02.12.2012 Views

Pulsatilla vulgaris (L.) Mill. - Plantlife

Pulsatilla vulgaris (L.) Mill. - Plantlife

Pulsatilla vulgaris (L.) Mill. - Plantlife

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Of the 10 vice-counties with surviving populations, seven only have single colonies.<br />

Bedfordshire and East Gloucestershire have the most with 4 and 5 populations respectively.<br />

Half the English populations support less than 100 plants, including one site (Ledsham, Midwest<br />

Yorkshire) with a single individual (known since 1984). Only five sites (28%) support in<br />

excess of 1000 plants (Fig 4a). Although total population sizes are difficult to estimate, recent<br />

counts on these sites suggest the following totals: 20,000 at Barnack Hill and Holes, 75,000 at<br />

Barnsley Wold, 5,000 at Barton Hills, 1,000 at Knocking Hoe and 60,000 at Therfield Heath<br />

(Tarpey, 1999; see Annex 2 for details). These five sites account for 99.3% of the total British<br />

population. Of the eighteen surviving populations 4 appear to be declining and are threatened<br />

with extinction, 9 are stable and 5 appear to be increasing due to improvements in grazing<br />

regimes (Table 3; see Annex 2 for details).<br />

Figure 3 – The hectad<br />

distribution of <strong>Pulsatilla</strong><br />

<strong>vulgaris</strong> in Britain and Ireland.<br />

Solid black circles are hectads<br />

where P. <strong>vulgaris</strong> has been<br />

recorded since 2000; solid grey<br />

circles, recorded 1987-1999;<br />

open circles, recorded before<br />

1987; X, introduced.<br />

Historical losses appear to have been high in all vice-counties especially East Gloucestershire,<br />

South Lincolnshire and Berkshire where 77%, 89% and 92% of populations have gone extinct<br />

(Table 2). The rate of loss appears to have been increased consistently since 1750 from around<br />

1.8 populations per decade to 6.0 since 1950 (Fig. 4b) although these figures presumably<br />

underestimate rates for earlier periods as fewer ‘extinction events’ are likely to have been<br />

detected by eighteenth century botanists (as fewer populations were then known).<br />

Consequently the total number of populations has displayed a consistent downward trend (Fig.<br />

4c). However, since 1960, the first period when we have detailed information on the size of<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!