New Zealand's National Universal Periodic Review (UPR) Report ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

• Develop fair trade agreements – impact statements and human rights implications.Some participants noted they would need more time to reflect internally on New Zealand’skey human rights challenges, progress and key priorities.The Human Rights Commission and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade thankedthose present for their contributions.10
Meeting of civil society organisations to receive feedback on New Zealand’s draftnational report under the Universal Periodic Review of the UN Human RightsCouncilWellington, 2 March 2009A Public Consultation meeting was held on Monday 2 March 2009 to allow Wellingtonbased stakeholders to discuss, and give feedback on New Zealand’s draft national reportunder the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of the UN Human Rights Council. The meetingwas chaired by MOJ and MFAT.A total of 25 participants attended the meeting. The New Zealand Human RightsCommission (Susan Biggs, Bill Hamilton, Michael White) joined the following civil societyorganisations in attendance: Peace Movement Aotearoa (Edwina Hughes); UNICEF NZ(Barbara Lambourn); Amnesty International (Rebecca Emery, Patrick Holmes); HumanRights Foundation (Ced Simpson); Wellington Peace Foundation (Rod Alley); UNIFEM NZ(Alana Bowman, Rae Julian); Council for International Development (Pedram Pirnia, JustinKemp); Council of Trade Unions (Eileen Brown); Problem Gambling Foundation (KittyChan); Mental Health Foundation (Susan Cuthbert); NZ Council of Christian SocialServices (Stephen Olsen); IHC (Wendy Proffitt).Apologies were received from the Office of the Children’s Commissioner.Stuart Beresford (Ministry of Justice) outlined the purpose of the meeting: to inform on theprocess used for preparing New Zealand’s draft national report, and to seek directfeedback and views from participants on the draft report to inform New Zealand’s Ministersbefore submission of the final report. Michael McBryde (Deputy Director of the UnitedNations, Human Rights and Commonwealth Division of MFAT) gave a brief presentation ofthe UPR process. Richard Kay then outlined New Zealand’s process for drafting the report:the key themes, resources drawn on and challenges faced.Susan Biggs from the New Zealand Human Rights Commission (NZHRC) emphasised theimportance of these consultations, and encouraged those present to make the most of theopportunity to engage with the Government on its human rights priorities, and makesubmissions on the draft report.On a related issue, Stuart Beresford began discussions by recognising the difficultiesinvolved in engaging in the treaty body process generally. The Minister of Justice hasdirected MOJ to identify options to improve the process for preparing reports, and for howthe reports (and subsequent recommendations) are received by the government. Treatybody reporting should not simply be seen as a compliance issue, but about engaging onhuman rights issues, and on the recommendations.MOJ would welcome any comments people have on the process, and will be discussingthe matter with the NZHRC.11General comments on the report• Edwina Hughes: What period does the report cover?- The report is current up to December 2008; the start date for coverage is openended.
Page 1 and 2: New Zealand’s NationalUniversal P
Page 3 and 4: 3. Violence and abuse, including ag
Page 5 and 6: • Child poverty, including challe
Page 7 and 8: 7New Zealand Human Rights Consultat
Page 9: • Decent work on the agenda.• W
Page 13 and 14: implies. This is important given th
Page 15 and 16: 3.6 Disabilities• Susan Biggs: ne
Page 17 and 18: - Remove the final sentence of para
Page 19 and 20: • Rawiti Marsh questioned what wo
Page 21 and 22: • Dayle Takitimu pointed out that
Page 23 and 24: • Dayle Takitimu suggested explai
Page 25 and 26: 25• Natalie Baird commented that
Page 27 and 28: • Jim Fraser commented that the G
Page 29 and 30: North Island Hui to receive feedbac
Page 31 and 32: Jason Pou suggested that a referenc
Page 33 and 34: 33Areta Koopu suggested that 3.4 (S

New Zealand's National Universal Periodic Review (UPR) Report ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?