Community Benefits Agreements - Steven Reed Johnson

ommunityBenefitsCommunity Benefits AgreementsMaking Development Projects AccountablebyJulian GrossLegal Director,California Partnership for Working FamilieswithGreg LeRoyof Good Jobs FirstandMadeline Janis-Aparicioof LAANEpublished byGood Jobs Firstand theCalifornia Partnership for Working Families,a collaboration ofthe Center on Policy Initiatives,the East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy,the Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy,and Working Partnerships USA.© Copyright 2005 Good Jobs First and the CaliforniaPartnership for Working Families.All Rights Reserved.

Community Benefits AgreementsMaking Development Projects AccountablebyJulian GrossLegal Director,California Partnership for Working FamilieswithGreg LeRoyof Good Jobs FirstandMadeline Janis-Aparicioof LAANEpublished byGood Jobs Firstand theCalifornia Partnership for Working Families,a collaboration ofthe Center on Policy Initiatives,the East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy,the Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy,and Working Partnerships USA.© Copyright 2005 Good Jobs First and the CaliforniaPartnership for Working Families.All Rights Reserved.

Table of ContentsIntroduction ..............................................................................................................................3Acknowledgments ..................................................................................................................7Chapter One: CBA Basics ........................................................................................................9Chapter Two: CBA Pros and Cons ..........................................................................................21Chapter Three: Implementation Experience—The Staples CBA ............................................29Chapter Four: Living Wage Programs as Part of CBAs ............................................................35Chapter Five: Targeted Hiring Programs as Part of CBAs ........................................................43Chapter Six: Addressing Environmental Issues Through CBAs ................................................51Chapter Seven: Other Community Benefits as Part of CBAs ..................................................57Chapter Eight: Monitoring and Enforcement of CBA Commitments ....................................69Conclusion: Changing the Paradigm ........................................................................................75About the Authors ................................................................................................................81Appendix A: Current Community Benefits Campaigns ........................................................85Appendix B: Past Community Benefits Agreements ............................................................88Appendix C: Wall Street Journal’s Real Estate Journal Article on CBAs ..................................91Appendix D: Staples CBA ..........................................................................................94Appendix E: Los Angeles Times Article About Staples CBA ................................................113Appendix F: Living Wage Section of the NoHo Commons CBA ..........................................117Appendix G: CIM Project—Memorandum Attachment to DDA ........................................120Appendix H: “Economic Prosperity Element” from Preliminary Draft of General Plan for theCity of San Diego. ....................................................................................................125Table of Contents |1

| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects Accountable2

IntroductionThe Community Benefits Movementand CBAsCommunity Benefit Agreements (CBAs) — dealsbetween developers and coalitions of communityorganizations, addressing a broad range of communityneeds — are safeguards to ensure thataffected residents share in the benefits of majordevelopments.They allow community groups tohave a voice in shaping a project, to press forcommunity benefits that are tailored to their particularneeds, and to enforce developer’s promises.CBAs are only one aspect of a growing newmovement towards community benefits in landuseplanning, taking shape through labor-communitypartnerships around the country.We have updated and revised this publication toshare our experience in implementing some ofthe CBAs described in the original edition.Wehave added extensive material in this preface onthe community benefits movement; a new chapterdescribing implementation of the landmarkCBA for the Staples development in Los Angeles;a new appendix listing past CBAs; a new appendixdescribing some current community benefitscampaigns; and several new sections on legalissues, community benefits victories, and newapproaches.We have also included an overview ofthe recent CBA for the Los Angeles InternationalAirport, providing for community benefits valuedat over half a billion dollars, and a special sectionon unusual legal aspects of this CBA.The Economic Development ContextOver the past decade, a growing number of citiesacross the country have pinned their hopes forrenewal on ambitious and expensive economicIntroduction |3

| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects Accountabledevelopment programs accomplished throughpublic/private partnerships. By the late ‘90’s,states, counties and cities were spending close to$50 billion per year on these programs, reflectinga deepening reliance on these partnerships to fueleconomic growth. Sports stadiums, entertainmentarenas, hotels, office parks,“big box” retail outlets,upscale residential projects and other such developmentsare increasingly being built with publicmoney in cities all around the country.The new emphasis on aggressive economic developmentis closely linked to the “back to the city”phenomenon. For the first time in decades, manylarge U.S. cities are experiencing populationincreases, with growing populations of both middle-class“urban pioneers” and Latin Americanand Asian immigrants taking up residence inurban neighborhoods.Local government has played a central role in thepush for urban economic development. As thefederal government has slashed its contribution tourban budgets, and devolution has shifted programslike workforce development and housingconstruction away from federal and state governments,responsibility for major decisionmaking onurban development is landing in the laps of electedofficials and staff at the city and county level.Unfortunately, the public-private partnerships atthe local level are being driven for the most partby the private sector. Although most city andcounty governments have “planning components,”these departments expend most of theirresources on the processing of permits and otherland use applications. Local governments, eager toexpand their tax bases and presented with littlemeaningful information about the costs and benefitsof their choices, often see their role as beinglimited to facilitating the visions and plans ofdevelopers—rather than facilitating a publicvision and plan developed with the input of awide range of stakeholders.They often rely onthe job creation projections of developer, butafter construction they have little informationabout actual jobs created. Standards for assessingthe costs and benefits of development for communities,if such standards exist, are generallyapplied on an inconsistent and piecemeal basis.Therefore, while economic development projectsare often heavily subsidized by taxpayer dollars,they produce decidedly mixed results for citydwellers.While many of these projects bringsorely needed jobs and tax revenues back to areasthat have been disinvested, there is usually noguarantee that the “ripple effects” of the projectswill benefit current residents. Many new developmentscause inner-city gentrification, pushing outlow-income residents as housing prices rise.Other projects create large numbers of dead-endlow-wage retail and service sector jobs, leavinglow income, families, mostly people of color,mired in an endless cycle of poverty.While someSmart Growth proponents have advanced thenotion that development should be governed bythe “Three E’s”—the economy, the environment,and equity—few if any jurisdictions have pursued“growth with equity” policies in a systematic way.Consequently, even after investing billions of dollarsin economic development, metropolitanregions continue to experience spiraling poverty,sprawling, unplanned growth, a crisis of affordablehousing and declining quality of life for low andmiddle-income communities.Large-scale expenditures on economic developmenttherefore present a host of questions forlocal government.What is the role of the publicsector in guiding urban growth? What informationis needed for local governments and communitystakeholders to make informed choicesabout economic development? How can communitiestake advantage of nearly $50 billion inannual investment in local economies to addressgrowing inequality and urban poverty and createa renaissance in urban areas across the country?What conditions or performance measures shouldbe attached to public subsidies and major land use4

entitlements? What are the goals of economicdevelopment? Is it desirable to maximize democratic,civic participation in the economic developmentprocess and, if so, what is the best meansto do so? What new partnerships can be built toavoid the fractured land use politics of the pastseveral decades?A New MovementAs local governments grapple with their responsibilityto shape development and land use patterns,a new movement has emerged to challengeconventional thinking and offer a broader vision.This movement is centered on the concept ofcommunity benefits—the simple proposition thatthe main purpose of economic development is tobring measurable, permanent improvements tothe lives of affected residents, particularly those inlow-income neighborhoods.This new movementis pressuring the public sector to play a morestrategic role in land use planning and urbangrowth, in order to leverage its multibillion dollarinvestment in the private sector toward creationof good jobs, affordable housing, and neighborhoodservices that improve the quality of life forall residents. Just as the state fiscal analysis andEconomic Analysis and Research Network(EARN) alliances are building capacity withingrassroots organizations to understand state fiscalissues, the community benefits movement isbuilding grassroots capacity and expertise toimpact a wide range of land use and urbangrowth issues.The community benefits movement began inCalifornia, where organizations in Los Angeles,San Diego, San Jose and the East Bay haveworked individually and collectively to realize thetremendous social justice potential of economicdevelopment and land use planning.The movementis spreading rapidly, taking hold in metropolitanregions across the country, includingDenver, Milwaukee, Minneapolis/St. Paul, Miami,Atlanta, Boston, Seattle, New York City, Chicago,and Washington D.C.In most locations, community benefits work isarising from—and remains integrally connectedto—the Smart Growth movement. Over the pastdecade, Smart Growth advocates have been successfulat combating sprawling development, bybringing such issues as jobs-housing balance andtransit-oriented development to the center ofregional planning processes. In many jurisdictions,Smart Growth has progressed from being a set ofproposals by advocates to becoming official governmentpolicy.As the Smart Growth movement has matured,key practitioners have recognized the need toexpand the scope of the policy debate on SmartGrowth beyond narrowly defined “environmental”issues to engage such challenges as creatingfamily-sustaining jobs in the urban core, bringingmuch-needed private capital into underinvestedcommunities while avoiding displacement oflow-income and middle-income families, andproviding the range of public services thattogether constitute “livable communities,” withattention to child care, health care, and parks andopen space.The community benefits movement gives SmartGrowth advocates a set of concrete policy toolsto advance these outcomes in ways that can bemeasured: e.g., how many thousands of affordablehousing units have been built, how many tens ofthousands of living wage jobs have been guaranteed,and how many millions of dollars have beenredirected towards community services.Themovement has also provided a vehicle to buildbroad coalitions that promote the deeper involvementof new constituencies, including communitiesof color, the organized labor movement, lowincomeurban residents and their institutions, andsocial service providers. For this reason, prominentchampions of Smart Growth, such as theSierra Club, the Greenbelt Alliance,Environmental Defense, Smart Growth America,Policy Link, and the Natural Resources DefenseCouncil, have embraced the community benefitsmovement in different regions.Introduction |5

| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects AccountableIn virtually every area, community benefits coalitionsare anchored by a renewed labor movement,with janitors and hotel workers, clericalworkers, retail clerks and, in some cases, thebuilding trades, stepping forward to participate inbroader social justice alliances. Often, these laborcoalitions include “Central Labor Councils,”regional alliances of unions dedicated to broadlyimproving the quality of life for working families.These organizations are joining together withgroups that were often on the opposite side ofland use disputes: environmentalists, housingdevelopers, neighborhood advocates and others.In the regions where the movement has takenroot, the community benefits movement isreframing the public discourse on economicdevelopment. No longer limited to narrow discussionsof tax revenue, the dialogue on developmentpolicy is now commonly characterized byspirited debates over living wage jobs, park space,affordable housing and proximity to transit corridors.For the first time in a generation, this movementhas caused a broad range of public officials,planners, and community-based organizations torecognize the need to play a leadership role inland use planning, and to use public dollars andland use authority in strategic ways to improvejob opportunities and the quality of life for lowincomecommunities.As a result, this movement is promoting democraticcivic participation among populations andconstituencies that usually engaged in land-useand economic development decisions. Once thenear-exclusive province of developers and businesses,the decision-making process in these areasnow often includes a much more diverse groupof voices as communities become organized andgain the sophistication to effectively advocate fortheir demands.Most importantly, the community benefits movementis measurably improving people’s lives.CBAs are now in place for major developmentsin several cities, as described in this publication.These agreements guarantee thousands of newquality jobs, training opportunities, increasednumbers of affordable housing units, green buildingpractices, parks, child-care centers, andnumerous other benefits.The movement has achieved a level of momentumand visibility reminiscent of the early days ofthe “Living Wage” movement (out of which, infact, many of the organizations advocating forcommunity benefits arose). Groups in severalcities are now pursuing citywide policies thatwould create minimum standards on jobs, housingand neighborhood services for public-privatedevelopment projects. National press has pickedup on this trend, with recent articles in the WallStreet Journal’s Real Estate Journal and the NewYork Times, among other prominent publications.(See Appendix C for the Wall Street Journal’sReal Estate Journal article, and www.laane.org/pressroom/news.html for many other examples.)This PublicationThis publication is intended to help communitygroups learn how CBAs work, and to explainmany of the different kinds of benefits for whichcommunity groups can negotiate. As you will see,there are now many different precedents, and wehope that groups will be inspired by these examplesto continue to push the envelope.A community group’s ability to win a CBA isdirectly related to how much power it has organized.For neighborhood organizations using thishandbook, we assume that you have an organizedpower base built upon foundations such as blockclubs, church-based committees, and/or laborunions. Nothing in this handbook takes the placeof organizing, and having a great CBA proposalwill get you nowhere unless people are organizedenough to make decisionmakers take note.As CPWF’s anchor organizations win more victories,demand for technical assistance and train-6

ing in this work has increased. As a result, CPWFis in the process of establishing the NationalCommunity Benefits Technical Support Center,to which Good Jobs First will contribute as well.The center will assist organizations across thenation as they embark on community benefitswork, coordinating training experiences betweenexperienced staff and interested organizations.The center’s programs will provide a mixture ofone-on-one consulting services, regional trainings,and distance training opportunities (using itswebsite at www.californiapartnership.org) andteleconferencing.The center is beginning itsoperations at the time of this publication.Ideally, CBAs or baseline community benefits willbecome a required part of every large, publiclysubsidizeddevelopment project. Until that time,however, we will have to keep organizing. If youhave examples of additional kinds of benefits—orother agreements for the kinds of benefits outlinedhere—we’d like to hear from you.Greg LeRoyGood Jobs FirstMadeline Janis-AparicioLAANEAcknowledgementsThe authors wish to acknowledge the generous assistance of the following individuals: Diana Bianco,Attorney/Consultant; Celia Cody, CPWF; John Goldstein, Milwaukee County Labor Council; LizetteHernandez, SAJE; Don Hesse, First Source Hiring Administrator, City of San Francisco; Laura Joseph,LAANE; David Koff, Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees Local 11; Sanford Lewis, GoodNeighbor Project; Gail Parson, National Training and Information Center; Rich McCracken, Davis,Cowell & Bowe; Sandra McNeill, Strategic Actions for a Just Economy; Sarah Muller,WorkingPartnerships U.S.A.; Chris Nevitt, Front Range Economic Strategy Center; Robert Perlmutter, Shute,Mihaly & Weinberger, San Francisco; Dennis Rockway, Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles; ErnestoSanchez, CPWF; Kevin Stein, California Reinvestment Committee; Paul Sonn, Brennan Center forJustice; Carson Strege-Flora, Northwest Federation of Community Organizations; Alyssa Talanker,Good Jobs First; Chereesse Thymes, CPWF; and Roxana Tynan, LAANE.Introduction |7


Chapter OneCBA BasicsWhat is a Community BenefitsAgreement?A Community Benefits Agreement, or “CBA,” is alegally enforceable contract, signed by communitygroups and by a developer, setting forth a range ofcommunity benefits that the developer agrees toprovide as part of a development project.A CBA is the result of a negotiation processbetween the developer and organized representativesof affected communities, in which the developeragrees to shape the development in a certainway or to provide specified community benefits.In exchange, the community groups promise tosupport the proposed project before governmentbodies that provide the necessary permits andsubsidies.The CBA is both a process to worktowards these mutually beneficial objectives,and a mechanism to enforce both sides’ promises.How Does a CBA Relate to aDevelopment Agreement?A development agreement is a contract betweena developer and a city or county, outlining thesubsidies that the local government will provideto the project. Development agreements go bydifferent legal terms in different contexts.Redevelopment agencies usually sign “dispositionand development agreements” (DDAs) when theysell land to developers, or “owner participationagreements” (OPAs) when they subsidize thedevelopment of land already owned by a developer.Many cities enter into “incentive agreements.”Theterm “development agreement”broadly describes all such contracts. Dependingon local practice, development agreements maycontain detailed information about the developer’splans for the project and the subsidies theproject will receive.Chapter One: CBA Basics |9

| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects AccountableWe strongly recommend that a CBA be incorporatedinto any development agreement for aproject, so that the CBA becomes enforceableby the government entity that is subsidizing thedevelopment.Whether or not that occurs, aCBA should remain a separate, enforceableagreement between the developer and the communitygroups.Some projects receive a public subsidy withoutany development agreement; this is often the casewhen a project receives a tax abatement but noother subsidies. In such cases community benefitswill have to be set forth in a CBA if they are setforth anywhere.When is a CBA Negotiated?A CBA is negotiated between the communitygroups and the developer before the developmentagreement is executed by the developer and government.Thedevelopment agreement negotiationsmay be going on while the CBA is alsobeing negotiated, but the CBA needs to be finalizedfirst.What is the Developer’s Self-Interestin CBA Negotiations?Developers use CBAs to help get governmentapproval for their development agreements. Inexchange for providing community benefits,developers get community support for their projects.Theyneed that support because they wanttheir projects subsidized, and because virtually alldevelopment projects require a wide range ofgovernmental permit approvals, such as buildingpermits, re-zoning and environmental impactstatements. Permit approvals almost always havesome kind of public approval process, as do mostdevelopment subsidies. For many projects, thedegree of community support or opposition willdetermine whether the developer will receive therequested approvals and subsidies.What Kinds of Community BenefitsCan CBAs Include?Benefits provided by a CBA can vary as widely asthe needs of affected communities. Communitygroups should be creative in advocating for benefitstailored to their own needs. Each particularCBA will depend on the community’s needs, thesize and type of the proposed development, andthe relative bargaining power of the communitygroups and the developer.Benefits contained in a CBA may be provided bythe developer or by other parties benefitting fromthe development subsidies, such as the stores thatrent space in a subsidized retail development.Some benefits can be built into the project itself,such as the inclusion of a child care center in theproject, or the use of environmentally sensitivedesign elements such as white roofs that helpavoid the “heat island” effect. Some benefits willaffect project operations, such as wage requirementsor traffic management rules. Other benefitswill be completely separate from the project, suchas money devoted to a public art fund, or supportfor existing job-training centers.Benefits that have been negotiated as part ofCBAs include:■■■■■■■a living wage requirement for workersemployed in the development;a “first source” hiring system, to targetjob opportunities in the development toresidents of low-income neighborhoods;space for a neighborhood-serving childcarecenter;environmentally-beneficial changes inmajor airport operations;construction of parks andrecreational facilities;community input in selection of tenantsof the development;construction of affordable housing.10

Later chapters of this handbook contain moredetail on these benefits.If community organizations are unable to negotiatewhat they want on a particular issue, they mayinstead negotiate a process to help achieve thesame outcome at a later date.“Sunshine” or disclosurerequirements are a good example of this.Even if a developer will not agree to require tenantsto pay a living wage, he may agree to requiretenants to report their wage levels.This informationcan later be used in living wage campaigns.Creativity and flexibility in the negotiationprocess will be well rewarded.Who Negotiates a CBA?CBAs are negotiated between leaders of communitygroups and the developer, prior to governmentalapproval of the project. Sometimes agovernment agency will play an active role inCBA negotiations.Community-based organizations and labor unionspress for CBAs containing strong community benefits.Community-based organizations involved inCBA negotiations are formed by concerned citizens;they may be built upon traditional communityorganizing structures such as block clubs orchurch-based groups.These groups may coalescewith living wage campaigns, or with individuallabor unions and/or with central labor councils.Sometimes a coalition including many groups willform around a particular proposed development. Inother situations, existing networks will take thelead. In either case, community groups and laborunions will need to appoint a steering committeeor negotiating team of workable size to conductnegotiations with the developer.The developer will negotiate with communityrepresentatives if he thinks he needs communitysupport to move the project forward. Of course,some developers want to work with communitygroups in order to promote community involvementwith and acceptance of the development,whether or not project approval is dependent onthose things. A representative from the developer,or the developer’s attorney, will conduct negotiationson his behalf.Government staff may or may not be involved inthe CBA negotiations.While government staffand attorneys are busy negotiating the developmentagreement for the project, they are sometimescontent to leave to the community representativesthe task of negotiating the CBA. Inunusual circumstances, a government entity mayin fact be the “developer” of a project, while oneor more other government entities have permittingauthority. In such cases, the government“developer” will be central to the negotiationsand a party to the CBA, as with the recent LAXCBA described below.Attorneys will have to become involved at somepoint, since CBAs are enforceable contracts, withreal legal consequences for both the developer andthe community groups. Ideally, the neighborhoodorganizations will start the negotiations directlywith the developer, and attorneys for both sidesare brought in to formalize the contract after anagreement has been reached. In such cases the roleof the attorneys is simply to memorialize, in alegally enforceable manner, the substance of theagreement. However, one side or the other maywish to have an attorney help conduct its part ofthe substantive negotiations. If the developernegotiates through an attorney, community groupsshould negotiate through one as well.How is a CBA Enforced?How a CBA is enforced depends on who signedit and what enforcement provisions it contains.Asa CBA is a legally binding contract, it can beenforced only by a party that has signed it. CBAsthat are incorporated into development agreementscan be enforced by the government, as wellas by community groups.Chapter One: CBA Basics |11

WITHOUT A CBACITY(or redevelopment agency) DevelopmentAgreementUNIONS| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects AccountableAFF.HOUSINGGROUPSNEIGHBORHOODGROUPS■■■■CHURCHGROUPSENVIROGROUPSOTHERCBOSLittle or no direct comunication b/w communitygroups and developerAll developer commitments go into developmentagreement – city & developer draft languageNo coordination & shared power amongcommunity groupsCommunity groups cannot enforce developercommitmentsDEVELOPER12

WITH A CBACITY(or redevelopment agency)Information re project &CBA negotiationsDevelopment Agreement(can incorporate CBA)UNIONSAFF.HOUSINGGROUPSENVIROGROUPSCHURCHGROUPSCBADEVELOPERNEIGHBORHOODGROUPSOTHERCBOScoordinated Coalition■■■■Developer commitments re community benefits gointo CBACoalition & developer draft language togetherCommunity groups can enforce developercommitments (City and agency can too, if CBA isincluded in the development agreement.)Community groups share information, have strengthin numbers, and coordinate their advocacyChapter One: CBA Basics |13

All CBAs should contain carefully-drafted provisionsdescribing how commitments will be monitoredand enforced. Commitments made bydevelopers should apply to successor entities suchas purchasers of property within the development,and to contractors and tenants of the developerfor certain commitments. Each commitment madein a CBA, and the CBA itself, should have adefined term of years.We provide more detail onenforcement issues in Chapter Eight.How are CBAs implemented?How a particular CBA is implemented dependson the benefits being provided. Some benefits| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects AccountableEXAMPLE: THE “STAPLES CBA”In May of 2001, a broad coalition of laborand community-based organizations—theFigueroa Corridor Coalition for EconomicJustice—negotiated a comprehensive CBA forthe Los Angeles Sports and EntertainmentDistrict development, a large multipurposeproject that will include a hotel, a 7,000-seattheater, a convention center expansion, a housingcomplex, and plazas for entertainment,restaurant, and retail businesses. Public subsidiesfor the project may run as high as$150 million.The CBA is often referred to as the “StaplesCBA” because the project is located adjacentto the Staples Center sports arena, which wasdeveloped by the same company.The Staples CBA was a tremendousachievement in several respects. It includes anunprecedented array of communitybenefits, including:■■■a developer-funded assessment of communitypark & recreation needs, and a$1 million commitment toward meetingthose needs;a goal that 70% of the jobs created inthe project will pay the City’s livingwage, and consultation with the coalitionon selection of tenants;a first source hiring program targetingjob opportunities to low-income individualsand those displaced bythe project;■■■increased affordable housing requirementsin the housing component of theproject, and a commitment ofseed money for other affordablehousing projects;developer funding for a residentialparking program for surroundingneighborhoods; andstandards for responsible contractingand leasing decisions by the developer.These many benefits reflect the very broadcoalition that worked together to negotiatethe CBA.The coalition, led in negotiationsby Strategic Actions for a Just Economy,LAANE, and Coalition L.A., included overthirty different community groups and laborunions, plus hundreds of affected individuals.These successful negotiations demonstratethe power community groups possess whenthey work cooperatively and support eachother’s agendas.Chapter Three is a description of the implementationexperience for the Coalition sincethe Staples CBA was signed.The CBA isincluded in its entirety as Appendix D.(The parties also signed a “CooperationAgreement,” laying out technical legal responsibilities;all community benefits are set forthin the CBA, however.) A Los Angeles Timesarticle on the deal is included as Appendix E.14

equire ongoing implementation by several entities.A local-hiring program, for example, mayrequire employers to send notice of job opportunitiesand to interview certain candidates,while job training centers match applicants withavailable jobs and make prompt referrals. Manycommunity benefits require ongoing communicationbetween community groups and thedeveloper for a period of years after the openingof the development.On the other hand, some CBA responsibilities canbe fulfilled well before the development opens, likea developer’s one-time payment into an existingneighborhood improvement fund. Roles, responsibilities,and time frames should be clearly describedin the CBA.Don’t Most Development ProjectsProvide Local Benefits Without a CBA?Most developments provide some benefit to thesurrounding communities, in the form of jobs,housing, or retail opportunities.This is never thecomplete story, however.There are many otherquestions about virtually any development:■Are the development’s benefits substantialenough to justify the public subsidy?■■■■■Do the benefits outweigh the costs, such asdislocation of homes and businesses, cannibalizationof sales from existing retailers,increased vehicle traffic, and/or gentrificationpressures?Does the development sufficiently cushionthe blow to those who will suffer the directnegative impacts of the development?Does the development have an appropriatecharacter and scale for the surroundingneighborhood?Are the promised benefits reasonably certainto materialize? For example, if thedevelopment promises jobs for residents ofaffected communities, is it clear that jobswill actually go to these residents?Will jobs created pay enough that the governmentwon’t have to subsidize theemployees’ wages and benefits?If the answer to any of these questions is negativeor unclear, community groups are right to haveconcerns about a proposed project, even whenthey believe it would provide some concrete benefits.TheCBA negotiation process is a mechanismfor community groups to shape the developmentand capture more community benefits,hopefully leading to a better project with strongercommunity support.EXAMPLE: THE “LAX CBA”In December of 2004, a broad coalition ofcommunity-based organizations and laborunions in Los Angeles entered into the largestCBA to date, addressing the Los AngelesInternational Airport’s $11 billion modernizationplan.The CBA is a legally-binding contractbetween the LAX Coalition forEconomic, Environmental, and EducationalJustice and the Los Angeles World Airports,the governmental entity that operates LAX.The benefits obtained through this CBAcampaign have been valued at half a billiondollars.The bulk of these benefits are setforth in the LAX CBA; the airport’s commitmentsto two area school districts are setforth in side agreements that were negotiatedas part of the Coalition’s CBA campaign.TheCBA has been hailed by both local policymakersand the administrator of the FederalAviation Administration as a model for futureChapter One: CBA Basics |15

| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects Accountableairport development nationally.The widerange of benefits include:■■■■■■■$15 million in job training funds forairport and aviation-related jobs;a local hiring program to givepriority for jobs at LAX to local residentsand low-income and specialneeds individuals;funds for soundproofing affectedschools and residences;retrofitting diesel construction vehiclesand diesel vehicles operating on thetarmac, curbing dangerous air pollutantsby up to 90%;electrifying airplane gates to eliminatepollution from jet engine idling;funds for studying the health impactsof airport operations on surroundingcommunities; andincreased opportunities for local,minority, and women-owned businessesin the modernization of LAX.The CBA has detailed monitoring andenforcement provisions, enabling Coalitionmembers to ensure implementation of thesebenefits and to hold accountable the responsibleparties.The text of the LAX CBA, more informationabout the campaign, and national pressreaction to the CBA are available online atwww.laane.org/lax/cba.html. Unusual legalaspects of the CBA are discussed below.Extensive information on environmentalaspects of the LAX CBA is contained inChapter Six.The LAX Coalition forEconomic, Environmental,and Educational JusticeThe almost entirely African-American andLatino communities that lie to the east ofLAX, directly under regular flight paths, havesuffered from increasing environmental pollutionover the years.The multi-racial coalition,formed after the LAX modernizationplan was announced, aimed to ensure thatthe new airport plans went forward only ifthe commuity’s environmental concerns andother issues were addressed. Organizing inInglewood and Lennox began immediatelyafter the announcement of LAX’s proposal.The Coalition aimed for an enforceableCBA from the start.The Coalition reflected a combination ofinterests that crosses many traditional borders,racial as well as topical. In addition to residentsof the communities, the Coalitionincluded the environmental movement, forwhom the LAX proposal presented a classicenvironmental justice issue.The Coalitionalso included the labor unions that representthe workers who are employed or will beemployed at LAX—who also, in many cases,live in the communities around the airport.School administrators were part of the coalitionbecause of the special impact of LAXgeneratednoise and air pollution on theschools and on children. Public school teachersand parents brought their concerns aboutthe impact of noise and dirty air on schools.Clergy, whose leadership is so important inthe communities of color, were alsoCoalition members, including clergy fromthe Black Muslim congregation inInglewood and south L.A.16

Through effective organizing, thousands ofAfrican-American and Latino communitymembers became involved in the campaign,both directly and indirectly, via their churches,schools and organizations.The Coalitionleadership solicited their views on what theirdemands should be, and the community’srepresentatives became the steering committeethat listed and prioritized those demandsduring the CBA negotiation process.Following is a list of LAXCoalition members.Community Organizations■■■■■■■■■■AGENDAClergy and Laity United forEconomic JusticeCommunity CoalitionInglewood Coalition for Drug andViolence PreventionInglewood Democratic ClubInglewood Area MinisterialAssociationLennox Coordinating CouncilLos Angeles Alliance for a NewEconomyLos Angeles Council of ChurchesLos Angeles Metropolitan Churches■■Nation of IslamAME Minister’s AllianceEnvironmental Organizations■■■■California EnvironmentalRights AllianceCoalition for Clean AirCommunities for a BetterEnvironmentCommunity Coalition for Change■ Environmental Defense –Environmental Justice Project■■Natural Resources Defense CouncilPhysicians for Social ResponsibilityLos AngelesLabor Unions■■■Hotel Employees and RestaurantEmployees Local 11Service Employees InternationalUnion Local 1877Service Employees InternationalUnion Local 347■ Teamsters Local 911School Districts■■Inglewood Unified School DistrictLennox School DistrictChapter One: CBA Basics |17

THE LAX CBA: UNUSUAL LEGAL ASPECTS| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects AccountableThe recent LAX CBA was unusual inthat it was negotiated between communitygroups and a government entity—in contrast with the usual situation, wherecommunity groups negotiate with a privatedeveloper. Nonetheless, the basic dynamicwas very similar to that of a standard CBAnegotiation.The Los Angeles WorldAirports (“LAWA”), an independent governmentalentity, was in effect the “developer”of the program of improvements atissue, and LAWA needed approval from theLos Angeles City Council before the programcould move forward. In theserespects, the standard three-way dynamicbetween a coalition, a developer, and adecisionmaker was in effect.Because the “developer” was a governmentalentity rather than a private party, thelegal consideration provided by theCoalition under the agreement was unusual.In most CBA negotiations, the developer’scentral demand is for an assurance thatthe Coalition members will provide politicalsupport for the project during publicmeetings, or at least will not use its politicalpower to oppose the project. However,obtaining such a commitment would beunseemly for a developer that is agovernmental entity: it would simply beinappropriate for a government actor toenter into a contract requiring a privatecitizen to take a certain position in frontof another governmental entity at apublic hearing.The LAX CBA therefore provides onlythat the Coalition organizations will notfile lawsuits to challenge the proposed projects.In theory, Coalition organizationswere thus free to oppose the LAX modernizationprogram in front of the citycouncil. Such opposition would clearlyhave violated the spirit of the CBA, however,and of course none of the Coalitionorganizations took that step.There was adisincentive to do that in any case, as theCBA brought LAWA’s and the Coalition’sinterests into alignment: there will be nobenefits provided under the CBA if theproject doesn’t move forward.This is agood example of how the CBA processencourages cooperative behavior betweenpotentially adversarial parties, even beyondthe strict legal responsibilities.Another unusual aspect of the LAX CBAnegotiations was the heavy influence of thefederal government. Federal law prohibitsairport revenues from being spent on purposesunrelated to airport operations. (See49 U.S.C. § 47133,“Restriction on use ofrevenues.”) The Federal AviationAdministration has issued regulations thatinterpret this rule strictly, allowing expendituresin support of the surrounding communityonly “if the expenditures are directlyand substantially related to operation ofthe airport.” (See Federal Register,Vol. 64,No. 30, Section V.A.8.)This legal reality meant that the parties tothe CBA could only negotiate benefits thatfit within this rule—in the future judgmentof the FAA. Airport officials and Coalitionmembers stayed in contact with the FAAduring the negotiations, at one point flyingto D.C. for a face-to-face meeting. Becausemost of the community’s concerns related18

to airport operations, however, this rulewas not as restrictive as it might seem.The Coalition and LAWA are confidentthat all benefits included in the CBA arepermissible under federal law as it hasbeen interpreted. Because subsequentchanges in FAA policy interpretationscould threaten some of the benefits setforth in the CBA, however, the CBAcontains various contingency plans. Forexample, if the FAA stepped in and prohibitedairport funding of the healthstudy required by the CBA, the airportwould be required to contribute $500,000toward measures or programs that promoteair quality, are not prohibited by theFAA, and are agreed upon by LAWA andthe Coalition.The CBA is thus structuredso that the surrounding communities willobtain alternate benefits if the FAA prohibitscertain negotiated items.Chapter One: CBA Basics |19


Chapter TwoCBA Pros and ConsBenefits of CBAsAny development project of significant size has togo through a complex governmental approvalprocess. As a proposed project moves through thisprocess, government officials and communitygroups may request that the project provide particularcommunity benefits, or that the project betailored to the needs of the community in a certainway.This happens with many developmentprojects, even where there is no formal CBA.CBAs can greatly improve this approval processby promoting the following values:■■Inclusiveness. The CBA negotiationprocess provides a mechanism to ensurethat community concerns are heard andaddressed.While some cities do a good jobof seeking community input and respondingto it, many do not. Low-incomeneighborhoods, non-English-speakingareas, and communities of color have historicallybeen excluded from the developmentprocess. Laws concerning publicnotice and participation are poorlyenforced,and official public hearings areheld at times and places that are not neighborhood-friendly.Having a CBA negotiationprocess helps to address these problems,providing a forum for all parts of anaffected community.Enforceability. CBAs ensure that thedeveloper’s promises regarding communitybenefits are legally enforceable. Developers“pitching” a project often make promisesthat are never written into the developmentagreement, or are never enforcedeven if they are included.This is especiallytrue of promises about jobs being createdfor local residents. CBAs commit developersin writing to promises they makeregarding their projects, and make enforcementmuch easier.Chapter Two: CBA Pros and Cons |21

| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects Accountable■■■Transparency. CBAs help the public,community groups, government officials,and the news media monitor a project’soutcome. Having all the benefits set forthin one place allows everyone to understandand assess the specific commitments madeby a developer.They can then comparethose benefits to benefits provided in similarprojects in the past.They can also comparebenefits offered by developers who arecompeting for the right to build on a particularpiece of land.Transparency is anundeniable good-government value.Coalition-Building. The process ofnegotiating a CBA encourages newalliances among community groups thatmay care about different issues or have differentconstituencies.This is criticalbecause developers often use a “divide andconquer” strategy when dealing with communitygroups, making just enoughaccommodation to gain the support of onegroup, while ignoring the concerns of others.(Sometimes this accommodation isseen as little more than a monetary payoffto a single group.) The developer can thenclaim that there is some community supportfor the project, and obtain necessarygovernment approvals, even though mostcommunity issues have not been addressed.Similarly, a developer may agree to build aproject with union construction laborwhile ignoring the concerns of thoseunions whose members will fill the project’spermanent jobs, and then claim theproject has “labor’s support.” By addressingmany issues and encouraging broad coalitions,the CBA process helps counter thesedivide-and-conquer ploys.Efficiency. CBAs encourage early negotiationbetween developers and the community,avoiding delays in the approvalprocess.Without a CBA process, communitygroups usually express their concerns■at public hearings, when the project is upfor government approvals. At that pointthere are three possible outcomes. First, thegovernment can approve the project overneighborhood objections, leaving residentsunhappy and leading to a project that failsto address some community needs. Second,the government can reject the projectcompletely, leaving the developer unhappyand the community without whateverbenefits the project might have provided.Third, the government can delay the projectuntil the controversial issues have beenresolved.That leaves the developer unhappybecause time is money, and it delays thecommunity benefits just as it delays thewhole project. It also puts the communitygroups and the developer in roughly thesame place they would have been in hadthey started negotiating over communitybenefits at the outset. CBA negotiationsavoid all three of these unsatisfactory scenariosby leading to a cooperative relationshipbetween normally adversarial parties,and getting good projects approved withoutdelays late in the process.Clarity of Outcomes. CBAs providelocal governments with the informationthey need to show successful delivery ofpromised benefits, like creation of jobs.Very few state and local economic developmententities can quantify their outcomeswhen questioned by legislatures orthe public about the success of their programsor the public’s return on investment.CBAs canbe a vehicle for governments to gatherand maintain information that demonstratesthat the jobs and other benefitsactually materialize.Difficulties and Potential Problemsof CBAs■Inadequate organizing could set poorprecedents. If neighborhood organizationsare poorly organized and therefore22

■have little leverage over developers andgovernmental agencies in a particular situation,seeking a CBA will not help—andcould result in a poor precedent being setfor future projects. CBA negotiations cannotbe effective without a certain amountof leverage or working political capital.Of course, if the CBA negotiationprocess becomes routine in certain cities,then it should increase leverage for communitygroups generally. In addition, thecoalition-building aspect of the CBAnegotiation process should increase communityleverage.One’s person’s floor is another person’sceiling. If developers are looking atthe CBAs from past projects, they may notwant to provide greater benefits than thoseprovided by others. Community groupswant to use past commitments as a “floor,”but developers will want to use them asa “ceiling.”■Legal expenses. Setting forth communitybenefits in an enforceable legal documentwill usually require community groups toemploy an attorney.We strongly recommendthat neighborhood groups have theirown attorney; relying on governmentattorneys and staff members to produce thelanguage is not effective. Developers willgenerally have attorneys as well.While thecommunity groups may conduct the negotiations,it is valuable, if not essential, tohave the fine print of the CBA finalized bya trusted attorney, to make sure the contractreflects both the substance and spiritof the negotiations.While retaining anexperienced attorney is the best option,community groups that lack the money todo so may seek pro bono help throughlegal assistance clinics, or by a referral fromthe National Lawyers Guild (go towww.nlg.org for a directory of chapters).LEGAL ISSUE: THE COALITION AS A LEGAL ENTITYBecause a coalition negotiating a CBA isnegotiating as a single entity, it is naturalto think that it is the coalition itself that willenter into the CBA with the developer.Thereare problems with that approach, however.Most coalitions that enter into CBAs are notincorporated as stand-alone nonprofits.Rather, they are simply groups of organizationsand individuals working together. Fewcoalitions have structured systems for determiningwho are official members, and whocan speak or act on their behalf. (Such systemswould be set out in bylaws or similardocuments.) This uncertainty could causeproblems if an unincorporated coalition werethe legal entity that signed a CBA.Such a CBA would naturally include commitmentsby the coalition to do certainthings and to refrain from doing other things.It would be impossible to determine thescope of these commitments without firmrules for coalition membership and action. Itis easy to imagine a situation where an individualwho attended several coalition meetingsspoke out against a development, after aCBA had been signed by the coalition with acommitment not to oppose the development.The developer might then claim that theindividual was a coalition member and hadviolated the CBA—thus allowing the developerto avoid its obligations as well.Thecoalition might respond that the individualwas not an official coalition member, or wasnot acting on behalf of the coalition—butChapter Two: CBA Pros and Cons |23

unless there were preestablished membershipand action rules then the answer is not clear.Definitions:| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects AccountableIn addition, even if the coalition were theentity signing the CBA, every coalitionmember could probably be forced to complywith the coalition’s commitments under theCBA.The coalition as a whole usually hasthe legal status of an “unincorporated association.”Whileunincorporated associations canenter into contracts, they differ from corporationsin that the members making up theentity can more easily be held responsible forthe entity’s commitments.For these reasons, a better approach is to haveeach organizational member of the coalitionsign the CBA on its own behalf. (Individualpersons who are coalition members generallyshould not take on the legal benefits and burdensof a complex contract like a CBA.) Thismakes clear to each organization the legalreality that it must live up to the CBA’s commitments;each organization will probablyhave its own internal approval process anyway.This makes the CBA into a complex contractbetween as many as several dozen differentparties. Nonetheless, for convenience theCBA can talk about the coalition organizationsas a group, placing similar responsibilitieson each of them.The definitions andtechnical language of the CBA just need tobe clear about the approach.Example: “Coalition” and“Organization” definitions andresponsibilities in the LAX CBA.The following language is from relevant sectionsof the Cooperation Agreement thataccompanied the LAX CBA.The LAX CBAis discussed in detail in Chapter One.The fullCBA and Cooperation Agreement are availableat: www.laane.org/lax/index.html.“Coalition” shall mean the LAXCoalition for Economic,Environmental, and EducationalJustice, an unincorporated associationcomprised exclusively of thefollowing Organizations that aresignatories to this Agreement, andno other organizations or individuals:[all signing organizationsare listed].“Organization” shall mean eachentity that is a member of theCoalition as defined above.Obligations of an Organizationshall be obligations only of: (1) theOrganization itself, as distinct fromits member organizations or anynatural persons; and (2) staff membersor members of the board ofdirectors of the Organization whenauthorized to act on behalf of theOrganization.Coalition Responsibilities:. . . All obligations, powers, rights, andresponsibilities of the Coalition under thisAgreement shall be obligations, powers,rights and responsibilities of eachOrganization.This language makes clear that each signingorganization has the power to enforce theCBA, and the responsibility to comply withit. It also makes clear that only the signingorganizations can be held to the CBA commitments.Finally, it clarifies that a signingorganization cannot be held responsible foractions of its members, staffers, or board,except when those parties are authorized toact for the organization.24

■Coalition politics. Of course, buildingand maintaining coalitions is difficult, especiallyif the developer is seeking to peel offsome groups. All of the basic structuralissues about coalitions have to be resolved:Who is in the coalition? How are decisionsmade? Who is on the negotiating team?How are competing concerns prioritized?Despite all of the difficulties and pitfalls, we feelthat the benefits of a CBA far outweigh the risks.If groups organize well, stick together, and win agood CBA, they will probably set valuable precedentsand make future campaigns in their citymuch easier.An Understandable Concern:“This is new to us. We don’t do thistype of thing.”CBAs raise complex issues for community-basedorganizations. Some community groups may beuncomfortable giving up the right to expressnegative opinions on a public matter like a developmentproject. Many are not used to enteringinto complex legal agreements with powerfuldevelopers.In light of these concerns, community groupsmay be tempted to simply advocate for inclusionof community benefits in a project’s developmentagreement, rather than negotiating a deal directlywith the developer.This approach enables communitygroups to avoid the legal complexitiesand responsibilities of signing a CBA. If communitygroups genuinely trust the developer to providethe benefits as described, or if they trust thegovernment to enforce the commitments as partof the development agreement, then thisapproach is simpler and makes sense.However, there are serious risks to this approach,and important comparative benefits to a CBA.First, and most important, a CBA allows thecommunity organizations that sign it to enforcethe developer’s commitments.They do not needto rely on the government to hold the developerto his promises. Government enforcement ofcommunity benefits is notoriously lax, and—nomatter how committed the developer and citystaffers seem—there is always a risk that promisedcommunity benefits will not materialize.Second, a developer may be willing to providebetter community benefits in exchange for alegally binding commitment of support fromcommunity groups, because he may feel moreconfident of the project’s success thanks to thatcommunity support.This is the basic negotiatingprinciple that parties are willing to give more inorder to get more.Third, there is a symbolic benefit to having communitygroups and the developer sign a CBA.The signing validates and makes concrete themonths of negotiations and hard work, and makesthe development more likely to be successful andembraced by the community.When negotiationsare leading toward an agreement that both sideswill sign, there is an assurance that both sides takethe negotiations seriously. Developers will have totreat their commitments as binding when theyknow community groups can enforce them; andcommunity leaders will have to be willing tostand by their own commitments when they aresigning a binding legal document.The goal ofhaving a CBA is to provide a directed, seriousframework, in which both sides can genuinelybuy into the process.In addition, while some community groups areunderstandably reluctant about making a legalcommitment to refrain from opposing a development,they may have to make at least an implicitcommitment in this regard even if they do notsign a CBA.That’s because the main reason thedeveloper is negotiating over community benefitsis to avoid community opposition. If communitygroups are not willing to refrain from opposingthe project during the approval process, theyChapter Two: CBA Pros and Cons |25

have little to offer a developer. For this reason,even if negotiated community benefits areonly going to be incorporated into the developmentagreement (and not into a CBA), thedeveloper will rightly expect that communitygroups with whom it reached agreement willnot oppose the project.Community-based organizations will quickly losecredibility if they negotiate an increase in a project’scommunity benefits and then turn aroundand oppose the project. If community groups areseen by developers and by government officials asprone to reneging on their end of a deal—evenonly a “handshake” deal—it will impede the abilityof other neighborhood groups to negotiatewith developers in the future.In sum, community groups are right to thinkcarefully about their commitments before enteringinto a CBA—but the potential benefits are great.A community group should not sign a CBAunless (1) it believes that offering its public supportin exchange for the negotiated communitybenefits is a good trade-off; and (2) it understandsits commitments under the CBA and is willingand able to abide by them. If those conditions aremet, having a CBA can greatly increase the qualityand certainty of a project’s community benefits.TIPS FROM THE ADVOCATES| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects AccountableAdvocates who have been involved in CBAnegotiations raise several points of importance.During negotiations:■ Ensure adequate issue training andleadership development. Becausecoalition members are interested andexperienced in different issues, it maytake time and focused effort to geteverybody working together on a sharedagenda.While in negotiations, it’s importantfor community leaders to be versatileenough to back each other up, especiallysince the developer will be resistantto particular requests. Because theremay be so many issues involved in thenegotiations, coalition members need toeducate each other on their various priorities.Issue trainings can help, andopenness and communication are anobvious imperative.■ Include advisors and observers.While the negotiating team needs to besmall, individuals with special expertisecan sit in on negotiations as “observers,”and can advise and educate team memberson technical issues like certain environmentalconcerns. Even without activeparticipation in the negotiations themselves,such advisors can play an importantand active role in strategy sessions.After a CBA is complete:■ Involve coalition members in monitoring.Coalition members can be theeyes and ears of the community oncethe project is moving forward.Observations of coalition members canbe more revealing than any requiredreports from tenants or the developer.■ Spread the word. Nothing is moreeffective in encouraging new organizingefforts than hearing from organizers whohave succeeded in the past. Coalitionmembers who have been part of successfulCBA negotiations can be instrumentalin spreading the word to other communities.Sharing of experiences and lessonslearned can help build a knowledgeand power base across various communities—andcan help inspire and buildeffective campaigns.See Chapter Three for more information onCBA implementation.26

Chapter Two: CBA Pros and Cons |27


Chapter ThreeImplementation Experience–The Staples CBAPerhaps the best-known community benefitsagreement is the one signed for the Staples developmentin Los Angeles in 2001.This CBA isattached as Appendix D and described in detail inthe box in Chapter One. Following is anoverview of the experience of the FigueroaCorridor Coalition for Economic Justice(FCCEJ) in implementation of the CBA through2004. In general, the relationship between FCCEJand the developers is good. One of FCCEJ’s leadorganizers stated that the developers—the L.A.Arena Land Company and Flower Holdings,LLC—had implemented the benefits in the CBA“to the letter and beyond.”Project StatusThe Staples project’s developers have steadilypushed the project forward since the signing ofthe CBA in May 2001.With the support of thecommunity groups that entered into the CBA,the project obtained approval from the City ofLos Angeles and the Los Angeles CommunityRedevelopment Agency just a few months later.The developers’ commitments under the CBAbecame terms of the disposition and developmentagreement between the developers and theCommunity Redevelopment Agency, makingthese commitments enforceable by local government,in addition to the community groups.Several of the benefits set forth in the CBA arealready being implemented, as described below.Construction of the project is set to break groundvery soon.Oversight CommitteeFrom the perspective of FCCEJ, the centralforum for implementation of the CBA is theChapter Three: Implementation Experience - The Staples CBA |29

| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects AccountableOversight Committee set up by the CBA itself.The Oversight Committee meets with the developersquarterly, providing an opportunity for thedevelopers to update FCCEJ on the status of theproject, and for FCCEJ and the developers to discussimplementation of the project’s communitybenefits.The Oversight Committee provides anongoing, regular accountability mechanism.In between meetings with the developers, varioussubcommittees of the Oversight Committeework on specific implementation issues. In addition,the Oversight Committee as a whole mayconvene prior to a meeting with the developers,to update all members and prepare.Strategic Actions for a Just Economy, a foundingmember of FCCEJ, has a staff member devotedfull-time to FCCEJ’s advocacy.While FCCEJ hasseveral ongoing projects aside from the StaplesCBA implementation, this individual spendsmuch time facilitating Oversight Committeemeetings, coordinating communications betweenFCCEJ members, and working on CBA implementationissues.The Oversight Committee alsoincludes staff from several other organizations, allparticipating as equals.The Oversight Committeereports to the larger FCCEJ Steering Committee,which prioritizes various activities and projects ofthe coalition.Commitments Being ImplementedAs of early 2005, the developers had begun toimplement the following commitments made inthe CBA, with cooperation from FCCEJ asdescribed below.■Residential parking program. TheCBA required the developers to workcooperatively with FCCEJ to urge theCity of Los Angeles to establish a residentialparking permit area covering theneighborhood surrounding the Staplesproject, in order to ensure that long-timeresidents wouldn’t face parking problems■■due to overflow from the project.TheCBA also required the developers to provide$25,000 to the City to fund thenew program.The City did in fact enact the residentialparking district as requested; the new residentialparking rules took effect onSeptember 1, 2004. In addition to themoney paid to the City for the costs ofsetting up the district, the developer paidresidents’ fees for the first five years of permitsas well as the posting of new streetsignage.This benefit is a good example ofan effective cooperative approach betweenthe developer, community residents, andlocal government.Funding for parks. The CBA requiredthe developers to fund a needs assessmentregarding parks, open space, and recreationalfacilities in the project’s neighborhood.Hundreds of local residents participatedin this process, guiding the one-million-dollarexpenditure required by theCBA for park & recreation facilities. Outof the needs assessment came agreementthat the developer would provide $500,000for a family recreation center that will befree to area residents, and another $500,000towards the rehabilitation of an existingpark. Both of these facilities are scheduledto begin construction in 2005.Funding for off-site affordable housing.The CBA required the developers toprovide $650,000 funding for interest-freeloans as “seed money” to area nonprofitaffordable housing developers.The developerhas already provided this full amountin zero-interest loans to two local nonprofitaffordable housing developers for thedevelopment of about sixty units so far.The Coalition helped set up the loan fundand ensure that local nonprofit developersknew about this opportunity.30

■■Construction of on-site affordablehousing. The developer has initiated themarket-rate housing portion of the development.In 2002, the coalition, the city, andthe developer worked cooperatively toresolve timing issues around construction ofaffordable units, and amended the developmentagreements and the CBA to reflecttheir shared understanding of theintended timing.Job readiness programs. As required bythe CBA, the developer is providing fundsfor the first source hiring system and jobreadiness programs. Project employmenthas not yet begun, but approximately$50,000 provided so far has supported arange of job readiness programs housed atSAJE and at Los Angeles Trade TechnicalCollege.The Coalition has leveraged thisseed money to begin a pilot jobs trainingprogram for the lowest income families livingin the area. Many Coalition organizationshave sent their members and constituentsto the job readiness programs aswell as acting as faculty in the classroom.These programs have expanded from twoclasses in the first year of operation to fiveclasses in 2005: Economic Survival, ESLLevels I and II, and Computer LiteracyLevels I and II.The program’s success hasled to an additional two-year grantthrough HUD’s Community OutreachPartnership Centers Program, designed toexpand the jobs program from its currentpilot stage to an institutionalized program.The ultimate goal is to have a pool of new,job-ready applicants from the local communityin place when jobs in the developmentarise. As the job readiness programsdevelop and an operational first source systembecomes necessary, the Coalition willrequest the remainder of the developer’s$100,000 commitment.Implementation ChallengesFollowing are some of the challenges FCCEJ hasfaced during the implementation process for theStaples CBA.■■Need for leadership developmenttraining for grassroots communitymember participants. The complexlegal, community, and policy aspects ofCBA implementation can be daunting anddifficult for individual grassroots communitymembers, no matter how committed.Professional organizers and policy advocatesbenefit from years of training andexperience.The Staples CBA implementationhas underlined the need for similartraining efforts to facilitate participationfrom—and leadership by—interested individualcommunity members. FCCEJ hastherefore helped set up an intensive leadershipdevelopment training program, whichis up and running at this time.Varying understandings of particularsof the CBA. At several points, theOversight Committee discovered thatCoalition members had varying understandingsof some key terms of the CBA.In particular, many coalition membersthought the CBA reserved certain decisionsto the Coalition, when in fact theagreement required shared consensusbetween the Coalition and the developer,or reserved the final decision for the developer.Because the relationship between theCoalition and the developer has beengood, these points have not developed intomajor problems. However, this issueemphasizes the importance of close reviewof a CBA, both prior to signing and duringimplementation. CBAs are complexdocuments, and the devil is in the details;input on the front end from many coalitionmembers will reduce misunderstandingsand disappointments down the road.Chapter Three: Implementation Experience - The Staples CBA |31

| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects Accountable■Continued cooperation and involvementamong coalition members.Implementation of a complex CBA takesyears and involves a wide variety of issues.No one organization has the expertise orthe capacity to handle everything that willcome up. Housing advocates in a coalitionneed to take an active role in implementationof affordable housing provisions; laborand its allies need to stay involved with jobtraining, wages, and benefits; and so forth.With the Staples CBA, many benefits arebeing implemented even prior to the project’sconstruction, making it easy to maintainfocus from many Coalition members.However, organizations that bond togetherto win a CBA should understand that theywill need to be working together for yearsin order to assure strong implementation ofthe benefits they obtained.AftereffectsFCCEJ organizers note that organizations thatlearned to work together through the Staplesnegotiations have continued collaborating withregard to other projects. In this respect, successhas bred success; the coalition-building aspect ofthe CBA process has indeed led to lasting collaboration,resulting in greater political effectivenessfor participants.In addition, the success to date of the StaplesCBA and other early CBAs has spawned severalsubsequent CBAs in Los Angeles, described inAppendix B.The developer community seems tobe more comfortable with the concept, havingseen it work with the Staples deal. And many feelthat some important City officials now expect tosee a CBA on any large, subsidized project, as anindication that the developer has engaged withthe community and that the community hasembraced the project.With a four-year track record of more than a halfdozen different full-scale, legally-binding CBAs inplace in Los Angeles, community advocates havearguably made CBAs the norm for large, subsidizedprojects in the city.The fact that developersand city officials seem to be at least accepting(and at times embracing!) this approach indicatesthat advocates are making demands that are reasonable,and are living up to their end of the bargainby delivering the community support theypromise.There should be no surprise on that lastpoint, as communities will support projects thatprovide good community benefits and addressidentified needs.The CBA process, asexemplified in the Staples deal and subsequentagreements, seems to have facilitated positiveoutcomes for developers, city officials, andaffected communities.32

Chapter Three: Implementation Experience - The Staples CBA |33


Chapter FourLiving Wage Programs as Part of CBAsThe living wage movement has enjoyed widespreadsuccess in the last few years; as of April2005, at least 123 jurisdictions 1 have enacted livingwage policies. Recognizing that taxpayer dollarsare often going to employers that pay wagesbelow the family poverty line, these jurisdictionshave required certain employers to pay a higherhourly wage rate. Sometimes the rate is indexedto the federal poverty line or a similar index;some are indexed to go up with the cost of living.Current living wage levels range from about$7.00 per hour up to more than $12.00 per hourrequired of some large employers in certain citiesin California.In addition to wage requirements, living wagepolicies can incorporate other employment-relatedbenefits as well. Many living wage policiesencourage employers to provide health insuranceto their workers by requiring them to pay a higherwage if they do not do so. Some policiesrequire employers to provide a certain number ofpaid and/or unpaid days off. Some impose limitationson hours worked, or require employers tonotify certain workers about eligibility for thefederal Earned Income Tax Credit.Almost all living wage policies apply to businessesreceiving government contracts—i.e.,businesses performing privatized governmentservices. In addition, at least 89 jurisdictionsapply “job quality standards” to companies thatreceive economic development subsidies 2 . Andtwo California cities, Berkeley and SantaMonica, have applied the principle geographicallyby enacting living wage policies that coverbusinesses in particular city districts. 31 ACORN maintains an updated national list of living wage victories. See www.livingwagecampaign.org.2 The Policy Shift To Good Jobs: Cities, States and Counties Attaching Job Quality Standards to Development Subsidies,” by Good Jobs First – availableat www.goodjobsfirst.org/pdf/jobquality.pdf – is the only national compilation of such requirements.3 Santa Monica’s geographically-based living wage ordinance was later repealed by voters in a razor-thin election. The city then enacted a narrowerliving wage ordinance covering service contractors.Chapter Four: Living Wage Programs as Part of CBAs |35

| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects AccountableThe dramatic success of the living wage movementover the last decade is a testament to thetremendous effectiveness of determined organizingcampaigns employed in city after city.Theidea that government contracts should not besubsidizing poverty-level wages is clearly resonating.And the living wage movement squares withthe essential justification of government spendingon economic development subsidies: that the subsidieswill improve the economic well-being ofcitizens. Indeed, three-fourths of the job qualitystandards attached to development subsidies havebeen established in the absence of grassrootsorganizing activity, suggesting that living wagearguments are influencing a very wide range ofpublic officials.The Impact of Existing Living WagePolicies on CBA NegotiationsIf a proposed development is located in a jurisdictionthat has a living wage policy, that policymay affect CBA negotiations in several ways:■The local living wage policy coversall employers in the development. Afew cities have living wage policies thatcover not just city contractors, and not justdirect recipients of subsidies, but also thosewho indirectly benefit from subsidies orlease space in a subsidized project. SanFrancisco, Oakland, and Toledo, Ohio,among others, have living wage policies■that go beyond the direct recipients tocover all employers in many subsidizedprojects. A similar result is achieved by livingwage policies that cover all employmenton land that is owned by the city;policies like this are often in place for arenas,convention centers, and other facilitiesin which private employment occurs oncity-owned land.In such cases, most or all of the jobs in aproposed development project will be coveredby the city’s living wage provisions.This is an ideal situation: living wagerequirements should become part of theproject automatically, and communitygroups can concentrate their energy andpolitical capital on other aspects ofthe project.The local living wage policy coversthe developer’s contractors, but doesnot cover tenants in the development.Most living wage policies that cover subsidyrecipients cover only the entity thatactually receives the subsidy and that entity’sservice contractors. In a typical nonmanufacturingor non-headquarters project,that means coverage is limited to thedeveloper and the developer’s contractors,such as janitorial, security, and parkingcompanies.Tenants like large stores thatlease space from a developer are consideredRESOURCES ON LIVING WAGE PROGRAMSAND THE LIVING WAGE MOVEMENT■■■Economic Policy Institute, Living WageIssue Guide, www.epinet.orgLAANE, Living Wage TechnicalAssistance Project, www.LAANE.orgACORN, Living Wage ResourceCenter, www.livingwagecampaign.org■■Policy Link, Equitable DevelopmentToolkit, www.policylink.orgNOT the employer-fundedEmployment Policies Institute’s antiliving-wagesites, www.livingwage.organd www.livingwage.com36

■“indirect beneficiaries,” and are not covered.Whilecoverage of the developer andits contractors can turn substantial numbersof jobs into living wage jobs, in the typicaldevelopment project most of the employmentis going to be by tenants of thedeveloper. Review local living wage lawscarefully to determine the scope of coveragewith regard to indirect beneficiariesof subsidies.Occasionally there are development projectsfor which most of the employment isby the entity receiving the public subsidy.For example, some big-box stores will purchaseland from a redevelopment agency,and then build and open a store there. Insuch cases this type of living wage policywill apply, and community groups canconcentrate on other issues.This distinctionunderscores the need for communitygroups to research and understand the precisenature of the proposed developmentscheme and public subsidy.The local living wage policy simplycovers government contractors. Manycities have living wage policies that applyonly to businesses receiving city contracts.These policies will not apply to developmentprojects except in very unusual cases.They can, however, support arguments fora living wage on a particular project: oncea city has decided that living wages shouldbe paid when it spends money throughcontracts, requiring living wages when itspends money through development subsidiesis a logical next step.Living Wage NegotiationsWhen There is No Local LivingWage PolicyWhen the local government does not have a livingwage policy applicable to all or part of a proposeddevelopment, community groups can stilladvocate for living wages as part of a CBA forthe project.When a proposed development projectwill create a large number of jobs—and particularlywhen a project is being promoted basedon the new employment opportunities—communityrepresentatives should always consider pressingfor living wage requirements. Indeed, thewage levels of jobs that come into a communitywill often be the issue that motivates communitygroups to seek a CBA in the first place.Payment of living wages by the developerand its contractorsCommunity groups in CBA negotiations mayconvince the developer to pay living wages to itsemployees on the project. Although the developermay have very few employees (such as propertymanagement office staffers), this commitment hassymbolic importance, as the developer is receivinga public subsidy.Besides tenants, the developer also has controlover its relationships with contractors that willcreate permanent jobs at the site, such as custodialcontractors and security contractors.The developermay agree to require such contractors to payliving wages to their employees. Because the totalamount of money involved is not great and suchservices are competitive, the developer may wellbe open to this idea.This can provide a concretebenefit to many low-wage workers involved withthe project.A Tougher Issue: Payment of LivingWages By TenantsWhen community groups ask for the applicationof living wage requirements to a development’stenants—such as large retail stores and hotels—negotiations over living wages often break down.Take a typical retail development project, wherethe developer plans to buy land, build a structure,and lease space to several retailers. Communitygroups will naturally focus their living wageefforts on the retail tenants’ employees, since thesetenants will provide the vast majority of the pro-Chapter Four: Living Wage Programs as Part of CBAs |37

WHAT ABOUT WAGES FOR CONSTRUCTIONOF THE DEVELOPMENT?Wages are often an issue with regard toconstruction jobs.Although some publicly-subsidizedprojects are subject to the federal“Davis-Bacon” law or similar state lawsrequiring that construction workers be paid the“prevailing wage” for the area, many are not.In such cases, building trades can become partof coalitions negotiating CBAs to help advocateon other issues. In addition to wageissues, the local building trades council may beadvocating for a project labor agreement for acertain development, or may have other concernsrelated to the project. Bringing buildingtrades into a coalition advocating for a rangeof issues can increase leverage for both. Pleasesee the box in the Conclusion on the ParkEast Redevelopment Compact for a goodexample of this. A box in Chapter Seven containsmore information on employment andcontracting issues regarding construction jobs,and resources on labor-community partnershipsin the construction industry.| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects Accountableject’s permanent jobs—and retail jobs are notoriousfor providing low pay, part-time hours, andno health benefits.However, since CBA negotiations generally occurprior to the developer’s acquisition of the land,this issue will have to be resolved before thedeveloper lines up its tenants. If the developer hasyet to recruit and negotiate with potential tenants,it will be very reluctant to agree to requiretenants to pay living wages. Some potential tenantsmay refuse to lease space under such arequirement, or they may demand lower rent ascompensation.These plausible scenarios are aserious concern for the developer, as rent paymentsare the developer’s regular income fromthe project.These risks are hard for the developer to quantify,and they directly affect the developer’s bottomline for the project. For these reasons, developersmay strongly resist application of living wagerequirements to tenants. Nonetheless, communitygroups should push hard on this issue, as wagelevels go to the basic economic benefit the projectwill provide.The arguments for applying living wages to tenantsare strong. A development project in a lowincomecommunity cannot provide an economicboost to that community if workers land inpoverty-wage jobs without health benefits, leavingfamilies dependent on government assistancefor basic necessities such as health care, housing,and transportation.In addition, retail tenants in a subsidized developmentproject benefit from the public subsidy justas the developer does.The development wouldnot exist without the public subsidies, leaving thetenants to scramble for an unsubsidized privatelocation.Those who will make the most moneyfrom the project—developers and retail tenants—should share whatever added costs a living wagerequirement creates.The purpose of an economicdevelopment subsidy is not to create povertyleveljobs. It is to build an economic base in thecommunity, and jobs with poverty-level wagesdon’t do that.In addition, there is substantial evidence that thecosts to employers of paying living wages aremuch less than one might suspect. Companies that38

ARE LIVING WAGE REQUIREMENTS LEGAL?Employers naturally resist any requiredincrease in the wages they must pay.This resistance has on occasion taken theform of lawsuits challenging living wage policiesenacted by various cities. Such challengeshave rarely been successful. It would be verysurprising if living wage laws were found toviolate any aspect of federal law. A small numberof states have enacted laws prohibitingcities from enacting living wage laws.Although other states’ laws vary, living wagelaws that are limited to contract and subsidyrecipients appear to be on safe ground.Living wage requirements agreed to by developersin negotiations with community groupsare even safer.Where the requirements aresimply part of a contract between private parties—likea CBA—it would be difficult foremployers to challenge them. Any employerwho dislikes a project’s living wage requirementsis free to refrain from leasing space inthe project. In such circumstances, it wouldbe very hard to successfully challenge a CBAbasedliving wage requirement.pay higher wages have lower employee turnover,which increases productivity and reduces trainingand recruitment costs. One study found thatemployers’ costs from turnover are at least 150%of the employees’ base salary. 4 In addition, somecosts of higher wages are either absorbed by theemployer or passed on to consumers. In general,studies find that the overall cost to employers ofpaying a living wage is minimal. 5Even if none of these offsetting cost factorsoccurred, the employer’s expense from paying aliving wage is far from overwhelming. A largeretail store that employs 20 full-time workers, ifrequired to raise wages $2 per hour, would incuronly $83,200 per year in increased wage costs 6 —hardly a backbreaking figure for a store largeenough to have 20 full-time employees, and likelygrossing millions of dollars per year in sales.Asking the developer and the tenants to share thiscost—after both have benefitted from public subsidiesthat may run to the tens of millions of dollars—isa reasonable step to ensure that the jobscreated are jobs worth having.What to Do If The Developer Won’tAgree to Require Tenants To PayLiving WagesCommunity groups may find that a developersimply will not agree to impose living wagerequirements on prospective tenants, no matterhow hard the issue is pressed.At that point, communitygroups must decide if this issue is a “dealbreaker”—meaning that they will pull outof CBA negotiations and oppose theproject altogether.If community groups don’t want to go that route,either because they still support the project orbecause they believe that the project is likely togo forward anyway, there are several compromisesthey can propose.These approaches fall short of astrict living wage requirement on all tenants, but4 Bliss and Associates and Gately Consulting, 1999, www.laborstudies.wayne.edu/report.pdf.5 See, e.g., Center for Urban Studies and Labor Studies Center, 1999 report on impact of Detroit living wage ordinance,www.laborstudies.wayne.edu/report.pdf.6 Two dollars per hour times 20 workers times 40 hours per week times 52 weeks per year equals $83,200.Chapter Four: Living Wage Programs as Part of CBAs |39

they may nonetheless increase wage levels in theproject, especially if used in combination.■Wage & benefit disclosure requirementsfor the developer and tenants.CBAs can require the developer and tenantsto provide annual or biannual reports■on wages paid at the development, and thepercentage of jobs for which benefitsare provided.Meeting requirements for the developerand tenants. CBAs can require thedeveloper to meet with community groupsEXAMPLE: LIVING WAGES FOR THE NOHOCOMMONS REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects AccountableAttached as Appendix F is the living wagesection of the community benefitsagreement for the “NoHo Commons” redevelopmentproject, to be built in NorthHollywood, a low-income area of LosAngeles.The 16.7-acre development projectincludes residential, retail, and office spaceand will receive over $31 million in publicsubsidies and loans.The CBA was signed in2001 by the developer and by the Valley JobsCoalition, a coalition of community groupsspearheaded during negotiations by LAANE.The living wage provisions for this projectreflect what will likely be a common scenario:the developer was unwilling to agreeto apply living wage requirements to all tenants,but was willing to commit to attainingliving wages for 75% of the project’s jobs,and to making other efforts to maximize livingwage participation in the project:■■■■employees of the developer will bepaid a living wage;employees of the developer’s contractorswill be paid a living wage;the developer will “make all reasonableefforts to maximize the numberof living wage jobs” in thedevelopment;■■■in choosing between prospective tenants,the developer will “take intoaccount as a substantial factor eachprospective Tenant’s potential impact”on the living wage threshold;the developer and prospective tenantswill meet with the coalition to discusseach prospective tenant’s impact onthe living wage threshold;the developer will provide biannualreports regarding wage levels; andtenants will provide the developerwith their wage levels.If despite these steps the 75% threshold isnot met for any two-year period, the developeragreed to pay a $10,000 penalty and tomeet with the coalition to develop additionalsteps to reach the living wage threshold.Living wage levels in the NoHo Commonspolicy are tied to Los Angeles’ living wageordinance.There are different approaches tosetting “living wage” levels; Policy Link’s“Equitable Development Toolkit” explainsseveral methods (see “Resources” box above).The project’s living wage threshold formulaexempts businesses with fewer than 10employees and jobs covered by a collectivebargaining agreement.40

■to discuss wage levels of major tenants,prior to leases being signed. CBAs can alsorequire prospective tenants to attend suchmeetings so that they can provide informationon likely wage levels, get informedabout the project’s living wage goal (ifany), and learn of any programs designedto assist employers in paying living wagesor providing benefits.Living wage goals. Even if a developerwill not guarantee that all jobs at a developmentwill be living wage jobs, it maycommit to making efforts to maximizethe number of living wage jobs.Thedeveloper might be required to “make allreasonable efforts to maximize the numberof living wage jobs in the project,” orto consider whether a business pays livingwages as a “substantial factor” in choosingtenants. Several CBAs include livingwage goals of 70 or 75%.Whether aproject has attained the living wage goalcan be monitored through requiredreports and meetings.What happens if a living wage goal isnot met?Different CBAs have approached this issue in differentways. Some have required the developer topay a monetary penalty; such a penalty must besubstantial enough that it provides a real incentivefor developers to achieve the goal. Alternatively, aCBA can require the developer to provide publicexplanations for failing to meet the goal, explainin a public forum how it intends to meet thegoal, or collaborate with the local governmentand community groups on efforts to increase theproject’s wage levels.Some experienced advocates believe that the simplepublic act of announcing a living wage goalfor a project places substantial pressure on developerswho care about their reputation with thelocal government and the community. Increasedpublic scrutiny and media attention may thus bethe best way to induce a project to meet its livingwage goal.Chapter Four: Living Wage Programs as Part of CBAs |41


Chapter FiveTargeted Hiring Programs as Part of CBAsFor many development projects, the developer’sprimary selling point is jobs. However, promisesof new jobs for the neighborhood often gounfulfilled.The simple fact that a project employsa certain number of people does not necessarilymean the employment needs of the local communityare being addressed.The new jobs may be filled by individuals wholive in other areas, or who have simply been transferredfrom the employer’s other locations. Lots offactors influence who hears about available jobs,who gets interviewed for such jobs, and who iseventually hired. Even if the hiring process doeswork well for the local community, many unemployedindividuals may need job training in orderto become qualified for the new positions.CBAs can assist with all these problems by incorporatingtargeted hiring programs—requirementsthat employers in a development make specialefforts to hire certain individuals, sometimes withthe assistance of local job training programs or a“first source” office.Targeted hiring programs canhelp development projects fulfill what is oftentheir most fundamental purpose—building aneconomic base in low-income communities.In addition to incorporating hiring requirementsfor employers, CBAs can require developers toprovide space or funding for a First Source office.A First Source office, if adequately funded, can bea powerful tool for targeting employment opportunitiesin socially beneficial ways. Communitygroups have regularly incorporated targeted hiringrequirements into CBAs.The Case for Targeted HiringTargeted hiring policies advance what is often themain function of development project: to help adepressed area by increasing economic opportu-Chapter Five: Targeted Hiring Programs as Part of CBAs |43

| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects Accountablenities there.This is often the main purpose citedto justify a development’s public subsidy.This purpose is a valid one. Few would arguethat a lack of economic opportunities does nothave weighty consequences for a community.Geographically concentrated poverty causes particularlyacute social conflicts. As employmentlevels in a neighborhood drop, the need forsocial services rises—just as a low-incomeneighborhood is contributing less to themunicipal tax base, and suffering from a correspondinglack of political power. Neighborhoodslacking a solid base of family incomes cannotsustain themselves.Targeted hiring policies are a concrete mechanismto break down employment patterns thatexacerbate these problems.While urban neighborhoodsdecline due to a complex web of largersocietal forces—including suburban sprawl, thedecline in manufacturing jobs, and a decline inreal wages—targeted hiring policies can helpgovernment take small but real steps to help theeconomies of neighborhoods hit hardest by thesesocial trends.In addition, targeted hiring policies often benefitcommunities where residents are predominantlypeople of color. Local governments and communitygroups can thus further the important socialgoals of affirmative action without the politicaland legal difficulties that sometimes come withan explicitly race-conscious policy.Some people are especially deserving of targetedhiring programs. For example, targeting jobs toworkers whose jobs were displaced by a developmentis obviously fair. Such individuals pay a heavyprice when a development project moves forward,and efforts to provide them with job opportunities—usuallymany months after their previous jobended—seem like small compensation. Somestates, including California, require steps to provideopportunities to displaced workers.Targeting jobs to residents of the neighborhoodof the development is also compelling. Anytime adevelopment project is built in a low-incomeneighborhood, residents of the neighborhood areurged to support the project based on promises ofjob opportunities the project will provide. It isonly fair to require that projects promoted onthat basis include some mechanism to ensure thatlocal people actually get some of the jobs. Inaddition, neighborhood residents will bear mostof the negative impacts of the development, suchas increased traffic, parking problems, months ofheavy construction, the possibility of increasedhousing costs, and other economic and environmentalimpacts.Those costs should be balancedwith the benefits of economic opportunities. (Forthese reasons, HUD’s “Section Three” programrequires that, for all HUD-assisted projects, economicopportunities such as job openings bedirected to neighborhood residents “to the greatestextent feasible.”)Combine all these arguments with the simple factthat most development projects explicitly promisejobs for local residents, and you have a powerfulcase for a CBA that includes some kind of targetedhiring mechanism. Developers and local governmentsdangling the prospect of local jobsshould be willing to take concrete steps to maketheir promises a reality.Target PopulationsIndividuals benefitting from a targeted hiring policymight include:■■■■individuals whose jobs are displaced by thedevelopment;residents of the neighborhood immediatelysurrounding the development;residents of low-income neighborhoodsanywhere in the metropolitan area;individuals referred by local, communitybasedjob training organizations;44

■■low-income individuals generally; or“special needs” individuals, such as publicassistance recipients or ex-offenders.Community groups can select one set of individualson which they would like the program tofocus, or they can develop a tiered system withfirst, second, and perhaps third priorities for availablejobs.There is plenty of room for creativityhere: communities may want to include othercategories of individuals, such as those graduatingfrom community-based job training programs. Aslong as there is an appropriate public purpose,targeted hiring is legitimate.EXAMPLE: TARGETEDHIRING IN THE LAX CBAThe LAX CBA’s targeted hiring programtargets job opportunities to arange of “Special Needs Individuals,”including:(i) an individual who has receivedpublic assistance through theTemporary Assistance for NeedyFamilies Program within 24 monthsof applying for a job or job trainingthrough this program; (ii) an individualwho is homeless; (iii) an exoffender;(iv) an individual who ischronically unemployed; or (v) a dislocatedairport worker.The LAX CBA is described in detail inChapter One.Referral and Hiring ProcessesOnce a targeted hiring program’s priorities areset, there are many ways to administer it.Following are some options on how referral andhiring processes can be structured, from simple tomore complex:■■■■Tell the employers what the hiring prioritiesare, and leave it up to them to recruitand hire targeted individuals.While thisapproach leaves the employers with widediscretion regarding their hiring methods,results can still be monitored, and enforcementprovisions can still be strong.Require employers to give notice of jobopenings in certain ways—mailings to targetedneighborhoods, advertisements incommunity newspapers, notification to jobtraining centers, etc.Require employers to hold jobs open for acertain period of time after notification,and to only interview targeted individualsduring that period.First Source—Require employers to interviewpeople referred by certain sources,such as particular job training centers or aFirst Source office.These methods can be combined or tailored tothe needs and capacities of any community. Anyof these methods can be combined with percentagegoals for hiring targeted individuals.It is important that the administrative requirementsof a targeted hiring program do notexceed the capacity of community resources. If atargeted hiring program’s responsibilities exceedlocal capacity, the program will place few needyworkers in the new jobs. It will also become auseless hurdle for employers trying to fill jobs,and could sour the neighborhood against suchprograms. But a targeted hiring program thatruns smoothly will bring jobs to the intendedindividuals, benefit employers by providing afree source of qualified applicants, and cementrelations between the development and the surroundingcommunity.Community groups should therefore make a realisticassessment of the number and sophisticationof job training organizations in the area beforeChapter Five: Targeted Hiring Programs as Part of CBAs |45

| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects Accountablenegotiating a program that relies on them forprompt referrals of qualified individuals. Similarly,before setting up a system that relies on a firstsource office for referrals, community groupsshould ensure that the office will have adequatefunding and staffing.First Source ProgramsThe most elaborate type of targeted hiring programis one that requires employers to interviewapplicants referred by a “first source” officebefore interviewing other applicants. A firstsource office receives notice of job openingsfrom employers, maintains contact with a varietyof job training organizations to access their poolsof applicants, and promptly refers qualified workersto employers.If adequately staffed and funded, a first sourceoffice can provide tremendous benefits. It canbenefit employers by enabling them to access avariety of sources of applicants through a singlejob notice. It can benefit job training organizationsand targeted individuals by giving themreliable access to information about job openings.It can help the targeted hiring program meet itsgoals. And it can dramatically simplify monitoringof the program, since all aspects of the programare centralized.These responsibilities place tremendouspressure on a first source office; how the officefunctions will determine the success or failureof the program. A first source office that promptlyrefers qualified applicants will be seen as a benefitto employers, and can be a powerful tool for targetedemployment. Conversely, a first sourceoffice that delays employers’ efforts to fill jobs, orsends unqualified applicants, will not succeed.If there is any doubt about the adequacy ofresources for a first source office, we recommendthat programs instead require employers to workdirectly with existing job training centers.However, a CBA can certainly require a developerto provide money and/or space for a firstsource office, and local governments can supportfirst source offices as well.Because of the risk of inadequate resources, firstsource offices make the most sense in large communities,where there are many established jobtraining centers, and adequate resources are available.TheCity of San Francisco has a well-establishedfirst source program.The office maintains amaster list of applicants from over forty job trainingcenters, and has the capacity to promptly referqualified applicants for available jobs. It processeshundreds of referrals per year, and keeps track ofwhether individuals referred were actually hired.The first source office is part of the San Franciscocity government, and works with employers onevery project covered by the citywide first sourcepolicy. 7 Many other cities have first source officesas well, with varying degrees of sophisticationand involvement. 8Monitoring and EnforcementThe most common complaint from communitygroups regarding targeted hiring programs is alack of enforcement. Indeed, many localities havefirst source or local hiring programs that lack anymonitoring or enforcement provisions whatsoever.Whilethe primary factor in the success of afirst source program is likely to be whether thefirst source office and the job training organizationscan promptly provide qualified applicants,the importance of monitoring and enforcing theprogram cannot be discounted.7 See “First in Line: An Evaluation of San Francisco's First Source Hiring Program,” San Francisco Urban Institute, August 2004 (www.picsf.org/documents/documents.htm);8 See “Adopting A Waterbury Local Hiring Preference Ordinance: An Analysis of the Legal & Policy Options,” National Employment Law Project,August 2000 (www.nelp.org/relatedPublications.cfm?section=%5Cwlwp); Frieda Molina, “Making Connections: A Study of Employment LinkagePrograms,” Center for Community Change, May 1998; Stephanie Haffner, “Using Local Hiring Programs to Promote Employment Opportunities inLow-Income Communities: Examples and Practical Considerations,” National Economic Development & Law Center, 1995.46

The most basic decision about enforcement is, ofcourse, who will do the enforcing. If the programinvolves a first source office, that office wouldseem an obvious choice to monitor and enforcethe program. However, the first source officeneeds to have a good relationship with employersin order to do its job, and the inherent tensionsof the enforcement process can impede this relationship.Whilethe first source system will be acrucial source of information regarding employers’compliance, actual enforcement responsibilitiesshould lie with community groups signingthe CBA, and with the local government if targetedhiring requirements are included in adevelopment agreement. (Please see ChapterEight for more information on monitoring andenforcing CBA benefits.)Percentage GoalsIf a program incorporates percentage goals, thesebecome a central aspect of the enforcement system.Goals can be used many different ways:■■■The percentage goal can be considered a“safe harbor,” so that if an employer hasmet the percentage goal, it is considered tobe in compliance with the program, andno enforcement action can be taken.Employers that meet the goal can be presumedto be in compliance with the program—butthe enforcement body isempowered to find otherwise.Failure to meet the goal can automaticallytrigger additional requirements for theemployer, such as a responsibility toexplain in writing the reasons for certainhiring decisions.However goals are used, they should giveemployers a strong incentive to meet them.Thebest approach is probably one that employs boththe “carrot” and the “stick.”While there are manymodels for the “stick,” community groups shouldbe creative in developing “carrots,” or ways toreward employers who meet their targetedhiring goals.Monitoring Hiring PatternsThe most difficult thing about enforcing a targetedhiring program is obtaining information fromemployers in enough detail to make enforcementpossible.Various factors make employers reluctantto give out information about how they madetheir hiring decisions. Employers are used to theirhiring processes being confidential, reasons fortheir decisions are often subjective, and hiringdecisions are among the most important decisionsan employer has to make.Nonetheless, an employer who agrees tocomply with a targeted hiring program—inexchange for participating in a subsidized developmentproject—must also agree to some mechanismfor determining whether the program isbeing followed. Central to any monitoring systemis a reporting requirement. Employersshould be required to file periodic reports onthe percentages of their hires that are targetedindividuals, and should be required to describeany difficulties they have had in complyingwith the program.Beyond the reporting requirements, how elaboratea monitoring system needs to be willdepend on the scope of the program itself. If theprogram merely places procedural requirementson employers, such as providing notice of availablejobs, then monitoring may be quitestraightforward.If the program includes percentage goals for hiringtargeted individuals, however, monitoring canbecome much more complicated. Employers willcertainly need to report on the percentage oftheir hires that were targeted individuals; if anemployer falls short of the percentage goal, thencompliance will probably depend on whether theemployer has made “good faith efforts” to hiretargeted individuals.This can be a hard questionto answer, and it may involve scrutiny of the cri-Chapter Five: Targeted Hiring Programs as Part of CBAs |47

| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects Accountableteria the employer used in hiring decisions—avery sensitive area.Whatever the particulars of a program and anenforcement mechanism, any targeted hiring programneeds the following to be enforceable:■■it should spell out cleazit should indicate who will monitorthe program and describe how it willbe enforced.If a program runs smoothly, enforcement provisionswill rarely come into play.Legal IssuesTargeted hiring programs need to be carefullycrafted to avoid legal pitfalls. Because there aremany laws governing the hiring process, theseprograms can be somewhat tricky from a legalperspective.While it is impossible to completelyinsulate any program from legal risk, a carefullyconstructed targeted hiring program should beupheld in the unlikely event of a legal challenge.Community groups should be sure to consultan attorney when designing targetedhiring programs.Following are some legal issues that require care:EXAMPLE: TARGETED HIRING FROM THESTAPLES PROJECTAttached as Appendix D is the CBA forthe Staples project, described above.TheFirst Source Hiring Policy, applicable to allemployers in the development, is an attachmentto the CBA, and will be included intenant leases.This policy targets three tiers ofindividuals for employment opportunities:individuals whose residence or job is displacedby any phase of the development, lowincomeindividuals living near the development,and low-income individuals living in■■Neighborhood Specificity: Programsthat give preference to residents of oneneighborhood over another can sometimesimplicate constitutional provisions thatprotect individuals’“fundamental right” topractice their trade.This is only likely tobecome an issue (1) when employers couldrecruit applicants from more than onestate, and (2) when the program is incorporatedinto a development agreement. Insuch cases, the best defense against thispotential problem is to make sure that theprogram is carefully and narrowly designedto address poverty or economic distress ina particular neighborhood, with detailedfindings regarding the need for such measures.Themore closely the program is tailoredto this accepted governmental role,the more likely it is to withstand any legalchallenge.This is an instance where thelegal requirements line up nicely with thesocial goals.Deal vs. Regulation: A targeted hiringprogram is also more legally defensiblewhen its application is limited to employ-low-income census tracts throughout LosAngeles. For initial hiring, employers arerequired to hold jobs open for three weekswhile they interview only targeted individuals.For later hiring this period is shortened tofive days. Employers who comply with thevarious hiring procedures or who have filledmore than 50% of jobs with targeted individualsare presumed to be in compliance withthe policy.The policy also contains detailedreporting requirements.48

■■ers who have clearly benefitted from thepublic subsidy to the development.Themore the program looks like part of a“deal” between consenting parties—andthe less it looks like government regulationof unconsenting businesses—the better itschances of being upheld.Targeted hiringprograms should be designed so thatemployers receive notice of the requirementsbefore they commit to a place inthe development. Employers who receivesuch notice and choose to sign a lease cannotclaim to be unfairly regulated.Race and Gender: Any targeted hiringprogram that incorporates race- or genderbasedcriteria into any aspect of its administrationis open to legal challenge. Suchprograms are legal in certain circumstances,but require very strong and detailed justificationif the program becomes part of adevelopment agreement. CBAs that willnot become part of development agreements,and are simply between two privateparties, have more leeway, although even inthat case there are limitations.Employer Court Orders: Some largeemployers are under court orders regarding■their hiring procedures. Court-orderedprocedures usually will not conflict withtargeted hiring programs; an employer maynonetheless point to a court order as a justificationfor exemption from the targetedhiring program. Unless there is an irreconcilableconflict between the court orderand the program, there is no reason toexempt such employers.Collective Bargaining Agreements:Targeted hiring programs may conflictwith collective bargaining agreements inthe construction industry. If communitygroups want to apply targeted hiringrequirements to construction jobs, theyshould work with representatives of thelocal building trade unions to try to designa policy that furthers the goals of targetedhiring, while also fitting with the complexsystems governing hiring in the constructionindustry. It will almost always makesense to have targeted hiring policies thatwork differently for construction than forother industries. Collective bargainingagreements in retail, service, and manufacturinggenerally do not conflict with targetedhiring requirements.Chapter Five: Targeted Hiring Programs as Part of CBAs |49


Chapter SixAddressing Environmental Issues Through CBAsThe fear of environmental impacts is often whatignites community organizing around a project.Residents may be concerned about anythingfrom the project’s visual appearance, to new parkingand traffic problems, to toxic emissions generatedby industrial projects. CBAs can also requirea developer to reduce the negative environmentalimpacts of a project, or to provide affirmativeenvironmental benefits like parks, open space, andrecreational facilities.The CBA negotiation process is an effectivemechanism for communities to negotiate for environmentalbenefits and mitigations beyond thoserequired by law. CBAs can also allow communitygroups to step in when government enforcementis lax, supplementing the always-important processof working with the government to ensureenforcement of environmental laws.The LAX CBA, described in detail in ChapterOne, provides a wide range of environmentalmitigations and benefits. Concern about environmentalimpacts of airport operations was thedriving force that led the community topress for a CBA. Environmental benefitsobtained include:■■■■■retrofitting diesel construction vehicles andground service equipment, curbing dangerousair pollutants by up to 90%;a five-year program for converting trucks,shuttles, passenger vans, and buses servingthe airport to alternative fuels or less-pollutingvehicles;limits on diesel idling of all vehicles atthe airport;electrifying airplane gates, hangars, andcargo operations areas, to minimize pollutionfrom jet engine idling;funds for a comprehensive airquality study;Chapter Six: Addressing Environmental Issues Through CBAs |51

■■■■■funds for a study of “upper respiratory systemand hearing loss impacts of LAXoperations”;funds for community-based researchstudies on the broad health impacts ofairport operations;millions of dollars for soundproofing nearbyschools and residences;designated routes for constructiontraffic; anda commitment from the airport to apply tothe FAA for permission to restrict nighttimeflights over adjacent neighborhoods.The language for these benefits is set out in theLAX CBA, available online atwww.laane.org/lax/index.html.Mitigations: Reducing the EnvironmentalImpacts of the DevelopmentCBA negotiations on environmental benefits takeplace against the complex backdrop of environmentallaw. Federal, state, and local laws containdetailed requirements pertaining to environmentalissues—zoning and planning measures, impactdisclosure requirements, restrictions on toxicemissions, and so forth. Such laws may regulateeverything from the basic uses that are| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects AccountableEXAMPLE: GATE ELECTRIFICATIONREQUIREMENTS IN THE LAX CBAWhen aircraft pull up to a gate, theyneed electrical power during periodsof loading and unloading passengers, cleaning,maintenance, and so forth. One would thinkthat planes would hook into electrical powerprovided by the terminal, but they instead runtheir own engines or diesel-powered auxiliaryunits to generate power. Burning jet fuel ordiesel fuel when there is a clean source ofelectricity only a few feet away is an obviouswaste, with major environmental impacts thatare easily avoidable. (Diesel fuel generateshuge amounts of smog and other pollutants;the California Scientific Review Panel onToxic Air Contaminants estimates that 16,000Californians will develop lung cancer due toexposure to diesel fumes.)Despite this situation, LAX has never movedaggressively to equip its gates to provide electricityto aircraft. A majority of LAX’s gatesare not electrified.This is a plain case wherethe real stakeholders—community memberswho breathe the air near LAX—had no abilityto influence the decisionmakers, and thisproblem languished for years. People affectedby this aspect of airline operations simply hadno effective means of pressing LAX to makethis simple equipment change—until theCBA negotiations.By making this issue a priority in theirCBA negotiations, the LAX Coalitionfor Economic, Environmental, andEducational Justice obtained significantcommitments from the airport.The airportagreed to an aggressive schedule of gate electrification,with all gates at the airport fullyelectrified within five years.The airport alsoagreed to require that all aircraft actually usethe gate-provided electricity, rather than runningtheir engines.The CBA contains similarprovisions for electrification of cargo operationsareas and hangars.These commitmentsshould ensure a substantial and longoverduereduction in harmful emissionsfrom the airport, leading to cleaner air foradjacent communities.52

permitted on a piece of land to the size andappearance of exterior signs.Virtually everyimpact of a development may be regulated tosome degree: both the obvious environmentalimpacts like pollution and handling of hazardouswastes, and the less obvious ones like traffic patterns,visual appearance, wind tunnels, andstorm water drainage.Environmental laws may prohibit a specificenvironmental impact, may require that itbe mitigated, may require that it merely bedisclosed, or may ignore it altogether.Community groups need to work closelywith experienced attorneys to determinewhat laws govern a proposed project.Once they understand the backdrop of environmentallaws pertaining to a project, communitygroups can use CBAs:■ to strengthen existing environmentalrequirements;■ to address environmental impacts thatexisting laws don’t cover; and■ to provide more enforcement options byenabling direct, private enforcement ofenvironmental requirements.One important step: whenever plans for a projectcontain an environmental impact statement or arelated document requiring the developer to takemitigation measures, community groups shouldtry to incorporate the document by referenceinto the CBA—ensuring that all mitigationrequirements are enforceable by affected communitymembers.Requiring Environmental BenefitsIn addition to helping reduce environmentalproblems, the CBA process can help communitiesobtain affirmative environmental benefits as well.The larger the proposed development, the greaterthe public benefits that ought to be provided:open space, public plazas, and money for park andrecreation facilities are all amenities that a developercan provide. Communities should think creativelyabout their needs—and should keep inmind the size of a project’s public subsidy whendoing so.Environmental RacismThe history of placement of polluting industriesin minority neighborhoods is long, well-documented,and tragic. A detailed discussion of theEXAMPLE: COMMUNITY ENFORCEMENT OF REQUIREDMITIGATIONS IN THE SUNQUEST PROJECT.The CBA for the SunQuest project,described in Appendix B, incorporatesthe project’s “mitigated negative declaration.”Under California law, a developer must filean environmental impact report unless theproposed project will have no significantimpact on the environment. If mitigationsare necessary in order to avoid environmentalimpacts, the developer files a mitigatednegative declaration, outlining therequired measures.This important document can be hundredsof pages long, and can contain crucial environmentalrequirements for the project.These requirements are enforceable by thelocal agency overseeing the project. Byincorporating the mitigated negative declarationinto the CBA, the Valley Jobs Coalitionmade them enforceable by the communitygroups as well, greatly strengthening thecommunity’s hand in addressing environmentalissues.Chapter Six: Addressing Environmental Issues Through CBAs |53

issue of environmental racism is outside the scopeof this handbook. Suffice it to say that in a greatmany instances, community groups will organizeto block the establishment or expansion of a pollutingor hazardous facility in their community.CBA negotiations are only appropriate withregard to such facilities when the community iscomfortable with the project’s proposed location—orwould be if the developer takes certainmitigation measures.Pollutants and Hazardous WastesIn general, industrial development projects thatraise issues of toxic discharges, regulated pollutants,hazardous materials, and the like will besubject to detailed strictures under federal andstate law. However, the existence of such laws isno substitute for an active, engaged community.Enforcement of these environmental regulationsis often spotty, and the consequences of unsafeindustrial practices can be devastating for surroundingcommunities. Community groups thathave reason to believe that a proposed developmentwill involve pollution or hazardous materialsshould obtain advice from organizations withexperience in this complex area. Please see boxon “Good Neighbor Agreements” for resourceson community-company agreements related topollution and similar issues.EXAMPLE: PARKS AND OPEN SPACEREQUIREMENTS FOR THE STAPLES PROJECT| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects AccountableThe Staples project, described in ChapterOne, will be built in the “FigueroaCorridor” neighborhood adjoining downtownLos Angeles. Community groups in theFigueroa Corridor had long noted they hadvery little park space. In fact, the area containedonly one quarter of the park spacedeemed necessary by the city, given the area’sresidential density.In light of this deficit in park space, the scaleof the Staples development, and the potentialsize of the public subsidy, community groupsmade an increase in neighborhood park spacea priority.The Staples CBA, attached in itsentirety as Appendix D, reflects this decision.Section III of the CBA sets out the frameworkfor assessing the community’s needs forparks, open space, and recreational facilities.Hundreds of local residents participated in aneeds assessment process paid for by thedeveloper, guiding the one-million-dollarexpenditure required by the CBA for park &recreation facilities.The CBA required thedeveloper is required to fund at least $1 millionworth of new parks and recreation facilities,built within one mile of the project andconsistent with the results of the needs assessment.Out of the needs assessment cameagreement that the developer would provide$500,000 for a family recreation center, freeto area residents; and approximately $500,000for rehabilitation of a local park. Both ofthese facilities are scheduled to begin constructionin Summer 2005.In addition to these new park and recreationfacilities, the Staples CBA requires the developerto include in the project itself “a streetlevelplaza of approximately one acre in sizeand open to the public.”The newly constructedparks and this public plaza shouldprovide a concrete benefit to the communitysurrounding the Staples project, and oneclosely tailored to the particular needs of theFigueroa Corridor community.54

BrownfieldsBrownfields are abandoned or under-used propertieswhere development is complicated by actualor perceived problems of environmental contamination.Many urban spaces that would beprime candidates for beneficial redevelopmentremain unused because developers are wary oftaking on unknown cleanup costs.The brownfields movement attempts to addressthis problem through a variety of public/privatepartnerships.These have often been innovativeand effective. Brownfields initiatives have incorporatedjob training and other community developmentprograms, as well as greenspace protectionand other environmentally friendly policies.When there are concerns regarding environmentalcontamination at a potential development site,community groups should be aware of brownfieldsprograms and the potential they offer.The web site of the U.S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency provides information about itsmany brownfields programs.(www.epa.gov/swerosps/bf/index.html).TheNortheast Midwest Institute links to many differentresources on brownfields.(www.nemw.org/reports.htm#brownfields).GOOD NEIGHBOR AGREEMENTSOver the last 25 years, many communitieshave signed enforceable “GoodNeighbor Agreements” with companiesoperating industrial facilities. Good NeighborAgreements most often focus on pollutioncontrol measures such as facility inspections,accident preparedness plans, and toxic emissions.Theysometimes incorporate a broaderrange of community benefits, such as localhiring, union representation issues, and infrastructureimprovements.When legally enforceable, Good NeighborAgreements are similar in concept to theCBAs discussed in this handbook. GoodNeighbor Agreements are distinguishable inthat (1) they generally emphasize control ofpollution, toxins, and hazardous materials atindustrial facilities, and (2) they are oftennegotiated with regard to existing facilitiesrather than proposed new developments.Most legal and practical concepts applicableto Good Neighbor Agreements are applicableto CBAs as well, and vice versa.The Good Neighbor Project provides extensiveinformation and resources on GoodNeighbor Agreements. (Contact: SanfordLewis, 160 Second Street, Cambridge, MA02142;(617) 354-1030).) An excellentoverview of Good Neighbor Agreements isthe article,“Good Neighbor Agreements: ATool For Environmental and Social Justice,”by Sanford Lewis, Esq., and Diane Henkels,in Social Justice,Volume 23, Number 4.(available online atwww.cpn.org/topics/environment/goodneighbor.html).Chapter Six: Addressing Environmental Issues Through CBAs |55


Chapter SevenOther Community Benefits as Part of CBAsOne of the advantages of CBAs is their flexibility:community advocates can negotiate for whateverbenefits their particular community needs themost. In fact, when community groups cometogether over a proposed development, it is anexcellent occasion to assess the community’sneeds.This assessment—and the coalition-buildingthat can accompany it—can spark organizingand advocacy that goes well beyond anysingle campaign.Previous chapters have described the most commonbenefits that many communities have in factnegotiated.This chapter describes other communitybenefits that can also be included in a CBA.Some of these benefits have already been won bycommunity groups, while others are strong candidatesfor future campaigns.Advocates should bethorough and inclusive in assessing their community’sneeds, and creative in developing new ideas.Job TrainingCBAs offer an excellent opportunity to tailor jobtraining to the needs of employers in a development,and to increase training options for neighborhoodresidents. CBAs can require employersto provide long-range information about trainingneeds. Local job training organizations can thentailor their programs to fit those needs.This strategyfits very well with a first source program,which can refer the trained employees to theemployers who had requested the training.This“customized job training” can be a selling pointfor tenants in the project, and helps blunt theargument that first source requirements drive upcosts for tenants.CBAs can also require the developer to providedirect support for job training efforts.The LAXCBA includes a commitment from the airport toChapter Seven: Other Community Benefits as Part of CBAs |57

| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects Accountableprovide $15 million for job training.These fundswill be administered through the Los AngelesCommunity Development Department and thelocal Workforce Investment Board. Funds will bepredominantly used for job training for:■■■■Low-Income Individuals living in theProject Impact Area for at least one year;Special Needs Individuals;Low-Income Individuals residing inthe City;Individuals currently working in AirportJobs or Aviation-Related Jobs and eligiblefor incumbent worker training.“Low-Income Individuals” are those whosehousehold income is no greater than 80% of themedian income, adjusted for household size, forthe Primary Metropolitan Statistical Area.“Special Needs Individuals” include individualswho have received public assistance through theTemporary Assistance for Needy FamiliesProgram within the last 24 months, who arehomeless, who are ex-offenders, who are chronicallyunemployed, and dislocated airport workers.“AirportJobs” and “Aviation-Related Jobs”are defined in the CBA.CBAs can also require the developer to providespace or seed money for establishment of a newjob training program.This approach was used inthe NoHo Commons redevelopment project,described in Chapter Four.The NoHoCommons CBA required the developer to provide$10,000 as seed money for a new job trainingprogram for day laborers, with the programto be operated by a local nonprofit. Serviceproviders and advocates can use such funds asleverage to raise money from other public andprivate sources for job training.Right-to-Organize CommitmentsLabor unions and many community groups willplace a high priority on obtaining “right-toorganize”commitments from employers in newdevelopments. Such commitments include “cardcheck” agreements, which greatly simplify theprocess of determining whether employees in aparticular workplace wish to unionize, and “neutrality”agreements, which ensure that employerswill not use their power over employees to dissuadethem from forming a union.Without suchcommitments, it is very easy for determinedemployers to impede unionization efforts.While advocacy for the right to organize fits naturallywith advocacy for other community benefits,resulting commitments usually should not beincorporated into CBAs.This is because CBAsshould become part of the developer’s agreementwith the local government, and federal law prohibitssome types of local government involvementin collective bargaining issues.While thereare some circumstances where right-to-organizecommitments may be included in developmentagreements, the legal complexities argue for acautious approach. (We strongly advise that youcheck with an experienced attorney on this issue,as this area of law is complicated and changing.)While the campaign for right-to-organize commitmentscan be integrated with the campaignfor other community benefits, memorializing theright-to-organize commitments in a separatedocument may avoid some legal pitfalls.These concerns should not impede aggressiveadvocacy on this issue, however: union jobs aregenerally good jobs, where workers have a rangeof benefits and protections for which they wouldnot otherwise be eligible. Right-to-organizecommitments can be integral to raising job qualityin new developments.Affordable HousingCBAs can be used to promote affordable housingthrough several different approaches. A lack ofaffordable housing—in both the rental housingmarket and the ownership market—is one of themost intractable barriers to economic develop-58

RESOURCES ON AFFORDABLE HOUSINGPerhaps the best resources for communitygroups interested in affordable housingare local nonprofit housing developers andexperienced affordable housing advocates.Most communities have one or more suchnonprofits, and they will be most familiarwith area affordability requirements andother key issues.Beyond local groups, there are many nationalsources of information on affordable housing.■■The website of the nonprofit NationalHousing Conference contains informationon housing policy issues ingeneral and affordability in particular,and its online “Affordable HousingClearinghouse” contains well-organizedlinks to a great number of groupsworking on housing affordabilitythrough many different strategies.(www.nhc.org)The nonprofit National Low-Income■■Housing Coalition provides resourceson affordable housing issues, in concertwith its network of local members.TheNLIHC web site is anothergood way to find local affordablehousing developers and advocates.(www.nlihc.org)The website of the InnovativeHousing Institute contains anoverview of inclusionary zoningrequirements around the country, andprovides technical assistance on inclusionaryzoning. (www.inhousing.org)The U.S. Department of Housing andUrban Development maintains manyoffices and programs devoted toexpanding the nation’s supply ofaffordable housing.A description oftheir current initiative to encourageconstruction by removing regulatorybarriers is at www.hud.gov/initiatives/affordablecom.cfm.ment of a low-income community. And in metropolitanareas where incomes are rising, loss ofaffordable housing contributes to gentrification.Many jurisdictions have “inclusionary zoning”requirements, calling for a certain percentage ofunits in new residential developments to be“affordable.” A typical affordability requirement is10% to 15% of new units; the percentage oftenvaries with the size of the development.Definitions of “affordable” vary widely, but areusually linked to regional median incomes, withthe goal that households should pay no morethan 30% of income towards rent.Many programs are mandatory for new housingdevelopments, but some are optional quid proquos, with the developer allowed to build at ahigher density if it incorporates affordable units.Even where there is no existing inclusionary zoningrequirement governing a project, local governmentscan insist on inclusion of a certain percentageof affordable units as a condition ofapproval of a project.If a proposed development includes a residentialcomponent, community groups need to determinewhether inclusionary requirements governthe project. If not, then community groups cantry to obtain a commitment through the CBAprocess that a certain percentage of the units willbe affordable. Even if affordability requirementsalready apply, community groups should considerattempting to strengthen them through a CBAChapter Seven: Other Community Benefits as Part of CBAs |59

| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects Accountablefor the project. Community groups can press forimprovements to the existing requirements inmany areas, such as:■■■■■■■■the percentage of units that will bemade affordable;the definition of “affordable”;the number of years after construction thatthe units must remain affordable;whether and how the required affordableunits will be integrated with themarket-rate units;number of bedrooms in affordable units;whether the developer will apply for awaiver or reduction in affordabilityrequirements, as is permitted insome jurisdictions;whether the developer will contributemoney to an affordable housing fundrather than building affordable units, as ispermitted in some jurisdictions; andwhether the affordable units must bebuilt at the same time as the marketrate units.Even if a proposed project does not include newresidential housing, community groups can pressfor the developer to fund local affordable housingprograms.This is especially appropriate when thedevelopment is likely to increase rents in the area,potentially driving out long-term residents.There are many ways that developers can providefinancial support for affordable housing.They cancontribute to nonprofit housing developers; theycan also contribute to the local jurisdiction’saffordable housing fund.The CBA for the Staplesproject used a creative approach whereby thedeveloper established a revolving loan fund foruse by several local nonprofit housing developers.The Staples CBA provides the framework for thedeveloper and these nonprofits to collaborate toproduce a substantial number of affordable unitsin the next few years—perhaps more than thedeveloper’s initial commitments regarding theStaples project itself.Even aside from inclusionary zoning requirements,there are many laws aimed at preservingand increasing the supply of affordable housing.For example, when a redevelopment projectresults in the demolition of affordable housingunits, the local government entity overseeing thatproject may be required to replace those units.Similarly, many states require that a portion ofnew tax revenue generated by redevelopmentprojects be dedicated to development of affordablehousing.While these responsibilities generallyfall on the local government rather than thedeveloper, community groups should understandthese requirements when negotiating over affordablehousing with the developer and the localgovernment. Community groups should workwith local affordable housing advocates to understandthe legal and financial environment andthe current opportunities for affordablehousing development.Funding or Facilities for CommunityServicesEvery neighborhood needs funding or facilitiesfor community services. Developers of large, publicly-subsidizedprojects are often willing to providespace or funding for such services. CBAnegotiations can galvanize these commitments,can tailor them as needed, and can make themdetailed and enforceable.Community groups might press for facilities orfunding for youth centers, health clinics; childcare centers; community centers; senior centers;job training programs; educational programs; artprograms; recreation facilities; or other neighborhoodimprovement projects.The many possibilities here underscore the needfor advocates to conduct a broad, inclusive assess-60

ment of their community’s needs, and then prioritizetheir goals. Advocates should remember thatdevelopers are not in the business of operatingthese types of facilities; if developer commitmentsare not supplemented with community resourcesand involvement, they are likely to go to waste.Community groups should expect to remaininvolved in implementation and fundraising forsuch programs.Shaping the Mix of Businesses In theDevelopmentCommunity groups routinely advocate forchanges in the elements of a proposed developmentproject, in an effort to bring desirable businessesor nonprofits into the new development.This advocacy fits naturally with negotiationsover a CBA.Communities often press for the inclusion of asupermarket or a bank—crucial services that areoften lacking in low-income neighborhoods. Iflocally-owned and local-serving businesses will bedisplaced by a development, then it is fair todemand space in the new project for at leastsome of these businesses. Advocates may also pressfor inclusion of space for community-servingnonprofits, at a reduced rent if possible.Because the use of space within a developmentdirectly affects the developer’s bottom line, communitygroups may have to spend a lot of theirpolitical capital to obtain this type of benefit.However, these decisions will determine whetheror not the development really serves the surroundingcommunity, so they are worth fightingfor. A new development may be an unusual—oreven unique—opportunity to bring a valuablebusiness like a bank or supermarket to a lowincomecommunity.The potential benefits toneighborhood residents are immense.Keeping out undesirable businesses can be just asimportant as including desirable ones.Community groups can push for developer commitmentsto exclude businesses that have a trackrecord of labor violations, workplace safety violations,or environmental problems.These criteriacan apply both to contractors hired by the developerand tenants, and to the developer’s selectionof tenants themselves.An ideal policy would prohibit contracting withor leasing to businesses based on specific, independentlyverifiable criteria, such as:■■a current designation by a governmententity that the business is not aresponsible contractor or is not eligiblefor public contracts;recent administrative or judicial findingsthat the business has violated labor orEXAMPLE: THE CIM PROJECT IN SAN JOSECommunity groups advocating aroundthe CIM project, described in AppendixB, obtained the following commitment fromthe developer:■“best efforts to achieve the goal of30% retailers from San Jose, 30%from the region, and 30% nationalto insure an effective and unique mixof retail.”■“a 10% set aside of retail space forexisting small businesses in the downtown.Thedeveloper will be responsiblefor reserving this space for 6months and for aggressively marketingthis opportunity for qualified firms.”The legally binding memorandum settingout developer commitments is attached asAppendix G.Chapter Seven: Other Community Benefits as Part of CBAs |61

■employment law, or legal settlements makingsuch admissions; orrecent citations for violation ofenvironmental laws.If a developer will not commit to absolute limitationson its discretion over contracting or leasing,it may be willing take into account considerationsof business responsibility.While more difficult toenforce, such a commitment will at least get thedeveloper thinking along these lines. Also helpfulare requirements that businesses report on suchviolations, and that the developer report on hismix of tenants from this perspective.The CBA for the Staples project, described inChapter One, used a combination of theseapproaches. See Appendix D, section VIII.Banking Services and Lending AssistanceMost low-income communities lack adequateaccess to banking services, home loans and smallbusiness loans.This stands as a real barrier toEXAMPLES: CHILD CARE FACILITY IN NOHOCOMMONS AND YOUTH CENTER IN SUNQUEST| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects AccountableThe CBA for the NoHo Commons redevelopmentproject, described in ChapterFour, contains the following provisionsregarding an on-site child-care center. Notethat the developer is required both to providespace within the development for the childcare facility, and to ensure that low-incomefamilies will have access to it. In addition,note the implementation role envisioned forthe coalition that negotiated this agreement.Child Care Program and Facility. TheDeveloper agrees to plan an on-site locationfor a child care center and to enterinto a lease agreement with a child careprovider for use of that location as a childcare center. This child care center shalloffer affordable, accessible and qualitychild care for both on-site employees andthe surrounding community. Developer inits lease with the childcare provider shallrequire that a minimum of 50 spaces shallbe made available to very low, low andmoderate-income families. The childcareprovider shall operate the site on an ongoingbasis and shall secure government subsidiesfor families in need.The Developer will work with the ValleyJobs Coalition and the Child Care ResourceCenter to select a quality child careprovider to lease the facility. The qualityand affordability of the child care centerwill be the long-term responsibility of theprovider. The Valley Jobs Coalition willassist the provider in fundraising and otherefforts to maintain the quality and affordabilityof the child care center.The NoHo Commons CBA also required thedeveloper to provide rent-free space for thedevelopment’s first source program.The CBA for the SunQuest Industrial ParkProject, described in Appendix B, requires thedeveloper to build and donate to the City ofLos Angeles a facility suitable for use as ayouth center. Unlike the NoHo Commonschild care facility, the space devoted to theyouth center will not be space within thedevelopment.The SunQuest CBA is availableonline at www.laane.org/ad/cba.html. Notethe heavy community and governmentinvolvement in implementation.62

community-friendly economic development.Improved financial services can benefit individuals,families looking to purchase a home, smallbusinesses, nonprofit affordable housing developers,and other local nonprofits.Many kinds of financial services and assistancewould make good community benefits as part ofa CBA.■■■Lending assistance. CommunityDevelopment Financial Institutions, orCDFIs, make loans that are targeted tocommunities, businesses, and nonprofitsthat are underserved by the traditional forprofitlending market. CDFIs can alsoguarantee loans made by private lenders,and provide technical assistance to loanapplicants. Developers can invest in or lendmoney to CDFIs or similar organizationsthat serve the neighborhoods in whichtheir projects will be located.Homeownership assistance. Developerscan support programs that help lowincomeindividuals to become homeowners,to repair their homes, or to remain intheir homes when at risk of foreclosurebecause of predatory lending.Banking services. Many low-incomecommunities have no banking serviceswhatsoever—not even an ATM. If a developmentis going to include commercialspace, bringing a bank into the communitycan provide a tremendous benefit.Good resources for information on efforts tobring capital and credit to low-income communitiesare the National Community ReinvestmentCoalition (www.ncrc.org), the CaliforniaReinvestment Coalition (www.calreinvest.org),and the Woodstock Institute (www.woodstockinst.org).Worker RetentionSome cities and states have “worker retention”laws, which provide job security to long-termservice workers when city contracts change hands.In addition to protecting workers, these ordinancesalso prevent employers who take over citycontracts from firing existing workers in order to“break” the union that represents those workers.CBAs can include similar protections for employeesworking at a new development.Worker retentionprovisions can apply to the developer’s contractors,tenants’ contractors, or both.They canalso apply to a specific tenants, such as a hotel ora theater.This ensures that the service workers getto keep their jobs even when the specific hotel ortheater operator changes—thus when a hotelchanges management from a Hilton to aSheraton, the hotel’s many service employees arenot thrown out of work. Security services, custodialservices, and the like are also natural fits forworker retention requirements. Section VII of theStaples CBA, attached as Appendix D, includesworker retention provisions covering contractorsand hotel and theater employees.Local Businesses and AffirmativeAction in ContractingPublicly subsidized development projects provideunique opportunities for businesses in lowincomeneighborhoods. Occasionally, laws providethat business opportunities arising in a subsidizeddevelopment be targeted to businesses displacedby the development, or to small businessesin the surrounding neighborhood; HUD’s“Section Three” program requires such efforts insome cases. However, these business opportunitiesare rarely realized.Community groups can use the CBA process torequire efforts to target business opportunities toneighborhood businesses.These efforts can pertainto service contracts (such as security, landscaping,or custodial services), supply contracts, orconstruction contracts. Even a single contract canChapter Seven: Other Community Benefits as Part of CBAs |63

| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects Accountablebump a small local business up from a previouslevel, giving it a track record on a project of largersize. In addition, contract awards to a localbusiness can produce a bigger “multiplier effect,”as locally-owned businesses are more likely tohire local workers and to reinvest profits in thecommunity.While there are some legitimate concernsabout such programs, particularly in theconstruction industry, in many situations businessopportunities will nonetheless be a high priorityfor community advocates.There are a great many models for programs tohelp certain businesses obtain contracts. Hundredsof jurisdictions have had or still maintain affirmativeaction programs in public contracting; manylarge corporations have programs promotingdiversity in contracts they award; and all levels ofgovernment have programs targeting small businessesfor contract awards.Approaches used in these programs vary widely.Many programs use some combination ofrequired elements, such as requirements that businessesawarding contracts must:■■■■■notify local contracting organizations ofcontracting opportunities;assist local businesses in bid preparation;break large contracts down into smallercontracts;make good faith efforts to award contractsto local businesses; andattempt to meet percentage goals for localbusiness awards.Contracting Programs in theConstruction IndustryContracting programs can present special concernsand tensions in the construction industry.The construction industry has unique processesfor hiring workers and for awarding contracts andsubcontracts, making advocacy in this area difficultand specialized.Many small construction contractors do notemploy union workers or pay union wages andbenefits. Building trades and worker advocatesare rightly concerned that contracting programsthat steer work to these contractors will dragdown wages and benefits for workers.Theyargue that providing jobs to community membersis of questionable value if the jobs pay lowwages, provide no employee benefits, and providelittle training.Tensions arise because some representatives oflow-income communities feel that few individualsfrom their communities are involved in theunionized construction referral system.Theyargue that without efforts to involve local businesses,large union contractors will perform theconstruction contracts, and, while wages mightbe good, these wages will be going to currentunion members rather than to workers fromtheir community.These opposing views present a false dichotomy.To the extent that construction contractors inlow-income communities are not union contractors,they can be brought into the union system.Many small construction contractors lackexperience with union referral and pensionsystems, and would benefit from special effortsto bring them in. More union constructioncontractors can only lead to a better qualityof life for workers.Similarly, to the extent that individuals fromlow-income communities are not wellrepresentedin certain construction trades,efforts can be made to bring them into the systemas well. Many labor unions and devotedadvocates have developed creative and successfulprograms to expand union membership inparticular communities.Many of these issues can be resolved throughcooperative efforts and through a combination ofrelated requirements and initiatives. Depending64

on the priorities of community groups and workeradvocates, these may include:■prevailing wage requirements, whichrequire decent wages and benefits and preventcontractors from underbidding eachother by cutting wages;A combination of these approaches may enablesmall local construction contractors to developtheir businesses while maintaining good wagelevels for the project and bringing many newcontractors and workers into the union system.Cooperation and openness by all parties is key.■■■project labor agreements, which establish acommon set of work rules, working conditions,hiring practices and settlement disputemechanisms, usually with the stipulationthat there will be no strikes by theunions or lockouts by management;local contracting programs, accompaniedby assistance to local contractors in complyingwith project wage requirements andnew systems; andefforts to bring community membersinto established union apprenticeshipprograms, including funding for preapprenticeshipprograms.Even if all these efforts are agreed upon, a localconstruction contracting program can be difficultto implement even for a single project. Primecontractors have very close relationships withtheir subcontractors, and are often loath to workwith new ones. Advocates for local constructioncontractors will have the best chance of success ifthey have the developer on board before thedeveloper has selected a prime contractor, so thatthe developer makes sure that the prime contractorit chooses has a real commitment to workwith local businesses.This is an area where thepersonal efforts of key individuals can be morevaluable than the most detailed written policy.LABOR-COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS IN THECONSTRUCTION INDUSTRYThere are several examples around thecountry of creative and effective partnershipsbetween building trades and communityorganizations.The recent, successfulpush for community benefits standards onthe Park East redevelopment project inMilwaukee featured a strong partnershipbetween building trades and various community-basedgroups. For more detail onthe Park East victory, see the conclusionof this handbook.For information on successful labor-communitypartnerships in the constructionindustry, contact:■■■■■John Goldstein, President, MilwaukeeCounty Labor Council, 414-771-7070, aflciojg@execpc.comHouston Drayton, consultant onSeattle-area PLAs, 206-988-5694Martin Trimble,Washington (DC)Interfaith Network, 202-518-0815Amaha Kassa, East Bay Alliance for aSustainable Economy, 510-893-7106Paul Sonn, Brennan Center for Justice(New York), 212-998-6328Also, see generally the High RoadPartnerships Project of the AFL-CIO’sWorking for America Institute (www.workingforamerica.org/highroad/index.htm).Chapter Seven: Other Community Benefits as Part of CBAs |65

EXAMPLE: BUSINESS ASSISTANCE PROGRAMSIN THE LAX CBAThe LAX CBA, described in ChapterOne, includes a range of business assistanceprograms, including thefollowing language:■■targeted outreach within the ProjectImpact Area to Project Impact Areasmall businesses, Project Impact Areadisadvantaged businesses, and relevantbusiness organizations;inclusion of Project Impact Areasmall businesses, Project Impact Areadisadvantaged businesses, andrelevant business organizations inpre-bid conferences;■■■“Meet the General Contractor” meetingsfor Project Impact Area small businessesand disadvantaged businesses;unbundling of construction projectsinto bid sizes that will allow smallbusinesses level competition, withoutrestricting the project timelines;assistance with access to bonding,insurance, procurement and othertypes of capacity-related assistancewhere necessary.These programs will be targeted tominority- and women-owned businessesand small businesses.| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects AccountableService and Supply ContractorsEfforts to assist service and supply contractors areless complex. Developers may be open to usinglocal contractors to provide security and otherservices or supplies related to the development.These ongoing contracts can be excellent opportunitiesfor local businesses. Developers may besomewhat more reluctant to apply contractingrequirements to their tenants, but communitygroups can certainly press on this issue.As with the construction industry, there are concernsthat efforts to assist small, local businessesin obtaining service and supply contracts willlead to lower wages and benefits, as larger businessesoften have better compensation packagesfor their workers. As with construction, however,focused efforts can help bring small businessesinto the union system, providing protectionfor workers while still keeping business opportunitieslocal.All policies assisting local businesses should have aclear limit on the size of the businesses that canbenefit.This limitation will help protect policiesfrom legal challenges. It will also prevent largebusinesses that are part of the new developmentfrom becoming unintended beneficiaries of alocal contracting policy.Just about everything mentioned in this sectionregarding local contracting applies as well toefforts to benefit minority- and woman-ownedbusinesses, with one caveat: there are special legalconcerns related to affirmative action.The limitationson race- and gender-conscious efforts bygovernment are very strict; therefore, the moreclosely the local government is involved in CBAnegotiations, the riskier an affirmative action policybecomes.The legal obstacles are less severe ifthe government is not involved in CBA negotiations,but they still exist. Programs that targetlocal contractors will in many cases achieve thesame important goals of affirmative action programs,with less legal risk.66

Chapter Seven: Other Community Benefits as Part of CBAs |67


Chapter EightMonitoring and Enforcements of CBA CommitmentsCommitments to provide community benefitsoften go unfulfilled. Difficulties in monitoringand enforcement are a widespread problem.CBAs are an attempt to address this problem,both by memorializing developer commitmentsin writing and by enabling community groups toenforce them, rather than having to rely onlocal governments.For a CBA to succeed in this role, communitygroups must pay careful attention during negotiationsto how each community benefit will bemonitored and enforced. For each developercommitment in a CBA, community groupsshould make sure that the CBA contains answersto the following questions:■What is the time frame for the commitmentto be fulfilled?■■■Who will monitor performance?How and when will information on performancebe made available?What will happen if the commitment isnot fulfilled?These are not easy issues to discuss in the contextof negotiations over community benefits. Anemphasis on the details of monitoring andenforcement does not help create a trusting, collaborativeatmosphere during negotiations. Somemonitoring and enforcement provisions are offputtingbecause they are so complex and technical,and they generally require legal expertise.Nonetheless, community groups need to makeeffective monitoring and enforcement provisionsa priority. Developers who resist sensible andeffective monitoring and enforcement systems areChapter Eight: Monitoring and Enforcement of CBA Commitments |69

| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects Accountabledevelopers whose commitments may reasonablybe questioned.Chapter Five contains detailed informationabout monitoring and enforcing targetedhiring programs.Time FrameEvery benefit described in a CBA should have aclearly defined time frame. Many communitybenefits are “front-end” commitments that areintended to be fulfilled as soon as it is clear thatthe development is actually going forward (forexample, financial contributions for improvedneighborhood services). Developers will wantsome assurance that community groups will notattempt to hold them to these commitments ifthe project falls through. Front-end benefitsshould be provided by a date at which it is clearthat the development is moving forward, such asthe date construction commences.Benefits concerning a developer’s selection oftenants should have time frames tied to the datethe developer enters into lease agreements. Agood example of this language is the followingprovision from the “Living Wages” section ofthe NoHo Commons CBA described inChapter Four.B. Coalition Meeting with Prospective Tenants.At least 30 days before signing a lease agreementor other contract for space within theProposed Development, the Developer willarrange and attend a meeting between theCoalition and the prospective Tenant, if theCoalition so requests. At such a meeting, theCoalition and the Developer will discuss withthe prospective Tenant the Living WageIncentive Program and the Health InsuranceTrust Fund, and will assist the Coalition inencouraging participation in these programs. Ifexigent circumstances so require, such a meetingmay occur less than 30 days prior to thesigning of a lease agreement; however, in suchcases the meeting shall be scheduled to occuron the earliest possible date and shall in anyevent occur prior to the signing of the leaseagreement or other contract.Other benefits can be provided only after theproject is built, such as living wages and local hiring.Whilethese benefits generally don’t need aparticular “start date,” developers may want thesebenefits to expire at a certain time—perhaps fiveor ten years from the opening of the development.If community groups agree to such a timelimit, it should be clearly described in the CBA.The CBA itself should have a defined end dateas well.MonitoringCommunity groups should consider how eachbenefit in a CBA will be monitored. Financialcommitments and other one-time benefits areprobably the easiest aspects of a CBA to monitor.Much more challenging are ongoing tenant commitments,such as living wage and local hiringrequirements.The most effective approachesinclude affirmative reporting requirements as wellas the ability to investigate complaints of noncompliance.Required reports should be no less frequentthan once a year, should be publicly available,and should be due by a particular date eachyear.A developer might be required to file withthe city council a report on a year’s wage levelsat the development by April 30 th of the succeedingyear.Tenants can be subject to similar requirements,or can be required to submit informationto the developer in time for the developer’s report.Community groups should not simply rely onreports from the developer and tenants. Reportsneed to be verifiable, and complaints need to beinvestigated.These tasks can be very tricky, how70

ever. Developers and tenants will be reluctant tolet community groups inspect records of theirwages and hiring decisions. But if developersare making a commitment to communitygroups, the community groups need a reliableway to determine whether that commitmentis being fulfilled.One possible compromise is to empower localgovernment officials to verify reports and/orinvestigate complaints. If the CBA has been foldedinto a development agreement, then the developer’scommitments have been made to the localgovernment as well, and a governmental monitoringrole is a natural fit.This approach is difficult(or in some cases impossible) if the CBA isnot part of a development agreement. In addition,community groups will always prefer theability to monitor performance themselves, ratherthan having to rely on the local government.Thisapproach may be a workable compromise on adifficult issue, however.There is no one-size-fits-all approach to monitoringcommunity benefits. However the detailsplay out, community groups should never settlefor a monitoring system where performancereports are not verifiable by anyone.This is anarea that will benefit from creative approachesand collaborative problem-solving during thenegotiation process.Enforcement by community groupsCommunity groups entering into CBAs can andshould have the ability to enforce CBAs againstthe developer in court.While most contracts havesome provisions for recovery of money damagesagainst a party violating the agreement, communitygroups will generally be more concernedwith ensuring that promised benefits are in factLEGAL ISSUE: CHAINS OF CONTRACTSLawyers drafting a CBA need to pay particularattention to language in the CBA thatwill bind parties other than the developer:developer’s contractors and tenants, varioussubcontractors, entities to whom the developersells land, and so forth. Making sure thatlegal requirements bind these entities can becomplex, as there may be a lengthy chain ofcontracts involved.Take the example of a CBA that includesmandatory living wage provisions covering allbusinesses working at the development.Thechain of contracts might work as follows: thecommunity groups enter into a CBA with thedeveloper, which enters into a lease agreementwith a tenant, which hires a contractor to providecustodial services, which hires a subcontractorto perform a particular task, whichhires the employees whose wages are at issue.If community groups hope to require thatsubcontractor to pay a certain wage to itsemployees, then the CBA needs to containdetailed and well-thought-out language makingsure that responsibilities move down thechain of contracts and bind the subcontractor.The CBA needs to set up a system whereby(1) each business is informed of and agrees tothe substantive requirements that apply to it,(2) each business agrees that it will includethese requirements in other contracts it entersinto, and (3) each business agrees that communitygroups, the local government, or affectedindividuals can enforce the requirements.The CBA needs to provide strict penalties forbusinesses that fail to do this. Any break in thecontractual “chain” will make CBA requirementsunenforceable against some businessesworking in the development.Chapter Eight: Monitoring and Enforcement of CBA Commitments |71

| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects Accountableprovided. Community groups should thereforeensure that CBAs recognize the right to ask for acourt order requiring the developer to honorcommitments contained in the CBA.It is a little trickier for community groups tomaintain the ability to directly enforce CBAcommitments on tenants and contractors of adevelopment. (See box on Legal Issue: Chains ofContracts.) Developers may be resistant to askingtheir tenants and contractors to open themselvesup to lawsuits by community groups. However, ifthe developer is really agreeing to impose thesecommitments on tenants and contractors, thereneeds to be a way for community groups toenforce them.The only alternative to direct enforcementagainst the tenants and contractors is to make thedeveloper responsible for the behavior of tenantsand contractors. Again, CBAs should be clear thatthe developer is subject to court orders to fulfillits commitments and cannot escape by payingmoney damages. All these enforcement issuesrequire close attention from an attorney trustedby community groups.Enforcement by Local GovernmentRequirements of a CBA should usually becomepart of a development agreement with the localjurisdiction providing the subsidy. If the localjurisdiction intends to provide the subsidy withoutany written agreement with the developer,community groups should encourage the jurisdictionto initiate one.Inclusion of a CBA in the developmentagreement greatly assists in the enforcementof the CBA.While community groups shouldcertainly ensure that they can directly enforce thedeveloper’s commitments, the threat of governmentenforcement may be much more powerfulto a developer. Development agreements generallycontemplate a wide variety of enforcementmeasures, and cities have the experience andresources necessary to take thesemeasures—when they have the politicalinclination to do so.In addition, government may be able to foldenforcement of some community benefits intoexisting administrative systems. For example, if acity has a living wage policy, making living wagecommitments in a CBA enforceable through thecity’s administrative system is an obvious step.Ideally this can be a system where affected individuals,such as workers in the development, cantake complaints of noncompliance.The only community benefits that generallyshould not become part of a development agreementare those for which there are clear restrictionson local governmental action, such as “cardcheck” agreements and affirmative action programs;community groups have wider flexibilitythan local governments in entering into contractsin these areas.On all issues, however, community groups signingCBAs should embrace their ability to enforcedeveloper commitments.The core principle of aCBA is that each side’s commitments are legallyenforceable by the other side. Community groupssigning a CBA thus have the legal power torequire the developer to provide the communitybenefits as described in the CBA, and carefuldrafting will make this possibility more than anabstract one.CBAs should contain some correction period,allowing each party a chance to correct problemsonce put on notice. In addition, CBAs shouldcontain some dispute-resolution system, givingparties an ability to come together and work outsolutions, thereby avoiding litigation. Courtaction or arbitration is an important last-resortenforcement option, however.Hopefully, it will be a rare case where community-basedorganizations actually need to take legalaction because a developer violates a CBA. Opencommunication and good-faith efforts to workout problems—backed by the ability to take legalaction if necessary—should solve most CBAcompliance issues.72

Chapter Eight: Monitoring and Enforcement of CBA Commitments |73


ConclusionChanging the ParadigmAs effective as community groups have been innegotiating recent CBAs, project-by-projectnegotiations are not an ideal approach.Community groups should not have to identifyupcoming projects, mobilize coalitions, and fightthe same battles over and over again. In the longrun, such an approach is too resource-intensive tobe effective for anything but the largest and mostprominent development projects. Many smallersubsidized projects will inevitably go forwardwithout appropriate community involvement.The goal of the community benefits movement isto avoid this situation by changing the paradigmof land use planning for large, publicly-subsidizedprojects or those requiring major land useapprovals. Results of this change will take manyconcrete forms: citywide policies providing minimumstandards for certain projects; changes inland use planning documents, like general plans,to require analysis of economic effects of land usedecisions; ordinances requiring close scrutiny ofhigh-impact big-box stores; and an expectationthat certain large, prominent, heavily subsidizedprojects will have a CBA.Community benefits advocates should remainoutcome-oriented.While this handbook describesan approach that has worked in many situations,the strength of this approach is its adaptability.Aspects of it that work in a given situation shouldbe used, and aspects that don’t should be jettisoned.Every community is different: in needs, inpolitics, in development opportunities, in strengthand cohesiveness of community organizations.The CBAs described in this handbook came outof determined yet flexible advocacy; throughflexibility and creativity, the determined advocatesaround the country will further develop thisapproach and craft new techniques as well.Conclusion: Changing the Paradigm |75

| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects AccountablePARK EAST REDEVELOPMENT COMPACTAbroad coalition of labor and communityadvocates, the Good Jobs and LivableNeighborhoods Coalition, recently won atremendous victory in Milwaukee. For twoyears, the Coalition has been pressing forstrong community benefits standards for thedowntown redevelopment of the Park Eastcorridor. In 2004 the County Board passeda legally binding resolution establishing arange of community benefits requirementsfor the series of redevelopment projects thatwill reshape downtown Milwaukee in comingyears.The resolution, known as the ParkEast Redevelopment Compact, sets out thefollowing requirements for covered projects:■■■■employer participation in a Countyassistedlocal hiring plan;prevailing wages for constructionworkers;additional apprenticeship andtraining requirements forconstruction employment;a 20% affordable housingrequirement;■■■■selection of developers shall take intoaccount the broad economic implicationsof the proposals, including jobsand tax base, and RFPs shall requiredevelopers to address those issues;County policies to assist disadvantagedbusiness enterprises will applyto Park East redevelopment projects;consideration of green space andgreen design principles in evaluationof RFPs; anda standing Community AdvisoryCommittee to advise the Countyon implementation of theserequirements.This range of principles and requirements,applicable to a series of large future redevelopmentprojects, is a perfect example ofincorporation of community benefits principlesinto land use planning.The campaignfor this project is also noteworthy in that itfeatured a close and effective collaborationbetween community groups and buildingtrades.The broad coalition included the followinggroups:76

■9 to 5 National Association ofWorking Women■ AFSCME District Council 48■ AFT Local 212■■■■■■■■■■■■Arlington Court ResidentOrganizationArms Around Amani NeighborhoodAssociationCommunity AdvocatesGreat Waters Group of theSierra ClubHarambee Ombudsman Project, Inc.Hillside Neighborhood ResidentsCouncilInstitute for Wisconsin’s FutureInterfaith Conference of GreaterMilwaukeeMetro Milwaukee Fair HousingCouncilMICAHMilwaukee County Labor CouncilNorthcott NeighborhoodHouse, Inc.■ Painters Local 781■■St. Benedict Community MealSt. Benedict the Moor CatholicChurch■ United Auto Workers Local 469■■■■■■United Lodge 66, Machinists UnionUrban UndergroundWisconsin Citizen ActionWisconsin Council on Children andFamiliesWisconsin Federation of Nurses andHealth ProfessionalsWomen and Poverty PublicEducation InitiativeFor more information on the Park East victory,see the web site of the Institute forWisconsin’s Future,www.wisconsinsfuture.org, or contact JohnGoldstein, President, Milwaukee CountyLabor Council, 414-771-7070,aflciojg@execpc.com. See Appendix A forinformation on Coalition advocacy duringinitial implementation of the Park EastRedevelopment Compact.Conclusion: Changing the Paradigm |77

MEASURING BROADER IMPACTS| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects AccountableSeveral communities have recentlymoved to change their land-use planningprocesses to require a formal assessmentof a wide range of impacts of proposedprojects. Environmental impactreports are a crucial tool, but, with narrowexceptions, their scope is necessarily limitedto environmental issues.The impacts of anylarge development are much broader thanthat, of course.Large developments always have substantialsocial and economic impacts in many areas,including type and quality of jobs, availabilityand cost of goods and services, publicfinances and tax base, economic climate forsurrounding businesses, jobs/housing balance,smart growth principles, and publicsafety. A large development could obviouslyhave positive or negative impacts in mostor all of these areas.Because most planning processes do notinclude formal consideration of these widerangingimpacts, community benefits advocateshave proposed changes, and severalgovernment entities have responded:■■The Los Angeles CommunityRedevelopment Agency requirespreparation of a “community contextreport” for certain projects, lookingat a wide range of impacts.■The city of Los Angeles recentlypassed an ordinance requiring developerswho propose to bring in certaintypes of “big box” stores to payfor formal assessments of the economicimpacts the stores.The assessmentsmust evaluate such factors aspotential business, housing, and openspace displacement; impact on cityrevenues; creation of blight; job creationor loss; and access to low-costgoods. Information on the ordinanceis available atwww.www.laane.org/ad/superstores.html.Thetext of the ordinanceis available at www.laane.org/ad/superstores.html.The city of Sacramento recentlypassed a “superstores” ordinancerequiring an assessment similar tothat required in Los Angeles.Advocates have generally proposed thesetypes of policies only for projects over acertain size or type, or that receive a publicsubsidy over a certain amount. Bothmembers of the public and governmentdecisionmakers will benefit fromformal consideration of a wide range ofproject impacts.In addition to project-specific impactassessment policies, some advocates havepushed for consideration of economicimpacts of land use decisions at the “generalplan” level—general plans are the basicland use planning documents in most cities.San Diego is currently considering additionof an “Economic Prosperity Element” to itsgeneral plan. Appendix H contains thecity’s current draft of this language.Contact: Donald Cohen, Center on PolicyInitiatives, 619-584-5744,dcohen@onlinecpi.org.78

Following are some of the benchmarks we’ll belooking for over the next few years:■■■■■■an increasing number of local and statepublic officials who advocate for communitybenefits and are willing to speak to theirpeers in other cities;more CBAs won for specific developments;more RFPs and RFQs issued by publicagencies requiring applicants to include arange of community benefits in their proposals;more development projects for which thepublic entity maintains a revenue streamdedicated for community benefits;new policies requiring certain minimumstandards for subsidized projects, like localhiring or living wages;new policies requiring measurement ofa wide range of impacts of proposeddevelopments;■■an increasing number of redevelopmentplans, specific plans, and other public landuse planning documents that reflect communitybenefits principles; andan increase in media awareness of communitybenefits issues and coverage of communitybenefits campaigns.We strongly encourage advocates throughout thecountry to be creative in designing and implementinga community benefits agenda in theirown communities. Please contact us for assistancewe can provide in developing your campaigns.The experience in California—and the burgeoningcommunity benefits movement throughoutthe country—demonstrate that in the right circumstances,determined organizing and strategicadvocacy can help publicly subsidized developmentprojects deliver tremendous benefits toaffected communities.Conclusion: Changing the Paradigm |79


About the AuthorsJulian GrossLegal DirectorCalifornia Partnership for Working Families870 Market Street, Suite 915,San Francisco, CA 94102415-544-9944www.juliangross.netJulian Gross is a civil rights attorney and is thelegal director of the California Partnership forWorking Families. He works with the CPWFanchor organizations on their community benefitsinitiatives, and is a resource to advocatesaround the country on legal aspects of this work.Julian represented LAANE and other community-basedorganizations in negotiating the LosAngeles CBAs described in this article. He hasdrafted numerous local hiring and contractingpolicies, and has worked on living wage policiesand many other community economic developmentinitiatives.Julian also runs a small law office in SanFrancisco, working with nonprofits and governmententities on issues of social and economicjustice, and assisting nonprofits with organizationalneeds. He has an extensive background inemployment law, community economic developmentstrategies, affirmative action, anti-discriminationlaw, and organizational issues relevant tononprofits. Prior to entering private practice,Julian was a Skadden Fellow and a ProjectAttorney at the Employment Law Center / LegalAid Society of San Francisco, litigating affirmativeaction, civil rights, and employment discriminationcases. Julian provides technical assistance tograntees of the McKay Foundation.About the Authors |81

| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects AccountableGreg LeRoyGood Jobs First1311 L Street NW,Washington, DC 20005202-626-3780goodjobs@goodjobsfirst.orgwww.goodjobsfirst.orgDubbed “the nation’s leading watchdog on stateand local economic development subsidies,” GregLeRoy founded and directs Good Jobs First. Heis the author of the 1994 book No More CandyStore: States and Cities Making Job SubsidiesAccountable (the first national compilation ofaccountability safeguards), and 1998 winner ofthe Public Interest Pioneer Award of the SternFamily Fund. Greg has been writing, training andconsulting on economic development issues morethan 20 years for state and local governments,labor-management committees, unions, communitygroups, and development associations. GoodJobs First is a national resource center promotingcorporate and government accountability in economicdevelopment; it provides research, training,model publications, consulting, and testimony tograssroots groups and public officials seeking toensure that subsidized businesses provide familywagejobs and other effective results.Madeline Janis-AparicioLos Angeles Alliance for a New Economy464 Lucas Ave,Los Angeles, CA 90017213-486-9880info@laane.orgwww.laane.orgMadeline Janis-Aparicio is co-founder and executivedirector of the Los Angeles Alliance for aNew Economy. In 2002, she was appointed byLos Angeles Mayor James Hahn as a volunteercommissioner to the board of the city’sCommunity Redevelopment Agency, the country’slargest such agency.Ms. Janis-Aparicio led the historic campaign topass L.A.’s living wage ordinance, which has sincebecome a national model. Over the past six years,she has provided training and assistance to livingwage coalitions in more than 20 cities across thecountry, and is widely regarded as an innovatorin the fight against working poverty. She serveson the boards of directors of Good Jobs First,the California Partnership for WorkingFamilies, Clergy and Laity United for EconomicJustice, and the Phoenix Fund for Workersand Communities, a project of the NewWorld Foundation.LAANE and Ms. Janis-Aparicio have receivedmany honors, including the UCLA LawSchool’s Antonia Hernandez Public InterestAward and the Los Angeles Roman CatholicArchdiocese’s Empowerment Award, awards fromthe Liberty Hill Foundation and Office of theAmericas, and numerous commendations fromthe Los Angeles City Council and the CaliforniaAssembly and Senate.Prior to founding LAANE, Ms. Janis-Aparicioserved as executive director of the CentralAmerican Refugee Center (CARECEN) from1989 to 1993, where she helped lead a successfulcampaign to legalize and regulate the activities ofthe mostly Latino immigrant sidewalk vendors.During this time, she also headed efforts to combatcivil rights abuses of Central American immigrantsby the L.A. Police Department and theImmigration and Naturalization Service, andhelped tens of thousands of Central Americanimmigrants achieve legal immigrant status.Before joining CARECEN, Ms. Janis-Aparicio,an attorney, represented tenants and homelesspeople in slum housing litigation, and advocatedfor homeless disabled people who had beendenied government benefits. She also workedfor two years at the law firm of Latham &Watkins on commercial litigation and land usematters, representing many large companiesthroughout Los Angeles. She received degreesfrom UCLA Law School and Amherst Collegein Massachusetts.82

About the Authors |83


Appendix ACurrent Community Benefits CampaignsFollowing is a list of some of the many communitybenefits campaigns in progress.This list is notintended to be exclusive; any attempt at a comprehensivelist would rapidly fall out of date.Wehope instead to simply give an idea of the widerange of campaigns going on around the countryat time of writing.Berkeley & Oakland, CaliforniaThe East Bay Alliance for a Sustainable Economy isworking with a coalition of labor and communitygroups to win a CBA for a proposed University ofCalifornia development that includes a full-servicehotel and conference center.The coalition is callingfor union construction, union hotel jobs at a livingwage, money for affordable housing and an affordablechildcare linkage fee. EBASE successfully campaignedfor a vote in favor of these principles fromthe City Council of Berkeley, where the UC projectwill be located.EBASE is also leading a campaign to win communitybenefits from the massive redevelopment of theformer Army base in West Oakland, includingensuring that a “community fund” promised to residentsis fully funded and that the project meetscommunity needs for living wage jobs and affordablehousing.Contact: Amaha KassaEBASE510-893-7106, x. 12amaha@workingeastbay.org.Denver, ColoradoDenver’s redevelopment agency is consideringgranting a public subsidy to the developer of alarge, multi-use redevelopment project on the site ofthe historic Gates Rubber Factory. A coalition oflabor unions and community groups, coordinatedby the Front Range Economic Strategy Center, isnegotiating a CBA with the developer.The coalitionis pressing the redevelopment agency forAppendix A: Current Community Benefits Campaigns |85

| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects Accountableimprovements in the project and increased communitybenefits, given the large amount of taxpayermoney to be spent.While negotiations over thebulk of the project continue, the coalition—knownas the Campaign for Responsible Development—entered into an enforceable memorandum ofunderstanding with the developer, under which thecoalition agreed to support a requested zoningchange, and the developer agreed to keep certainbig-box stores out of the area.Contact: Chris NevittFront Range Economic Strategy Center303-477-6111, x. 14Los Angeles, CaliforniaAdams/LaBrea Project: In 2003 LAANE helpedorganized a community effort that successfullyreopened the public process for a development thatwould have destroyed dozens of homes. LAANE isnow working with the Adams-La BreaNeighborhood Committee for AccountableDevelopment—a grassroots organization of neighborhoodresidents—to ensure that theAdams/LaBrea Redevelopment Project meets theneeds of the community.Thanks to this advocacy,the revised RFP for this project contains basic communitybenefits principles, which may become partof a CBA with the selected developer.The RFP,developer responses, and other information aboutthis project are available at the CommunityRedevelopment Agency’s web site,www.lacity.org/cra/adamslabrea/index.htm.Grand Avenue Project: The Grand AvenueRedevelopment Project will be an enormous developmentcentered around Los Angeles’ major musicalvenues—the Disney Hall and Dorothy ChandlerPavilion—near City Hall.The project will includehotels, offices, housing, retail, and a park, mostly onpublic land. LAANE has been working with theFigueroa Corridor Coalition for Economic Justiceto advocate for a CBA and to ensure that communitybenefits are incorporated in the developmentagreement between the City and the developer.TheCRA’s living wage policy will require that everyjob at the project be a living wage job. In addition,at least 20% of the housing units will be affordable,and an existing park will be rehabilitated to make itmore accessible to the community. FCCEJ will pressfor deeper affordability levels, and local hiring andjob training commitments.Contact: Roxana TynanLAANE213-486-9880, x. 136rtynan@laane.orgMiami, FloridaThe Miami Workers Center is advocating for aCBA for the 7th Avenue Passenger Service Center,a transit hub development that would serve the predominantlyAfrican-American neighborhood ofLiberty City.The project is slated to receive up to$35 million in subsidies. Miami Workers Center isseeking to influence the RFP for the project so thatthe community receives low-income housing andvarious community services.Contact: Sushma ShethMiami Workers Center305-759-8717 xt. 1004sushma@theworkerscenter.org.Milwaukee, WisconsinThe Good Jobs and Livable NeighborhoodsCoalition is working on initial implementationissues for the Park East Redevelopment Compact,described in the conclusion of this handbook.Despite opponents’ claims that the community benefitsrequirements would rule out developer interestin projects in the Park East Corridor, there are atleast six different proposals in the works for the firstparcel for sale under the new requirements.TheCoalition is advocating for selection of a projectthat will provide the maximum beneficial impact onsurrounding communities.Contact: John GoldsteinMilwaukee County Labor Council414-771-7070aflciojg@execpc.com86

San Diego, CaliforniaThe city of San Diego is considering adopting an“Economic Prosperity Element” to include in itsgeneral plan. (General plans establish legally bindinglong-range plans for a community’s growth anddevelopment.) The Center on Policy Initiatives hasbeen advocating for this change, which would formallybring several community benefits principlesinto the city’s land use planning process. As currentlydrafted, this new element discusses income distributionand the connection between land use decisionsand the local economy.This sophisticated documentis attached as Appendix H.In addition, San Diego is updating its basic land useplanning documents for its continued redevelopmentof the city’s downtown.The Center on PolicyInitiatives is working with a broad coalition, ACommunity Coalition for ResponsibleDevelopment (ACCORD), to encourage the city torequire a range of community benefits standards andprocedures for future downtown redevelopmentprojects. Proposed policies include responsible contracting,wage and health care requirements,increased funding for affordable housing, andvarious environmental standards.The Coalition isalso advocating for use of a “Community EconomicBenefits Assessment” tool to encourage selectionof projects that have a positive overalleconomic impact.Contact: Donald CohenCenter on Policy Initiatives619-584-5744dcohen@onlinecpi.orgSan Jose, CaliforniaThe proposed Coyote Valley development project inSan Jose requires enactment of a “specific plan,” acrucial land use document, setting out the scope ofthe development and the subsidies it will entail.Thedevelopment is slated to create over 25,000 housingunits and more than 50,000 jobs in the San Joseregion.Working Partnerships is a working memberof the Coyote Valley Specific Plan Task Force.Working Partnerships is seeking a 20% set-aside foraffordable housing units, as well as construction oftwo new health care clinics to serve the expected80,000 new residents.This process provides anopportunity for community benefits issues to beaddressed during early stages of land use planning,along with the traditional traffic andenvironmental issues.Also in San Jose,Working Partnerships is advocatingfor a citywide policy on community benefits for subsidizedprojects.The policy would require a widerangingimpacts assessment, and would set certainrecommended levels of community benefits based onthe results of the impacts assessment.The San JoseCity Council and Redevelopment Agency are slatedto consider enactment of the policy this year.Contact: Sarah MullerWorking Partnerships U.S.A.408-445-4574smuller@atwork.orgNew Haven, ConnecticutIn November 2004, the Yale University MedicalSchool’s announced plans to construct a new $430million cancer center, which will be a 14-story,comprehensive clinical cancer care center.The universityprojects that the project will create 400 newpermanent positions and 350 construction jobs.Theproject is to be completed by fall 2008, and is likelyto receive federal, state, and local subsidies.TheConnecticut Center for a New Economy is leadinga coalition advocating for a community benefitsagreement for the project, including a range ofcommunity benefits. Last summer the city’sBoard of Aldermen passed a resolution “stronglyurging” the university to enter into communitybenefits negotiations.Contact: Andrea van den HeeverConnecticut Center for a New Economy203-785-9494 x. 269andrea@ctneweconomy.orgAppendix A: Current Community Benefits Campaigns |87

Appendix BPast Community Benefits Agreements| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects AccountableFollowing is a brief overview of some successfulnegotiations of Community Benefits Agreements,and the current status of the projects.LAX CBA:This recent, landmark CBA is described in detailin a box in Chapter One.The text of the CBAand detailed information about the campaign isavailable online at www.laane.org/lax/cba.html.Hollywood & Vine CBA:In early 2004, a coalition of community-basedorganizations entered into a CBA for this large,mixed-use development project on one of themost prominent intersections in Hollywood.TheCBA requires the developer to:■take specified steps to achieve a 70% livingwage goal;■■■■require employers in the development tohire through a first source hiring policy;increase the number of affordable housingunits in the development, with specifiedportions of the affordable units reserved fortenants of varying income levels;provide $150,000 for area job training programs;andprovide $30,000 of seed funding for ahealth care access outreach program.The CBA will be incorporated into the dispositionand development agreement for the project.Construction is slated to begin in 2005.CIM Project CBA:A broad coalition of service employees’ unions,building trades, small businesses, environmentaladvocates, neighborhood groups, and child care88

advocates obtained the following commitments inthe 2003 amended development agreement forthis $140 million multi-use project in San Jose.The project is receiving a subsidy of about $40million from San Jose’s redevelopment agency.■■■■■■living wages for employees of the development’sparking garage;a project labor agreement for the constructionof the project;increased affordable-housing requirements;guaranteed space in the development forsmall businesses, and a marketing programto make local small businesses aware ofproject opportunities;a commitment to work toward low-costspace for a child-care center; anda commitment to seek living wage jobs if agrocery store, department store, or hotelbecomes part of the project.Appendix G is a memorandum that sets out mostof these commitments and that became a legallybinding attachment to the project’s developmentagreement.The community benefits commitmentsare explicitly enforceable by the Coalitionunder the legal status of a designated “third-partybeneficiary.”The project is under construction atthis time.Marlton Square CBA:In 2002, a coalition of community-based organizationsentered into a CBA with the developer ofthis $123 million retail and housing redevelopmentproject in Los Angeles.The CBA includeddeveloper commitments to:■■dedicate space within the development fora community services facility, such as acommunity center, youth center, or jobtraining center, according to needs asdetermined through a community process;require employers in the development■to hire through a first source hiringpolicy; andtake specified steps to achieve a 70% livingwage goal.The CBA was incorporated into the masteragreement the developer signed with the city.Construction has not yet begun on the project.The Staples CBA:This noteworthy 2001 CBA is described in detailin Chapter One. Implementation experience forthis CBA is covered in Chapter Three.The StaplesCBA is included in its entirety as Appendix D.ALos Angeles Times article on the deal is includedas Appendix E.NoHo Commons CBA:In 2001, the Valley Jobs Coalition entered into aCBA with the developer of this residential, retail,and office project in North Hollywood, a lowincomearea of Los Angeles.The project willreceive over $31 million in public subsidies andloans.The CBA is enforceable by the Coalition,and includes the following commitments:■■■■■a 75% living wage commitment foremployment in the development, withconcrete steps to be taken toward achievementof this commitment and monetarypenalties if the commitment is not met;on-site space for a child care center, withat least 50 spaces reserved for very-low,low, and moderate-income families;establishment of a first source hiring systemfor employers in the development,including rent-free space for staffing thereferral system;a system for tailoring job training to needsof employers in the development;seed money for a job training program forday laborers; andAppendix B: Past Community Benefits Agreements |89

| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects Accountable■developer and contractor compliance withcity worker retention and responsible contractingpolicies.The Living Wage provisions in this CBA aredescribed in Chapter Four, and are included asAppendix F.The CBA was incorporated into theLos Angeles Community Redevelopment Agency’sdisposition and development agreement with thedeveloper, so it is enforceable by the Agency.Regular implementation meetings on local hiringare occurring, and the developer provided seedmoney for the day laborers’ job training programon schedule. Construction is underway.SunQuest Industrial Park CBA:The SunQuest Industrial Park is a 33-acre industrialproject to planned for Los Angeles’ SanFernando Valley.The project relied on the sale ofcity-owned land, and benefitted from a city commitmentto clean up toxic wastes at the developmentsite. A CBA for the project was signed inOctober 2001 by the developer and by the ValleyJobs Coalition, a coalition of community groupsled during negotiations by LAANE. Benefits containedin the CBA include:■■limitations on truck traffic andtruck idling;a process for community review of designof the development, and commitmentsfrom the developer regarding certain environmentallyfriendly design components;■■■■■$150,000 from the developer toward aneighborhood improvement fund;funding for arts programs in local schools;4,000 square feet of indoor space and10,000 square feet of outdoor space for ayouth center;a goal of 70% living wage jobs at thedevelopment, and specified efforts tomeet that goal;a first source hiring policy covering allemployers at the development.The developer is still negotiating terms of its dealwith the City of Los Angeles, so the project hasnot moved forward yet. If and when it does, CBArequirements will be in force.Hollywood & Highland:In 1997, a coalition of community-based organizationsand leaders, labor unions, and clergypressed for greater community benefits as part ofthis high-profile hotel and retail redevelopmentproject in the heart of Hollywood. Half of the2,000 jobs at the development are either livingwage or union, as a direct result of this organizingeffort.The coalition also pressed for a detailedlocal hiring policy covering both hotel and retailjobs; this policy has been implemented very successfully,and is often looked at as a model firstsource program.90

Appendix CArticle on CBAs from Wall Street Journal’sReal Estate JournalThe Wall Street Journal’s Real Estate JournalDecember 15, 2004----------------------------------------------Residents Have Their Say On LAXExpansion PlansBy SHEILA MUTOIn the latest sign of the growing coordinationamong social groups and the sway they are havingon development projects, the city of Los Angeleshas agreed to pay nearly $500 million to provideenvironmental mitigation and jobs-related benefitsprograms to the neighborhoods affected byplans to upgrade and expand the Los AngelesInternational Airport.As expected, the Los Angeles City Council yesterdayapproved the agreement struck betweenthe Los Angeles World Airports, the city departmentthat owns and operates the Los AngelesInternational Airport and three other airports inSouthern California, and a 22-member coalitionof environmental, neighborhood, labor, social andreligious groups and two school districts.The legally-binding accord includes measures tosoundproof schools and homes in the airportarea, set up opportunities for businesses and residentsin the impacted area to get aviation and airport-relatedwork, study the impact of the airport'soperations on the health of nearby residents,and boost funding to reduce airport noise,emissions and traffic.The Los Angeles WorldAirports will fund the measures outlined in theagreement. In return, the coalition has promisednot to sue the city over its $11 billion plan toupgrade and expand the airport."It was in our best interest to negotiate ratherthan litigate," says Daniel Tabor, one of the leadnegotiators of the agreement and a resident ofInglewood, Calif., one of the cities affected byoperations at the airport. "The coalition gavestanding and a seat at the table for people whofor years have been complaining about the nega-Appendix C: Wall Street Journal’s Real Estate Journal Article About Staples CBA |91

tive impacts of the airport and have opposed pastairport-expansion plans," he says.know about these projects in advance. Once theshovels hit the ground, it's too late."| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects Accountable92The airport accord is the latest in a growingnumber of so-called community-benefits agreements.Theconcept was pioneered in Los Angelesby the nonprofit Los Angeles Alliance for a NewEconomy to allow local residents and groups tohave a say in shaping a major development project,press for benefits from the project and mitigateits harmful effects.The concessions typicallyare granted in exchange for pledges from thegroups that are parties to the agreement not tofile lawsuits or otherwise stand in the way of thedevelopment proceeding. Efforts to hammer outsuch agreements between residents and developersor public agencies are underway from NewYork to Seattle.In New York, a group of neighborhood, civic andbusiness leaders are pressing Columbia Universityto help create low-income housing in the WestHarlem area where the university has proposed toexpand. In Seattle, a public-interest coalition isnegotiating with city officials and representativesof Vulcan Inc., billionaire Paul Allen's company,which is seeking to develop an area north ofdowntown into a biotechnology hub, to addressaffordable-housing, transportation, job and environmentalissues.At least a dozen such agreements are in the worksin the U.S., according to Madeline Janis-Aparicio,executive director of Los Angeles Alliance for aNew Economy (LAANE). "It's a relatively newmovement to reshape the nature of land use andeconomic development," she says. "It's at its mostadvanced stage in Los Angeles because that'swhere we came up with it."The key to working out community-benefitagreements, "is keeping communities, residentsand organizations informed to be able to participatein a serious way in the process," says Ms.Janis-Aparicio. "They need to understand howdecisions are made, how land use and economicdevelopment works in the area, and they need toSo far, LAANE has been involved with negotiatingcommunity-benefits agreements stemmingfrom about half a dozen development projects. In2001, the nonprofit was part of a coalition of 25community groups and five unions that reached a$70 million agreement with the developer of afour-million-square-foot expansion of the StaplesCenter in downtown Los Angeles, which includedplans to develop two hotels, shops, restaurants,housing and expand the Los AngelesConvention Center.At the time, many residents in the area felt theyhad been left out of the planning process whenthe Staples Center arena was built in 1999.Seeking a role in the expansion plan, the coalitiongroups banded together and negotiated anagreement with the Los Angeles Arena Land Co.,a company owned by Philip Anschutz andRupert Murdoch, to give local residents first shotat jobs created by the project, guarantee that 70%of the jobs created by the project pay a livingwage of $10.04 an hour without health benefitsand $8.79 with benefits, and provide $1 millionfor a park, among other things.Most of the $500 million allocated by the LosAngeles airport accord will go toward noiseabatement and job training.The accord requiresthe Los Angeles World Airports to spend $15 millionover a five-year period on training residentsof Inglewood and Lennox and other communitiesaffected by the airport upgrade-and-expansionplan for aviation- and airport-related jobs.Residents will also be given the first shot at airportjobs.The Inglewood and Lennox school districtswill receive $229 million over 10 years tosoundproof schools, most of which have simplyboarded up classroom windows to suppress thenoise from airplanes taking off and landing. A littlemore than $43 million over a five-year periodwill go to soundproofing homes in theaffected areas.

"None of the organizations in the coalition aregetting money from this agreement," says JerilynLópez Mendoza, policy director of the LosAngeles office of Environmental Defense, a NewYork-based nonprofit that is a member of thecoalition. "The money is going directly to themitigation programs and job programs."Los Angeles World Airports will pay for thesemeasures through bonds, reserves, concessions andparking revenues, passenger charges, airline landingfees and terminal rents, according to anagency spokesman.The agreement must still passmuster with the Federal Aviation Administration,since the city is seeking to use airport revenues tofund the measures."We feel very good about the agreement," saysJim Ritchie, deputy executive director of longrangeplanning at the Los Angeles World Airports,who was involved with negotiations on theagreement. He says the FAA was briefed on theagreement, which was "well received," althoughthe FAA gave no formal indication of whether itwill approve the agreement. "Here we were," saysMr. Ritchie, "a team of airport personnel andtypical opponents coming together with anapproach, rather than waiting for litigation andthe same groups appearing in court."-- Ms. Muto is a national real-estate writer for The WallStreet Journal. Her "Bricks & Mortar" column appears mostWednesdays exclusively on RealEstateJournal. She is basedin the Journal's San Francisco bureau.Appendix C: Wall Street Journal’s Real Estate Journal Article About Staples CBA |93

Appendix DStaples CBA| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects AccountableFollowing is the “Community BenefitsProgram” for the Staples CBA, signed inMay of 2001, and discussed in detail inChapters One and Three.The parties alsosigned a “Cooperation Agreement,” layingout technical legal responsibilities; allcommunity benefits are set forth in thefollowing CBA, however. A Los AngelesTimes article on the deal is included asAppendix E.94

ATTACHMENT ACOMMUNITY BENEFITS PROGRAMI. PURPOSEThe purpose of this Community Benefits Program for the Los Angeles Sports andEntertainment District Project is to provide for a coordinated effort between the Coalition and theDeveloper to maximize the benefits of the Project to the Figueroa Corridor community. ThisCommunity Benefits Program is agreed to by the Parties in connection with, and as a result of,the Cooperation Agreement to which it is attached. This Community Benefits Program willprovide publicly accessible park space, open space, and recreational facilities; target employmentopportunities to residents in the vicinity of the Figueroa Corridor; provide permanent affordablehousing; provide basic services needed by the Figueroa Corridor community; and address issuesof traffic, parking, and public safety.II.DEFINITIONSAs used in this Community Benefits Program, the following capitalized termsshall have the following meanings. All definitions include both the singular and plural form.Any capitalized terms not specifically defined in this Attachment A shall have the meanings asset forth in the Settlement Agreement.of Los Angeles.“Agency” shall mean the Community Redevelopment Agency of the City“City” shall mean the City of Los Angeles.Agreement.“Coalition” shall have the meaning set forth in the Cooperation“Contractor” shall mean a prime contractor, a subcontractor, or any otherbusiness entering into a contract with the Developer related to the use, maintenance, or operationof the Project or part thereof. The term Contractor shall not include Tenants.“Cooperation Agreement” shall mean the Cooperation Agreement enteredinto between the Developer and the Coalition on May 29, 2001.“Developer” shall mean the corporations entitled the L.A. Arena LandCompany and Flower Holdings, LLC.“Needs Assessment” shall have the meaning set forth in Section III.C.1.“Project” shall have the meaning set forth in the Cooperation Agreement.“Tenant” shall mean a person or entity that conducts any portion of itsoperations within the Project, such as a tenant leasing commercial space within the Project, or anentity that has acquired a fee simple interest from the Developer for the purpose of developing aportion of the Project. “Tenant” does not include Contractors and agents of the Developer.LA_DOCS\682924.9 [W97]A-195

Tenant shall exclude any tenant of a residential dwelling unit, any guest or other client of anyhotel and any governmental entity.III.PARKS AND RECREATIONA. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Section is to help address the deficit of parkspace in the Figueroa Corridor community. The Figueroa Corridor contains less than aquarter of the park space acreage required by the City. The park construction effortsunder this Section will help address this deficit, providing a measurable and lastingbenefit to the Figueroa Corridor community.B. QUIMBY FEES. Developer agrees to pay all fees required by the Los AngelesMunicipal Code, Chapter I, Article 7, Section 17.12, “park and recreation site acquisitionand development provisions,” subject to offsetting credits as allowed by that sectionand/or state law and approved by the city. The Coalition shall support Developer’sapplication for Quimby credit under this section, provided that Developer’s applicationsfor credits are based on publicly accessible space and facilities.C. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE NEEDS ASSESSMENT.1. Needs Assessment. The Developer will fund an assessment of the needfor parks, open space, and recreational facilities in the area bounded by thefollowing streets: Beverly Boulevard and the 101 freeway (north boundary);Western Avenue (west boundary); Vernon Avenue (south boundary); andAlameda Street (east boundary). Developer will commence fulfillment of itsresponsibilities under this section III.C within 90 days after enactment by the LosAngeles City Council of a development agreement ordinance for the Project.2. Funding. Developer will fund the Needs Assessment in an amountbetween $50,000 and $75,000, unless the Coalition consents to the Developerfunding the Needs Assessment in an amount less than $50,000.3. Selection of organization conducting needs assessment. The NeedsAssessment will be conducted by a qualified organization agreed upon by both theDeveloper and the Coalition, and paid an amount consistent with Section III.C.2,above. The Developer and the Coalition may enlist other mutually agreed uponorganizations to assist in conducting the Needs Assessment.D. PARK AND RECREATION FACILITY CREATION BY DEVELOPER.96LA_DOCS\682924.9 [W97]1. Park and recreation facility creation. Following the completion of theneeds assessment, the Developer shall fund or cause to be privately funded at leastone million dollars ($1,000,000) for the creation or improvement of one or moreparks and recreation facilities, including but not limited to land acquisition, parkdesign, and construction, within a one-mile radius of the Project, in a mannerconsistent with the results of the Needs Assessment. By mutual agreement of theCoalition and the Developer, this one-mile radius may be increased. Each park orrecreation facility created pursuant to this agreement shall be open to the publicand free of charge. Developer shall have no responsibility for operation orA-2

maintenance of any park and recreation facility created or improved pursuant tothis agreement. Developer after consultation with the Coalition shall select thelocation of park and recreation facilities to be created or improved. Park andrecreation facilities shall be created or improved in a manner such that aresponsible entity shall own, operate, and maintain such facilities. Each parkcreated or improved pursuant to this agreement shall include active recreationcomponents such as playgrounds and playing fields, and shall also includepermanent improvements and features recommended by the Needs Assessment,such as restroom facilities, drinking fountains, park benches, patio structures,barbecue facilities, and picnic tables. Recreation facilities created pursuant to thisSection should to the extent appropriate provide opportunities for physicalrecreation appropriate for all ages and physical ability levels.2. Timeline. The park and recreation facilities created or improved pursuantto this agreement shall be completed within five years of completion of the NeedsAssessment. At least $800,000 of the funds described in Section III.D.1, above,shall be spent within four years of completion of the Needs Assessment.E. OPEN SPACE COMPONENTS OF DEVELOPMENT.1. Street-level plaza. The Project will include a street-level plaza ofapproximately one-acre in size and open to the public.2. Other public spaces. The Project will include several publicly-accessibleopen spaces, such as plazas, paseos, walkways, terraces, and lawns.IV.COMMUNITY PROTECTIONA. PARKING PROGRAM. The Developer shall assist the Coalition with theestablishment of a residential permit parking program as set forth below.1. Permit Area. The area initially designated as part of the Parking Programis generally bounded by James Wood Drive on the north, Byram and GeorgiaStreets on the west, Olympic Boulevard on the south and Francisco on the east.The permit area may be adjusted from time to time by mutual agreement of theDeveloper and the Coalition or upon action by the City determining the actualboundaries of a residential parking district in the vicinity of the Project.2. Developer Support. The Developer shall support the Coalition’s effortsto establish the parking program in the permit area by requesting the City toestablish a residential permit parking district through a letter to City Councilmembers and City staff, testimony before the City Council or appropriate Boardsof Commissioners, and through technical assistance which reasonably may beprovided by Developer’s consultants.LA_DOCS\682924.9 [W97]To defray the parking program’s costs to residents of the permit area, theDeveloper shall provide funding of up to $25,000 per year for five years towardthe cost of developing and implementing the parking program within the permitarea. Such funding shall be provided to the City.A-397

3. Limitations. The Coalition understands, acknowledges and hereby agreesthat the City’s determination of whether to establish a residential permit parkingdistrict and the boundaries thereof are within the City’s sole discretion. TheDeveloper is not liable for any action or inaction on the part of the City as toestablishment of a residential permit parking district or for the boundaries thereof.The Coalition understands, acknowledges and hereby agrees that the total annualaggregate cost of a residential permit parking district may exceed $25,000 peryear and that in such event, the Developer shall have no liability for any amountsin excess of $25,000 per year for five years.B. TRAFFIC. The Developer in consultation with the Coalition shall establish atraffic liaison to assist the Figueroa Corridor community with traffic issues related to theProject.C. SECURITY. The Developer shall encourage the South Park Western GatewayBusiness Improvement District to address issues of trash disposal and community safetyin the residential areas surrounding the Project. The Developer shall request the BID toprovide additional trash receptacles in the vicinity of the Project, including receptacleslocated in nearby residential areas.V. LIVING WAGE PROGRAMA. DEVELOPER RESPONSIBILITIES REGARDING LIVING WAGES.1. Compliance With Living Wage Ordinance. The Developer, Tenants,and Contractors shall comply with the City's Living Wage Ordinance, set forth inthe Los Angeles Administrative Code, Section 10.37, to the extent such ordinanceis applicable.2. Seventy Percent Living Wage Goal. The Developer shall make allreasonable efforts to maximize the number of living wage jobs in the Project. TheDeveloper and the Coalition agree to a Living Wage Goal of maintaining 70% ofthe jobs in the Project as living wage jobs. The Developer and the Coalition agreethat this is a reasonable goal in light of all of the circumstances. Achievement ofthe Living Wage Goal shall be measured five years and ten years from the date ofthis Agreement. In the event that actual performance is less than 80% of the goalfor two consecutive years, Developer shall meet and confer with the Coalition atthe end of such two year period to determine mutually agreeable additional stepswhich can and will be taken to meet the Living Wage Goal.3. Achievement of Living Wage Goal. For purposes of determining thepercentage of living wage jobs in the Project, the following jobs shall beconsidered living wage jobs:jobs covered by the City’s Living Wage Ordinance;jobs for which the employee is paid on a salaried basis atleast $16,057.60 per year if the employee is provided with98LA_DOCS\682924.9 [W97]A-4

employer-sponsored health insurance, or $18.657.60 peryear otherwise (these amounts will be adjusted in concertwith cost-of-living adjustments to wages required under theCity’s Living Wage Ordinance);jobs for which the employee is paid at least $7.72 per hourif the worker is provided with employer-sponsored healthinsurance, or $8.97 per hour otherwise (these amounts willbe adjusted in concert with cost-of-living adjustments towages required under the City’s Living Wage Ordinance);andjobs covered by a collective bargaining agreement.The percentage of living wage jobs in the Project will be calculated as thenumber of on-site jobs falling into any of the above four categories,divided by the total number of on-site jobs. The resulting number will becompared to the Living Wage Goal to determine whether the Living WageGoal has been achieved.4. Developer Compliance If Goal Not Met. Whether or not the LivingWage Goal is being met at the five- and ten-year points, the Developer shall beconsidered to be in compliance with this Section if it is in compliance with theremaining provisions of this Section.5. Reporting Requirements. The Developer will provide an annual reportto the City Council's Community and Economic Development Committee on thepercentage of jobs in the Project that are living wage jobs. The report will containproject-wide data as well as data regarding each employer in the Project. Dataregarding particular employers will not include precise salaries; rather, such datawill only include the number of jobs and the percentage of these jobs that areliving wage jobs, as defined in Section V.A.3, above. If the report indicates thatthe Living Wage Goal is not being met, the Developer will include as part of thereport a discussion of the reasons why that is the case. In compiling this report,Developer shall be entitled to rely on information provided by Tenants andContractors, without responsibility to perform independent investigation. Thisreport shall be filed for any given year or partial year by April 30th of thesucceeding year.6. Selection of Tenants.a. Developer Notifies Coalition Before Selecting Tenants. At least45 days before signing any lease agreement or other contract for spacewithin the Project, the Developer shall notify the Coalition that theDeveloper is considering entering into such lease or contract, shall notifythe Coalition of the identity of the prospective Tenant, and shall, if theCoalition so requests, meet with the Coalition regarding the prospectiveTenant’s impact on the 70% living wage goal. If exigent circumstances soLA_DOCS\682924.9 [W97]A-599

equire, notice may be given less than 45 days prior to signing such a leaseagreement or other contract; however, in such cases the Developer shall atthe earliest possible date give the Coalition notice of the identity of theprospective Tenant, and, if the Coalition requests a meeting, the meetingshall occur on the earliest possible date and shall in any event occur priorto the signing of the lease agreement or other contract.b. Coalition Meeting with Prospective Tenants. At least 30 daysbefore signing a lease agreement or other contract for space within theProposed Development, the Developer will arrange and attend a meetingbetween the Coalition and the prospective Tenant, if the Coalition sorequests. At such a meeting, the Coalition and the Developer will discusswith the prospective Tenant the Living Wage Incentive Program and theHealth Insurance Trust Fund, and will assist the Coalition in encouragingparticipation in these programs. If exigent circumstances so require, sucha meeting may occur less than 30 days prior to the signing of a leaseagreement; however, in such cases the meeting shall be scheduled to occuron the earliest possible date and shall in any event occur prior to thesigning of the lease agreement or other contract. The Developer will notenter into a lease agreement with any prospective Tenant that has notoffered to meet with the Coalition and the Developer regarding theseissues prior to signing of the lease.c. Consideration of Impact on Living Wage Goal. When choosingbetween prospective Tenants for a particular space within the Project, theDeveloper will, within commercially reasonable limits, take into accountas a substantial factor each prospective Tenant’s potential impact onachievement of the Living Wage Goal.d. Tenants Agree to Reporting Requirements. Tenants are notrequired to participate in the Living Wage Incentive Program or the HealthInsurance Trust Fund. However, all Tenants in the Project shall makeannual reports as set forth in Section V.B.3, below. The Developer willinclude these reporting requirements as a material term of all leaseagreements or other contracts for space within the Project.B. TENANTS’ OPPORTUNITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.100LA_DOCS\682924.9 [W97]1. Living Wage Incentive Program. All Tenants will be offered theopportunity to participate in a Living Wage Incentive Program. Tenants are notrequired to participate in this program, but may choose to participate. Under theLiving Wage Incentive Program, Tenants providing living wage jobs may receivevarious benefits of substantial economic value. The Coalition, the Developer, andthe City will collaborate to structure a set of incentives, at no cost to theDeveloper, to assist the Project in meeting the Living Wage Goal. The LivingWage Incentive Program shall be described in a simple and accessible writtenformat suitable for presentation to prospective Tenants. The Coalition, workingcollaboratively with the Developer, shall seek funding from governmental andA-6

private sources to support the incentives and benefits provided in the Living WageIncentive Program.2. Health Insurance Trust Fund. All Tenants will be offered theopportunity to participate in the Health Insurance Trust Fund. Tenants are notrequired to participate in this program, but may choose to participate. The HealthInsurance Trust Fund, still being established by the City, will provide Tenantswith a low-cost method of providing employees with basic health insurance.3. Reporting Requirements. Each Tenant in the Project must annuallyreport to the Developer its number of on-site jobs, the percentage of these jobsthat are living wage jobs, and the percentage of these jobs for which employeesare provided health insurance by the Tenant. Tenants need not include precisesalaries in such reports; rather, with regard to wages, Tenants need only includethe number of jobs and the percentage of these jobs that are living wage jobs, asdefined in Section V.A.3, above. Such reports shall be filed for any given year orpartial year by January 31st of the succeeding year.C. TERM. All provisions and requirements of this Section shall terminate andbecome ineffective for each Tenant ten years from the date of that Tenant’s first annualreport submitted pursuant to Section V.B.3, above.VI.LOCAL HIRING AND JOB TRAININGA. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Section is to facilitate the customized trainingand employment of targeted job applicants in the Project. Targeted job applicantsinclude, among others, individuals whose residence or place of employment has beendisplaced by the STAPLES Center project, low-income individuals living within a threemileradius of the Project, and individuals living in low-income areas throughout theCity. This Section (1) establishes a mechanism whereby targeted job applicants willreceive job training in the precise skills requested by employers in the Project, and (2)establishes a non-exclusive system for referral of targeted job applicants to employers inthe Project as jobs become available.B. CUSTOMIZED JOB TRAINING PROGRAM. The First Source ReferralSystem, described below, will coordinate job training programs with appropriatecommunity-based job training organizations. Prior to hiring for living wage jobs withinthe Project, employers may request specialized job training for applicants they intend tohire, tailored to the employers’ particular needs, by contacting the First Source ReferralSystem. The First Source Referral System will then work with appropriate communitybasedjob training organizations to ensure that these applicants are provided with therequested training.C. FIRST SOURCE HIRING POLICY. Through the First Source Hiring Policy,attached hereto as attachment No. 1, qualified individuals who are targeted foremployment opportunities as set forth in Section IV.D of the First Source Hiring Policywill have the opportunity to interview for job openings in the Project. The Developer,Contractors, and Tenants shall participate in the First Source Hiring Policy, attachedLA_DOCS\682924.9 [W97]A-7101

hereto as Attachment No. 1. Under the First Source Hiring Policy, the First SourceReferral System will promptly refer qualified, trained applicants to employers foravailable jobs. The Developer, Contractors, and Tenants shall have no responsibility toprovide notice of job openings to the First Source Referral System if the First SourceReferral System is not fulfilling its obligations under the First Source Hiring Policy. Theterms of the First Source Hiring Policy shall be part of any deed, lease, or contract withany prospective Tenant or Contractor.D. FIRST SOURCE REFERRAL SYSTEM. The First Source Referral System, tobe established through a joint effort of the Developer and the Coalition, will work withemployers and with appropriate community-based job training organizations to providethe referrals described in this Section. The Coalition and the Developer will select amutually agreeable nonprofit organization to staff and operate the First Source ReferralSystem, as described in the First Source Hiring Policy. The Developer will provide$100,000 in seed funding to this organization. The Developer will meet and confer withthe Coalition regarding the possibility of providing space on site for the First SourceReferral System, for the convenience of Tenants and job applicants; provided, however,the Developer may in its sole and absolute discretion determine whether or on what termsit would be willing to provide space for the First Source Referral System. If the FirstSource Referral System becomes defunct, Employers shall have no responsibility tocontact it with regard to job opportunities.VII.SERVICE WORKER RETENTIONA. SERVICE CONTRACTOR WORKER RETENTION. The Developer andits Contractors shall follow the City's Worker Retention Policy as set forth in the LosAngeles Administrative Code, Section 10.36. The City’s Worker Retention Policy doesnot cover individuals who are managerial or supervisory employees, or who are requiredto possess an occupational license.B. WORKER RETENTION FOR HOTEL AND THEATER EMPLOYEES.The Developer agrees that Tenants in hotel and theater components of the Project willfollow the City's Worker Retention Policy with regard to all employees, and will requirecontractors to do the same. The Developer will include these requirements as materialterms of all lease agreements or other contracts regarding hotel and/or theatercomponents of the Project.C. INCLUSION IN CONTRACTS. The Developer shall include the requirementsof this section as material terms of all contracts with Contractors and with Tenants inhotel and theater components of the Project, with a statement that such inclusion is for thebenefit of the Coalition.VIII. RESPONSIBLE CONTRACTINGA. DEVELOPER SELECTION OF CONTRACTORS. The Developer agreesnot to retain as a Contractor any business that has been declared not to be a responsiblecontractor under the City’s Contractor Responsibility Program (Los AngelesAdministrative Code, Section 10.40.)102LA_DOCS\682924.9 [W97]A-8

B. DEVELOPER SELECTION OF TENANTS. The Developer agrees that beforeentering into or renewing a lease agreement regarding any space over fifteen thousand(15,000) square feet, the Developer shall obtain from any prospective Tenant a writtenaccount of whether the prospective Tenant has within the past three years been found bya court, an arbitrator, or an administrative agency to be in violation of labor relations,workplace safety, employment discrimination, or other workplace-related laws. Whenchoosing between prospective Tenants for a particular space within the Project, theDeveloper will, within commercially reasonable limits, take into account as a substantialfactor weighing against a prospective Tenant any findings of violations of workplacerelatedlaws. In complying with this Section, the Developer shall be entitled to rely oninformation provided by Tenants, without responsibility to perform independentinvestigation.C. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS. The Developer will provide an annualreport to the Coalition and to the City Council's Community and Economic DevelopmentCommittee on the percentage of new lease agreements or other contracts regarding use ofspace within the Project that were entered into with entities reporting violations ofworkplace-related laws. In compiling this report, Developer shall be entitled to rely oninformation provided by Tenants and Contractors, without responsibility to performindependent investigation. The report may aggregate information from various EndUsers, so as not to identify any particular Tenant. This report shall be filed for any givenyear or partial year by April 30th of the succeeding year, and may be combined with thereport regarding living wages, required to be filed by Section V.B.3.IX.AFFORDABLE HOUSINGA. PURPOSE. Developer has included between 500 and 800 housing units as partof the Project. The goal is create an “inclusionary” development; i.e. the project willinclude an affordable housing component (the “Affordable Housing Program”) as setforth in this Section.B. DEVELOPER AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM. This DeveloperAffordable Housing Program exceeds requirements of state law and the Agency. Tofurther its connection to the surrounding neighborhoods, the Developer proposes to workwith community-based housing developers to implement much of the plan.1. Percentage Affordable Units. The Developer shall develop or cause tobe developed affordable housing equal to 20% of the units constructed within theProject, as may be adjusted under Section IX.D., below, through joint efforts withcommunity-based organizations to create additional affordable units as providedin Section IX.C, below. The Developer intends to include between 500 and 800units in the Project; therefore, the Developer’s affordable housing commitmentwould be between 100 and 160 units, as may be adjusted under Section IX.Dbelow.LA_DOCS\682924.9 [W97]A-9103

2. Income Targeting The distribution of affordable units shall be asfollows:a. 30% affordable to families earning zero to 50% of Area MedianIncome (“AMI”);b. 35% affordable to families earning 51% to 60% of AMI;c. 35% affordable to families earning 61% to 80% of AMI.3. Term of Affordability. Affordable units will remain affordable for aminimum of 30 years.4. Location. Affordable units may be built within the Project or off-site.Units built off site will be located in redevelopment areas within a three-mileradius from the intersection of 11 th and Figueroa Streets. To the extent theAgency provides direct financial assistance in the creation of affordable units,50% of the affordable units shall be constructed within the Project if required bythe Agency.5. Unit and Project Type. Given the high density of the proposed on-sitehigh-rise housing, any inclusionary units within the Project will be two-bedroomunits. Three- and four-bedroom units may be developed at offsite locations thatare more appropriate to accommodate larger units and families. In connectionwith any off-site affordable units, Developer shall give priority consideration tocreation of projects suitable for families in terms of unit size, location, andproximity to family-serving uses and services.6. Relocated Persons. To the extent allowed by law, priority shall be givento selecting persons relocated in connection with the development of theSTAPLES Center to be tenants in any affordable units created under this SectionIX. Notice of availability of affordable units shall be given to such relocatedpersons as set forth in Section X.D.7. Public Participation and Assistance. Nothing herein shall limit the rightof the Developer to seek or obtain funding or assistance from any federal, state orlocal governmental entity or any non-profit organization in connection with thecreation or rehabilitation of affordable units.C. COOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT WITH COMMUNITY BASEDORGANIZATIONS1. Purpose. In addition to development of affordable housing on-site or offsite,Developer shall work cooperatively with community based organizations toin an effort to provide additional affordable housing units. The goal of thisprogram is to identify affordable housing infill development opportunities withina 1.5-mile radius of Figueroa and 11 th Street and to affiliate with well-establishednon-profit affordable housing development corporations in the area.104LA_DOCS\682924.9 [W97]A-10

2. Interest Free Loans. As “seed money” for affordable housingdevelopment, within 2 years after receiving final entitlement approvals for theProject, Developer will provide interest-free loans in the aggregate amount not toexceed $650,000 to one or more non-profit housing developers that are active inthe Figueroa Corridor area and are identified in the Section VI.D.3, below, or aremutually agreed upon by the Developer and the Coalition. Repayment ofprincipal repayment shall be due in full within three (3) years from the date theloan is made. Provided that the loan or loans have been timely repaid, such repaidamounts may be loaned again to one or more non-profit housing developers;however, it is understood that all loans will be repaid within six (6) years from thedate the first loan was made. In addition, the loans shall be on such othercommercially reasonable terms consistent with the purposes of this Section IX.C.3. Prequalified Non-Profit Development Corporations. The followingnon-profit community based organizations are eligible to seek to participate inthis cooperative program:a. Esperanza Development Corporation - Sister Diane Donoghueb. 1010 Hope Development Corporation - DarEll Weistc. Pueblo Development Corporation- Carmela Lacayod. Pico Union Development Corporation - Gloria Farias4. Use of Program Funds. The interest free loans may be used by theselected organizations for the following purposes:a. Land acquisition/option/due diligence.b. To focus on existing buildings to substantially rehabilitate or toacquire small infill sites capable of supporting approximately 40 or moreunits.c. Entitlement and design feasibility studies.d. Financial analysis and predevelopment studies.e. Funding applications and initial legal expenses.f. Other expenses reasonably approved by Developer to secure fullfunding agreements5. Project Selection Processa. Within 90 days following Project approvals, Developer will meetand confer with principals of each non-profit listed in Section IX.C.3,above to gain a comprehensive understanding of the capabilities andcapacity of each organization and ability to obtain financing support.LA_DOCS\682924.9 [W97]A-11105

. Within 6 months following Project approvals, Developer willrequest proposals from each non-profit organization, which may includeone or more prospective sites and use best efforts to identify one or moreprojects to pursue.c. Developer shall consult with and seek the input of the Coalition inthe selection of the nonprofit housing developer or developers. Developershall enter into a loan agreement with any selected nonprofit housingdeveloper to provide the interest free loan as set forth in this Section IX.C.D. ADJUSTMENTS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS. The assistanceprovided by Developer under Section IX.C may result in production of affordable unitssubstantially in excess of 20%. Further, the Coalition has a goal of at least 25%affordable units. Therefore, for every two units of affordable housing (including bothrehabilitation or new construction) created by the non-profit developer or developers withthe assistance of Developer under Section IX.C in excess of 25%, Developer shall receivea credit of one unit toward Developer’s obligation to create affordable housing units;provided, however, that Developer’s overall obligation for affordable housing units shallnot be less than 15% due to any such reduction.In the event that no affordable units are created under the cooperative programestablished in Section IX.C, above, through no fault of the Developer and the Developeris unable to recoup all or a portion of the loan or loans, the Developer’s obligation tocreate affordable units shall be reduced by one unit for each $10,000 of unrecoupedloans; provided, however that Developer’s overall obligation for affordable housing unitsshall not be less than 15% of the housing due to any such reduction.X. RELOCATED FAMILIESA. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Section is to address problems that may be facedby families that were relocated by the Agency in connection with the development of theSTAPLES Center. Many such families can no longer afford their current housing due tothe expiration of the relocation assistance provided by the Agency.B. MEET AND CONFER. The Developer agrees to meet and confer with theCoalition, City Councilmembers, Agency board and staff, and other City staff in effort toseek and obtain permanent affordable housing for families relocated in connection withthe development of the STAPLES Center. Meetings with the Coalition shall be heldquarterly, or less frequently if mutually agreed by the Coalition and the Developer.Meetings with City Councilmembers, Agency board and staff, and other City staff will beheld as necessary. The Developer’s responsibilities under this section will terminate fiveyears from the effective date of the Cooperation Agreement.C. ASSISTANCE. The Developer will generally assist the Coalition to seek andobtain permanent affordable housing for relocated families. Developer will speak infavor of such efforts at least two appropriate public meetings and hearings whenrequested to do so by the Coalition. The Developer will use commercially reasonableefforts to provide technical assistance to the Coalition.106LA_DOCS\682924.9 [W97]A-12

D. NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY. For a period of three years, Developer shall usegood faith efforts to cause the Agency to give, to the fullest extent allowed by law, 30days notice of availability of affordable units created by the Project to persons relocatedin connection with construction of STAPLES Center and to provide such relocatedpersons the first opportunity to apply as potential tenants. Persons eligible for suchnotice shall be relocated persons who are not tenants in a permanent affordable housingproject and who otherwise meet income and other requirements for affordable housing.E. TIMING. Permanent affordable housing for relocated families is an urgentmatter and, therefore, time is of the essence. Consequently, Developer’s obligationsunder this Section X, shall begin within five days following execution of the SettlementAgreement.XI.COALITION ADVISORY COMMITTEETo assist with implementation of this Community Benefits Program, addressenvironmental concerns and facilitate an ongoing dialogue between the Coalition and theDeveloper, the Coalition and the Developer shall establish a working group of representatives ofthe Coalition and the Developer, known as the Advisory Committee. This Advisory Committeeshall meet quarterly, unless it is mutually agreed that less frequent meetings are appropriate.Among other issues, the Developer shall seek the input of the Advisory Committee in theDeveloper’s preparation of the construction management plan, the traffic management plan, thewaste management plan and the neighborhood traffic protection plan. In addition, the Developershall seek the input of the Advisory Committee in a effort to develop and implement potentialsolutions to other environmental concerns, including without limitation, pedestrian safety, airquality and green building principles.XII.GENERAL PROVISIONSA. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. If any term, provision, covenant, or condition ofthis Community Benefits Program is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to beinvalid, void, or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions shall continue in fullforce and effect.B. Material Terms. All provisions and attachments of this Community BenefitsProgram are material terms of this Community Benefits Program.LA_DOCS\682924.9 [W97]A-13107

SECTION I. PURPOSE.Attachment 1FIRST SOURCE HIRING POLICYThe purpose of this First Source Hiring Policy is to facilitate the employment oftargeted job applicants by employers in the Los Angeles Sports and Entertainment District. It isa goal of this First Source Hiring Policy that the First Source Referral System contemplatedherein will benefit employers in the project by providing a pool of qualified job applicants whosejob training has been specifically tailored to the needs of employers in the project through a nonexclusivereferral system.SECTION II.DEFINITIONS.As used in this policy, the following capitalized terms shall have the followingmeanings. All definitions include both the singular and plural form.and/or agencies.“City” shall mean the City of Los Angeles and any of its departments“Developer” shall mean the L.A. Arena Land Company and FlowerHoldings, LLC. and their Transferees.“Project” shall mean the Los Angeles Sports and Entertainment District.“Employer” shall mean a business or nonprofit corporation that conductsany portion of its operations within the Project; provided, however, this First Source HiringPolicy shall only apply to any such portion of operations within the Project.. Employer includesbut is not limited to lessees, landowners, and businesses performing contracts on location at theProject. All “Employers” are “Covered Entities,” as defined above.“First Source Referral System” shall mean the system developed andoperated to implement this First Source Hiring Policy, and the nonprofit organization operatingit.“Low-Income Individual” shall mean an individual whose householdincome is no greater than 80% of the median income for the Standard Metropolitan StatisticalArea.IV.D, below.“Targeted Job Applicants” shall mean job applicants described in Section“Transferee” shall mean a person or entity that acquires a fee simpleinterest or a ground lease from the Developer for the purpose of developing all or any portion ofthe Proposed Development.108LA_DOCS\682924.9 [W97]A-14

SECTION III.EMPLOYER RESPONSIBILITIESA. Coverage. This First Source Hiring Policy shall apply to hiring byEmployers for all jobs for which the work site is located within the Project, except for jobs forwhich hiring procedures are governed by a collective bargaining agreement which conflicts withthis First Source Hiring Policy.B. Long-Range Planning. Within a reasonable time after theinformation is available following execution by of a lease by Developer and Employer for spacewithin the Project, the Employer shall provide to the First Source Referral System regarding theapproximate number and type of jobs that will need to be filled and the basic qualificationsnecessary.C. Hiring process.(1) Notification of job opportunities. Prior to hiring for anyjob for which the job site will be in the Project, the Employer will notify the First SourceReferral System of available job openings and provide a description of job responsibilities andqualifications, including expectations, salary, work schedule, duration of employment, requiredstandard of appearance, and any special requirements (e.g. language skills, drivers’ license, etc.).Job qualifications shall be limited to skills directly related to performance of job duties, in thereasonable discretion of the Employer.(2) Referrals. The First Source Referral System will, asquickly as possible, refer to the Employer Targeted Job Applicants who meet the Employer’squalifications. The First Source Referral System will also, as quickly as possible, provide to theEmployer an estimate of the number of qualified applicants it will refer.(3) Hiring. The Employer may at all times consider applicantsreferred or recruited through any source. When making initial hires for the commencement ofthe Employer’s operations in the Project, the Employer will hire only Targeted Job Applicantsfor a three-week period following the notification of job opportunities described in subparagraphIII.C.1, above. When making hires after the commencement of operations in the Project, theEmployer will hire only Targeted Job Applicants for a five-day period following the notificationof job opportunities. During such periods Employers may hire Targeted Job Applicantsrecruited or referred through any source. During such periods Employers will use normal hiringpractices, including interviews, to consider all applicants referred by the First Source ReferralSystem. After such periods Employers shall make good-faith efforts to hire Targeted JobApplicants, but may hire any applicant recruited or referred through any source.E. Goal. Any Employer who has filled more than 50% of jobsavailable either during a particular six-month period with Targeted Job Applicants (whetherreferred by the First Source Referral System or not), shall be deemed to be in compliance withthis First Source Hiring Policy for all hiring during that six-month period. Any Employer whohas complied with remaining provisions of this First Source Hiring Policy is in compliance withthis First Source Hiring Policy even it has not met this 50% goal during a particular six-monthperiod.LA_DOCS\682924.9 [W97]A-15109

F. No Referral Fees. Employers shall not be required to pay any fee,cost or expense of the First Source Referral System or any potential employees referred to theEmployer by the First Source Referral System in connection with such referral.SECTION IV.REFERRAL SYSTEM.RESPONSIBILITIES OF FIRST SOURCEThe First Source Referral System will perform the following functions related tothis First Source Hiring Policy:A. Receive Employer notification of job openings, immediatelyinitiate recruitment and pre-screening activities, and provide an estimate to Employers of thenumber of qualified applicants it is likely to refer, as described above.B. Recruit Targeted Job Applicants to create a pool of applicants forjobs who match Employer job specifications.C. Coordinate with various job-training centers.D. Screen and refer Targeted Job Applicants according toqualifications and specific selection criteria submitted by Employers. Targeted Job Applicantsshall be referred in the following order:(1) First Priority: individuals whose residence or place ofemployment has been displaced by the STAPLES Center project or by the initial construction ofthe project and Low-Income Individuals living within a one-half-mile radius of the Project.(2) Second Priority: Low-Income Individuals living within athree-mile radius of the Project.(3) Third Priority: Low-Income Individuals living in censustracts or zip codes throughout the City for which more than 80% of the households, householdincome is no greater than 80% of the median household income for the Standard MetropolitanStatistical Area.E. Maintain contact with Employers with respect to Employers’hiring decisions regarding applicants referred by the First Source Referral System.F. Assist Employers with reporting responsibilities as set forth inSection V of this First Source Hiring Policy, below, including but not limited to supplyingreporting forms and recognizing Targeted Job Applicants.G. Prepare and submit compliance reports to the City as set forth inSection V of this First Source Hiring Policy, below.110LA_DOCS\682924.9 [W97]A-16

SECTION V.REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.A. Reporting Requirements and Recordkeeping.(1) Reports. During the time that this First Source HiringPolicy is applicable to any Employer, that Employer shall, on a quarterly basis, notify the FirstSource Referral System of the number, by job classification, of Targeted Job Applicants hired bythe Employer during that, quarter and the total number of employees hired by the Employerduring that quarter. The First Source Referral System shall submit annual aggregate reports forall Employers to the City, with a copy to the Coalition, detailing the employment of Targeted JobApplicants in the Project.(2) Recordkeeping. During the time that this First SourceHiring Policy is applicable to any Employer, that Employer shall retain records sufficient toreport compliance with this First Source Hiring Policy, including records of referrals from theFirst Source Referral System, job applications, and number of Targeted Job Applicants hired. Tothe extent allowed by law, and upon reasonable notice, these records shall be made available tothe City for inspection upon request. Records may be redacted so that individuals are notidentified by name and so that other confidential information is excluded.(3) Failure to Meet Goal. In the event an Employer has notmet the 50% goal during a particular six-month period, the City may require the Employer toprovide reasons it has not met the goal and the City may determine whether the Employer hasnonetheless adhered to this Policy.SECTION VI.GENERAL PROVISIONS.A. Term. This First Source Hiring Policy shall be effective withregard to any particular Employer until five years from the date that Employer commencedoperations within the Project.B. Meet & Confer, Enforcement. If the Coalition, the First SourceReferral System, or the City believes that an Employer is not complying with this First SourceHiring Policy, then the Coalition, the First Source Referral System, the City, and the Employershall meet and confer in a good faith attempt to resolve the issue. If the issue is not resolvedthrough the meet and confer process within a reasonable period of time, the City may enforce theFirst Source Hiring Policy against the Developer as a term of any agreement between the Cityand the Developer into which the First Source Hiring Policy has been incorporated.B. Miscellaneous.(1) Compliance with State and Federal Law. This FirstSource Hiring Policy shall only be enforced to the extent that it is consistent with the laws of theState of California and the United States. If any provision of this First Source Hiring Policy isheld by a court of law to be in conflict with state or federal law, the applicable law shall prevailover the terms of this First Source Hiring Policy, and the conflicting provisions of this FirstSource Hiring Policy shall not be enforceable.A-17LA_DOCS\682924.9 [W97]111

(2) Indemnification. The First Source Referral System shall,jointly and severally, indemnify, hold harmless and defend the Developer and any Employer, andtheir officers, directors, partners, agents, employees and funding sources, if required by any suchfunding source (the "Indemnified Parties") from and against all fines, suits, liabilities,proceedings, claims, costs, damages, losses and expenses, including, but not limited, to attorney'sfees and court costs, demands, actions, or causes of action, of any kind and of whatsoever nature,whether in contract or in tort, arising from, growing out of, or in any way related to the breach bythe First Source Referral System or their affiliates, officers, directors, partners, agents,employees, subcontractors (the “First Source Parties”) of the terms and provisions of this FirstSource Hiring Policy or the negligence, fraud or willful misconduct of First Source Parties. Theindemnification obligations of the First Source Parties shall survive the termination or expirationof this First Source Hiring Policy, with respect to any claims arising as the result of eventsoccurring during the effective term of this First Source Hiring Policy .(3) Compliance with Court Order. Notwithstanding theprovisions of this Policy, the Developer, Employers, Contractors, or Subcontractors shall bedeemed to be in compliance with this First Source Hiring Policy if subject to by a court oradministrative order or decree, arising from a labor relations dispute, which governs the hiring ofworkers and contains provisions which conflict with terms of this Policy.(4) Severability Clause. If any term, provision, covenant, orcondition of this First Source Hiring Policy is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to beinvalid, void, or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions shall continue in full force andeffect.(5) Binding on Successors. This First Source Hiring Policyshall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, administrators, executors, successorsin interest, and assigns of each of the parties. Any reference in this Policy to a specificallynamed party shall be deemed to apply to any successor in interest, heir, administrator, executor,or assign of such party.(6) Material Terms. The provisions of this First SourceHiring Policy are material terms of any deed, lease, or contract in which it is included.(7) Coverage. All entities entering into a deed, lease, orcontract relating to the rental, sale, lease, use, maintenance, or operation of the Project or partthereof shall be covered by the First Source Hiring Policy, through the incorporation of this FirstSource Hiring Policy into the deed, lease, or contract. Substantive provisions set forth in SectionIII. “Employer Responsibilities,” apply only to jobs for which the work site is located within theProject.112LA_DOCS\682924.9 [W97]A-18

Appendix ELos Angeles Times Article About Staples CBALos Angeles TimesThursday, May 31, 2001Home EditionSection: Part APage: A-1----------------------------------------------Community, Developers Agree onStaples PlanDeal:The proposed entertainment and sportsdistrict could become a model for urbanpartnerships.By: LEE ROMNEYTIMES STAFF WRITEREnding the threat of widespread opposition,the developers of a major hotel and entertainmentcenter around Staples Center haveagreed to an unprecedented package of concessionsdemanded by community groups,environmentalists and labor.The developers--including billionaire PhilipAnschutz and media mogul RupertMurdoch--agreed to hire locally, provide"living wage jobs" and build affordable housingand new parks.The deal is scheduled tobe announced today after months of confidentialnegotiations.The billion-dollar project is seen as vital tothe revitalization of downtown Los Angeles.Known as the L.A. Sports and EntertainmentDistrict, it would be anchored by a 45-storyhotel with at least 1,200 rooms at OlympicBoulevard and Georgia Street.The projectalso would include a 7,000-seat theater formusicals, award shows and other live entertainment.Restaurants, nightclubs and retailstores would be built around a plaza.Appendix E: Los Angeles Times Article About Staples CBA |113

| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects AccountableA 250,000-square-foot expansion of the adjacentLos Angeles Convention Center also isin the plan, as well as two apartment towerswith a total of 800 units and a secondsmaller hotel.The deal brokered with the coalition ofactivist groups, unions and residents, whichwill become part of the development agreement,is believed to be the first of its kindnationwide to take such a broad array ofcommunity concerns into account, accordingto economic and community developmentexperts. Union and neighborhood leaders arehopeful that it will serve as a blueprint forsimilar projects, particularly when hefty publicsubsidies are involved."I've never heard of an agreement that's ascomprehensive as this," said Greg LeRoy,director of the Washington-based Good JobsFirst, a national clearinghouse that tracks thepublic benefits of economic developmentprojects. "What's unusual here is that [housing,employment and open-space provisionsare] all together....It's really a model."The development partnership, led by the LosAngeles Arena Land Co., also owns StaplesCenter.That project received Los Angelescity approval in 1997 on the condition thatthe developers eventually build the massivecomplex to help the Convention Centerattract more business.But community opposition posed a seriousthreat, in part because the hotel project likelywill require a city subsidy that could exceed$75 million.While scattered resistance mayyet emerge, the developers now can claim thebacking of the groups most affected by thedevelopment, including 29 communitygroups, about 300 predominantly immigrantresidents of the neighborhood and fivelabor unions."I think the City Council has to be pleasedwith that . . . because those are the peoplewho will be most impacted," said JohnSheppard, land use planning deputy toCouncilwoman Rita Walters, whorepresents the neighborhood and arrangedthe first meeting between communitygroups and Arena Land President TimLeiweke last fall.Next week's city elections added urgency tothe mix. Marching orders for Ted Tanner, seniorvice president of Staples Center andArena Land--the main developer--were tosecure all city entitlements by the end ofJune. Getting the community on board, andavoiding a protracted fight, was "extremelyimportant," he said.The city Planning Commission approved theplan May 23. It is scheduled for a vote beforethe Community Redevelopment Agencynext week and then moves to City Council.The approach on both sides of the tablestands in marked contrast to the way thingswent down when Staples Center rose fromthe ground just two years ago.Then, thecommunity was neither organized norinformed enough to act, and Staples officialsnow concede they were insensitive to communityneeds.Still, the new deal did not come easy. Manycoalition members are more accustomed toprotest than to the 100 hours of labor-stylenegotiations that ultimately produced thepackage. Early relations were rocky.WhenLeiweke canceled plans to attend the firstmeeting with residents last October, organizersplaced his name placard on an emptychair, addressing him angrily in his absence.But the tone changed over time as mutualtrust built. By March,Tanner--who had beenanointed lead negotiator by Leiweke--deliveredan update to residents in accentedSpanish, and was met with applause.Tanner said the difficulty in negotiations was114

in striking a balance--to meet the demandsof the coalition without burdening the developmentor its tenants with costly conditionsnot required elsewhere."Our goal in continuing negotiations was towin true support and advocacy for the project,"said Tanner, an architect who early inhis career sat across the table from communitygroups on urban planning projects inPhiladelphia. "Their goal was the same--tosee if we could make this project better andimprove benefits for the community."For community groups, unions andresidents, however, the deal has evenbroader implications.The effort, they say,has yielded the most tangible results yet of anascent strategy to serve the overall interestsof neighborhoods."It's a huge step forward," said MadelineJanis-Aparicio, executive director of the LosAngeles Alliance for a New Economy andone of the lead community negotiators."Bringing all these groups together showedhow housing relates to jobs relates to environment.Theseare holistic people withholistic needs, and to have a developer takethat into account . . . is just amazing."Among the highlights of the deal:■■More than $1 million for the creation orimprovement of parks within a mile of theproject, with community input; a one-acrepublic plaza and other public open space.At least 70% of the estimated 5,500 permanentjobs to be created by the project--including those offered by tenants--willpay a living wage or better.Those aredefined as paying $7.72 an hour with benefitsor $8.97 without, or covered by collectivebargaining agreement.The deal alsocalls on the developer to notify the coalition45 days before signing tenantlease agreements.■■A local hiring and job training program forthose displaced by the arena, living withinthree miles of the project or living in lowincomeareas citywide. Developers willgive $100,000 in seed funding to createspecialized job training programs throughlocal community groups and ensure thatappropriate residents are notified firstof jobs.A residential parking permit program,financed by developers for five years, thatwill reserve street parking for residents.Common in affluent areas, officials say itwill become the first parking permit zonein a low-income neighborhood.■ Construction of between 100 and 160affordable housing units, or 20% of thetotal project.Those will be affordable toresidents earning below 50%, 60% and 80%of the area's median income.The unitsexceed Community RedevelopmentAgency requirements in number and servefamilies with lower incomes. Developersalso will provide up to $650,000 in interest-freeloans for nonprofit housing developersin the early stages of developingprojects in the area.Some of the 29 community groups that cametogether as the Figueroa Corridor Coalitionfor Economic Justice had worked togetherbefore, helping to organize union efforts atUSC.The alliance broadened beginning lastsummer to include everyone from localchurches and housing activists to environmentalists,tenant organizers and immigrantrights groups.Meanwhile, residents began to organize too,coming together to air concerns over conditionsaround the existing arena, where recklessdrivers, costly parking tickets, and vandalismhave plagued their lives.Labor, too, played a key role--with twoAppendix E: Los Angeles Times Article About Staples CBA |115

| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects Accountableunions representing hotel and restaurantworkers and janitors joining the communitycoalition as part of an effort to expand theirinfluence beyond wage issues.They are among five unions negotiatingjointly for union jobs and the right to organizeat the new center under the direction ofLos Angeles County Federation of Laborleader Miguel Contreras.Realizing that the window of opportunitywas small and closing, coalition membersopted to link up with labor to further leveragetheir power, said Gilda Haas, director ofStrategic Actions for a Just Economy, one ofthe lead organizations in the coalition.When disagreements stymied the progress ofthe janitors' union, community negotiatorsstood in unison with labor. In turn, laborchimed in on issues such as affordable housing,which affects their membership but wasnot technically on their agenda."I kept thinking of this as two airplanesapproaching an airport at the same time,"said David Koff, a hotel union research analystwho served as an official CountyFederation of Labor observer in the communitynegotiations. "The idea was to get bothto make a soft landing at the same time."The unions, which also represent parking lotattendants, stagehands and operating engineers,are expected to announce their finalizedagreements soon. But labor sources saidmost of the core issues have been resolved,due in part to the coordinated approachto negotiations."What we're hoping is to get work, to gethousing, to have a better way of living," saidManuel Pacheco Galvan, who hopes to tradehis job at a Hollywood market for one closerto home. "Almost everything we asked forwe got. ...In the beginning it didn't seempossible, but now we see that it's a reality.This will mean some change for all of us."PHOTO:Proposed L.A. Sports and EntertainmentDistrict around Staples Center is a billiondollarproject.PHOTOGRAPHER:UCLA Urban Simulation Team116

Appendix FLiving Wage Section of the NoHo Commons CBAFollowing are the living wage provisionsfor the NoHo Commons CBA, describedin Chapter Four.The entire CBA isavailable online athttp://www.laane.org/ad/cba.html.SECTION VI. LIVING WAGE POLICY.A. Developer Responsibilities RegardingLiving Wages.1. Compliance With Living Wage Ordinance.The Developer and Contractors shall complywith substantive provisions of theCity's Living Wage Ordinance, set forth inthe Los Angeles Administrative Code,Section 10.37.2. Seventy-Five Percent Living WageProportion. The Developer shall make allreasonable efforts to maximize the numberof living wage jobs in the Development.The Developer and the Coalition agreethat at least 75% of the jobs in theDevelopment will be living wage jobs.TheDeveloper and the Coalition agree that thisis a reasonable requirement in light of allof the circumstances. Achievement of theLiving Wage Proportion shall be measuredeach year on January 1, but shall be reportedbiannually, as described in sectionVI.A.5, below. In the event that actual performanceis less than 75% of the LivingWage Proportion for two consecutiveyears, Developer shall promptly meet andconfer with the Coalition to determinemutually agreeable additional steps whichcan and will be taken to meet the LivingWage Proportion. Notwithstanding anythingto the contrary, Developers failure tomeet the above mentioned 75% requirementshall not be a breach or defaultunder this agreement or the OwnersParticipation Agreement. However if theAgency determines in its reasonable discretionthat the Developer has not in any twocalendar year period used reasonable effortsAppendix F: Living Wage Section of the NoHo Commons CBA |117

| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects Accountableto meet the 75% requirement, then theAgency may assess a penalty of $10,000 foreach such applicable period.This penaltyshall be the only liability that Developershall have regarding the 75% Living Wagerequirement.3. Exemption for Small Businesses.Developer’s responsibilities with regard tothe Living Wage Proportion shall not applyto jobs at businesses that employ fewerthan ten workers.4. Calculation of Proportion of Living WageJobs. For purposes of determining the percentageof living wage jobs in theDevelopment, the following jobs shall beconsidered living wage jobs:■■■■jobs covered by the City’s LivingWage Ordinance;jobs for which the employee is paid on asalaried basis at least $16,057.60 per year ifthe employee is provided with employersponsoredhealth insurance, or $18.657.60per year otherwise (these amounts will beadjusted in concert with cost-of-livingadjustments to wages required under theCity’s Living Wage Ordinance);jobs for which the employee is paid atleast $7.99 per hour if the worker is providedwith employer-sponsored healthinsurance, or $9.24 per hour otherwise(these amounts will be adjusted in concertwith cost-of-living adjustments to wagesrequired under the City’s Living WageOrdinance); andjobs covered by a collective bargainingagreement.The percentage of living wage jobs in theDevelopment will be calculated as thenumber of on-site jobs falling into any ofthe above four categories, divided by thetotal number of on-site jobs. No part ofthis calculation shall take into account jobscovered by the exemption for small businesses,described in section VI.A.3, above.The resulting number will be compared tothe Living Wage Proportion to determinewhether the Living Wage Proportion hasbeen met.5. Reporting Requirements. The Developerwill provide a bi-annual report to theAgency on the percentage of jobs in theDevelopment that are living wage jobs.The report will contain project-wide dataas well as data regarding each employer inthe Development. Data regarding particularemployers will not include precise salaries;rather, such data will only include thenumber of jobs and the percentage of thesejobs that are living wage jobs, as defined inSection VI.A.3, above. If the report indicatesthat the Living Wage Proportion isnot being met, the Developer will includeas part of the report a discussion of thereasons why that is the case. In compilingthis report, Developer shall be entitled torely on information provided by Tenantsand Contractors, without responsibility toperform independent investigation.Thisreport shall be filed for any given year orpartial year by April 30th of thesucceeding year.6. Selection of Tenants.a. Developer Notifies Coalition Before SelectingTenants. At least 45 days before signing anylease agreement or other contract for spacewithin the Development, the Developershall notify the Coalition that theDeveloper is considering entering intosuch lease or contract, shall notify theCoalition of the identity of the prospectiveTenant, and shall, if the Coalition sorequests, meet with the Coalition regardingthe prospective Tenant’s impact on the 75%Living Wage Proportion. If exigent circumstancesso require, notice may be given lessthan 45 days prior to signing such a leaseagreement or other contract; however, insuch cases the Developer shall at the earliestpossible date give the Coalition noticeof the identity of the prospective Tenant,118

and, if the Coalition requests a meeting,the meeting shall occur on the earliest possibledate and shall in any event occurprior to the signing of the lease agreementor other contract.b. Coalition Meeting with Prospective Tenants. Atleast 30 days before signing a lease agreementor other contract for space withinthe Proposed Development, the Developerwill arrange and attend a meeting betweenthe Coalition and the prospective Tenant, ifthe Coalition so requests. At such a meeting,the Coalition and the Developer willdiscuss with the prospective Tenant theLiving Wage Incentive Program and theHealth Insurance Trust Fund, and will assistthe Coalition in encouraging participationin these programs. If exigent circumstancesso require, such a meeting may occur lessthan 30 days prior to the signing of a leaseagreement; however, in such cases themeeting shall be scheduled to occur on theearliest possible date and shall in any eventoccur prior to the signing of the leaseagreement or other contract.c. Consideration of Impact on Living WageProportion. When choosing betweenprospective Tenants for a particular spacewithin the Development, the Developerwill reasonably take into account as a substantialfactor each prospective Tenant’spotential impact on achievement of theLiving Wage Proportion.d. Tenants Agree to Reporting Requirements.Tenants shall make annual reports as setforth in Section VI.B.3, below.TheDeveloper will use best efforts to includethese reporting requirements as a materialterm of all lease agreements or other contractsfor space within the Development.B. Tenants’ opportunities andresponsibilities.1. Living Wage Incentive Program. All Tenantswill be offered the opportunity to participatein a Living Wage Incentive Program.Under the Living Wage Incentive Program,Tenants providing living wage jobs mayreceive various benefits of substantial economicvalue. At no cost to the Developer,without the Developer’s prior and soleconsent, the Coalition, the Developer, andthe Agency will collaborate to attempt tostructure a set of incentives to assist theDevelopment in meeting the Living WageProportion.The Living Wage IncentiveProgram shall be described in a simple andaccessible written format suitable for presentationto prospective Tenants.TheCoalition, working collaboratively with theDeveloper, shall seek funding from governmentaland private sources to support theincentives and benefits provided in theLiving Wage Incentive Program.2. Health Insurance Trust Fund. The Agency,the City and the Coalition are attemptingto create a Health Insurance Trust Fund,which is intended to provide Tenants witha low-cost method of providing employeeswith basic health insurance.When available,all Tenants will be offered the opportunityto participate in the HealthInsurance Trust Fund.Tenants are notrequired to participate in this program, butmay choose to participate.3. Reporting Requirements. Developer shallrequire each Tenant to annually report tothe Developer its number of on-site jobs,the percentage of these jobs that are livingwage jobs, and the percentage of these jobsfor which employees are provided healthinsurance by the Tenant.Tenants need notinclude precise salaries in such reports;rather, with regard to wages,Tenants needonly include the number of jobs and thepercentage of these jobs that are livingwage jobs, as defined in Section VI.A.4,above. Such reports shall be filed for anygiven year or partial year by January 31stof the succeeding year.Appendix F: Living Wage Section of the NoHo Commons CBA |119

Appendix GCIM Project – Memorandum Attachment to DDA| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects Accountable120Following is a memorandum setting outcommunity benefits commitments for theCIM project, described in Appendix B.This memorandum became a legallybinding attachment to the project’s developmentagreement.These communitybenefits commitments are explicitlyenforceable by the Coalition under thelegal status of a designated “third-partybeneficiary.”

121

122

123

124

Appendix H“Economic Prosperity Element” from Preliminary Draftof General Plan for the City of San DiegoFollowing is the City of San Diego’s preliminarydraft for an “Economic Prosperity Element” thatwould be included in the City’s general plan, asdescribed in Appendix A.This language reflectsthe latest version as of this writing.Economic OpportunityDespite the economic growth that has occurredover the last few years, economic prosperity hasnot been evenly distributed in the City of SanDiego. National and local economic trends haveresulted in a combination of fewer middle incomejobs, a concentration and culture of poverty, andincreasing high end job opportunities creatingincreased income, social, and spatial disparities.Among the costs of these disparities, are theincreased service costs incurred by the City andother public agencies and the significant land useimpacts which exacerbate these same disparities.D. Employment Development Goals■■■■■A broad distribution of economic opportunitythroughout the City.A higher standard of living throughincreased wages and benefits inlow-wage industries.A City which provides life-long skillsand learning opportunities by investing inexcellent schools, post-secondary institutions,and opportunities for continuouseducation and training available toexisting residents.Equitable access to educationalopportunities.A City which provides a variety of jobopportunities including middle-incomeemployment opportunities and career laddersfor all segments of the population.Appendix H: “Economic Prosperity Element” |125

| Community Benefits Agreements: Making Development Projects Accountable■A City that will continue to incubategrowth and investment by providing askilled and educated workforce that meetsindustry needs.Employment and Wages DiscussionJob creation and retention are directly related toenhanced economic development opportunities.There is a nationwide economic trend away fromthe production and assembly of physical goodsand toward the provision of services and the productionof intellectual property. Many jobs associatedwith manufacturing which are in the middle-incomerange have moved overseas.Withinthe United States, long-term trends suggest thatworkers and firms have been moving to areas inthe South and Southwest which have lower costsof living and lower wages.San Diego is one of the top ten cities in thecountry projected for job growth in the next 20years. Many new jobs are currently being createdby emerging high-technology companies includingtelecommunications, electronics, computers,software, and biotechnology.The expansion ofhigh-technology industries in San Diego has successfullycreated higher-income employmentopportunities for local residents and has alsoattracted others outside the region seeking hightechnologyemployment. Because these exportdrivenindustries compete in national and internationalmarkets, they have favorable long-termgrowth potential and also support locally-basedfirms which supply services and products.However, the majority of the additional jobs overthe next few years will be in the services industries.Thecontinued success of the visitor industryand retail/business service occupations has resultedin an increased percentage of lower-wageemployment in the City. Unfortunately, the mostsignificant decline in average wages in the regionhave occurred in low-paying industries.The Cityof San Diego should increase the quality of thesejobs by encouraging the development of careerladders in these low-wage industries.The shift away from base-sector manufacturing toboth service and knowledge-based employmenthas contributed to an “hour-glass” economy inthe City. A middle-income job provides benefits,offers full-time employment, and is associatedwith a career ladder.These jobs pay a wage thatwill cover the cost of housing, food and healthcare,with some money left over for discretionaryspending. Middle-income jobs are central to theCity’s economic health because they reduce theburden on social, health, and housing programsand assure an adequate supply of discretionaryincome resulting in higher sales tax revenue forthe City. Savings from public programs and additionalsales tax revenue from discretionary purchasesenable the City to invest in education,mobility, conservation, community infrastructureand other areas vital to San Diego’s economiccompetitiveness.These investments are imperativeas San Diego competes with low-wage regionsand countries to retain middle-income jobs.San Diego must rely on quality of life, a highlyeducated and skilled workforce and localingenuity to continue to retain beneficial industries.In the last ten years, the San Diego regionhas pursued an economic development strategythat focuses on supporting industry clusters thatimport dollars. Although a diverse employmentmix is the key to a stable economy, a new focuson the attraction and growth of middle-incomeemployment and the development of career laddersin low-wage industries should also be consideredwhen updating incentives.PoliciesD.1. Employment land shall be preserved formiddle-income employment uses includingmanufacturing, research and development,distribution, and wholesale trade.126

D.2.The city shall invest in infrastructure, educationaland skill development, and qualityof life assets that support middle-incomeemployment development.D.3.The City shall encourage the developmentof measures that facilitate expansionof high technology business facilities whichhave the potential to create middle-incomejobs likely to be filled by local residents.D.4.Through incentives and legislation, theCity should pursue the creation of middleincomeemployment and higher qualityjobs in low-paying driver industries such asvisitor and entertainment and amusement.D.5.The City should support legislation toincrease health benefits to employees andaddress the rising costs of businessesthat try to provide healthcare fortheir employees.D.6.The City should support measures toincrease wages in low-wage industriesincluding efforts to create career ladders.D.7.The City should support living wage, orsimilar legislation, to increase the standardof living for lower-income residents.D.8.The City should continue topromote job opportunities in low-incomeneighborhoods.Appendix H: “Economic Prosperity Element” |127

California Partnershipfor Working Families436 14th Street, Suite 1126Oakland, CA 94612(510) 834-8503www.californiapartnership.orgGood Jobs First1311 L Street NWWashington, DC 20005202-626-3780www.goodjobsfirst.org

Community Benefits Agreements - Steven Reed Johnson

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?