12.07.2015 Views

THE MILITARY SYSTEM OF BENIN KINGDOM, c.1440 - 1897

THE MILITARY SYSTEM OF BENIN KINGDOM, c.1440 - 1897

THE MILITARY SYSTEM OF BENIN KINGDOM, c.1440 - 1897

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

To outsiders, particularly non-African writers, the nature and character of the different phasesof state formation in Benin, that is, the large-scale organisation of the kingdom and empire,were developments which seem possible only in the savannah area. This is why Alan Ryderalso asked similar questions: on why Benin departed from a political pattern seemingly inharmony with its social structure and suited to its physical environment, a physicalenvironment where the tropical forest hindered communications that were essential to largescaleorganisation. 34Attempts have been made by writers from different disciplines to throw light on anumber of questions being asked about Benin. Since 1957 when the Scheme for the Study ofBenin History and Culture was set up, 35 different research projects have been studying theoral history, language, social and political institutions, economic organisation, the religion,the art, and other aspects of Benin. The literature on Benin studies suggest that scholars aremore interested in the art of Benin than any other aspect of its heritage and history. No studyof the military system has been embarked upon except a few research on aspects of themilitary history of Benin. 36For the more recent works on Benin history, the state of knowledge has progressedbeyond explaining as well as describing events in the past or of what the history is all about.Rather, the presentation of conflicting views of particular periods and problems, albeit, withinthe context of general interpretations, has deepened the understanding of the historical detailsof the Benin past. The challenge of prevailing views concerning the chronological data, theorigin of Benin, the Ogiso period, the origin of the Eweka dynasty, and the rise of Beninseems to be the sources of disagreement among the historians of Benin. The issues presentedin the debates have helped in the understanding of the evidence, the arguments and themethods used by academic and non-academic historians, and other writers. The debates havealso stimulated interests in historical reconstruction, in knowing what happened and why ithappened, and how different writers, viewing the same event, have attempted to answer thequestions being asked about Benin. In some cases, the subject matter being investigated or the34 Ryder, 1967, “The Rise,” p. 27.35 Professor Kenneth Onwuka Dike was appointed the Director. For the research agenda of the Benin HistoricalResearch Scheme, see K. O. Dike, “The Benin Scheme”, Ibadan No. 1, October 1957; K. O. Dike, “The BeninScheme Begins”, Corona, IX September, 1957 and K. O. Dike, “Benin: A Great Forest Kingdom of MedievalNigeria”, The UNESCO Courier, No. 10, October 1959.36See for example, P. M. Roese, 1992, “Kriegführung und Waffen im alten Benin (Sudnigeria),Ethnographisch-Archaeologische Zeitschrift, Jahrgang 33, Heft 3 Berlin: Germany; B. W. Blackmun, 1983,“Remembering the Warrior Kings”, In: Ben-Amos, P. Girshick and A. Rubin, (eds.) The Art of Power, thePower of Art Los Angeles: Fowler Museum of Cultural History, UCLA;and M. P. Roese, A. R. Rees and G. K.Maliphant “Defence Systems of the Benin Empire”, West African Journal of Archaeology 7, 1977. See also, S. J.Barnes and P. Ben-Amos, 1983, “Benin, Oyo, and Dahomey: Warfare, State Building, and the Sacralization of12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!