and was found to achieve a high standard, and able to comply with EPA and trafficmanagement requirements. Past work has also been completed on time and to a satisfactorystandard. Grime Fighters’ demonstrated trial area will represent the benchmark for future cleaningwork.FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:Works of this nature are financed from both capital and operational budgets. $60,000 is currentlyallocated from operational funds for oil removal requirements.GST Implications:Grime Fighters submitted a schedule of rates that correctly demonstrated GST compliance, isregistered for GST and has an appropriate ABN number.COMMENTS:Following an appraisal of the schedule of rates and tender submissions (attached in Schedule No. 2),it is recommended that the tender submitted by Grime Fighters be accepted. They have thenecessary experience and resources to carry out the removal of oil and chemicals from roadsurfaces, which will be carried out mainly out of hours, in strict compliance with EPA noise andenvironmental regulations.M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 770 - 13 JUNE 2000Moved by Cr MacGill, seconded by Cr StroudThat the Council accepts the tender submitted by Grime Fighters for the provision ofmaterials and labour for the removal of oil and chemicals from road surfaces, asrequired in accordance with the attached Schedule No. 2, for a period of 12 monthswith an option to extend by two one year periods.Discussion ensuedThe motion was put and carried333/00 LICENSING OF THE ADVERTISING PILLARS - HAYSTREET MALLBACKGROUND:PerthSUBURB/LOCATION:DA/BA REFERENCE:FILE REFERENCE: P1011738/2RESPONSIBLE DIRECTOR:Garry Dunne, Director Service UnitsDATE: 17 May 2000This report was presented to the Business Opportunities and Savings Committee at itsmeeting held on 17 May 2000.The City owns three advertising pillars in the Hay Street Mall - one at the south/east corner ofWilliam Street and the Mall: one on the northern side of the mall near Carillon City Arcade: and oneat the north/western corner of Barrack Street and the Mall.The pillars are an elliptical shape with two curved display surfaces approximately 1200mm x1000mm and two side faces approximately 300mm x 1000mm. One face of each pillar hosts alocality map of the CBD and mall opening times while the other side is largely unutilised. The sidepanels house institutional advertising which carries the message “Great to see you in the City”.The City has been approached by a tenant in Carillon City Arcade, offering to pay $4,800 perannum for the use of the unutilised side of the pillar near their property. Cell-media, the successfultenderer for the overhead advertising positions on Padbury Walk has also expressed interest in thislocation.The Council approved a new suite of street sign designs at its meeting on 27 October 1998. Part ofthe project to install these signs will involve the possible replacement of the information pillars at bothM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 771 - 13 JUNE 2000ends of the Hay Street Mall with new directory boards, following a trial to assess the communityresponse to the new design.POLICY/LEGISLATION/STRATEGIC PLAN:Policy SU92 (Commercial Enterprises on the Council's Land)."Public tenders shall be invited whenever it is the Council's intention to permit the establishment of acommercial enterprise on any property owned or controlled by the Council."DETAILS:The subject advertising pillars were originally intended to be used for the promotion of activities inthe City. They were found to require specialist window dressing skills to maintain the displays to anacceptable standard and except on rare occasions, these areas have been little used for a number ofyears.Changes in technology, such as the information kiosks and the production of a printed newsheetentitled “What’s On” have replaced the need for static displays in the Hay Street Mall.Accordingly, the recent approaches from businesses wishing to take a licence over one of the displaypanels appears to represent a timely opportunity to generate income from the existing informationpillar in the centre of the Hay Street Mall, which is not presently intended to be replaced.Further, it appears to present an opportunity to improve the appearance of this facility, with displaysmaintained by the business to whom the space would be licensed.FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:No income from the subject advertising pillars is presently budgeted for.GST Implications:GST would be payable on any income from this source. It would be the City’s intention to recoverthe GST from the licensee/s.COMMENTS:Prima facie evidence suggests that the information pillars in the Hay Street Mall are seldom used fortheir intended purpose. Further, the City map on one face of each of them will become redundantwhen the new suite of signs is installed however there is no apparent advantage in removal of thepresent structures.While the approach in hand appears to be attractive, it is recommended that the City’s policy oftendering property to be licensed be followed, in order to ensure probity in the process, and thatconsideration be given to offering all four faces of the subject pillar for tender for commercialadvertising purposes.M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 772 - 13 JUNE 2000It is recognised that the businesses nearest to this structure may object to this process leading to acompetitor being advertised in front of their premises.If the suggestion to tender these spaces is supported, it would be recommended that separatelicences be offered (one for each face of the three pillars), in order to generate visual interest. Itwould also be recommended that the initial licences be granted for a twelve month trial period, inorder to assess the community response and the impact on the Mall.This matter was presented to the Business Opportunities and Savings Committee at its meeting held17 May 2000 where it was resolved to recommend that the Council approves to tender for a twelvemonth trial, licences for the three advertising pillars in the Hay Street Mall.Moved by Cr Stroud, seconded by Cr McEvoyThat the Council approves to tender for a twelve month trial, licences for the threeadvertising pillars in the Hay Street Mall.The motion was put and carried334/00 ADDITIONAL ADVERTISING PROPOSAL - PADBURYWALKBACKGROUND:Padbury Walk, PerthSUBURB/LOCATION:DA/BA REFERENCE:FILE REFERENCE: P1015530/2RESPONSIBLE DIRECTOR:Garry Dunne, Director Service UnitsDATE: 18 May 2000This report was presented to the Business Opportunities and Savings Committee at itsmeeting held on 17 May 2000.Space-Time Media Pty Ltd, the successful tenderer for the elevated advertising locations on theForrest Place frontage of Padbury Walk has submitted a proposal for the licensing of a number ofadditional advertising locations on both levels of the walkway.At its meeting on 11 April 2000, the Council resolved:-M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 773 - 13 JUNE 2000“That the most suitable tender being that submitted by Space-Time Media Pty Ltd to use bothends on the inside barrel-vaulted roof space of Padbury Walk for advertising purposes for anannual fee of $41,860 plus GST be accepted”.POLICY/LEGISLATION/STRATEGIC PLAN:Policy SU92 (Commercial Enterprises on the Council's Land)."Public tenders shall be invited whenever it is the Council's intention to permit the establishment of acommercial enterprise on any property owned or controlled by the Council."Clause 13.2 of the Forrest Place and City Station Development Plan Agreement requires theapproval of any signatory or their successor in title, affected by a substantial change to the projectproposed by either the City or the State up to 30 June 2005. If this proposal is supported, it wouldbe necessary to obtain the approval of the owners of Forrest Chase, before the matter could beprogressed.DETAILS:Space-Time Media Pty Ltd, trading as Cell-media, has submitted a proposal dated 26 April 2000,seeking an extension of its advertising licence to include video advertising screens mounted in thevoids, outside all entrances to the Myer City Store, on both levels of the walkway system. It is alsoproposing fixed video posters at the eastern ends of the walkway on both levels, at the Wellingtonand Murray Street ends of Forrest Chase.FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:ACCOUNT NO: 145 530 000BUDGET ITEM:Licences - Air Space - Video PostersBUDGET PAGE NUMBER: 11BUDGETTED AMOUNT: $20,000INCOME TO DATE: 0BALANCE: 0Cell-media is offering additional income of $20,580 per annum in consideration of the extension of itslicence to include the additional spaces it has proposed. This sum is comprised of $18,490 for newsites, plus $2,090 for approval to relocate its gas plasma screens to the void outside the ForrestPlace entry to Myers on the upper level.GST Implications:The licence fees derived from this source are assessable for GST, which would be recovered fromthe licensee.M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 774 - 13 JUNE 2000COMMENTS:It is considered that this proposal has the potential to create conflict with the business of nearbyratepayers, and that the approval of the owners of Forrest Chase is unlikely to be obtained.This matter was presented to the Business Opportunities and Savings Committee at its meeting heldon 17 May 2000 where it was resolved to recommend that the Council does not support theproposals for additional advertising sites on and under Padbury Walk, submitted by Space-TimeMedia Pty Ltd.Moved by Cr Stroud, seconded by Cr McEvoyThat the Council does not support the proposals for additional advertising sites onand under Padbury Walk, submitted by Space-Time Media Pty Ltd.Discussion ensuedThe motion was put and carried335/00 ASSIGNMENT AND EXTENSION OF LEASE - CITYSTATION PHARMACYBACKGROUND:SUBURB/LOCATION:DA/BA REFERENCE:FILE REFERENCE:RESPONSIBLE DIRECTOR:City Station Concourse, PerthP1001392Garry Dunne, Director Service UnitsDATE: 29 May 2000At its meeting on 13 February 1996 the Council resolved:“That:-(i)subject to the approval of the Hon. Minister for Local Government under Section 267 ofthe Local Government Act, the Council agrees to grant seven (7) year options ofM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 775 - 13 JUNE 2000renewal for the period 1 February 1999 to 31 January 2006 in respect of the leases withthe following parties:-(a)(b)Jaxonvale Pty Ltd in respect of shop "A" at the City Station Concourse subject tocompletion of the development to upgrade the shop front of the City StationPharmacy to the satisfaction of the Council;Van Can Quan and Ngoc Linh Tran in respect of shop "B" at the City StationConcourse;(ii)(iii)the amendments be documents by formal deeds of variation of lease, to be prepared bythe City's Solicitor at the Lessee's expense;the cost of advertising the Ministerial Approval to be recovered from the Lessees.”.At its meeting on 9 June 1998 it was resolved:“That the Council AMENDS BY AN ABSOLUTE MAJORITY part (i) of its resolution of 10March 1998:-“the base rental for the City Station Pharmacy be increased to $73,590 pa for the period 1February 1998 to 31 October 1998, and to $86,970 pa for the period 1 November 1998 to 31July 1999”;by adopting the following substitute sub-clause:-“the base rental for the City Station Pharmacy be increased to $73,590 for the period 1February 1998 to 31 January 1999, and $80,280 for the period 1 February 1999 to 31 July1999 and to $86,970 for the period 1 August 1999 to 31 January 2001.”POLICY/LEGISLATION/STRATEGIC PLAN:Section 10(2) of the Commercial Tenancy (Retail Shops) Agreement Act 1985.”Where a tenant under a retail shop lease has in writing requested the landlord to consent to:(a)(b)an assignment of the lease; orwhere the lease provides for a sub-lease of the premises by consent, a sub-lease of thepremises,and the landlord fails to give notice in writing of the consent or the withholding of consent tothe tenant within 28 days after receiving the request, the landlord shall be taken to haveconsented to the assignment or sub-lease, as the case may be.”M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 776 - 13 JUNE 2000DETAILS:Mr Stephen Onesti, through his company Jaxonvale has operated the City Station Pharmacy sincethe additions to the City Station were completed in 1989. A very satisfactory landlord/tenantrelationship exists and Mr Onesti has never been in breach of his lease.For the last four years, Mr Onesti has employed Sun Chuan Tan as a dispensing Pharmacist. In thattime, Mr Tan has become an integral part of the business and Mr Onesti has decided to recognise hisinput by selling a 35% interest in the business to Mr Tan, effective from 1 July 2000, subject to theapproval of the Council and an agreement to extend the term of the lease to coincide with the term ofthe loan.FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:ACCOUNT NO: 145 6339 525 039BUDGET ITEM:City Station RentalBUDGET PAGE NUMBER: 11BUDGETED AMOUNT: $471,974 (this component $88,900)INCOME TO DATE: $81,665.00ANTICIPATED INCOME TO 30.6.00: $88,912.50BALANCE:GST Implications:There are no new GST implications attached to assigning an existing lease. However, for theavoidance of doubt, it is proposed that the deed of assignment and variation of lease incrued a clauseto record the City’s ability to pass on any GST assessed on the rental or the recovery of outgoingsassociated with this lease from the next review date.COMMENTS:As Mr Onesti will continue to personally guarantee the performance of the lease once it has beenassigned to his company and Mr Tan’s company, the City’s position is strengthened by the proposedassignment of this lease.The Bank’s insistence on the lease term coinciding with the term of the loan to be taken by Mr Tan isin accordance with normal commercial practice. Accordingly, approval of the lessee’s request forthe lease over the City Station Pharmacy to be signed to Jaxonvale Pty Ltd and S.C. Tan Pty Ltd,with personal guarantees from Stephen Paul Onesti and Sun Tuan Tan, and for it to be extended to30 June 2010, is recommended.Moved by Cr Tudori, seconded by Cr GoodmanThat, in respect of the City Station Pharmacy, the Council approves:-M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 777 - 13 JUNE 2000(i)assignment of the lease from Jaxonvale Pty Ltd to Jaxonvale Pty Ltd and S CTan Pty Ltd (ACN 092946015), effective from 1 July 2000, with personalguarantees from Stephen Paul Onesti and Sun Chuan Tan;(ii) extension of the lease to 30 June 2010, subject to reviews every eighteen (18)months, as set out in the existing lease;(iii) the insertion of a provision in the deed of assignment and extension of lease toformalise the requirement for the assignee to pay the goods and services taxassessed on the rental and the variable outgoings attached to this tenancy fromthe next market review opportunity (1 February 2001);(iv)the deed of assignment and extension of lease to be prepared by the City’sSolicitor at the cost of the lessee, including the stamp duty assessed on theagreement.Discussion ensuedThe motion was put and carried336/00 ASSIGNMENT OF LEASE - QV1 BASEMENT CAR PARKBACKGROUND:PerthSUBURB/LOCATION:DA/BA REFERENCE:FILE REFERENCE: P1001301/2RESPONSIBLE DIRECTOR:Garry Dunne, Director Service UnitsDATE: 23 May 2000The BT Office Trust (Trust) owns a half share in the QV1 Building Perth. Part of the Trust’s interestin that property is a 50% tenant in common share in registered Lease E766926 over the section ofthe basement carpark under the City’s Hay Street colonnade reserve.The colonnade reserve was acquired by the City in December 1991 for Nil consideration from QV1Pty Ltd, with the purchase price being offset against lease back of the Lots for a 30 years period forbasement car parking purposes.POLICY/LEGISLATION/STRATEGIC PLAN:As the City is a third party to the Lease, it is not required to advertise this disposition under Section3.58 of the Local Government Act 1995.M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 778 - 13 JUNE 2000DETAILS:The Trust is required to be registered as a Managed Investment Scheme, under the newCorporations Law. As part of the transition process, Permanent Trustee Australia Limited (RetiringTrustee) will retire as Trustee of the Trust and BT Funds Management Limited (Responsible Trustee)will act as both manager and trustee.The City has previously agreed on separate occasions to the assignment of one undivided halfinterest in the leasehold land to SAS Trustee Corporation and Telfirst Pty Ltd (now called QV1 PtyLtd ACN 053 696 727) and Permanent Trustee Australia Limited.FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:There are no budget implications attached to this request.GST Implications:There are no GST implications attached to this request.COMMENTS:Many Property Trusts across Australia will consolidate the roles of Trustee and Manager under thenew Managed Investments regulations. This is the first of several similar transactions the City is likelyto see in the lead up to the new financial year.As the City’s position is unaffected by the identity of the trustee for the BT Office Trust, it isrecommended that the Council agrees to enter into a deed of Assignment of Lease E766926 withBT Funds Management Limited ACN 002 916 458 in respect of basement area of Lots 15 and 163Hay Street, Perth.Moved by Cr McEvoy, seconded by Cr MacGillThat the Council approves the assignment of the interest in Lease E766926 held byPermament Trustee Australia Limited, over portion of the basement of the QV1carpark to BT Custodial Services Pty Limited of Level 15 The Chifley Tower, 2Chifley Square, Sydney, NSW. The Assignment of Lease to be documented by theSolicitor for The BT Office Trust (Trust), at the expense of the Trust.The motion was put and carried337/00 PIER STREET CARPARK - ONE.TEL BATTERY BACKUPCUBE AND ANTENNAEM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 779 - 13 JUNE 2000BACKGROUND:SUBURB/LOCATION:DA/BA REFERENCE:FILE REFERENCE:RESPONSIBLE DIRECTOR:Pier and Murray Street Car Park, PerthP1011706Garry Dunne, Director Service UnitsDATE: 29 May 2000Through its Agent, Nicholas Masters and Associates, Lucent Technologies Australia Pty Limited,operator of the One.Tel Communications network has made an offer to lease approximately 2.9square metres on the western side of the existing air conditioning duct situated on level 2, to the northof stair No. 2 access door at the Pier Street car park. The intent is to accommodate a One.TelBattery Bakup and Cube (both to be mounted on the wall). In addition, an area of approximatelyone (1) square metre located on the south eastern corner of the roof of the building, is required toaccommodate a communication pole and microwave antennae and to install a One.Tel MicrocellAntenna to the south eastern elevation approximately 8 metres above ground level, along with cablesas (as required) linking the above areas.POLICY/LEGISLATION/STRATEGIC PLAN:While Lucent Technologies Australia Pty Limited is not a Government instrumentality, it has similarcompulsory acquisition powers under Clauses 17 and 18, schedule 3 of the Telecommunications Act1997. It is able to compel the City to lease premises deemed to be “low impact” facilities, however,the City cannot voluntarily lease property to Lucent Technologies without first advertising for publicobjections under section 3.58 of the Local Government Act 1995.DETAILS:Lucent Technologies Australia Pty Limited has made this offer as part of its program to construct anational mobile digital telephone network.After some negotiation, it has proposed a rental of $10,000 per annum payable by monthlyinstalments in advance, with annual reviews to the Consumer Price Index (All Groups, Perth). Alease term of ten (10) years is proposed.In all respects, the offer reflects the lease terms set out in the recommendation attached to this report.FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS:ACCOUNT NO: CL 0911-3000 6904BUDGET ITEM:Multi-Story Car Parks-Pier Street CarparkBUDGET PAGE NUMBER: N/ABUDGETED AMOUNT: $10,000 (2000/01)INCOME TO DATE: $0.00ACTUAL INCOME: $N/AM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 780 - 13 JUNE 2000BALANCE: $10,000Income has not previously been derived from this source, and approval of this lease will deliverunbudgeted income of approximately $10,000 to parking operations in 2000/01.GST IMPLICATIONS:This lease will be subject to GST from 1 July 2000. It is proposed that the tax be recovered fromthe lessee.COMMENTS:The granting of a lease to Lucent Technologies Australia Pty Limited is supported, as there is noimpact on the car park by the equipment, and the external components will not impact on theaesthetics of the carpark.The major telecommunication carriers, Telstra and Cable and Wireless Optus are unlikely to objectas they are already accommodated on nearby buildings.As the installation proposed is classified as a “low impact” facility under the Telecommunications Act1997, there is no requirement for Lucent to submit a formal development application, however theplan submitted has been considered by the City and is considered to be acceptable.It is therefore recommended that the Council advertises its intention to enter into a lease to LucentTechnologies Australia Pty Limited on the conditions set out in the recommendation which forms partof this report.Moved by Cr Tudori, seconded by Cr McEvoyThat the Council advertises its intention to enter into a lease under section 3.58 of theLocal Government Act 1995, over portions of the rooftop and level 2 at the PierStreet Car Park with Lucent Technologies Australia Pty Limited ACN 002 326 687,6-10 Talavera Road, North Ryde, New South Wales, on the following terms andconditions:-Premises:An area of approximately 2.9 square metres located onthe western side the Air Conditioning Duct situated onlevel 2 north of stair No. 2, to accommodate a One. TelBattery Backup and Cube (both to be mounted on thewall) along with approximately one (1) square metrelocated on the south eastern corner of the roof of thebuilding, to accommodate a communication pole andmicrowave antenna and the right to install a One. TelM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 781 - 13 JUNE 2000Microcell Antenna to the south eastern elevationapproximately 8 metres above ground level, along withcables as required;Term: Ten (10) years from 1 July 2000;Initial Rental:Rent Reviews:Insurance:$10,000 per annum, payable by monthly instalments of$833.33 in advance, with GST being recovered from thelessee;Rental is to be reviewed annually to the movement in theConsumer Price Index (All Groups Perth), subject to the rentfor each year being not less than the previous year;The lessee shall take out and hold current for the term of thislease and any extension a policy of insurance for publicliability with a reputable insurer for not less than $10millionfor any one claim;Use: Installation, testing, operation, maintenance andreplacement of equipment for a mobile telephone network, asshown on plan 6O11A-2-036-01 and defined as a “lowimpact” facility under the Telecommunications Act 1997;(Cont’d)Access:ElectricalSupply:Assignment:Maintenance:EquipmentColour:EarlyThe lessee is to have access to the premises twenty four hoursper day, seven days per week, subject to payment for thecallout fee from the security contractor in the event of accessbeing required after car park operating hours;The lessee shall arrange its own power supply, whichshall be separately metered, and it shall pay for its energyconsumption direct to the supplier;The lessee may assign this lease to a related body, One.TelNetworks Pty Ltd ACN 085 574 054, or any other carrierunder the Telecommunications Act by notice to the City;The lessee shall maintain the premises in good andsubstantial repair, subject to fair wear and tear;The lessee shall colour equipment installed to match styleguide colours of the carpark;the lessee may terminate this lease in the event of changes tolegislation, technology, radio reception in the vicinity;M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 782 - 13 JUNE 2000Termination:Documentation:Legal Fees:This lease shall be recorded in the form of the draft leaseprovided by the lessee, subject to any amendments reasonablyrecommended by the City’s legal representative;The lessee shall pay the costs for the City to obtain legaladvice on their draft lease, up to the sum of one thousanddollars ($1,000), plus stamp duty and registration charges.The motion was put and carried338/00 HOUSE/SPONSORSHIP AND DONATIONS COMMITTEE -MEETING HELD ON 16 MAY 2000BACKGROUND:SUBURB/LOCATION:DA/BA REFERENCE:FILE REFERENCE:RESPONSIBLE DIRECTOR:PerthP.1011874/5Noelene Jennings, Director Corporate ServicesDATE: 19 May 2000ROLE AND DELEGATION OF POWER TO:-• to investigate and determine protocols and procedures for Elected Members including the DiningRoom, Civic Receptions and Precinct Committees and make recommendations to the Councilon Elected Members’ benefits and allowances.• assess request for donations and sponsorship made to the Council;• approve or decline donation or sponsorship requests of $10,000 or less.DETAILS:The unconfirmed minutes of the House/Sponsorship and Donations Committee meeting held on 16May 2000 are detailed in Schedule No.3. It is suggested the unconfirmed minutes be noted.The matters not delegated to the Committee at the meeting were presented to the Council at itsmeeting held on 23 May 2000.Moved by Cr Davidson, seconded by Cr StroudM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 783 - 13 JUNE 2000That the Council notes the unconfirmed minutes of the House/Sponsorship andDonations Committee meeting held on 16 May 2000.The motion was put and carried339/00 NORTHBRIDGE/WEST END PRECINCT COMMITTEE -VACANCYBACKGROUND:SUBURB/LOCATION:DA/BA REFERENCE:FILE REFERENCE:RESPONSIBLE DIRECTOR:PerthP.1011894/6Noelene Jennings, Director Corporate ServicesDATE: 7 June 2000Cr Sutherland’s resignation from the Northbridge/West End Precinct Committee was noted by theCouncil at its meeting held on 23 May 2000.POLICY/LEGISLATION/STRATEGIC PLAN:Local Government Act 1995 - Section 5.11.DETAILS:The Council at its meeting held on 25 May 1999 agreed to appoint up to three elected members asmembers to each precinct committee, and approved these appointments at its meeting held on 8June 1999. The Council approved at its meeting held on 13 July 1999 to limit the membership ofeach Precinct Committee to a maximum of 12 members.The vacancy created by Cr Sutherland can be filled by either an Elected Member or member of thepublic.COMMENTS:The City has on file, written nominations from interested persons wishing to become members of theCommittee, some received as a result of the advertising for members in June 1999 and otherssubmitted subsequently, in the instance that a vacancy will occur. There has also been recent interestin the Committee from residents in Northbridge and Northbridge Safer WA.It is the practice of the City to only advertise for community membership to precinct committees, ifthere are no nominations from interested persons or if there are more vacancies than the number ofM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 784 - 13 JUNE 2000nominations of people wishing to gain membership on the Committee. It is therefore not considerednecessary to advertise for this vacancy.The following people have registered an interest in being on the Northbridge/West End PrecinctCommittee:-1. Mr William Bradbury2. Rosemary Lynch3. Mr Christopher Swift4. Mr Patrick Culhane5. Rodney Martin Phillips6. Ms Stephanie DevaneyIt was therefore suggested that the Northbridge/West End Precinct Committee considers filling therecent vacancy on the Northbridge/West End Precinct Committee with:-(i)(ii)an Elected Member; ora member of the public.This matter was discussed by the Northbridge/West End Precinct Committee at its meeting held on 7June 2000 where it was resolved to recommend that the Council APPROVES BY ANABSOLUTE MAJORITY to appoint Ms Stephanie De Vaney as member of the Northbridge/WestEnd Precinct Committee.Moved by Cr McEvoy, seconded by Cr MacGillThat the Council APPROVES BY AN ABSOLUTE MAJORITY to appoint MsStephanie De Vaney as member of the Northbridge/West End PrecinctCommittee.The motion was put and carried by an absolute majority340/00 BUDGET POLICIESBACKGROUND:SUBURB/LOCATION:DA/BA REFERENCE: -PerthM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 785 - 13 JUNE 2000FILE REFERENCE: P1015416RESPONSIBLE DIRECTOR: Noelene Jennings, Director Corporate ServiceDATE: 7 June 2000At its meeting held on 16 May 2000 the Budget Committee resolved to endorse a number of BudgetPolicy Statements, with the addition of car parking fees to be determined taking into account thecontrol and management of traffic in the City, to form the basis of policies.POLICY/LEGISLATION/STRATEGIC PLAN:City of Perth Strategic Plan 1998 - 2002Economy: Income Maintenance and Growth - Develop strategies for the future through incomemaintenance, diversity and growth.Governance: Decision Making Structure - Clarify and communicate the City’s decision makingstructure.DETAILS:The Budget Policy Statements previously endorsed by the Budget Committee form the basis ofBudget Policies as attached in Schedule 4.The objective of the Budget Policies is to have in place clear guidelines which can form the basis ofbudget preparation and adoption.Moved by Cr McEvoy, seconded by Cr MacGillThat the Council adopts the Budget Policies as attached in Schedule 4.The motion was put and carried341/00 MOTIONS OF WHICH PREVIOUS NOTICE HAS BEENGIVEN1. GAY AND LESBIAN PRIDE PARADEThe following motion was received from Cr Goodman.Moved by Cr Goodman, seconded by Cr TudoriThat the Council calls upon the Lord Mayor to table the correspondence to which hereferred to when talking to his Notice of Motion at the Council meeting held on 23May 2000, relating to a request to the State Electoral Commission and the City’ssupport for the staging of the Gay and Lesbian Pride Parade.M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 786 - 13 JUNE 2000Discussion ensuedThe motion was put and carried2. GAY AND LESBIAN PRIDE PARADE - COUNCIL SPOKESPERSONThe following motion was received from Cr Goodman.Moved by Cr Goodman, seconded by Cr TudoriThat the Council appoint an elected person as its spokesperson (other than the LordMayor) in relation to matters concerning the Gay and Lesbian Pride Parade.Discussion ensuedThe motion was put and lost3. ARDEN STREET, EAST PERTH - SURVEYThe following motion was received from Cr Goodman.Moved by Cr Goodman, seconded by Cr TudoriThat the State Electoral Commission be requested to include in their mail out‘package’ for the forthcoming Extraordinary postal vote election, a survey as towhether or not the electors support the City of Perth retaining Lots 42-54 ArdenStreet, East Perth plus Part Lot 9 Arden Street, East Perth as a public park, andtaking further action to prevent resumption and/or development of the land forhousing by the East Perth Redevelopment Authority.M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 787 - 13 JUNE 2000Discussion ensuedThe motion was put and lost4. PERTH CONVENTION AND EXHIBITION CENTRE TASKFORCE -COUNCIL REPRESENTATIVEThe following motion was received from Cr Goodman.Moved by Cr Goodman, seconded by Cr TudoriThat the Council:-(i)(ii)receives copies of facsimiles and correspondence tabled in regard to theappointment of an elected person to the Perth Convention and ExhibitionCentre Taskforce;calls upon the Lord Mayor to table the notice which he received at 5.30pm onThursday, 1 June, 2000, and any other correspondence, notices, memoranda,facsimiles relating to this matter, in order that Council be fully informed.The motion was put and carried5. PERTH CONVENTION AND EXHIBITION CENTRE TASKFORCE -COUNCIL NOMINATED REPRESENTATIVEThe following motion was received from Cr Goodman.Moved by Cr Goodman, seconded by Cr DavidsonThat the Council nominates and appoints an elected person as its representative toattend the Perth Convention and Exhibition Centre Taskforce Committee meetings.Motion to amendMoved by Cr Stroud, seconded by Cr McEvoyM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 788 - 13 JUNE 2000That the words “or the Chief Executive Officer” be added after the word “person”.Discussion ensuedThe amendment was put and carriedThe amended motion was put and carriedCr Goodman nominated the Chief Executive OfficerCr Davidson nominated Cr TudoriDiscussion ensuedCr Goodman withdrew his nomination for the Chief Executive Officer.Moved by Cr Goodman, seconded by Cr DavidsonThat Cr Tudori be appointed the Council’s representative to attend the PerthConvention and Exhibition Centre Taskforce Committee meetings.Discussion ensuedThe motion was put and lostCr Goodman requested that his dissent to the Presiding Person’s ruling that this matterwas required to be voted upon be recorded.6. PERTH CONVENTION AND EXHIBITION CENTRE TASKFORCE -COUNCIL NOMINATED REPRESENTATIVEThe following motion was received from Cr McEvoy.Moved by Cr McEvoy, seconded by Cr StroudThat the Council nominates the Chief Executive Officer as its representative toattend the Perth Convention and Exhibition Centre Taskforce Committee meetings.Discussion ensuedM:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 789 - 13 JUNE 2000The motion was put and carried342/00 REPRESENTATION ON STATUTORY AUTHORITIES ANDPUBLIC BODIESNil343/00 URGENT BUSINESS1. QUORUM OF FORESHORE ENHANCEMENT COMMITTEEThe Deputy Lord Mayor ruled the motion as urgent in accordance with Clause 3.13 of theCity’s Standing Orders.Moved by Cr Sutherland, seconded by Cr McEvoyThat the Council APPROVES BY AN ABSOLUTE MAJORITY:-(i)(ii)membership of the Foreshore Enhancement Committee being reduced to sevenmembers;the quorum for the Foreshore Enhancement Committee comprising fourmembers.Discussion ensuedThe motion was put and carried by an absolute majority2. GAY AND LESBIAN PRIDE PARADE SURVEYThe Deputy Lord Mayor ruled the motion as urgent in accordance with Clause 3.13 of theCity’s Standing Orders.As required under Regulation 10 of the Local Government Act (Administration)Regulations 1996, this motion received the required support of at least one third ofmembers of the Council in order for it to be considered. The motion was supported by CrsDavidson, Goodman and Tudori.M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 790 - 13 JUNE 2000Moved by Cr Davidson, seconded by Cr GoodmanThat the Council:-(i) RESCINDS BY AN ABSOLUTE MAJORITY its decision of 23 May 2000:“That the State Electoral Commission be requested to include in their mail out“package” for the forthcoming Extraordinary postal vote election, a survey asto whether or not the electors agree with the City of Perth supporting the stagingof the Gay and Lesbian Parade.”(ii)the above recission is supported by:(a)(b)(c)the overwhelming results of the survey conducted by the Subiaco Councilin favour of the Parade by the Council and the Community;the unnecessary financial burden to the City of Perth;such survey being not required in an extraordinary election.Discussion ensuedMotion to deferMoved by Cr McEvoy, seconded by Cr StroudThat the motion relating to the Gay And Lesbian Pride Parade Survey, be deferred.The motion to defer was put and lostDiscussion ensuedThe motion was put and lost as an absolute majority was not achieved.As requested by Cr Tudori the votes were recorded as follows:-For:Against:Crs Davidson, Goodman, MacGill and Tudori.Crs McEvoy, Stroud and Sutherland.M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC

COUNCILMINUTES - 791 - 13 JUNE 2000The Deputy Lord Mayor declared the meeting closed at 8.06pm with Councillors Davidson,Goodman, MacGill, McEvoy, Stroud and Tudori in attendance.M:\CON992000\MN000613.DOC