12.07.2015 Views

Guide for the Development of Results-based Management and ...

Guide for the Development of Results-based Management and ...

Guide for the Development of Results-based Management and ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

RMAF <strong>Guide</strong> August, 2001contribution <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> policy, program or initiative to <strong>the</strong>se achieved outcomes (<strong>of</strong>tencalled summative evaluations).The first step in developing an evaluation strategy involves identifying <strong>the</strong> issues <strong>and</strong> associated questionsthat need to be addressed during <strong>the</strong> periodic evaluations. The identification <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> evaluation issues <strong>and</strong>questions provides a guide <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> strategy that ensures all essential issues will beaddressed during later evaluation. A key benefit to <strong>the</strong> identification <strong>of</strong> issues at this stage is that <strong>the</strong>se are<strong>the</strong>n used to elaborate a set <strong>of</strong> data requirements <strong>and</strong> data collection strategies, which, on implementation,helps to ensure that in<strong>for</strong>mation necessary <strong>for</strong> evaluation is available when it is needed. As such, <strong>the</strong>evaluation strategy needs to be linked to <strong>the</strong> ongoing per<strong>for</strong>mance measurement strategy as someevaluation data requirements will be met through ongoing per<strong>for</strong>mance measurement activities.Evaluation issues are <strong>the</strong> broad areas which need to be explored within an evaluation while evaluationquestions are <strong>the</strong> more specific research questions that need to be answered in order to be able to addresseach evaluation issue. Some issues <strong>and</strong> questions might only be relevant during a <strong>for</strong>mative evaluation,o<strong>the</strong>rs only in <strong>the</strong> context <strong>of</strong> a summative evaluation <strong>and</strong> yet some might be relevant during both. Everypolicy, program or initiative will have its own unique set <strong>of</strong> evaluation issues as well as intended schedule<strong>for</strong> evaluation. For example, initiatives <strong>of</strong> a limited timeframe may require a <strong>for</strong>mative evaluation afterbeing in place <strong>for</strong> only a year, whereas longer-term policies, programs or initiatives may require a<strong>for</strong>mative evaluation after two or three years <strong>of</strong> operation.b. ProcessAs presented in Appendix B: Evaluation St<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> Government <strong>of</strong> Canada, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Treasury BoardEvaluation Policy, <strong>the</strong>re are three primary issue areas <strong>for</strong> evaluation that need to be considered:Relevance - Does <strong>the</strong> policy, program or initiative continue to be consistent withdepartmental <strong>and</strong> government-wide priorities, <strong>and</strong> does it realistically address an actualneed?Success - Is <strong>the</strong> policy, program or initiative effective in meeting its intendedoutcomes, within budget <strong>and</strong> without unwanted negative outcomes? Is <strong>the</strong> policy,program or initiative making progress toward <strong>the</strong> achievement <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> final outcomes?Cost-Effectiveness - Are <strong>the</strong> most appropriate <strong>and</strong> efficient means being used toachieve outcomes, relative to alternative design <strong>and</strong> delivery approaches?22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!