13.07.2015 Views

a piezoelectric contact problem with slip dependent coefficient of ...

a piezoelectric contact problem with slip dependent coefficient of ...

a piezoelectric contact problem with slip dependent coefficient of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Piezoelectric Contact Problem <strong>with</strong> Slip Dependent Coefficient 231density q 0 . It is also submitted to mechanical and electric constraints on the boundary.To describe them, we consider a partition <strong>of</strong> Γ into three measurable parts Γ 1 , Γ 2 ,Γ 3 , on one hand, and on two measurable parts Γ a and Γ b , on the other hand, suchthat meas Γ 1 > 0 and meas Γ a > 0. We assume that the body is clamped on Γ 1and surfaces tractions <strong>of</strong> density f 2 act on Γ 2 . On Γ 3 the body is in frictional <strong>contact</strong><strong>with</strong> an obstacle, the so-called foundation. We model the <strong>contact</strong> <strong>with</strong> a version <strong>of</strong>Coulomb’s law <strong>of</strong> dry friction, already used in [3] and [6], in which the normal stressis prescribed and the <strong>coefficient</strong> <strong>of</strong> friction depends on the <strong>slip</strong>. We also assume thatthe electrical potential vanishes on Γ a and a surface electric charge <strong>of</strong> density q 2is prescribed on Γ b . We denote by S d the space <strong>of</strong> second order symmetric tensorson R d or, equivalently, the space <strong>of</strong> symmetric matrices <strong>of</strong> order d. Also, below νrepresents the unit outward normal on Γ while “ · ” and ‖ · ‖ denote the inner productand the Euclidean norm on R d and S d , respectively.With the assumption above, the <strong>problem</strong> <strong>of</strong> equilibrium <strong>of</strong> the electroelastic bodyin frictional <strong>contact</strong> <strong>with</strong> a foundation is the following.Problem P . Find a displacement field u : Ω → R d , a stress field σ : Ω → S d , anelectric potential ϕ : Ω → R and an electric displacement field D : Ω → R d suchthatσ = Fε(u) − E T E(ϕ) in Ω, (2.1)D = Eε(u) + βE(ϕ) in Ω, (2.2)Div σ + f 0 = 0 in Ω, (2.3)div D = q 0 in Ω, (2.4)u = 0 on Γ 1 , (2.5)σν = f 2 on Γ 2 , (2.6)− σ ν = S on Γ 3 , (2.7){‖στ ‖ ≤ µ(‖u τ ‖)|S|,σ τ = −µ(‖u τ ‖)|S| ‖u uττ ‖ , if u τ ≠ 0on Γ 3 ,(2.8)ϕ = 0 on Γ a , (2.9)D · ν = q 2 on Γ b . (2.10)In (2.1) – (2.10) and below, in order to simplify the notation, we do not indicateexplicitly the dependence <strong>of</strong> various functions on the spatial variable x ∈ Ω ∪ Γ .Equations (2.1) and (2.2) represent the electroelastic constitutive law <strong>of</strong> the materialin which F is a given nonlinear function, ε(u) denotes the small strain tensor,E(ϕ) = −∇ϕ is the electric field, E represents the third order <strong>piezoelectric</strong> tensor,E T is its transposite and β denotes the electric permitivitty tensor. Details <strong>of</strong> thelinear version <strong>of</strong> the constitutive relations (2.1) and (2.2) can be find in [1, 2]. Equations(2.3) and (2.4) represent the equilibrium equations for the stress and electricdisplacementfields, respectively, (2.5) and (2.6) are the displacement and tractionboundary conditions, respectively, and (2.9), (2.10) represent the electric boundaryconditions.We now provide some comments on the frictional <strong>contact</strong> conditions (2.7) and(2.8), which are our main interest. Condition (2.7) states that the normal stress σ ν

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!