13.07.2015 Views

CAMP for Mammals of India - Zoo Outreach Organisation

CAMP for Mammals of India - Zoo Outreach Organisation

CAMP for Mammals of India - Zoo Outreach Organisation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3. To create a set <strong>of</strong> "survey, search and find" recommendations <strong>for</strong> the species that clearly lack in<strong>for</strong>mation(DD species).4. To create a set <strong>of</strong> conservation recommendations <strong>for</strong> species that are threatened.5. To list the problems working groups had in applying the revised IUCN Red List criteria to species <strong>for</strong><strong>for</strong>warding to the Task Force which is to be set up to review the application <strong>of</strong> the revised criteria so far.6. To produce a Draft Report <strong>of</strong> the work done to be sent <strong>for</strong> correction to participants and then a Report toorganisations and individuals relevant to conservation <strong>of</strong> <strong>India</strong>n mammals.Results and DiscussionRed List categories have been in use since the 1960s with few revisions made until 1990. The criteria on whichthese categories are based and – <strong>for</strong> the most part – their intended application were based on mammals.However, since 1991, the IUCN Red List Categories have undergone a series <strong>of</strong> revisions to enhance theirapplicability to organisms other than mammals and to reflect the development <strong>of</strong> the new conservation sciences,population dynamics and conservation biology <strong>of</strong> the last two decades. The current version <strong>of</strong> the IUCN RedList Criteria is the version that was ratified in December 1994 by the IUCN General Assembly. This version hasfar more objective criteria <strong>for</strong> assessment as well as detailed guidelines on how to use the criteria in deriving thecategory <strong>of</strong> threat status. There<strong>for</strong>e mammal evaluation, as well as other organisms, has benefited from therevisions. The categories can be divided into 5 divisions as illustrated in the list and figure below1. Extinct (Extinct and Extinct in the Wild),2. Threatened (Critically Endangered, Endangered and Vulnerable),3. Non-threatened (Lower Risk -- near threatened, conservation dependent and least concern),4. Data Deficient and5. Not EvaluatedStructure <strong>of</strong> the CategoriesExtinctExtinct in the WildCritically endangered(Threatened)EndangeredVulnerable(Adequatedata)Lower riskConservationdependentNear threatenedEvaluatedLeast ConcernData DeficientNot EvaluatedMethodologyIn the past global species evaluation and even Red Data Books have been a compilation <strong>of</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation by oneperson or a group <strong>of</strong> persons, usually from temperate countries, who have access to all available literature ondistribution and ecological in<strong>for</strong>mation with reference to a particular species. The status according to old IUCNcategories was derived based on the compiler’s perception <strong>of</strong> the status as understood from the compiledliterature. Later, this exercise was broadened to include some range country representatives from differentcontinental regions if the exercise was global in scope, such as the IUCN Red Data Books. In <strong>India</strong> national levelReport <strong>of</strong> BCPP <strong>CAMP</strong> on mammals <strong>of</strong> <strong>India</strong> 33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!