02.12.2012 Views

Martina Schäfer, Noara Kebir, Daniel Philipp (editors) - TU Berlin

Martina Schäfer, Noara Kebir, Daniel Philipp (editors) - TU Berlin

Martina Schäfer, Noara Kebir, Daniel Philipp (editors) - TU Berlin

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PROCEEDINGS Conference MPDES 2011<br />

family farm: in the context of operating the biogas plant,<br />

those which were referred to most frequently comprise of<br />

an internal knowledge system, technical skills, short<br />

distances and social skills.<br />

Internal knowledge system: By consciously using the<br />

internal knowledge system, the farming families refer to<br />

knowledge which can be characterized as contextual,<br />

experimental and integrated (following e.g. Stuiver,<br />

Leeuwis & Ploeg, 2004). Contextual knowledge is<br />

founded on recognized and applied uniqueness of the<br />

time-spatial settings of the particular biogas plant and its<br />

operation, for example when a decision about which kind<br />

of recommended energy crops and cropping system<br />

should be implemented at a height of 850 m above sea<br />

level. Experimental knowledge describes knowledge<br />

which is bound to practical skills. Its relevance has<br />

already been revealed in the family farms’ descriptions of<br />

their plant planning process. Thus visiting colleagues who<br />

operate biogas plants beforehand has been rated as one of<br />

the most important ways of becoming informed. One<br />

farmer alone made 50 visits. Integrated knowledge is<br />

mainly concerned with the ability to take an overview of<br />

and to coordinate complex situations, such as the<br />

interaction of the biogas plant operation with other areas<br />

of production within the family farm, not least to unfold<br />

synergies. In the process of operating their biogas plant<br />

these types of knowledge were relevant within the whole<br />

work flow. They were considered very necessary,<br />

especially when making use of external knowledge such<br />

as expert recommendations referring to the plant process.<br />

Technical skills: Almost all family farms rated technical<br />

skills as crucial, comprising of a basic understanding of<br />

technical interrelations as well as an affinity with<br />

technology. Their relevance is demonstrated whenever<br />

handling disturbances in the technical work flow need to<br />

be assessed. At least for quickly carrying out minor<br />

repairs and regular maintenance work themselves, as well<br />

as always ensuring the system operation, it is considered<br />

very important.<br />

Short distances: Taking account of short distances is<br />

another aspect valued in different ways. Minimizing<br />

transportation routes is seen as very important as a means<br />

of economizing one’s working steps. The average distance<br />

for transporting substrata as well as digestate is 2 to 3<br />

kilometers. Most of the family farms also value their<br />

average distance of 60 meters between the residential<br />

building and biogas plant for purposes of inspection<br />

walkways. Besides daily regular inspections, it has a lot to<br />

do with taking sights spontaneously like, for example,<br />

casually looking at the gas hood.<br />

Last but not least, social skills are considered as a very<br />

important aspect of the quality of labor in the context of<br />

operating the biogas plant. The key skills within the<br />

context of supporting the work flow of biogas plant<br />

operation varied between specific cases. In one family<br />

farm, which had expanded its activities in regional value<br />

chains of energy supply, the significance of the skill to<br />

communicate directly with colleagues, neighbors etc. and<br />

either preventing or quickly solving upcoming conflicts<br />

was made clear. Another family farm is benefiting from<br />

having very reliable and flexible cooperation partners, for<br />

example in coping with technical repairs of the biogas<br />

plant, proved to use its capacity to recognize and to<br />

integrate individual and shared specificities into enjoying<br />

work.<br />

Cultural Capital, defined here as the regionally grown<br />

specialties of, for example, the regionally-grown circuits<br />

and networks that link the family farm to specific<br />

stakeholders e.g. consumers within the region.<br />

The importance of cultural capital was not seen as great<br />

as the importance of ecological and human capital by<br />

most family farms. Nevertheless, several forms of<br />

networks with a particular focus on advancing in general<br />

renewable energies or organic farming had experienced<br />

support as a means of strengthening their own plan of<br />

action.<br />

Sustaining Self-Determined Innovativeness<br />

Innovativeness is immanent in family farms. It has its<br />

source in the intrinsic necessity to change continuously in<br />

the course of a seasonal rhythm, breaks in the weather,<br />

amendments in societal guidelines or technical progress.<br />

Sustaining self-determined innovativeness, particularly<br />

with regard to interactions between novelties and<br />

innovations, is considered to be essential.<br />

A novelty is here defined as an innovation within the<br />

farm which originates in the needs and expertise of the<br />

farming family. Thus the definition follows Ploeg et al.<br />

(2004) who describes novelties as “a modification of, and<br />

sometimes a break with, existing routines” and further as<br />

a “new insight into an existing practice or might consist of<br />

a new practice” or a new or evolved artifact. Novelties are<br />

founded “through complex cycles of careful observation,<br />

interpretation, re-organization and evaluation”. In order<br />

to create them, it is of crucial importance to act within<br />

day-to-day business in a very flexible and spontaneous<br />

way. Observing the creation of novelties within a certain<br />

period of time, their interwovenness appears as a web of<br />

novelties (Figure 5). As such it expresses how specific<br />

novelties are built upon each other and sometimes even<br />

complement each other (Ploeg, 2008).<br />

Figure 5: A virtual web of novelties, symbolizing their<br />

interwovenness (following Ploeg, 2008).<br />

An innovation is defined here in contrast to a novelty<br />

(following e.g. Ploeg et al., 2004). It comprises of new<br />

practices or artifacts which are primary founded on<br />

knowledge and expertise of external specialists in<br />

technology and science. An innovation can be bought as a<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!