NEW MODELS FOR A NEW WORLD4.5.2 Social Impact BondsRooted in the broader efforts to improve the performance and outcomes ofsocial service delivery and to find innovative ways to control costs, SIBs, bydesign, offer incentives to improve outcomes while transferring some or all ofthe financial risk from governments and taxpayers to private investors. Theconcept of social impact bonds was developed to help enhance social benefitsthrough investments in preventative as well as early intervention services, andto facilitate innovation through cross-sectoral partnerships that generatesavings for government (Langford, 2011). SIBs work by identifying potentialgovernment savings through a restructuring of traditional relationshipsbetween government agencies, third sector organizations and the privatesector. Once these savings are identified, capital can be raised from privateinvestors to pay for action to address social problems before they arise orbecome unmanageable.Three elements of Social Impact Bonds:• Start-up investments are made by commercial investors, foundations and trusts, and high-net-worthindividuals in interventions that prevent future problems• Outcomes, rather than the means, are the focus of the investment. These outcomes are clearly definedin a set of targets. Providers are free to develop the most effective means to meet their targets• If the programs are successful, payments by the government cover the costs of the interventions andenable investors to make a return; if the desired outcomes are not achieved, investors are unrewarded(Moynagh, 2010. p. 11).Although originally conceived of as simple bonds, SIBs operate more like anequity investment in that investors will be paid based on outcomes achievedrather than automatically. In this sense, payments depend on tangibleimprovements in people’s lives. Investors initially buy into an equity fundthat is scheduled to be wound up on a pre-determined date. Returns thendepend on how the bond is structured and how the program performs basedon the pre-established targets (Moynagh, 2010).22 • <strong>Uncharted</strong> <strong>Territory</strong>: Can Social Innovation Revitalize Literacy and <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Programs?
NEW MODELS FOR A NEW WORLDFrom an idea first tested in 2010 in Peterborough, England city prisons [see SocialFinance, Ltd. and the U.K. Ministry of Justice – Pioneers of Social Finance p. 24], SIBs havegarnered much international interest and become a buzzword in social policy. In 2012,Goldman Sachs announced that it would create the first SIB in America to help fund aNew York City prison program that aims to lower the 50% recidivism rate among youthoffenders jailed at the Rikers Island Correctional Facility. The four-year program isproviding education, intensive training and counselling to at-risk incarcerated youthsthrough private, non-profit agencies. It will have to reduce the recidivism rate by at least10% for Goldman Sachs to recoup its investment. If the recidivism rate drops further,Goldman could profit by up to $2.1 million beyond its original investment while thecompany stands to lose up to $2.4 million if the program fails to meet its targets(Francescani, 2012).As with most investments, there are inherent risks associated with SIBs. While it is tooearly to make any inferences or draw solid conclusions, it is understood that SIBs are anew financial instrument with the potential to harness innovation in the social servicesector and address intractable social issues.As the field of social finance evolves, we will develop a better understanding of howand which financial instruments, investments and incentives work best for whom andunder what conditions.The New York City Social Impact Bond: Its structure and financial returnsGoldmanSachsProvidesLoansNYC Social Impact Bond Structure$9.6M Senior LoanLoan Principal andInterest Payments($7.2M-$11.7M)BloombergPhilanthropiesGuaranteesLoan$7.2MGrantMDRCManagesProgram and InvestmentsOsborneAssociationsDeliversServicesInitial Investment$9.6MCBT InterventionSuccess PaymentsBased on Savings($0 -$11.7M)Payment terms for Final Evaluation(4 Years of Investment)Reduction in ReincarceerationCity Payment to MRDCProjected Loan-TermCity Net Savings ($)*20.0% $ 11,712,000 $ 20,500,00016.0% $ 10,944,000 $ 11,700,00013.0% $ 10,368,000 $ 7,200,00012.5% $ 10,272,000 $ 6,400,00012.0% $ 10,176,000 $ 5,600,00011.0% $ 10,080,000 $ 1,700,00010.0% (breakeven) $ 9,600,000 $ 1,00,0008.5% $ 4,800,000 $ 1,00,000Vera Instituteof JusticeMeasures ImpactYouth on RykersIslandReceivesServicesDecrease inRecidivismNYC Dept.of CorrectionRealizesSavings*Savings after repayment and continued funding for program delivery.Source: Gibbs, Linda I. (2012, October). Bringing Social Impact Bonds to NewYork City. Presented at The Centre for Literacy, Fall Institute 2012 SocialFinance and Innovation for Adult Basic Learning: Opportunities and Challenges,Saint John, New Brunswick. Reprinted with permission from the author.<strong>Uncharted</strong> <strong>Territory</strong>: Can Social Innovation Revitalize Literacy and <strong>Essential</strong> <strong>Skills</strong> Programs? • 23