5<strong>The</strong> <strong>Broaden<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Church</strong>In <strong>the</strong> U.S.A.THE sixty years between <strong>the</strong> reunion of 1869 (actuallyconsummated <strong>in</strong> 1870, but approved <strong>in</strong> 1869)and <strong>the</strong> reorganization of Pr<strong>in</strong>ceton <strong>The</strong>ologicalSem<strong>in</strong>ary <strong>in</strong> 1929 witnessed significant growth <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Presbyterian<strong>Church</strong>, U.S.A. For <strong>in</strong>stance, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> forty or so yearsfollow<strong>in</strong>g reunion, <strong>the</strong> number of churches more than doubledand <strong>the</strong> number of communicant members more thantripled. 1 Much was accomplished for <strong>the</strong> fur<strong>the</strong>r<strong>in</strong>g ofChrist‟s k<strong>in</strong>gdom on earth, and <strong>the</strong> <strong>Church</strong> was open<strong>in</strong>g itsdoors to <strong>in</strong>clude more and more people. However <strong>the</strong> <strong>Church</strong>was also broaden<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> a far deeper and more significantway—namely, <strong>in</strong> its doctr<strong>in</strong>e, and chiefly <strong>in</strong> its toleration ofteach<strong>in</strong>g blatantly contrary to <strong>the</strong> doctr<strong>in</strong>al system and spiritof its Confession of Faith. This story is well told by ProfessorLefferts A. Loetscher <strong>in</strong> his well-known book, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Broaden<strong>in</strong>g</strong><strong>Church</strong> (1954), a study of <strong>the</strong>ological issues <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Presbyterian<strong>Church</strong>, U.S.A., s<strong>in</strong>ce 1869. 2 A similar trend wasalso tak<strong>in</strong>g place <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r ma<strong>in</strong>l<strong>in</strong>e American <strong>Church</strong>es.It is all-important that we grasp this broaden<strong>in</strong>g trend if1. S. H. Roberts, A Concise History of <strong>the</strong> Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>U.S.A., 1917, 67-78.2. L. A. Loetscher, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Broaden<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Church</strong>: A Study of <strong>The</strong>ological Issues<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong> S<strong>in</strong>ce 1869, 1954. Actually, <strong>the</strong> story is only carrieddown <strong>in</strong> 1936. This book (BC) is <strong>the</strong> crucial secondary source for this period. It iswell-documented and conta<strong>in</strong>s much valuable <strong>in</strong>formation. Loetscher is Professorof American <strong>Church</strong> History at Pr<strong>in</strong>ceton Sem<strong>in</strong>ary, and <strong>the</strong> fact that he writesfrom <strong>the</strong> standpo<strong>in</strong>t of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Broaden<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Church</strong> gives <strong>the</strong> book even more value.153<strong>The</strong> History Beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> Reformed Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong>, Evangelical Synod, pp. 152-193.
154 <strong>The</strong> <strong>Broaden<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Church</strong> In <strong>the</strong> U.S.A.we are to understand <strong>the</strong> history beh<strong>in</strong>d <strong>the</strong> Reformed Presbyterian<strong>Church</strong>, Evangelical Synod. Thus <strong>the</strong> present chapterdeals with <strong>the</strong> history of <strong>the</strong> U.S.A. Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong>dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> sixty-year period (1869-1929) <strong>in</strong> terms of thisdevelopment and <strong>the</strong> reaction to it with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Church</strong>. <strong>The</strong>relevant topics before us, <strong>the</strong>n, are <strong>the</strong> rise of modernism, <strong>the</strong>reaction of fundamentalism, <strong>the</strong> Pr<strong>in</strong>ceton tradition, and <strong>the</strong>triumph of <strong>in</strong>differentism.Rise of Modernism<strong>The</strong> decades follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> reunion of 1870 witnessed<strong>in</strong>tense activity <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Presbyterian <strong>Church</strong>, U.S.A., especially<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> areas of home and foreign missions, Christian education,and social reform. „<strong>The</strong> causes of temperance and Sundayobservance, which had been <strong>the</strong> classic centers of Protestantsocial concern next to slavery, cont<strong>in</strong>ued as objects ofPresbyterian <strong>in</strong>terest <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> period after <strong>the</strong> Civil War.‟ 3 Inconnection with all this activity <strong>the</strong>re emerged a morestreaml<strong>in</strong>ed and centralized <strong>Church</strong> organization. 4 In duetime this organization passed <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> control of men under<strong>the</strong> spell of modernism.Indeed, by far <strong>the</strong> most significant development with<strong>in</strong><strong>the</strong> <strong>Church</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g this period was <strong>the</strong> rise of modernism.Apparently, <strong>the</strong> term „modernism‟ was first officially used <strong>in</strong>3. L. A. Loetscher, „Some Events and Trends S<strong>in</strong>ce 1869,‟ <strong>in</strong> G. J. Slosser(ed.), <strong>The</strong>y Seek a Country: <strong>the</strong> American Presbyterians, 1955, 257. This briefarticle (p. 251-266) is on <strong>the</strong> whole a very perceptive <strong>in</strong>troduction to generaldevelopments <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> post-reunion period. For documents relat<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong>se developments,see M. W. Armstrong, L. A. Loetscher, and C. A. Anderson (ed.), <strong>The</strong>Presbyterian Enterprise (PE): Sources of American Presbyterian History. 1956,225 ff.4. Cf. ibid., 259: „Runn<strong>in</strong>g through such activism is often <strong>the</strong> implicationthat <strong>the</strong> church is primarily a voluntary society, chartered to do bus<strong>in</strong>ess for <strong>the</strong>Lord; and also <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>timation that anyth<strong>in</strong>g that hampers <strong>the</strong> church‟s workshould be elim<strong>in</strong>ated or reduced. . . . <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>tense activity of this period, withresult<strong>in</strong>g development of executive power, has perhaps made possible authoritariantendencies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area of <strong>the</strong> church‟s spiritual and <strong>the</strong>ological life, whichhappily have not as yet materialized.‟ One may wonder whe<strong>the</strong>r Loetscher‟s confidence,that such „authoritarian tendencies‟ have not triumphed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S.A.<strong>Church</strong>, is well-founded.This digital edition prepared by <strong>the</strong> staff of <strong>the</strong> <strong>PCA</strong> <strong>Historical</strong> <strong>Center</strong>, 2009.