12.07.2015 Views

THE MILITARY SYSTEM OF BENIN KINGDOM, c.1440 - 1897

THE MILITARY SYSTEM OF BENIN KINGDOM, c.1440 - 1897

THE MILITARY SYSTEM OF BENIN KINGDOM, c.1440 - 1897

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

when the seat of monarchy emerged in Benin. The idea of centralised political organisationwhich evolved in response to local politics, was a contributory factor to the emergence of thestate.It is useful at this point to explain the concept of ‘state’ and ‘society’ as these twoterms have been used frequently in this study. While doing this, attempt has been made toexplain state-society relations. On this ground, the relations between military system and thestate and military system and society is further elucidated. The understanding of the conceptof the state usually refers to the modern state which originated in Europe in the fifteenthcentury, and by the end of the eighteenth century had evolved into a nation-state, and whichdiffused all over the world in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. There are varioustheories of the state, 9 and the common characteristics of the state that have been identified are:organised form of decision-making and governance; sovereign or supreme authority; clearlydefined boundaries; clearly defined population; and security for the society. Thesecharacteristics tend to justify the argument that the state is the political organisation of asociety.From the studies presented and discussed at the Fourth International African Seminarin Dakar, Senegal in 1961, the criteria to be taken in defining a state system were identified.Careful distinctions were made between state systems in general, divine kingship, andkingship by divine right. The Seminar defined state system “as a political structure in whichthere is differentiated status between rulers and the ruled.” 10 This state system is founded notonly on relations of kinship but also on a territorial basis. The most important index is thepresence of political offices, that is, of persons invested with roles which include secularauthority over others in given territorial aggregations for which there are effective sanctionsfor disobedience. 11 Such political offices must furthermore be coordinated hierarchically. Itwas also pointed out that a state may merge through a process of internal developmentwhereby one of its corporate groups succeeds in imposing itself on others. 129 For general discussions of the theories, see J. Haas, 1982, The Evolution of the Prehistoric State. New YorkUniversity Press; R. Cohen and E. L. Service (eds.), 1978, Origins of the State: The Anthropology of PoliticalEvolution. Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues; Elman R. Service, 1975, Origins of the Stateand Civilisation: The Process of Cultural Evolution. New York: Norton; Robert L. Carneiro, 1970, “A Theory ofthe Origin of the State.” Science, 169 pp.733-738; Morton H. Fried, 1967, The Evolution of Political Society: AnEssay in Political Anthropology. New York: Random House.10 J. Vansina, R. Mauny and L.V. Thomas (eds.) 1964, The Historian in Tropical Africa (Studies Presented andDiscussed at the Fourth International African Seminar at the University of Dakar, Senegal 1961). London:Oxford University Press, 1964, p.87.11 ibid.12 ibid., p.89.4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!