5. Trophy Hunting and Local Communities5.1 SummaryTrophy hunting is becoming increasingly accepted as a conservation tool due to thevast amount of land that can be conserved by the industry, large revenues generatedand potential benefits to local communities. Within the Kilombero Valley of centralsouthern<strong>Tanzania</strong> in the Districts of Kilombero and Ulanga, the Kilombero GameControlled Area hosts four concessions operated by two hunting outfitters. A thirdoutfitter is based to the south of the Ulanga District. Between August and December2007 structured interviews were conducted within 24 villages in the region, gatheringinformation from 360 village residents aimed to determine the impact that the huntingcompanies has on their livelihoods. Local communities are thought to be able tobenefit financially from trophy hunting, and to be given opportunities of employment,in addition to gains from infrastructure development and the provision of meat.Evidence of these types of benefits was limited within the Kilombero, with only 15%of respondents feeling that they received benefits. Only eight people had beenemployed by a hunting company. Problems associated with the presence of theoutfitters were extensive, ranging from physical abuse to increases in crop damageand controversy over boundaries. While it is evident that there are benefits to begained from trophy hunting, it would appear that much of these benefits are notreaching the residents sufficiently. Greater communication is required between thehunting companies and the villagers. It is also necessary to clarify the benefits thatare given, and to provide education to illustrate the activities of the hunting companies.It would be helpful to attempt to provide benefits on an individual basis, in terms ofemployment and the provision of bushmeat. A useful step would be for the companiesto act directly with the villagers, rather than contributing purely to central government,who then provide money to District Councils for allocation.Trophy hunting can benefit local communities; however effort is required to improvethis service and to encourage satisfactory relationships between hunting companiesand local communities.5.2 The impact of trophy hunting on local communities5.2.1 IntroductionThe 21 st century has brought new challenges to conservation programmes, as thepressures upon wildlife areas no longer support previous preservationist methods ofconservation. The new conservation paradigm involves local communities directly inconservation efforts, so that they benefit directly from wildlife, providing an incentiveto maintain wildlife areas and populations in the face of competition from populationgrowth, industrialisation, agricultural expansion (Baker, 1997b). One of the majortransformations of conservation is the move to the utilisation of wildlife, advocated byArticle 1 of the 1993 United Nations Convention on Biodiversity (UNCBD, 1993).47
Wildlife utilisation can be described as either non-consumptive or consumptive, andthe two different types of utilisation have very important different consequences.Non-consumptive utilisation includes bird watching and photographic tourism, (Baker,1997b), and involves large numbers of tourists visiting areas to watch wildlife. Whilethis creates economic benefits and contributes to species and habitat conservation,problems can result from land degradation and infrastructure demands. Consumptiveutilisation can include hunting, fishing, bird shooting, the sale of live animals andgame cropping (Baker, 1997a; Ashley and Jones, 2001; Mayaka et al., 2005).Although there are substantial benefits from consumptive use, predominantly largeeconomic gains and habitat protection in inaccessible areas, the stakes are high, as therisks of over-exploitation and resource depletion caused by badly managed andunsustainable consumptive use (Hutton and Leader-Williams, 2003) can becatastrophic and irreversible.One of the major forms of consumptive wildlife use is trophy hunting 1 , the selectivehunting of wildlife displaying desired characteristic traits, usually carried out byforeign hunters who are willing to pay a fee for the experience and/or the trophyattained (Hofer, 2002). Trophy hunting can provide large sums of money that can beused to conserve habitat and species (Leader-Williams et al., 2005), but perhaps mostimportantly, it conserves habitat that is unsuitable for non-consumptive uses. In sub-Saharan Africa trophy hunting areas cover over 1.4 million km 2 , an area 22% greaterthan that covered by national parks in countries where trophy hunting is permitted(Lindsey, 2006). This is because areas can be utilised that are unsuitable for otherforms of tourism due to the need for established infrastructure and amenities (Baker,1997a; Barnes, 2001), as can land in areas that are politically unstable (Du Toit, 2004).There are however, several biological issues of concern, and there has been littleresearch on the effects of trophy hunting on animal populations, (Festa-Blanchet et al.,2004; Wilkie and Carpenter, 1999a). Harris et al., (2002) listed four potential effectsthat trophy hunting may have; 1) alteration of genetic flow rates between populations,2) alteration of the rate of genetic drift through the effect on the genetically effectivepopulation size, 3) the removal of animals with desirable traits may decrease fitness;and 4) the removal of individuals with undesirable traits may also lead to a decreasein fitness. There are also issues regarding the haphazard nature of quota setting(Taylor, 2001; Baker, 1997a).A frequently voiced argument supporting trophy hunting is the benefits it can bring tolocal people (Baker, 1997a), and that this can alter the perception that localcommunities have towards the wildlife, leading to their involvement with wildlifeconservation and to a greater chance of successful conservation schemes. This ispossible due to the highly profitable nature of the industry (Crowe et al., 1997; Vande Merwe and Saayman, 2003), with hunting clientele paying as much as three timesthe amount that a photographic tourist will pay (Baker, 1997a). In 2000 the estimatedturnover of the trophy hunting industry in Botswana was US$12.65 million (BWMA,2001), and in Namibia it was US$11.5 million (Humavindu and Barnes, 2003). It hasbeen shown that 86% of American clients would be more willing to purchase a hunt iflocal communities would benefit (Lindsey et al., 2007).1 Trophy hunting is also known as tourist hunting (Caro et al., 1998, a, b), safari or game hunting(Kreuter and Workman, 1997), and sport hunting (Baker, 1997b).48