<strong>The</strong> <strong>Persistence</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innovation</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Government</strong>: A Guide for Innovative Public Servantswww.bus<strong>in</strong>ess<strong>of</strong>government.orgAttention to the media can build support for the <strong>in</strong>novation, as well as <strong>in</strong>crease the likelihood<strong>of</strong> transfer. Innovators should look for the dramatic and <strong>in</strong>spir<strong>in</strong>g human stories embeddedwith<strong>in</strong> their program’s history, whether among clients or implementers, as a means <strong>of</strong> attract<strong>in</strong>gmedia <strong>in</strong>terest. Such stories can also be featured on agency websites and <strong>in</strong> future awardsapplications. <strong>The</strong> media are likely to research such stories to check their validity, just as theycheck quantitative performance measures. Do not assume, therefore, that the media will beuncritically supportive.Recommendation Eleven: Respond to critics.Even after an <strong>in</strong>novation has been successfully implemented, it is likely to have ongo<strong>in</strong>g critics.<strong>The</strong> most frequent are those who oppose its philosophy, as dist<strong>in</strong>ct from those whooppose it because it harms their <strong>in</strong>terests (Bor<strong>in</strong>s, 2014, pp. 99 –103). <strong>The</strong> best responses tocriticism parallel the best responses to obstacles <strong>in</strong> the course <strong>of</strong> implementation. Innovatorsshould respond to philosophical opposition with the tools <strong>of</strong> persuasion, namely arguments forthe virtues <strong>of</strong> an <strong>in</strong>itiative and demonstrations that it is deliver<strong>in</strong>g widespread benefits.Quantitative outcome measures and external reviews can be useful ammunition here. So, too,can <strong>in</strong>dividual case histories <strong>of</strong> clients. Where possible, <strong>in</strong>novators should respond to argumentsthat an <strong>in</strong>novation harms certa<strong>in</strong> groups’ <strong>in</strong>terests with accommodation. Fail<strong>in</strong>g that,<strong>in</strong>novators should <strong>of</strong>fer the counter-argument that the <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>of</strong> those the <strong>in</strong>novation benefitsare broader and/or more press<strong>in</strong>g than the <strong>in</strong>terests <strong>of</strong> those it harms, supported with quantitativeevidence.Recommendations to <strong>Government</strong> ExecutivesRecommendation One: Support local heroes.Approximately half <strong>of</strong> the HKS Awards semif<strong>in</strong>alist programs, both <strong>in</strong> the early 1990s and <strong>in</strong>2010, were <strong>in</strong>itiated by middle managers or frontl<strong>in</strong>e public servants. This should encouragea middle manager or frontl<strong>in</strong>e public servant to put his ideas forward. It should also conv<strong>in</strong>cepolitically appo<strong>in</strong>ted agency heads and senior executives <strong>in</strong> government organizations toempower these local heroes and create a supportive organizational culture. Senior executivescould do this by free<strong>in</strong>g up some <strong>of</strong> the <strong>in</strong>novator’s time, provid<strong>in</strong>g a modicum <strong>of</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancialresources, and listen<strong>in</strong>g with an open m<strong>in</strong>d to her proposals. If the <strong>in</strong>novation is implementedand is successful, recognition is due. 14Recommendation Two: Protect public servants associated with unsuccessful<strong>in</strong>novations.A will<strong>in</strong>gness to <strong>in</strong>novate entails an awareness that some <strong>in</strong>novations will fail. Individual publicservants will have managed the failed <strong>in</strong>novations. An <strong>in</strong>novative culture will accept failurewith equanimity, term<strong>in</strong>ate programs that do not work, and learn from them. An <strong>in</strong>novativeculture will not tolerate <strong>in</strong>ternal blam<strong>in</strong>g and sham<strong>in</strong>g, where public servants who have beenassociated with failures are stigmatized or fired. <strong>The</strong>re should never be any question that theywill carry on with their careers, mov<strong>in</strong>g on to other projects, positions, and responsibilities.14. Twenty-five percent <strong>of</strong> the 2010 HKS Award semif<strong>in</strong>alists reported receiv<strong>in</strong>g some sort <strong>of</strong> award from their own government (Bor<strong>in</strong>s2014, Table 6-5, p. 117).31
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Persistence</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Innovation</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Government</strong>: A Guide for Innovative Public ServantsIBM Center for <strong>The</strong> Bus<strong>in</strong>ess <strong>of</strong> <strong>Government</strong>Recommendation Three: Support communities <strong>of</strong> practice and other <strong>in</strong>itiatives topromote <strong>in</strong>terorganizational dialogue at the front l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> government organization.Given that so much public sector <strong>in</strong>novation <strong>in</strong>volves <strong>in</strong>terorganizational collaboration, middlemanagers and frontl<strong>in</strong>e staff should look beyond their organizations’ boundaries. Conversationswith counterparts <strong>in</strong> other public sector organizations might spark an <strong>in</strong>novation. F<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gopportunities for such dialogue <strong>in</strong>creases the likelihood that a spark will be struck. <strong>The</strong> establishmentwith<strong>in</strong> governments <strong>of</strong> communities <strong>of</strong> practice, <strong>of</strong>ten supported by wikis, is one way<strong>of</strong> facilitat<strong>in</strong>g contact across agency boundaries.Recommendation Four: Support performance management systems because theyencourage <strong>in</strong>novative problem solv<strong>in</strong>g.Two decades <strong>of</strong> research on public sector <strong>in</strong>novation have shown the prevalence <strong>of</strong> problemsolv<strong>in</strong>g, rather than crisis response, as a motivator. Performance management systems, especiallyif they produce real-time results, provide essential <strong>in</strong>formation on evolv<strong>in</strong>g problems.Awareness <strong>of</strong> these problems stimulates <strong>in</strong>novation. In addition, hav<strong>in</strong>g an organization-wideperformance management system encourages, if not obligates, <strong>in</strong>novators to establish metricsto track how well their <strong>in</strong>novation is work<strong>in</strong>g. This research has also shown that <strong>in</strong>novationswhose performance is measured, both <strong>in</strong>ternally and by external evaluators, are more likely toproduce achievements that receive external recognition.32