13.07.2015 Views

Paleosols in clastic sedimentary rocks: their geologic applications

Paleosols in clastic sedimentary rocks: their geologic applications

Paleosols in clastic sedimentary rocks: their geologic applications

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

58( )M.J. KrausrEarth-Science ReÕiews 47 1999 41–70Fig. 10. Paleosol–landscape associations <strong>in</strong> alluvial <strong>rocks</strong> at both the local and bas<strong>in</strong>al scales. Pedofacies developed over a distance of -2km, with weakly developed paleosols Ž Entisols or Inceptisols. grad<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to better-developed paleosols Ž Alfisols and Vertisols .. Over adistance of ;75 km, paleosols became even more strongly developed Ž Stage 4.<strong>in</strong> response to bas<strong>in</strong>al changes <strong>in</strong> the rate of aggradation.See text for more details Ž modified from Platt and Keller, 1992 ..lateral changes <strong>in</strong> parent material produce lateralchanges <strong>in</strong> the cumulative soils that form on theloess Ž e.g., Smith, 1942; Ruhe, 1983 .. For exampleMcDonald and Busacca Ž 1990.found that, with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gproximity to the sediment source, a s<strong>in</strong>glesoil bifurcated <strong>in</strong>to two well-developed soils. HollidayŽ 1990.also documented lateral variations <strong>in</strong>soils developed on eolian deposits and attributedthese primarily to variations <strong>in</strong> the gra<strong>in</strong> size of thesediment, although local thickness variations alsoplayed a role.Catenas and pedofacies are produced by variations<strong>in</strong> topography and gra<strong>in</strong> size related to landscapeposition. Modern soil studies show thatcompositional differences are l<strong>in</strong>ked to gra<strong>in</strong> sizedifferences and suggest that those compositional differencesalso <strong>in</strong>fluence soil development. In fluvialsystems, for example, sands and coarse silts thataccumulate <strong>in</strong> channel-marg<strong>in</strong>al environmentsŽ levees, splays.tend to be dom<strong>in</strong>ated by quartz,feldspar, and lithic fragments Že.g., Schumacher etal., 1988 .. In contrast, clay and f<strong>in</strong>e silt, whichtypically accumulate <strong>in</strong> distal floodbas<strong>in</strong>s, consistprimarily of clay m<strong>in</strong>erals such as smectite, illite,kaol<strong>in</strong>ite, and chlorite. Aslan and Aut<strong>in</strong> Ž 1998.concludedthat, <strong>in</strong> Mississippi River floodpla<strong>in</strong>s, thesedepositionally controlled compositional differenceshad a greater impact on the chemistry of alluvialsoils than did weather<strong>in</strong>g processes. Similarly, withQuaternary loess deposits, compositional changes,<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> clay m<strong>in</strong>erals, are foundwith <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g distance from source areas, Že.g.,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!