12.07.2015 Views

(CASAC) Peer Review of EPA's Integrated Science Assessment

(CASAC) Peer Review of EPA's Integrated Science Assessment

(CASAC) Peer Review of EPA's Integrated Science Assessment

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Dr. Steven KleebergerComments on SOx 2 nd Draft ISA3. In the revision, we reduced redundancy, added summary sections and reorganizedChapter 3. In addition, discussions on potential confounding by and interactions withcopollutants have been added. The 2nd draft ISA also includes additional analyses <strong>of</strong>individual-level data from human clinical studies (Sections 3.1.3. and 4.1.1) that buildsupon the analysis included in the 1994 Supplement to the Second Addendum. Thetoxicology sections were reorganized to focus on studies using more relevantconcentrations <strong>of</strong> SO2 and sections were added to better discuss mode <strong>of</strong> action andpotential particle-SO2 interactions. We are requesting <strong>CASAC</strong> review specifically onthese analyses as well as on the integration <strong>of</strong> the overall evidence from the humanclinical, animal toxicological, and epidemiological studies.Overall, the reorganized Chapter 3 is greatly improved over the previous version.In particular, the following aspects <strong>of</strong> the Chapter were useful:• Summary <strong>of</strong> findings from the previous review – these provide much needed anduseful reference points to enable evaluation <strong>of</strong> the more current investigations.• Redundancy was largely eliminated, though some repetition remains that could beedited or removed.• Additional individual-level data (i.e. specific numbers <strong>of</strong> individuals in responsegroups) enabled better evaluation <strong>of</strong> between-individual variation and the impacton interpretation <strong>of</strong> results.• Removal <strong>of</strong> animal studies that used SO2 concentrations that had questionableenvironmental relevance was appropriate, though some remain that likely couldalso be removed.• The end-section summaries were very useful and largely presented a reasonableevaluation <strong>of</strong> the literature with respect to weight <strong>of</strong> evidence for causaldetermination.• Incorporation <strong>of</strong> the effects <strong>of</strong> SOx intervention and subsequent change in healthoutcomes into evaluation <strong>of</strong> causality was appropriate and useful.Additional Comments:While it may be argued that SO2/particle interactions should be included in theISA document, the case was made in the REA that the current review <strong>of</strong> the SO2NAAQS would focus on gaseous species <strong>of</strong> sulfur oxides and not consider health effectsdirectly associated with particulate sulfur oxide species. These species and their healtheffects instead will be reviewed in the PM document. However, one <strong>of</strong> the sections in the24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!