12.07.2015 Views

Narmada Bachao Andolan vs. Union of India - International ...

Narmada Bachao Andolan vs. Union of India - International ...

Narmada Bachao Andolan vs. Union of India - International ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

etween RL 95 m and RL 110 m but would also serve to accommodate PAFs from submergence villages whichwould be getting affected at levels above RL 110 m. The action plan giving the village wise details is said to havebeen sent to NCA in June 2000 for its approval.230. According to the said affidavit the balance number <strong>of</strong> PAFs remaining to be resettled at Gujarat at FRL138.68 m is 10,765. Taking into account that an additional area <strong>of</strong> 10 percent towards house plot and civicamenities would be required in addition to the allotment <strong>of</strong> minimum 2 hectares <strong>of</strong> agricultural land, the total landrequirement per PAF would be approximately 2.2 hectares. For planning purposes in respect <strong>of</strong> 10,765 PAFs theland requirement would be about 23,700 hectares. As against this requirement the status <strong>of</strong> land, as per the saidaffidavit, under different categories with the Government <strong>of</strong> Gujarat is stated to be as under:Sr. No. Particulars Land (ha)1. Land identified (<strong>of</strong>fers received in respect <strong>of</strong> private 15,716land and Government land)2. Land available (private land for which price is approved 480by Expert Committee and <strong>of</strong>fer/counter <strong>of</strong>fer conveyedand acceptance <strong>of</strong> land holder is obtained)3. Land in possession <strong>of</strong> SSPA/GoG in 12 districts 8,416Total 24,612It is averred that between March and 21 June 2000 the land in possession as well as the land identified hasincreased considerably.231. It has also been explained in the said affidavit that the Government <strong>of</strong> Gujarat has a well established practice<strong>of</strong> procuring land for R&R at realistic market prices from willing sellers. Officers hold discussions with prospectiveresettlers, verify the suitability <strong>of</strong> land and after the price is settled, the same is procured through legal process <strong>of</strong>Land Acquisition Act and consent awards are passed so that the PAPs are assured <strong>of</strong> undisputed legal title freefrom encumbrances. This process <strong>of</strong> negotiated purchase has been streamlined. At the instance <strong>of</strong> GRA, a retiredjudge <strong>of</strong> the High Court is now appointed as Chairman <strong>of</strong> the Expert Committee with retired senior governmentsecretaries as its members. This Expert Committee oversees the exercise <strong>of</strong> purchase <strong>of</strong> suitable land at the marketprice. At the instance <strong>of</strong> the GRA, PAPs are being issues Sanads for the land allotted to them which will ensureprovision <strong>of</strong> a proper legal document in their favour.232. Dealing with the term <strong>of</strong> the Award to the effect that Gujarat shall acquire and make available a year inadvance <strong>of</strong> the submergence before each successive stage, land and house sites for rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> the ousteefamilies from Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra who are willing to migrate to Gujarat, the affidavit states that theGujarat Government has already identified sufficient land for accommodating the balance PAFs remaining to beresettled in Gujarat at FRL 138.68 m. In respect <strong>of</strong> PAFs upto RL 110 m, Gujarat has sufficient land available tomeet the R&R requirements but for the PAFs above 110 m, suitable land has already been identified and the samewould be acquired and made available one year in advance <strong>of</strong> submergence before each successive stage. Theaffidavit gives reason as to why it is not advisable for the State, at this stage to acquire the total requirement <strong>of</strong> landfor FRL in one go. What is stated in the affidavit is as follows:i. Since at present GoG has sufficient land to meet R&R requirement to accommodated PAFs upto RL 110m, it would not be necessary to acquire further land immediately, especially when the additional landwould be required only after the R&R Sub-group and Environment Sub-group give approval for RL 95 mto RL 110 m after examining the preparedness at different stages. This would ensure that public money isnot unnecessarily blocked for a long period.ii.By acquiring land much before it would be required, problems <strong>of</strong> illegal trespass are likely to arise.iii. The excess land would, by and large, remain fallow and no agricultural production would take place.iv. If the land remains fallow for long the overall productivity <strong>of</strong> the land would be adversely affected.47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!