13.07.2015 Views

Counterexamples to Calabi conjectures on minimal hypersurfaces ...

Counterexamples to Calabi conjectures on minimal hypersurfaces ...

Counterexamples to Calabi conjectures on minimal hypersurfaces ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2 The resultsPart (a) of Theorem 2.1 below extends the main results given in [1] for compact<strong>hypersurfaces</strong>. Part (b) generalizes s<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>chastic incompleteness results of [2] and [10]for <strong>minimal</strong> submanifolds.In the following we denote⎧ √ √ √⎨ b cot( bt) if b > 0, t < π/2 b,C b (t) = 1/t if b = 0,⎩ √ √−b coth( −b t) if b < 0.Theorem 2.1 Let ϕ: M m → N n−l × R l be an isometric immersi<strong>on</strong> of a completeRiemannian manifold M of dimensi<strong>on</strong> m ≥ l + 1. Let B N (r) be the geodesic ballof N n−l centered at p with radius r. Given q ∈ M, assume that the radial secti<strong>on</strong>alcurvature K radNbounded as K radNal<strong>on</strong>g the radial geodesics issuing from p = π N(ϕ(q)) ∈ N n−l is≤ b in B N(r). Suppose thatϕ(M) ⊂ B N (r) × R lfor r < min{inj N (p), π/2 √ b}, where we replace π/2 √ b by +∞ if b ≤ 0.(a) If ϕ: M m → N n−l × R l is proper, then(b) Ifthen M is s<str<strong>on</strong>g>to</str<strong>on</strong>g>chastically incomplete.(m − l)sup |H| ≥M m C b(r). (1)(m − l)sup |H|

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!