(d) PAFs affected in MP, have increased due to delay in publication <strong>of</strong> Section 4 notification under the LandAcquisition Act.(e) Persons socially or physically cut-<strong>of</strong>f due to impounding <strong>of</strong> water in reservoir, are also considered as PAFs byall the three States.(f) All the three States decided to consider encroachers as PAFs.(g) Major unmarried daughters in Maharashtra are considered as a separate family by Government <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra.(h) Some genuine PAFs were earlier left out (as many stayed in remote areas or used to undertake seasonalmigration to towns and developed areas in search <strong>of</strong> casual work).185. As far as the State <strong>of</strong> Gujarat is concerned, its contention is that the task <strong>of</strong> R&R is not impossible asrecognised by the FMG-I in its 1994 report and according to the State, it is fully ready and prepared to resettle inGujarat all the PAFs upto FRL 455 ft.186. On 13 November 1996, a meeting <strong>of</strong> the Review Committee <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Narmada</strong> Control Authority chaired by the<strong>Union</strong> Minister <strong>of</strong> Water Resources was held. This meeting was attended by the Chief Ministers <strong>of</strong> all the Statesincluding Rajasthan and representatives <strong>of</strong> Ministry <strong>of</strong> Environment and Forests, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Social Justice andEmpowerment, Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>India</strong>. In the meeting it was unanimously decided that the reviews <strong>of</strong> theimplementation <strong>of</strong> the resettlement and rehabilitation measures will be undertaken for every five-metre height <strong>of</strong>the dam jointly by the concerned R&R Sub-group and Environment Sub-group so that work could progress paripassu with the implementation measures. In its meeting held on 6 January 1999, the R&R Sub-group <strong>of</strong> the NCAobserved that arrangements made by the states for R&R <strong>of</strong> the balance families pertaining to the dam height EL 90metre were adequate and a meeting <strong>of</strong> the party States should be convened shortly to finalise the action plan.Pursuant thereto a special inter-state meeting was convened under the chairmanship <strong>of</strong> the Secretary to theGovernment <strong>of</strong> <strong>India</strong>, Ministry <strong>of</strong> Social Justice and Empowerment on 21 January 1999 at New Delhi and actionplan for resettlement and rehabilitation for balanced (sic) families <strong>of</strong> dam height EL 90 metre was finalised forimplementation by the States. It is the case <strong>of</strong> the State <strong>of</strong> Gujarat that it had issued notices and made <strong>of</strong>fers inJanuary 1998 to PAFs affected at RL 90 metre in connection with the selection <strong>of</strong> land and their resettlement inGujarat. According to it, even in respect <strong>of</strong> PAFs affected at RL 95 metre, notices were issued in January 1999 andto the PAFs included in the subsequent list, notices were issued in September 1999. The process <strong>of</strong> land selectionby PAFs who had opted to resettle in Gujarat at RL 95 meter was already started. According to the <strong>Union</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>India</strong>,the Master Plan was under implementation and the progress <strong>of</strong> R&R at various elevations <strong>of</strong> dam viz. EL 90metre, EL 95 metre, EL 110 metre and FRL 138.68 metre had been made.187. The measures which have been implemented for sustainable development with regard to preserving thesocio-cultural environment <strong>of</strong> the displaced persons in the States <strong>of</strong> Maharashtra, Gujarat and Madhya Pradeshare stated to be as follows:• Three choices to the people for the selection <strong>of</strong> relocation sites.• Integration <strong>of</strong> the displaced person with the neighbouring villages by organising medical check-up camps,animal husbandry camps, festivals, eye camps, rural development seminar for village workers etc.• Establishment <strong>of</strong> rehabilitation committees at different levels.• Respect <strong>of</strong> traditional beliefs, rituals and rights at the starting <strong>of</strong> house construction, the day and time <strong>of</strong>leaving the old house and village and the day and time <strong>of</strong> occupying the new house etc.• The sacred places at the native villages are being recreated along with their settlements at new sites.• Installation <strong>of</strong> all the religious deities with the due consultation <strong>of</strong> religious heads.• Promotion <strong>of</strong> cultural milieu viz social festivals, religious rights, rights <strong>of</strong> passage, presence <strong>of</strong> priests, shaman,kinsmen, clansmen etc.• Special consideration for the preservation <strong>of</strong> holistic nature <strong>of</strong> the culture.39
• Proper use <strong>of</strong> built-in-mechanism <strong>of</strong> cultural heritage <strong>of</strong> the displaced persons.• Launching <strong>of</strong> culturally appropriate development plan.• Genuine representation <strong>of</strong> the traditional leader.188. The Tribunal had already made provision <strong>of</strong> various civic amenities which were further liberalised by theState Governments during implementation. The existing development programmes were strengthened for ensuringsustainable development at the rehabilitation sites. These were Integrated Rural Development Programme (IRDP)for agriculture, business and village industries; Integrated Child Development Scheme (ICDS) for nutrition, healthand education; Jawahar Rojgar Yojna (JRY); aids for improved seeds, fertilisers, irrigation, animal husbandry;Training Rural Youth for self-employment (TRYSEM); Employment Guarantee Schemes (EGS), Social Assistance;Industrial Training Institute (ITI); Tribal Development Programme (TDP), financial benefits to the backwardclasses, economically weaker sections, tribals and other backward classes (OBC), eye camps, subsidies to farmers(seed, tractorisation, fertilisers, diesel, etc.) agricultural prices support subsidy etc.189. Other benefits which were extended for improving the quality <strong>of</strong> life <strong>of</strong> the resettled PAFs included fodderfarm, mobile sale, shop <strong>of</strong> fodder, seeds cultivation training, initial help in land preparation for agricultural activities,better seeds and fertilisers, access to finance, special programme for women in the traditional skills entrepreneurshipdevelopment, employment skill formation, different plantation programmes, special emphasis for pasturemanagement, environment awareness and education programme, programme for bio-gas/smokeless chulhas, safedrinking water supply, electricity, lift irrigation, fertilisers kit distribution, gypsum treatment <strong>of</strong> soil etc.190. The project authorities in these three States <strong>of</strong> Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat and Maharashtra represented thatcomprehensive health care was available in tribal areas where the displaced families had been resettled. It wascontended that extensive preventive health measures like mass immunisation, anti-malaria programme, familywelfareprogrammes, child development schemes, etc. had been undertaken. What is important is that primaryhealth centres were established at relocation sites for all necessary health facilities to the PAFs.191. The submission on behalf <strong>of</strong> <strong>Union</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>India</strong> was that there was a well established mechanism <strong>of</strong> Government<strong>of</strong> <strong>India</strong> for coordination and monitoring <strong>of</strong> R&R programmes in case <strong>of</strong> Sardar Sarovar Project. The R&R Subgroupand Rehabilitation Committee <strong>of</strong> <strong>Narmada</strong> Control Authority are responsible for applying their independentmind on R&R. The Sub-group convenes its meeting regularly to monitor and review the progress <strong>of</strong> R&R whileRehabilitation Committee visits the submergence areas/relocation sites to see whether the rehabilitation is takingplace physically and to hear the individual problems <strong>of</strong> the PAPs. The R&R group, keeping in view the progress<strong>of</strong> relief and rehabilitation, has not permitted the height to be raised, until and unless it is satisfied that adequatesatisfactory progress has been made with regard to R&R. Whereas at an earlier point <strong>of</strong> time in 1994, the constructionschedule had required the minimum block level to be raised to 85 meters, the R&R Sub-group had permitted thesame to be raised to EL 69 meter only during that period to match the R&R activity. It was in the meeting <strong>of</strong> R&RSub-group on 6 January 1999 after the R&R Sub-group had reviewed the progress and had satisfied itself that theland for resettlement in Gujarat, Maharashtra and Madhya Pradesh, which were available, was more than requiredfor the resettlement <strong>of</strong> the balanced PAFs that it cleared the construction upto the dam height EL 90 meters. Theaction plan for the same had been approved and is under implementation by the States concerned.192. The petitioners had contended that no proper surveys were carried out to determine the different categories <strong>of</strong>affected persons as the total number <strong>of</strong> affected persons had been shown at a much lower side and that many hadbeen denied PAF status. From what is being stated hereinabove, it is clear that each state has drawn a detailedaction plan and it is after requisite study had been made that the number <strong>of</strong> PAFs have been identified. The numberhas substantially increased from what was estimated in the Tribunal’s Award. The reason for the same, as alreadynoticed, is the liberalisation <strong>of</strong> the R&R packages by the State Governments. Except for a bald assertion, thereappears to be no material on which this Court can come to the conclusion that no proper surveys had been carriedout for determining the number <strong>of</strong> PAFs who would be adversely affected by the construction <strong>of</strong> the dam.193. Resettlement and rehabilitation packages in the three States were different due to different geographical,local and economic conditions and availability <strong>of</strong> land in the States. The liberal packages available to the SardarSarovar Project oustees in Gujarat are not even available to the project affected people <strong>of</strong> other projects in Gujarat.It is incorrect to say that the difference in R&R packages, the package <strong>of</strong> Gujarat being the most liberal, amountsto restricting the choice <strong>of</strong> the oustees. Each State has its own package and oustees have an option to select the onewhich was most attractive to them. A project affected family may, for instance, choose to leave its home State <strong>of</strong>40