The Blue Bird of Ergativity - celia

More documents

Recommendations

Info

DRYER, Matthew. 1986. Primary object, secondary object, and antidative.Language 62.808-45.FORREST, Linda. 1999. The role of attention and activation in languageproduction: A neurocognitive linguistic approach. Ph.D. dissertation,University of Oregon.GIVÓN, T. 2001. Syntax: An introduction, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Benjamins.HOPPER, Paul, and S. A. THOMPSON. 1980. Transitivity in grammar anddiscourse. Language 56.251-99.LI, Charles, and S. A. THOMPSON. 1976. Subject and topic: A new typology oflanguage. Pp. 457-90 in Charles Li, ed., Subject and topic. New York:Academic Press.MATISOFF, James. 1972. The grammar of Lahu. Berkeley and Los Angeles:University of California Press.MITHUN, Marianne, and Wallace CHAFE. 1999. What are S, A and O? Studies inLanguage 23:3.569-606.MOHANAN, K.P., and Tara MOHANAN. 1990. Dative subjects in Malayalam:Semantic information in syntax. pp. 43-57 in Manindra Verma and K.P.Mohanan, eds. Experiencer Subjects in South Asian Languages. Stanford:Center for the Study of Language and Information.RIGSBY, Bruce, and Noel RUDE. 1996 Sketch of Sahaptin, a Sahaptian language.Pp. 666-692 in Ives Goddard, ed., Languages. (Handbook of North AmericanIndians vol. 17). Washington: Smithsonian Institution.RUDE, Noel. 1991. On the origin of the Nez Perce ergative NP suffix. IJAL57:24-50.SAPIR, Edward. 1917. Review of Uhlenbeck, "Het passieve karakSter van hetverbum transitivum of van het verbum actionis in talen van Noord-Amerika."IJAL 1.82-6.SCHUCHARDT, Hugo. 1895. Über den passiven Charakter des Transitivs in denkaukasischen Sprachen. in: Sitzungsberichte der kais. Akademie derWissenschaften, phil.-hist. Klasse, vol. 133. Vienna.20
SILVERSTEIN, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. Pp. 112-71 inR.M.W. Dixon, ed., Grammatical categories of Australian languages.Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.SOE, Myint. 1999. A grammar of Burmese. Ph.D. dissertation, University ofOregon.STERN, Theodore. 1963. A provisional sketch of Sizang Chin. Asia Major n.s.10.222-78.1984. Sizang (Siyin) Chin texts. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area8.1:43-58.TOMLIN, Russell. 1997. Mapping conceptual representations into linguisticrepresentations: The role of attention in grammar. in Jan Nuyts and EricPederson, eds., Language and conceptualization, pp. 162-89. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.TOURNADRE, Nicolas. 1991. The rhetorical use of the Tibetan ergative.Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 14.93-108.1996. L'Ergativite en tibetain: approche morphosyntaxique de la langue parlee.Paris: Peeters.WINFIELD, W.W. 1929. A grammar of the Kui language. (Bibliotheca Indica no.245, issue n.s. no. 1496). Calcutta: Asiatic Society of Bengal.ZÚÑIGA, Fernando. 2003. Inverse systems in the indigenous languages of theAmericas. Ph.D. dissertation, Universität Zürich.21
Page 1 and 2: The Blue Bird of ErgativityScott DE
Page 4 and 5: what we mean by unmarked. I suppose
Page 6 and 7: elative markedness in this terminol
Page 8: 'A dog bit me.'In this language, I
Page 12 and 13: 25) iwínsh-ni,-m=nam i-q'ínu-sha
Page 14 and 15: a full NP two clauses previous to t
Page 16 and 17: Even in a consistent dative-subject
Page 18 and 19: talk about it. That is, a great man

The Blue Bird of Ergativity - celia

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?